The largest database of trusted experimental protocols
Sourced in United States

EM grade is a line of laboratory equipment designed for electron microscopy applications. The core function of EM grade products is to provide high-quality components and accessories that support the operation and performance of electron microscopes. These products are engineered to meet the specific requirements and standards of electron microscopy research and analysis.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

31 protocols using em grade

1

Exosome Imaging via Electron Microscopy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Following EV isolation, exosome-enriched isolates were resuspended in 50–100 µL of sterile filtered PBS for electron microscopy imaging according to Lasser et al. [61 (link)]. Briefly, intact exosomes (5 µL) were dropped onto Parafilm for each sample preparation. With forceps, a carbon-coated 400 Hex Mesh Copper grid (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, PA, USA) was positioned with coating side down on top of each drop for 60 min. Grids were then washed with sterile filtered PBS three times, and the grid was transferred on top of a 30 µL drop of PBS each time. Excess solution was wicked off the grid gently using absorbing paper between each wash, while avoiding direct contact with the coating side. Exosomes were fixed by positioning the grid on top of a 20-µL drop of 2% PFA (EM grade, Electron Microscopy Sciences) for 10 min. After washing, grids were then transferred on top of a 20 µL drop of 2.5% glutaraldehyde (EM grade, Electron Microscopy Sciences) for 10 min, followed by three washes with particle-free filtered water. Grid samples were stained on a 20 µL drop of 2% uranyl acetate (EMS grade) for 10 min before embedding on 20 µL of 0.13% methyl cellulose and 0.4% uranyl acetate for another 10 min. Excess liquid was removed using absorbing paper and grids were left to dry coated side up before imaging on the electron microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Fixation and Permeabilization of Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were fixed in 1% ice-cold paraformaldehyde (10% stock, EM-grade; Electron Microscopy Sciences) and permeabilized in 1 mL ice-cold 80% methanol, as described previously (Zwollo et al., 2010 (link)). After overnight incubation at −20° C, cells were either resuspended in permeabilizing solution (BD perm wash in PBS, BD Biosciences) and stained as described previously, or refixed and stored in FBS containing 10% DMSO at −80C (Zwollo et al., 2010 (link), MacMurray 2013 (link)). Approximately 30,000 events were acquired per sample using a BD FACSArray (BD Biosciences). Duplicate samples for each staining combo were run for each experiment. Contour graphs were generated using WinMDI 2–8 (J. Trotter 1993–1998) software. Contour graphs are shown as log algorithms with intervals of 50%.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immunoelectron Microscopy of Exosomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The 100K pellet was centrifuged at 20,000 × g for 30 min at 4°C and, after gentle removal of supernatant, fixed for 2 hr in 500 μL of 4% paraformaldehyde (32% aqueous solution, EM grade, Electron Microscopy Sciences, 15714-S) diluted in PBS. Fixed pellets were cryosectioned and immunolabeled with anti-Gluc (mouse; Nanolight) or anti-CD63 (mouse; BD Biosciences) followed by rabbit anti-mouse (Cappel/MP Biomedicals, LLC) and 5 nm protein A-gold (University Medical Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands). Images were captured using Tecnai G2 Spirit Bio TWIN transmission electron microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Multicolor Immunofluorescence Staining Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Primary antibodies were mouse anti-BKα (ab192759; Abcam), rabbit anti-BKβ4 (ab222083; Abcam), and rat anti-HA (11867423001; Roche Applied Science). Secondary antibodies were goat anti-rat conjugated to Alexa Fluor 647 (ab150159; Abcam), goat anti-rabbit conjugated to Alexa Fluor 647 (A21245) or Alexa Fluor 488 (A11008), and goat anti-mouse conjugated to Alexa Fluor 647 (A32728) or Alexa Fluor 488 (A11001), all from Invitrogen. Cells at a density of 4 × 105 per well were fixed with 3% paraformaldehyde and 0.1% glutaraldehyde (Electron Microscopy Sciences, EM grade) in PBS for 10 min at room temperature and then reduced with 0.1% NaBH4 in PBS for 7 min to mitigate cell auto-fluorescence. Next, cells were washed three times with PBS (5 min per wash) and then permeabilized with 0.2% Triton X-100 in PBS for 15 min. Subsequently, cells were blocked for 90 min with 10% normal goat serum and 0.05% Triton X-100 in PBS and incubated with primary antibodies for 1 h. Samples were washed five times with 1% normal goat serum and 0.05% Triton X-100 in PBS (10 min per wash), incubated with secondary antibodies for 1 h, and washed again. Cells were then fixed with 3% paraformaldehyde and 0.1% glutaraldehyde for 10 min, rinsed three times with PBS, and stored at 4°C until used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Mitochondrial Dynamics and Apoptosis Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mito-Tracker Orange CM-H2TMRos (Molecular Probes, Cat No. M-7511) was supplied by Life Technologies. PI4KIIIα inhibitor, phenylarsine oxide (PAO, Sigma, Cat No. P-3075) and PI4KIIIβ inhibitor, PIK-93 (AdooQ BioScience, Cat No. A10731), were acquired from Sigma and AdooQ BioScience, respectively. Transfection reagents, polyethylenimine (PEI, Sigma Cat No. 408727) and GenJet in vitro DNA tranfection reagent for Huh-7 Cells (SignaGen, Cat No. SL100489-HUH) were purchased from Sigma and SignaGen, respectively. Hydrogen peroxide (Cat No. 1100066) was purchased from International Laboratory, USA). Apoptotic cells were detected by by TUNEL staining using In situ cell death detection kit, TMR red (Roche, Cat no. 12156792910).
For sample preparation for electron microscopy (EM), fixatives glutaldehyde, EM Grade (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Cat No. 16200) and osmium tetroxide (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Cat No. 19110); embedding medium, Embed-812 embedding kit (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Cat No. 14120); and stains, uranyl acetate (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Cat No. 22400) and lead citrate (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Cat No. 17800) were purchased from Electron Microscopy Sciences.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Immunofluorescence Analysis of Sperm Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Caudal epididymal spermatozoa were isolated in PBS from wild type (WT) and Ppp3r2 knockout mice and were centrifuged at 700×g for 10 min at 4°C. Spermatozoa were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, EM grade (Electron Microscopy Sciences) at 4°C for 20 min, followed by permeabilization with 0.2% Triton-X (5 min). Fixed spermatozoa were attached to poly-L-lysine coated coverslips. The coverslips were washed three times with TTBS to remove excess paraformaldehyde and incubated for 4 hours in a blocking solution containing 5% non-immune serum in TTBS at room temperature. The coverslips were incubated overnight at 4°C with one of the following primary antibodies: PPP3R2 antibody (1:150 dilution; Proteintech; Cat # 14005–1-AP), MCT2 (1:200 dilution; sc-166925), Basigin (1:200 dilution; Invitrogen; Cat # 12-1471-81), DRP1 (1:150; BD Biosciences; Cat# 611738) and p-DRP1 (1:150 dilution; Cell Signaling; Cat# 3455S). Coverslips were subsequently washed three times 5 min each with TTBS, followed by incubation with the appropriate secondary antibody conjugated to Cy3 or Alexa flour488 for 1 hour at room temperature. The coverslips were washed three times, 10 min each with TTBS; cells were then stained with Hoechst. Mounting medium was applied, and the slides were examined by confocal laser scanning microscope (Olympus IX81 attached with FLUOVIEW FV1000).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Immunofluorescent Staining of Acini

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The cells were extracted from the Matrigel as previously described and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (EM grade, Electron Microscopy Sciences). Slides were permeabilized with 0.5% Triton and washed with PBS/Glycine. Then the slides were blocked with 10% goat serum (Wisent) and 20 µg/mL goat anti-mouse F(ab)’ fragment (Cedarlane). The acini were stained with antibody against Integrin (Millipore) and nuclear staining with DAPI (Invitrogen). Prolong Gold Antifade reagent (Life Technologies) was added to each well. Confocal fluorescence images were taken using a Leica TCS SP8 confocal microscope (Leica Microsystems).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Adipose-Derived Stem Cells in Type II Diabetes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

Type II diabetes mellitus adipose‐derived stem cells (T2DM‐ADSC); Lonza, NC, USA

Normal adipose‐derived stem cells (N‐ADSC); Lonza, NC, USA

ADSC Apidose‐Derived Stem Cells Growth Medium BulletKit™; Lonza, NC, USA

8well Cell Culture slides; SPL Life Sciences, Gyeonggi‐do, Korea

ProLong™ Gold Antifade Mountant with DAPI; Invitrogen, OR, USA

60 × 15 mm Tissue culture dish; FALCON, NJ, USA

Glutaraldehyde; EM grade, Electron Microscopy Science. PA., USA

Osmium tetra‐oxide; Crystal, Heraeus Chemicals South Africa, South Africa

Ethanol; Wako, Osaka, Japan

Toluidine bleu: Wako, Osaka, Japan

Grid: Cu 200 mesh, EM fine grid, Nisshinn EM, Tokyo, Japan

Epoxy resin: TAAB Laboratories, UK

Lead staining solution; A stable lead by modification of Sato's method.

Anti‐Emerin antibody ab40688; abcam, OR, USA

Alexa Fluor 488 goat anti‐rabbit IgG(H + L), PROTEINTECH, IL, USA

Anti‐Lamin A/C antibody 2032; Cell Signaling Technology, MA, USA

HRP‐labelled secondary antibody; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, TX, USA

MTT Cell Proliferation and Cytotoxicity Assay Kit; Boster, CA., USA

Human mitochondrial DNA (mt DNA) monitoring primer 7246; TAKARA, Shiga, Japan

SYBR® Premix Ex Taq™ II (Tli RNaseH Plus); TAKARA, Shiga, Japan

+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Ultrastructural Analysis of Lung Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The lung tissue was excised from patient autopsies and cut into 2–3 mm3 pieces, and immediately fixed in 2·5% glutaraldehyde (EM grade; Electron Microscopy Sciences) dissolved in 0·1 M Na cacodylate, pH 7·4, for 2 hours at room temperature. Samples were processed as previously described by the Electron Microscopy Laboratory in the Department of Pathology at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine before examination with an electron microscope CM120 (Philips) under 80 kV.43 (link) Images were acquired with Image Capture Engine V602 (Advanced Microscopy Techniques).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Immunofluorescence Staining for DDX20 and SMN

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (EM grade, Electron Microscopy Sciences) for 10 min, rinsed three times in PBS and permeabilized for 10 min in PBS/0.2% Triton X-100 at room temperature, followed by three rinses in PBS. After blocking for 30 min at room temperature in PBS/5% FBS, slides were incubated with the primary antibody against DDX20 (mouse monoclonal, sc-57007, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, 1:200 dilution) or SMN (rabbit polyclonal, sc-15320, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, 1:200 dilution) in PBS/5% FBS at 4°C overnight. After three rinses in PBS, slides were incubated with the secondary antibody (1:1,000 dilution in both cases) and Hoechst nuclear dye (1:10,000 dilution) for 90 min at room temperature. The secondary antibody for DDX20 was a goat anti-mouse Alexa 594 antibody (Invitrogen) and the secondary antibody for SMN was a donkey anti-rabbit Alexa 568 antibody (Invitrogen). Slides were rinsed three times in PBS and once in water. If no FISH was performed subsequently, slides were mounted.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!