The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

9 protocols using 1 8 dihydroxyanthraquinone

1

Quantifying Metabolites using HPLC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sample tissues and cells were extracted with 416 μL methanol and 84 μL 1,8-dihydroxyanthraquinone (internal standard, IS, 200 μg/mL) in a centrifuge tube. The tissue homogenates were centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 10 min at 4 °C and the supernatant was transferred to a clean tube. The combined organic solvent of the supernatants was evaporated to a final volume of 400 μL, and subsequently placed in a sealed amber vial for HPLC analysis [23 (link)]. To improve the sensitivity and precision of quantification, we purified the samples and cited 1,8-dihydroxyanthraquinone (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) as the internal standard and trans-resveratrol (Sigma-Aldrich) as the standard for drawing a standard curve by the methods described elsewhere [24 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Antimicrobial Evaluation of Anthraquinones

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
1,8-dihydroxy-4,5-dinitroanthraquinone (97%) (CAS 81-55-0), 1,8-dihydroxyanthraquinone (97%) (CAS: 117-10-2), 1,8-dichloroanthraquinone (97%) (CAS: 82-43-9), Mueller-Hinton agar, and Mueller-Hinton broth were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). HiCrome™ UTI Agar was purchased from Hi-media Laboratory Ltd. (Mumbai, India). All antibiotic disks were purchased from Bioanalyse (Ankara, Turkey). Control strains of S. aureus (ATCC 25923), E. faecalis (ATCC 29212), and E. coli (ATCC 25922) were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (Rockville, MD, USA). Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) was obtained from Merck (Rahway, NJ, USA). All reagents used were of the highest grade available.
In the experiments, the maximum concentration of anthraquinones used was 125 µg/mL. Final concentrations in the culture media were obtained by using solutions of the anthraquinones prepared in DMSO and adding them to sterile Mueller-Hinton (MH) broth or molten MH agar. The final concentration of DMSO in the culture media used in all experiments was 1%.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantitative HPLC Analysis of Resveratrol in Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples for HPLC analysis were prepared from frozen tumor specimens and pooled ovarian tissues by a method described elsewhere.13 (link) Briefly, a frozen tissue sample was sectioned into 7 mm slices using a freezing microtome, collected in a centrifuge tube, and extracted with 416 μl methanol and 84 μl internal standard [IS, 1, 8-dihydroxyanthraquinone, 200 μg/ml; (Sigma-Aldrich)]. The tissue homogenates were vortexed for 5 min and centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 10 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was then transferred to a clean tube. The residue was extracted twice with 1 ml methanol by 5 min of vigorous agitation, followed by centrifugation. The combined organic solvent of the supernatants was evaporated to a final volume of 400 μl and subsequently placed in a sealed amber vial for HPLC analysis.23 (link) To improve the sensitivity and precision of quantification, 1, 8-dihydroxyanthraquinone was used as the internal standard and trans-resveratrol (Sigma-Aldrich) as the standard to construct a standard curve using previously described methods.13 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

HPLC Analysis of Resveratrol in Brain Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All experiments were performed 20 min following LP administration. Briefly, brains were dissected on an ice bed, wrapped in aluminum foil, snap frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C until use. Tumor-bearing and cancer-free brain tissues in the frozen sections were separately collected using standard procedures [13 (link)] and used for HPLC analysis. Sample tissues were extracted with 416 μl methanol and 84 μl internal standard (IS, 1, 8-dihydroxyanthraquinone, 200 μg/ml) in a centrifuge tube. The tissue homogenates were vortexed for 5 min and centrifuged at 12000 rpm for 10 min at 4°C. The supernatant was then transferred to a clean tube. The residue was extracted twice more with 1 ml methanol by vigorous 5 min agitation, followed by centrifugation. The combined organic solvent of the supernatants was evaporated to a final volume of 400 μl, and subsequently placed in a sealed amber vial for HPLC analysis [11 (link)]. To improve the sensitivity and precision of quantification, we purified the samples and cited 1, 8-dihydroxyanthraquinone (Sigma-Aldrich) as the internal standard and trans-resveratrol (Sigma-Aldrich) as the standard for drawing a standard curve using previously described methods [13 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Ames Test for Mutagenicity Evaluation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Ames test was conducted to evaluate the mutagenicity of the lyophilized powder with or without S9 activation in accordance with the preparation method of S9 in Salmonella typhimurium/Mammals Microsomal Enzyme Test, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Test Guideline (No. 471, 2020). Four strains of Salmonella typhimurium, TA97a, TA98, TA100, and TA1535, and one strain of Escherichia coli WP2urvA were used in this assay (Molecular Toxicology, Boone, NC, USA). Five dosages of lyophilized powder at 0.3125, 0.625, 1.25, 2.5, and 5 mg/plate were prepared for analysis. The sterile water was used as the negative control. The five positive control groups comprised 50 μg/plate of dexon (sodium p-dimethylamino-benzenediazo sulfonate, Chem Service, West Chester, PA, USA) and 1 μg/plate of methyl methanesulfonate (Fu Chen Chemical Reagents, Tianjin, China) for the −S9 comparisons. Ten (10) μg/plate of 2-aminofluorene (Sigma–Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), 50 μg/plate of 1,8-dihydroxyanthraquinone (Sigma–Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), and 200 μg/plate of cyclophosphamide (TCI, Tokyo, Japan) were comprised for the +S9 comparisons. Incubation was performed at 37 ± 1 °C for 48 h, and the number of colonies was counted in triplicate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Synthesis and Characterization of LP4C

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The coumarin derivative LP4C was synthesized according to the method reported previously [19 (link)]. The infrared spectra of LP4C were determined by a spectrophotometer (Bruker Fourier, Ettlingen, Germany). 1H Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) spectrum, 13C NMR spectrum, DEPT-135 NMR spectrum, 1H-1H COSY, Heteronuclear Single Quantum Coherence (HSQC) and Heteronuclear Multiple-Bond Correlation (HMBC) characterization data were obtained using the spectrometer (Varian Inova-500, CA, USA), which is shown in Supplementary Figure S1 and Table S2. Samples of 4-nitrobenzene-1,2-diamine, mitomycin C, 2-aminofluorene and 1,8-dihydroxyanthraquinone were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Emu Fatty Tissue Antioxidant Evaluation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Emu fatty tissue was obtained from Guangdong Xinji Emu Industry Co., Ltd. (Jiangmen, China). The β-carotene, gallic acid, Folin–Ciocalteau reagent, 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), 2,2′-azino-bis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulphonic acid) (ABTS), cytochalasin B, penicillin GNa, ethyl methanesulfonate, 2-aminofluorene, trypsin-EDTA, 4-nitro-1,2-phenylenediamine monohydrochloride, 1,8-dihydroxyanthraquinone, mitomycin C, 4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide, linoleic acid, tertbutyl hydroquinone (TBHQ), cyclophosphamide monohydrate, and Giemsa were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (Sigma Aldrich Trading Co., Ltd., Steinheim, Germany). Corn oil was obtained from Yihai (Guangzhou) Grain and Oil Industry Co., Ltd. (Guangzhou, China). The malondialdehyde (MDA) assay kit was obtained from Beijing Solarbio Science & Technology Co., Ltd. (Beijing Solarbio Science & Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China). All the reagents used were of analytical grade.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Carcinogen Exposure Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DEN (Diethylnitrosamine, CAS No. 55-18-5), MNU (N-methyl-N-nitrosourea, CAS No. 684-93-5) and DHPN (Dihydroxy-di-N-propyl-nitrosamine, CAS No. 53609-64-6) were purchased from J & K Scientific Ltd., (Beijing, China). Resveratrol, dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), HPLC-grade acetonitrile, methanol, acetic acid, and 1,8-dihydroxyanthraquinone were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Comprehensive Antioxidant Compound Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
1,8-dihydroxyanthraquinone (95.5%), epicatechin (EC) (99%), gallic acid (GA) (Z 97.5%), caffeine (Caf) (99%), hydrochloric acid -37%, sodium dihydrophosphate dihydrate (99%) were purchased from Sigma Aldrich (Germany). Short codes (such as EC, GA, etc.) are used here and below only for substances further mentioned in Tables and Pictures. Epigallocatechin (EGC) (Z 90%), epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) (Z97%), sodium hydrophosphate dodecahydrate (98%) and formic acid (98%) were from Fluka (Germany), sodium hydroxide (99%) and methanol were from Merck, rhein (88.7%) was from LKT Laboratories (USA), berberine hydrochloride (4 98%) from Northeast Pharmaceutical Group Shenyang NO.1 Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd (China), sodium dodecyl sulfate (4 98%) from Reahim and ethylacetate from Vekton (both St. Petersburg, Russia), acetonitrile from Biosolve (France), TWEEN 20 (4 98%) from Helicon (Moscow, Russia). All other chemicals were of analytical reagent grade and were used without further purification.
Water for preparation of buffer and standard solutions was from Milli-Q Advantage A10 purification system (Millipore, Molsheim, France).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!