The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

111 protocols using dcode universal mutation detection system

1

Analyzing Microbial Diversity via PCR-DGGE

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Three independent PCR products were pooled together, and then 20 μL of the nested PCR product was subsequently analyzed by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) on a DCode Universal Mutation Detection System (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Piscataway, NJ, USA). Standard DNA markers were created by individually PCR-amplifying DNA extracted from root samples by Higo et al. (2015b) (link). The PCR-DGGE condition was based on the method of Higo et al. (2015b) (link). The gels containing 6.5% acrylamide were poured with a gradient of 35–55% denaturant. All DGGE analyses were performed in a 1× TAE buffer at a constant temperature of 55 °C at 50 V for 60 min, followed by 50 V for 960 min. The gels were stained with SYBR Green diluted in 1× TAE buffer (1:10,000) for 20 min, UV illuminated and digitally photographed (Figs. S1 and S2). Pictures were digitized by Phoretix 1D Pro (Nonlinear Dynamics Ltd., Newcastle upon Tyne, UK). We calculated Shannon index (H′) from these data, expressed by the number of DGGE bands in each root sample. Fromin et al. (2002) (link) and Schneider et al. (2015) (link) mentioned that visual observation of the DGGE gel revealed the presence of multiple bands in all samples (a band represents a distinct taxon in theory).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Bacterial Identification via DGGE Sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DGGE was performed with DCode™ Universal Mutation Detection System (Biorad, California, USA). The PCR products were loaded onto 10% polyacrylamide gels in 1 × TAE buffer (20 mM Tris, 10 mM glacial acetic acid, and 0.5 mM EDTA pH 8.0) with a denaturing gradient (urea-formamide) that ranged from 40 to 70%. Electrophoresis was carried out at 60°C and a constant voltage of 70 V was applied during 14 h. After electrophoresis the gel was stained using GelGreen™ for 30 min (Biotium, California, USA) before being visualized on a UV transilluminator (Biorad, California, USA). The dominant bands were excised from the gel, eluted in 10 mM Tris–HCl, 50 mM KCl, 1.5 mM MgCl, 0.1% Triton-x 100, pH 9.0, at 95°C for 20 min and centrifuged (10,000 rpm, 5 min). The DNA was reamplified by PCR with the conditions mentioned in the “PCR amplification” section. The PCR products from reamplification were purified and sent to sequencing at Macrogen Service Center (Maryland, USA). Sequence data were analyzed with BioEdit v 7.1 software (Ibis Bioscience, California, USA) and submitted to the non-redundant nucleotide data base at GenBank® using the BLAST program (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast/) and Ribosomal Database Project (http://rdp.cme.msu.edu/index.jsp) for bacterial identification.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Fungal DGGE Profiling using BioRad System

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The BioRad DCode Universal Mutation Detection System (BioRad, Hercules, CA, USA) was used for DGGE analyses with 8% (w/v) polyacrylamide gels in 1 × TAE. A 30–50% urea-formamide denaturing gradient (diluted from a 7 M urea and 40% (w/v) formamide stock) yielded optimal fungal sample separation. Gels were run for 17 h at 100 V at 60 °C, after which they were stained with AgNO3 as published previously [15 (link)]. The Quantity One software and a calibrated imaging densitometer GS-710 (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) were then used to image and analyze DGGE fingerprint profiles.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Sourdough Microbiome Profiling Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA and RNA were extracted from the sourdough samples according to Doulgeraki et al. [27 (link)] in the first case and using the NucleoSpin® RNAkit (Macherey-Nagel, Dueren, Germany) in the second. In the latter case, cDNA was synthesized using the PrimeScriptTMRT reagent kit (Takara, Kusatsu, Japan). As far as DNA and cDNA fragments are concerned, they were subjected to two PCR reactions. The approximately 250 nucleotides of the 5′ end of the 26S rRNA gene and the V6–V8 region of the 16S rRNA gene were amplified by PCR, in a final volume of 50 μL, using NL1 with a GC clamp and LS2 as primers in the first case and U968 with a GC clamp and L1401 in the latter one, in agreement with Paramithiotis et al. [30 (link),31 (link)]. PCR products were separated using the DCode Universal Mutation Detection System (Bio-Rad) with 8% (w/v) polyacrylamide gel containing urea-formamide (Applichem, Darmstadt, Germany) as denaturing agents in a concentration gradient from 20–60% in TAE buffer (40 mM Tris–acetate, 2 mM Na2EDTA H2O, pH 8.5). Electrophoresis took place at 50 V for 10 min and then 200 V for 4 h. Then, gels were visualized by ethidium bromide staining and photographed using a GelDoc system (Bio-Rad). Species identification was performed by co-migration with reference patterns.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis of Landfill and Marshland DNA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis genomic DNA extracted from landfill and marshland was amplified using primer 519FWD and 915GC which gave a product length of about 500 bp. DGGE was performed with a D-Code universal mutation detection system (Biorad, Hercules, CA, USA) using 16 cm by 16 cm and one mm gels. PCR products were loaded onto 7% (w/v) polyacrylamide gel. The polyacrylamide gels (Bis-Acrylamide, 37.5 : 1) were made with denaturing gradients ranging from 30 to 70%. 100% denaturant contained 7 M urea and 40% formamide. Electrophoresis was initially run at 200 V for 10 min at 60°C and afterwards for 15 h at 85 V. After electrophoresis, the gel was silver-stained and scanned under white light using Gel Doc (Biorad) (Figure 2). DGGE gel was further analyzed using Gel2K software (Svein Norland, Department of Biology, University of Bergen, Norway).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

DGGE Analysis of Biofilm Community

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The PCR-amplified fragments were separated by DGGE using a DCode universal mutation detection system (Bio-Rad Laboratories, USA) as described previously.22 (link) A 30 mL 40–60% urea–formamide denaturant gradient gel 8% (w/v) acrylamide solution (40% acrylamide and bisacrylamide, 37.5 : 1 stock solution) in 5× TAE buffer was used. A 45 μL of PCR amplicons from DNA of biofilm mass slices was loaded in each gel well. Electrophoresis was conducted in 1× TAE buffer solution at 85 V and 60 °C for 15 h. After electrophoresis, the gel was stained with ethidium bromide for 15 min and then destained for 1 h with 1× TAE buffer solution, and visualized by a SynGene Bio Imaging system (GeneGenius, UK). SynGene Gene-Tools software was used for DGGE band pattern analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Optimization and DGGE Analysis of DNA Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
At first, some optimization experiments have been done followed by preparation of the required gel with the obtained optimum conditions. Perpendicular DGGE was performed using D-Code Universal Mutation Detection System (BioRad) as described by Lyautey, et al. 2005 (link), with some modifications. The gradient polyacrylamide gel ranging from 50 to 70% was prepared using urea and deionized formamide as denaturants (100% denaturant is 7 M urea and 40% deionized formamide). After gel polymerization; 15 µl of each PCR sample was loaded and the DGGE was run at 50 V for 18 h at 60 °C.
After electrophoresis, the polyacrylamide gel was carefully transferred for 15 min to a container contains 300 ml of 1X TAE buffer with 30 µl of 10 mg/ml ethidium bromide for staining. The gel was then de-stained by transferring to 300 ml of 1X TAE buffer without stain. The stained gel was photographed using gel documentation system and the bands of interest were excised by sharp razor.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Microbial Diversity Analysis via DGGE

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DGGE analysis was performed as described previously (McEwan et al. 2005 (link)). Briefly, analysis was performed as follows. Approximately 200 base pairs (bp) of the V3 region of the 16S rRNA gene were amplified using a forward primer: 5ʹ-TAC GGG AGG CAG CAG-3ʹ, and reverse primer: 5ʹ-ATT ACC GCG GCT GCT GG-3ʹ, with a GC-clamp (5ʹ-CGC CCG CCG CGC GCG GCG GGC GGG GCG GGG GCA CGG GGG GCC-3ʹ) at the 5′ terminus of the forward primer. PCR was performed using the following conditions: 5 min at 94 °C; 35 cycles of 1 min at 94 °C, 1 min at 60 °C, 1 min at 72 °C; 1 cycle of 1 min at 94 °C, 1 min at 60 °C, 10 min at 72 °C. Successful amplification was verified and the size of amplicons checked by agarose gel electrophoresis.
A DCode™ Universal Mutation Detection system (16 cm system, BioRad) was used to prepare and run the DGGE gels. DGGE parallel gradient gels ranged from 40 to 60% (8% acrylamide), and were run at 80 mV, 200 mA, for 16 h at 60 °C. DNA was visualised by staining with a DNA Silver Staining Kit (Amersham). In each case, all samples on a gel were from a single-organ source, with no comparisons made between gels.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Bacterial Community Analysis by DGGE

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Analyses of PCR products generated from 16S rRNA genes (reflecting the total bacterial community) or generated from 16S rRNA-derived cDNA (reflecting active members of the bacterial community) was performed by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) using the DCode Universal Mutation Detection System (Bio-Rad) with a 40%–70% denaturing gradient and 6% (wt/vol) polyacrylamide content in the gel. As an internal reference for gel analysis and as a marker for band separation, we used a pool of 16S rRNA gene-PCR products derived from different bacterial isolates. Loading volume of PCR products was adjusted according to their band intensity on an agarose gel, i.e. loaded DNA amount on DGGE was ∼200 ng. Denaturing gradient gels were stained with SYBR Gold (Molecular Probes, Invitrogen) and visualized using the Molecular Imager® Gel Doc XR+ System (Bio-Rad) and the software Image Lab.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Bacterial Isolate Sequencing and TTGE Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The PCR extracts from bacterial isolates were sequenced by GATC-biotech company (Konstanz, Germany). Partial sequences were compared to those in the GenBank database using the BLAST program. Cheese PCR products were subjected to a TTGE analysis using a Dcode universal mutation detection system (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA) following the method described previously [14 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!