The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

270 protocols using nanodrop

1

Pancreatic Tumor Cell Line and Tissue Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The MIA PaCa2, HPAC, and PANC-1 cell lines were obtained as frozen aliquots from ATCC (http://www.atcc.org/). A total of six de-identified pancreatic tumor frozen specimens were available for this study through an IRB approved tissue banking protocol. Genomic DNA and total RNA were isolated using Omega BioTek (http://www.omegabiotek.com/) chemistries according to the manufacturer's protocols. DNA was quantitated using NanoDrop and Qubit, and RNA was quantitated using NanoDrop and Agilent BioAnalyzer.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Genomic DNA and RNA Isolation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA and total RNA were isolated using Omega BioTek chemistries according to the manufacturer’s protocol from 5 μM sections for each isolate. DNA was quantitated using NanoDrop and Qubit, and RNA was quantitated using NanoDrop and Agilent BioAnalyzer.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

RNA Isolation, cDNA Synthesis, and qRT-PCR Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was isolated from cells using trizol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, United States) and RNA purity was determined by NanoDrop spectrophotometer (BioTek, Winooski, VT, United States). Further, 2 μg RNA was used for cDNA synthesis using maxima first cDNA synthesis kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, United States) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Briefly, RNA was treated with Maxima Reverse Transcriptase enzyme and reaction buffer. Thereafter, RT-PCR and analysis were done on ABI 7500 Fast real-time PCR system (Waltham, MA, United States) at cycling conditions as: 10 min at 95°C, followed by 40 cycles of 15 s at 95°C, 30 s at 60°C, and 60 s at 72°C. The analysis was done using comparative Ct method. β-actin was used as an internal control (Khan et al., 2016 (link)). Results are normalized to β-actin and depicted as relative expression (fold change). Primers used in the qRT-PCR are as follows:
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

DNA Extraction and Purity Assessment from Vegetable Oils

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Before conducting the PCR reaction on the extracted DNA from crude and refined soybean, corn, and canola oils, the quality of the extracted DNA was assessed using agarose gel electrophoresis. The results are presented in Fig. 1.

Agarose gel electrophoresis of genomic DNA extracted from crude Soybean Oil. Well 1: DNA extraction using the CTAB method, wells 2 and 3: DNA extracted using the MBST kit, well 4: DNA extracted using the manual hexane-based method, M: Molecular marker.

To quantify the amount of extracted DNA from oil, a NanoDrop device (BioTek Epoch, USA) was utilized. Using this instrument, DNA absorbance at 260 nm (nucleic acid absorption wavelength) and 280 nm (protein absorption wavelength) was measured, and ultimately, the A260/A280 absorption ratio, which is an indicator of DNA purity, was obtained.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantitative gene expression analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA was extracted using ISOLATE-II RNA MiniKits (Bioline, London, UK) with on-column DNase treatment. RNA was quantified using a Nanodrop (BioTek, Winooski, VT), and reverse-transcribed using a SensiFAST cDNA synthesis kit (Bioline). cDNA was amplified in triplicate with gene-specific primers (Invitrogen) using a CFX384 real-time PCR machine (BioRad). Thermal cycling conditions were 95 °C for 2 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C for 5 s and 60 °C for 30 s. Data were analysed using the ΔΔCt method with expression normalized to the housekeeping gene and sham-operated animals used as the referent controls.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Fecal DNA Extraction Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After microbiological analysis, the fecal samples were stored at −80°C until DNA extraction. Samples collected from each subject on different days (n = 9; T0–T8) were thawed on ice and mixed vigorously for 2–3 min with a sterile spatula; then, 250 mg of each sample was weighed and processed with a DNeasy® PowerLyzer® PowerSoil® Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) with the following modifications: tubes containing samples were incubated at 65°C for 10 min after addition of solution C1. Before extraction, mechanical lysis of the cells was carried out using a Precellys 24 bead homogenizer (Bertin Technologies, Montigny le Bretonneux, France). Then, the extraction was conducted according to the manufacturer’s specifications. The DNA extracted from fecal samples was quantified by using a NanoDrop (BioTek Instruments, Inc., CA, United States). Finally, the DNA was stored at −80°C until molecular analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Fecal DNA Extraction and Real-Time PCR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Stool samples were collected from eligible participants and stored at −80 °C in an ultra-freezer. For molecular tests, DNA was extracted from faecal by Sambio™ Stool DNA Extraction Kit (Azma gene company, Iran) according to the manufacturer's recommendation. The purity of DNA was determined by UV methods (NanoDrop, Epoch, BioTek, USA). The DNA concentration was normalized for all samples to 30 ng/μL and stored at −20 °C until to do the Real-Time PCR assay.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Colorectal Cancer Tumor Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Patient samples were scrutinised following the set criteria. A total of 15 CRC tumors with paired normal colorectal mucosa samples were collected from RGCIRC (Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre), India, from 2016 to 2019. It was ensured that the tumor was sporadic and the patient had not received chemotherapy or radiotherapy before surgery. The pathologist ensured the total oncogenic area of cancerous cells was not less than 80%. Informed consent was obtained from each patient. The ethical approval of the study was approved by the Institute Ethics Committee, Motilal Nehru National Institute of Technology Allahabad (Ref. No. IEC17-18/027). Total RNA was extracted from tumor tissues using RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, cat no.74104), and RNA concentration and quality were estimated using nanodrop (BioTek Take3). The cDNA preparation and RT-PCR analysis were done as described above.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

16S Metagenomic Sequencing Workflow

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Each sequenced sample was prepared according to the Illumina 16S Metagenomic Sequencing Library protocol to amplify the V3 and V4 regions (519F-806R). DNA quality was measured using PicoGreen reagent and Nanodrop (BioTek, Winooski, VT, USA). Input gDNA (10 ng) was used for PCR amplification. The barcoded fusion primer sequences used for PCR amplifications were as follows: 519F, 5′-CCTACGGGNGGCWGCAG-3′; 806R, 5′-GACTACHVGGGTATCTAATCC-3′. Then the final purified product was quantified by quantitative PCR using a KAPA Library Quantification kit for Illumina Sequencing platforms (Roche, Mannheim, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s protocol, and the quality was assessed using a LabChip GX HT DNA High Sensitivity Kit (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA). Next, paired-end (2 × 300 bp) sequencing was performed using the MiSeq platform (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

ODE Sample DNA Removal Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In order to eliminate any interference by the prokaryotic or eukaryotic DNA that may be present in 0.2 μm filtered ODE samples, we performed the DNase treatment. Total RNA in an ODE sample was measured using NanoDrop (Biotek synergy 2). Then RNA concentration was used as a criterion for the amount of DNase (Turbo DNase, Thermo Fisher Scientific catalog # AM2239) to be added in 50 μL volume of 100% ODE to remove any traces of DNA effectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!