The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

5 protocols using anti cxcl8

1

Blocking Chemokines in HUVEC Co-culture

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The polyclonal antibodies used to block the corresponding chemokines were rabbit polyclonal anti-CCL2 (1:10; cat. no. 25542-1-AP; ProteinTech Group, Inc.), rabbit polyclonal anti-CCL15 (1:10; cat. no. ab221040; Abcam) and rabbit polyclonal anti-CXCL8 (1:10; cat. no. ab7747; Abcam). The addition of the antibodies to HUVECs cultured in the co-culture system was performed at 37°C for 24 h with 5% CO2 prior to further experiments. Control groups were added with the same amount of TE buffer (pH 9.0), which is the solvent of these antibodies only.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Multiplex Immunohistochemistry of Pancreatic Cancer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fluorescent mIHC was performed in serial sections of FFPE tumor tissue from each PDAC patient using the Opal 7-Colour Manual IHC Kit (PerkinElmer Hopkinton, Massachusetts, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol and as described in our previous article. In short, sections experienced primary antibodies including Rabbit monoclonal antibodies anti-CD68 (1:500, Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA), anti-CXCR2 (1:500, Abcam), anti-CD206 (1000, Abcam), anti-CXCL1 (1:200, Abcam), anti-CXCL5 (1:200, Abcam), anti-CXCL8 (1:500, Abcam) and anti-CD8 (1:2000, Abcam), followed by HRP-conjugated secondary antibody and fluorescent dyes (Opal520, Opal570, Opal620, Opal690, and DAPI). Stained sections were scanned and processed by a Vectra PolarisTM Automated Quantitative Pathology Imaging System (AKOYA Biosciences, PerkinElmer, Massachusetts, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

CXCL8 Expression in Cervical Cancer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunohistochemical analysis was performed to measure CXCL8 protein expression in cervical cancer tissue samples. In brief, slides were baked at 60°C for 1 h, followed by deparaffinization with xylene, and rehydrated. The sections were submerged in EDTA antigenic retrieval buffer and microwaved for antigen retrieval. They were then treated with 3% hydrogen peroxide in methanol to quench endogenous peroxidase activity, followed by incubation with 5% BSA to block nonspecific binding. Sections were incubated with anti-CXCL8 (1:200 dilution, Abcam) overnight at 4°C. After washing, tissue sections were treated with secondary antibody, followed by incubation with conjugated horseradish peroxidase streptavidin. Tissue sections were then counterstained with Hematoxylin, dehydrated, and mounted. Finally, sections were viewed under a bright-field microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Protein Expression Analysis in Cartilage

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Proteins were extracted using RIPA buffer containing protease inhibitors. Protein samples were separated using SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting using the following primary antibodies: anti-cxcl 8 (1:1000; Abcam), anti-aggrecan (1:2000), anti-sox9 (1:2000), anti-collagen II (1:5000), and anti-RPL4 (1:1000). Then, the membranes were incubated with secondary antibodies (1:1000; all from Cell Signaling Technology). The protein bands were visualized using enhanced chemiluminescence detection kit (Millipore).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Histological Analysis of Kidney Damage

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Kidney tissues in each group were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and blocked in paraffin. Thereafter, the sections were stained in hematoxylin for 5 min and eosin for 3 min. Images of HE sections were observed under an inverted microscope (Leica, Germany). 5 fields were randomly determined from each section. The kidney damage was evaluated according to the loss of brush borders (0–3), tubular vascularization (0–3) and inflammatory cell infiltration (0–3) [Zhou, 2014 #48]. All sections were independently assessed by an investigator in a blinded manner. IHC was performed as previously described [33 (link)]. To be more specific, the sections were washed by PBS and blocked in 3% H2O2 for 10 min. and were then incubated with goat serum for 15 min and washed. Subsequently, the sections were incubated with anti-CXCL8 (1:500, Abcam, Cambridge, UK) overnight at 4 °C followed by being incubated with streptavidin peroxidase-conjugated second antibody (Zhongshan Golden Bridge, Beijing, China) for 1 h at 37 °C. Next, the sections were stained with 3,3′-diaminobenzidine (DAB, Zhongshan Golden Bridge) for 6 min and then rinsed and stained in hematoxylin for 30 s. The sections were dehydrated in gradient alcohol and sealed in neutral resins. The integral optical density (IOD) was calculated with Image Pro plus 6.0 software (Microsoft Media Cybernetics, Bethesda, MD, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!