The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

159 protocols using anti tsg101

1

Protein Expression Analysis in SKOV3 Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To examine the expression of the proteins in both cell lines, SKOV3-CDDP and SKOV3 cells were seeded at 2 × 105 cells per well in 6-well plates and cultured overnight. The two cell lines were treated with PBS, miR497, miR497-HENPs, TP, TP-HENPs and miR497/TP-HENPs for 48 h. Then, 150 µl RIPA buffer (Sigma–Aldrich) was added and lysed on ice for 5 min. The lysate was collected and centrifuged at 12,000 g for 15 min at 4 °C. The protein content in the supernatant was quantified by a BCA protein assay kit. Protein samples were separated by SDS–PAGE and transferred to PVDF membranes, and the membranes were blocked with 5% blocking buffer for 1 h and then incubated overnight at 4 °C with the following primary antibodies: anti-calnexin, anti-TSG101, anti-CD9, anti-CD47, anti-GAPDH, anti-PI3K, anti-p-PI3K and anti-mTOR (purchased from Abcam) and anti-p-mTOR, anti-AKT, anti-p-AKT and HIF-α (obtained from CST). The membranes were washed three times, and then at room temperature, the secondary antibody was incubated for 1 h. All strips were visualized using a Bio–Rad Imaging System (Bio–Rad, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Exosome Characterization by TEM and DLS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Exosome morphology was observed using TEM. The exosome suspension was mixed with an equal volume of 4% paraformaldehyde, and 10 μL of the mixture was placed on a clean copper grid (RT) at room temperature. Uranyl acetate staining was negative. The images were acquired by observation with a JEOL 1200EX TEMSCAN microscope. The exosomal suspensions were analyzed for particle size using dynamic light scattering (DLS) (Nanosizer ™ instrument, Malvern Instruments, Malvern, UK).
The extracted exosomes were resuspended in cell lysate (Beyotime, Nantong, China) supplemented with 1% PMSF. The protein concentration of exosomes was determined using a Pierce BCA protein detection kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Rockford, IL, USA). Sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) (12%) were prepared with 20 μg of protein on each sample. Anti-CD63, anti-TSG101, anti-β-actin, and anti-GAPDH were purchased from Abcam (Cambridge, UK). All antibodies used in western blot are diluted 1:1000.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Exosome Characterization and Nrf-1 Immunoblotting

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The cell pellet and exosomes were homogenized in RIPA buffer. The homogenates were centrifuged, the supernatant was isolated, and immunoblotting was performed using exosomal positive and negative markers, including anti-CD63 (Abcam), anti-TSG101 (Abcam) and anti-β-actin (Cell Signaling Technology) to confirm the success of exosome extraction. The conditioned medium recovered after the exosome isolation procedure was used as a negative control. Immunoblot analysis was performed for Nrf-1 (Abcam) and band densities were normalized to GAPDH (Millipore Sigma).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantifying Extracellular Vesicle Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The concentration of total protein in EV samples and cells lysed in RIPA buffer was determined using the NanoOrange protein quantitation kit (#N6666, ThermoFisher Scientific, Eugene, OR, USA) according to the manufacturer’s recommendations using a SpectraMax M5e microplate reader (Molecular Devices, LLC., San Jose, CA, USA). Immunoblotting was performed according to the previously described procedure [25 (link)] with the differences that 5 µg of total protein was applied to SDS-PAGE and proteins were visualized with SuperSignal West Femto Maximum Sensitivity Substrate (#34095, ThermoFisher Scientific, Rockford, IL, USA). The following primary and secondary antibodies and dilutions were used: anti-Alix (#sc-271975, 1:500; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, USA), anti-Flotillin-2 (#3436S, 1:1000; Cell Signaling Technology, Topsfield, MA, USA), anti-CD9 (#13174, 1:2000; Cell Signaling Technology), anti-TSG-101 (ab125011, 1:5000; Abcam, Cambridge, UK), anti-PCNA (#sc-7907, 1:500; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti-Stomatin (#sc-134554, 1:500; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti-mouse goat polyclonal antibodies (#2367, 1:5000; Cell Signaling Technology); and anti-rabbit goat polyclonal antibodies (#29902, 1:80,000; Cell Signaling Technology).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Comprehensive Protein Expression Profiling of Extracellular Vesicles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Protein extracts were boiled in RIPA buffer (Beyotime) and separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide electrophoresis gel electrophoresis (SDS‐PAGE). The proteins were then transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride membranes (Millipore) and probed with anti‐CD9, anti‐CD63, anti‐ALIX, anti‐TSG101, anti‐EGFR, anti‐FXR1, anti‐TLR‐4, anti‐MMP2, anti‐TGF‐β1, anti‐phospho‐STAT5, anti‐STAT5, anti‐phospho‐ERK1/2, anti‐ERK1/2, anti‐phospho‐AKT, anti‐AKT, anti‐Ki‐67, anti‐PTEN (Abcam), anti‐Bcl‐2, anti‐Bax, anti‐E‐Cadherin, anti‐Vimentin, and anti‐GAPDH antibodies (Cell Signaling Technology). Electrochemiluminescence (Millipore) was applied to determine protein expression levels.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Western Blot Analysis of Exosomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Exosomes and total protein were run on 10% denaturing SDS‐PAGE gels, then transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (BioRad), which were incubated with primary antibodies anti‐GAPDH (1:1000, rabbit monoclonal, Santa Cruz), anti‐CD9 (1:2000, rabbit monoclonal, Abcam), anti‐Rab5 (1:1000, rabbit monoclonal, Abcam), anti‐TSG101 (1:1000, rabbit monoclonal, Abcam), β‐actin (1:1000, mouse polyclonal, CST), CXCR‐4 (1:100, rabbit monoclonal, Abcam), IL‐6 (1:1000, rabbit monoclonal, Abcam), IL‐10 (1:1000, rabbit monoclonal, Abcam), Arg‐1(1:1000, rabbit monoclonal, CST), iNOS (1:1000, rabbit monoclonal, Abcam), STAT3 (1:1000, mouse monoclonal, CST), Phospho‐STAT3 (1:2000, rabbit monoclonal, CST), Bax (1:1000, mouse monoclonal, Abcam), PCNA (1:1000, mouse monoclonal, Abcam) at 4°C overnight. Blots were detected with horseradish peroxidase (HRP)‐conjugated goat anti‐rabbit or rabbit anti‐mouse secondary antibody (Invitrogen) for 1 hour at room temperature. Images were quantified using the Super Signal West Pico or Femto chemiluminescent detection system (Pierce).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Proteomics Analysis of EV Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Proteins were extracted from platelets or endothelial-derived EVs, separated on 10–12% sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gels, and transferred onto PVDF membranes, which were soaked in Tris-buffered saline–Tween (TBST) solution containing 5% bovine serum albumin (room temperature) to block non-specific binding. Subsequently, the membranes were exposed to the primary antibodies: anti-PDI (Abcam), anti-ERP57 (Abcam), anti-ERP46 (Immunoway, Plano, TX, USA), anti-GRP94 (Abcam), anti-CD63 (Abcam), anti-Calnexin (Abcam), and anti-TSG101 (Abcam). After staining overnight at 4 °C, the membranes were washed three times with TBST and incubated with horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-labeled anti-rabbit (ZSGB-BIO, Beijing, China) or anti-mouse (ZSGB-BIO) secondary antibodies at room temperature for 90 min. After washing thrice more with TBST, an enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) reagent was added, and images were acquired and analyzed quantitatively using Image J.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Western Blotting Analysis of Cellular Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Western blotting was carried out as described previously [68 (link)]. Firstly, the total proteins in cell lysates were harvested, and then they were separated using SDS-PAGE gels. Later, the proteins that had been separated were transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes, which were then blocked in the fat free milk (concentration of 5%). Subsequently, the following antibodies were incubated under 4 °C overnight: anti-RUNX2 (#12556, Cell Signaling Technology, 1:1000), anti-TSG101 (#ab125011, Abcam, 1:1000), anti-CD63 (#ab217345, Abcam, 1:1000), anti-Calnexin (#ab213243, Abcam, 1:1000), anti-UCHL3 (#D25E6, Cell Signaling Technology, 1:1000), anti-SMAD1 (#AP20642c, Abcepta, 1:1000), and anti-β-ACTIN (#4976, Cell Signaling Technology, 1:1000). After incubated with horseradish peroxidase‐conjugated secondary antibodies (Shengxing Biological, Nanjing, China) for 1 h, the specific bands were visualized with the enhanced chemiluminescence (Tanon). The relative density was measured using ImageJ software (V1.8.0, National Institutes of Health, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Exosome and MSC Protein Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Exosomes or MSCs were lysed with RIPA buffer containing protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche Applied Science, Penzberg, Germany). Extracted protein concentration was determined by BCA assay (Beyotime, Shanghai, China). Equal quantities of protein were loaded and run on 10% SDS-PAGE gels and then transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membranes. Each membrane was blocked in 5% BSA and subsequently incubated overnight at 4 °C with anti-TSG101 (Abcam, UK) and anti-CD63 (Abcam, UK) antibodies for exosome characterization, anti-HIF-1α antibody (Abcam, UK) for MSCs analysis, and anti-Actin antibody (Beyotime, Shanghai, China) for both. After washing, the membranes were incubated with peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit or goat anti-mouse secondary antibodies (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Image analysis and blot quantification were performed with Image Quant LAS 4000 mini biomolecular imager (GE Healthcare, Uppsala, Sweden).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Extracellular Vesicle Protein Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
EVs and PC-3 cells (used as a positive control) were lysed in RIPA buffer (150 ml NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, 0.5% Na deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS, 50 ml Tris) and the protein concentration was assessed using Pierce™ BCA Protein Assay Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) following manufacturer’s instructions. Thirty micrograms of EV and cell proteins were mixed with Laemmli buffer under reduction conditions, denatured for 5 min at 100 °C and loaded on 10% SDS-PAGE gel. Proteins were electroblotted to nitrocellulose membranes and the membranes were blocked with 10% (w/v) fat-free milk and then incubated with the following primary antibodies: anti-TSG101 (Abcam, # ab125011), Calnexin (Abcam, # ab22595), CD9 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, # sc-13118) and β-actin (Abcam, # ab8224) in 1:1000 dilution. The blots were washed and incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG F(ab’)2-HRP (1:2000) (Santa Cruz, #sc-3837) or chicken anti-mouse IgG-HRP (1:2000) (Santa Cruz, #sc-2962) secondary antibodies, respectively. Protein expression was visualized using Western Blotting Detection Reagent kit (GE HealthCare Lifesciences, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!