The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Zen acquisition software

Manufactured by Zeiss
Sourced in Germany

ZEN acquisition software is a tool developed by Zeiss for the control and management of microscope hardware. It enables users to capture images and acquire data from Zeiss microscopes. The software provides an interface for configuring instrument settings and automating imaging workflows.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

29 protocols using zen acquisition software

1

Intravital Imaging of Muscle Microvasculature

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mice were subjected to sciatic nerve transection and exposure of the ipsilateral gastrocnemius muscle under anesthesia with isoflurane; inhaled anesthesia was maintained throughout the subsequent intravital imaging experiment. Mouse body temperature was maintained using a heating pad. Gastrocnemius muscle intravital imaging experiments were performed using a spinning-disk confocal microscope (Zeiss Axio Observer Z1 basic stand inverted scope equipped with a Yokogawa CSU-X spinning disk unit and an EMCCD camera [Hamamatsu]). Samples were excited with 488-nm and 633-nm laser lines, and emission was collected using a 10×/0.3 and 25×/0.8 objective with standard emission filter sets (Semrock). Images were acquired using ZEN acquisition software (Zeiss). The muscle microvasculature was visualized by intravenous infusion of 5 µg of anti-PECAM-1. Neutrophils inside the muscle microvasculature and tissue were visualized via topical application of fluorescently labeled anti-Ly6G (1A8) antibody.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Engulfment Analysis of Microglia

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Engulfment analysis was performed according to previously described methods2 (link),58 . Briefly, immunostained sections were imaged on a Zeiss Observer Spinning Disk Confocal microscope equipped with diode lasers (405nm, 488nm, 594nm, 647nm) and Zen acquisition software (Zeiss; Oberkochen, Germany). For each hemisphere, three to five 63x fields of view within the barrel field were acquired with 50–70 z-stack steps at 0.27 μm spacing. Images were first processed in ImageJ (NIH) and then individual images of 15–20 single cells per hemisphere per animal were processed in Imaris (Bitplane; Zurich, Switzerland) as previously described. All image files were blinded for unbiased quantification. All data was then normalized to the control, spared hemisphere within each animal. Note, Cx3cr1+/− littermates were used for comparison to Cx3cr1−/− mice as microglia within both sets of mice are labeled with EGFP and show similar changes in TC synapses (Fig 2).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantitative Analysis of Synaptic Density

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Synapse density analysis was performed blind to condition and genotype as described previously2 (link),7 (link). Briefly, immunostained sections were imaged on a Zeiss LSM700 scanning confocal microscope equipped with 405nm, 488nm, 555nm, and 639nm lasers and Zen acquisition software (Zeiss; Oberkochen, Germany). Synapse density analysis was performed on single plane confocal images in ImageJ (NIH). Three 63x fields of view per hemisphere per animal were analyzed. Sample images for each genotype and condition were manually thresholded by eye, and a consistent threshold range was determined (IsoData segmentation method, 85–255). Each channel was thresholded and the Analyze Particles function (ImageJ plugin, NIH) with set parameters for each marker (VGluT2 = 0.2-infinity; Homer1 = 0.1-infinity) was used to measure the total pre- and postsynaptic puncta area. To quantify total synaptic area, Image Calculator (ImageJ plugin, NIH) was used to visualize co-localized pre- and postsynaptic puncta and then the Analyze Particles function was used to calculate the total area of co-localized puncta. Data for each hemisphere was averaged across all three fields of view and then normalized to the control hemisphere within each animal.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Confocal Microscopy Imaging of Cellular Structures

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After fixation and immunostaining, images were acquired with an inverted laser scanning confocal microscope LSM700 (Zeiss, Germany), with a 63X objective (zoom 1.0). Images were acquired using the ZEN acquisition software (Zeiss). In all experiments, we acquired Z-stacks covering the whole volume of cells. For the experiments where integrated density was measured in control and α-syn treated cells (LysoTracker DR, Magic Red CathB, DQ-BSA assays, and evaluation of LAMP1 at the PM in non-permeabilized condition), all settings (including the laser power and exposure line time) were kept identical. In some experiments, line averaging were also used in order to improve the signal-to-noise ratio.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Cortical Enrichment of Myosin II and Actin

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HeLa Kyoto cells expressing MYH9-EGFP and Lifeact-mCherry, MYH9-EGFP or Actin-EGFP were prepared for experiments in glass bottom dishes, chemically arrested in mitosis in the presence of 2 µM STC and mounted on an inverted light microscope (AxioObserver.Z1, Zeiss) equipped with a laser scanning microscope (LSM 700, Zeiss) using a dish heater (JPK Instruments) at a constant temperature of 37 °C on a manual or automated precision stage (JPK Instruments). Imaging was carried out using a ×63 water-immersion objective (LCI Plan-Neofluar 63x/1.3 Imm Corr DIC M27) and ZEN acquisition software (Zeiss). Using modified (‘wedged’) cantilevers compensating for the 10° tilt intrinsic to our AFM setup and thus preventing cells from sliding towards the cantilever base5 (link), 19 (link), the cantilever was brought into contact with the glass surface close to the cell of interest, retracted by at least 22 µm, positioned over the cell and subsequently lowered with a constant speed of 0.5 µm s−1 to a predefined set height (10 or 12 µm). Images at the cellular midplane were recorded and cortical enrichment of myosin II and actin were analyzed by comparing the average fluorescence intensity of MYH9-EGFP, Lifeact-mCherry or Actin-EGFP at the cell edge to that in the cytoplasm using a custom Igor image analysis macro (Igor Pro)11 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Fluorescence Microscopy Imaging Protocols

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Imaging of immunofluorescent samples were conducted on a Zeiss Axio Observer.Z1 inverted microscope equipped with a Hamamatsu ORCA-R2 digital camera and Velocity 6.3.0 imaging software (PerkinElmer), a Zeiss LSM 710 confocal system and Zen acquisition software (Zeiss), or a Keyence BX-X710 all-in-one fluorescence microscope and BZ-X Viewer version 01.03.00.05 and BZ-S Analyzer version 1.3.0.3 software with the sectioning, advanced observation, advanced analysis, measurement, hybrid cell count and macro cell count modules. Images were taken at the lowest allowable exposure to capture fluorescent signal and then processed in GIMP (https://www.gimp.org) or ImageJ (https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/), both open source editing software, for overlays and linear (only) contrast adjustments.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Immunofluorescence Staining of Lymph Nodes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Paraffin-embedded lymph node sections were deparaffinized, incubated in citrate buffer (10 mM sodium citrate) for antigen retrieval, and permeabilized in TTBS (10 mM Tris, 150 mM NaCl, 0,05% Tween20). 0.1% Sudan black B (Sigma-Aldrich/Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) in 70% ethanol was applied as described before to reduce autofluorescence [119 (link)]. After washing with TTBS, sections were blocked with 5% normal horse serum (Invitrogen/Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) in TTBS. Primary antibodies listed in Supplementary Table S8 were diluted in TTBS, administered to the slides, and incubated overnight at 4 °C. The next day, slides were washed with TTBS and secondary antibodies were added to incubate for 45 min at room temperature in the dark. Slides were washed and mounted using mounting medium with DAPI (SouthernBiotech, Birmingham, AL, USA) to stain nuclei. Images were acquired using a Zeiss cell observer widefield microscope and ZEN acquisition software (both Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Engulfment Analysis of Microglia

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Engulfment analysis was performed according to previously described methods2 (link),58 . Briefly, immunostained sections were imaged on a Zeiss Observer Spinning Disk Confocal microscope equipped with diode lasers (405nm, 488nm, 594nm, 647nm) and Zen acquisition software (Zeiss; Oberkochen, Germany). For each hemisphere, three to five 63x fields of view within the barrel field were acquired with 50–70 z-stack steps at 0.27 μm spacing. Images were first processed in ImageJ (NIH) and then individual images of 15–20 single cells per hemisphere per animal were processed in Imaris (Bitplane; Zurich, Switzerland) as previously described. All image files were blinded for unbiased quantification. All data was then normalized to the control, spared hemisphere within each animal. Note, Cx3cr1+/− littermates were used for comparison to Cx3cr1−/− mice as microglia within both sets of mice are labeled with EGFP and show similar changes in TC synapses (Fig 2).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Immunofluorescence Imaging of Cultured Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cultured rat primary neurons, HEK293T cells, COS-7 cells, and brain sections were fixed in 4% PFA (pH 7.2) and immunostained with the appropriate antibodies in phosphate buffer with 0.3% Triton X-100 and 10% goat serum. Images of immunofluorescence were captured using an Axio-imager Z1 microscope (Carl Zeiss MicroImaging) or Axio-observer Z1 microscope (Carl Zeiss MicroImaging) fitted with Apotome and an AxioCam digital camera (Carl Zeiss MicroImaging). Zeiss 20× (0.8 NA) Plan Apochromat, 40× (0.75 NA) Plan Neofluar, and 63× (1.4 NA) Plan Apochromat objectives were used to acquire images. Images were collected at room temperature using Zen acquisition software (Carl Zeiss MicroImaging). Fluorophores included Alexa Fluor-488, Alexa Fluor-594, and AMCA conjugated to secondary antibodies. To measure fluorescence intensity, we used ImageJ analysis software version 2.0.0-rc-68/1.52h. Briefly, the cell or region of interest was outlined and the fluorescence intensity in the selected region was measured. Within an experiment, exposure times for all cells measured were kept constant. Only linear adjustments were made to the lookup table to maximize the range of fluorescence.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Confocal Microscopy for Neurological Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Images of stained sections were acquired using a Zeiss LSM510 confocal scanning microscope (Carl Zeiss, GER) as previously described (Biancardi et al. 2010; Iddings et al. 2015). Images from consecutive optical focal planes (1 μm interval), were taken using a 25× or 40× oil immersion objective, and a projection image of the sections was generated. For NMDAR (n = 6, per group), FITC dextran (n = 13, per group), Iba1 (n = 13, per group) and GFAP (n = 13, per group) 30 μm consecutives images were acquired at 40×. Additionally, for FITC dextran (n = 10, per group) 50 μm consecutive images were acquired at 25×. Images from both hemispheres of WKY and SHR groups were acquired by Zen acquisition software (Carl Zeiss Microscopy, Oberkochen, Germany) and digitized with identical acquisition settings for further comparison.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!