The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

3 3 diaminobenzidine (dab)

Manufactured by BioGenex
Sourced in United States

DAB is a chromogenic substrate used for the detection and visualization of target molecules in immunohistochemistry (IHC) and in situ hybridization (ISH) assays. It produces a stable brown precipitate at the site of the target antigen or nucleic acid sequence, allowing for the localization and identification of the analyte of interest.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

15 protocols using 3 3 diaminobenzidine (dab)

1

Histological Analysis of Tuberculosis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Lung tissues from Mtb-infected mice were fixed in 4% phosphate-buffered formalin for 24 h and were then embedded in paraffin wax. The paraffin-embedded lungs were cut in serial sections with a thickness of 2–3 μm. Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining were applied to detect the infiltration in the lungs. Acid-fast staining with the standard Ziehl–Neelsen method was employed for the determination of Mtb burden in the lungs. Five noncontiguous sections were examined for each lung, and at least five animals were sacrificed for each group. The stained slides were visualized by light microscopy.
For immunohistochemistry, lung tissue from three PTB patients with pulmonary lobectomy and six Mtb-infected mice was investigated. Segments of lung tissues were fixed in 10% buffered formalin and were embedded in paraffin. The blocks were cut into 5 μm sections, and five noncontiguous sections were processed for IHC staining with LC3B antibody at a 1:250 dilution. The sections were then incubated with the Supersensitive 1-step polymer-HRP detection system (Biogenex). Immunostaining was visualized with 3,3-diaminobenzidine (DAB, Biogenex) substrate. After counterstaining in hematoxylin, the sections were mounted and examined. The studies on clinical samples were conducted in accordance with ethical guidelines of the Institutional Review Board of Tongji University.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Autophagy Assessment in Human Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RT2 Profiler Human Autophagy PCR Array (PAHS084ZE), RNeasy mini kit, RT2 First Strand Kit, primers for qPCR validation, including BECN (PPH05670B), MAP1LC3A (PPH19436A), ATG4B (PPH15916A), DRAM1 (PPH19768F), CTSD (PPH00112F) and RPLPO (PPH21138F) were purchased from Qiagen-Sabiosciences. 3,3′-diaminobenzidine (DAB) was from BioGenex. TRIzol® reagent, 4-12% NuPAGE gels and Hanks balanced salt solution (HBSS) were from Invitrogen. Chloroquine (CQ), 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI), and all other chemicals used were from Sigma. Antibodies used in this study are listed in Suppl Table 5.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immunohistochemical Staining Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Paraffin-embedded sections were deparaffinized in xylene and rehydrated in descending concentrations of ethanol. After being washed in PBS, antigen retrieval was performed in boiling 10 mM sodium citrate solution (pH 6.0) containing 0.05% Tween-20 for 20 min. Sections were subsequently incubated in 3% H2O2 for 10 min and then in Rodent Block M (Biocare Medical, Concord, CA, USA) at RT. After 1 h, the sections were incubated with primary antibodies diluted in Tris-HCl buffer containing 0.1% Tween and 0.015 M NaN3 (Dako Antibody Diluent; Dako North America) for 16 h at 4 °C. Rabbit, mouse, and rat IgG were used as negative controls. Following three washes in PBS containing 0.5% Tween-20 (PBST) for 10 min, the appropriate horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-labeled secondary antibodies were applied for 1 h at RT. To detect mouse or rabbit primary antibodies versus rat or goat primary antibodies, the Super Sensitive Polymer-HRP IHC Detection System (BioGenex, San Ramon, CA, USA) or Histofine Simple Stain MAX PO Kits (Nichirei, Tokyo, Japan) were used, respectively, with 3,3′-diaminobenzidine (DAB) as the chromogen (BioGenex). Nuclei were counterstained with hematoxylin. The sections were dehydrated and mounted with coverslips (Malinol NX; Muto Pure Chemicals).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Kidney CYP4A

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The right kidney was fixed by the retrograde perfusion through the abdominal aorta with 200 mL of 4% paraformaldehyde containing 0.2% picric acid in 0.1 mol/L phosphate buffer at 4°C. The kidneys were collected and immersed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 24 h. The kidneys were embedded in paraffin, and 5‐μm‐thick sections were prepared. The antigens were retrieved by microwave‐oven treatment in sodium citrate buffer 0.01 mol/L, pH 6 for 3 min. The endogenous peroxidase activity was subsequently blocked with 3% H2O2 and the nonimmunologic binding with phosphate‐buffered saline containing 1% bovine serum albumin. The slides were incubated with a rabbit polyclonal antibody to CYP4A (1:500, Abcam) for 1 h at 4°C then extensively washed with TBS. The antibody complex was detected using the Sensitive Link‐Label IHC detection system and 3,3′‐diaminobenzidine (DAB) as chromogen (BioGenex, San Ramon, CA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

ADAM10 Expression in Colorectal Cancer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded sections from available Crc specimens and normal mucosa underwent antigen retrieval and quenching with 3% hydrogen peroxide. Sections were incubated 12 hr at 4°C with anti-ADAM10 N-terminal antibodies (1:500 Sigma; 1:1000 ab39153, Abcam), followed by labelled Envision anti-rabbit System (Dako). The immunoreaction was revealed by HRP using 3,3′diaminobenzidine (Biogenex), the slides were slightly counterstained with Harris's hematoxylin, analysed with optical microscope Axioskope 2 (Zeiss) and images acquired with AxioVision 4.4 system (Zeiss). Available tumor specimens frozen at −80°C were mechanically broken and incubated with 1%TritonX-extraction buffer containing protease- and phosphatase-inhibitors (Sigma). Proteins were resolved by SDS-PAGE and WB analysis was performed with anti-ADAM10 (AB936, R&D-Systems) and anti-β-actin (Sigma) Abs. Secondary Abs were HRP-conjugated goat-anti-rabbit IgG and rabbit-anti-mouse IgG (Dako). The protein loading was normalized by ponceau-staining and β-actin immunostaining.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantitative Analysis of Pancreatic Insulitis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Pancreata and thymi were harvested, fixed in 10% buffered formalin (Bio Optica) and embedded in paraffin. Serial sections (4 μm) were stained with hematoxylin and eosin for morphological analysis and insulitis scoring. To determine levels of insulitis, we performed an unbiased software quantification analysis based on the Aperio Scan Software System. Thus, pancreatic islets were assigned as healthy islets with no lesions/infiltration: 1%–25%, 26%–50%, 51%–75%, and 76%–100% of infiltration/islet destruction.
To assess immunolocalization of Foxp3, rabbit anti-Foxp3 (FjK-16s) antibody was used after antigen retrieval with Tris-EDTA (pH 9) in a warm bath and revealed by rat on a rodent HRP-polymer and rabbit on a rodent HRP-polymer (Biocare Medical), using 3,3-diaminobenzidine as chromogen (BioGenex). Slides were counterstained with hematoxylin. To normalize Foxp3+Treg infiltration, the ratio between the area of Foxp3-stained and the area of infiltration of each single islet was measured using an unbiased software quantification analysis tool based on Aperio Scan Software System.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Histological and Immunohistochemical Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
H&E and IHC staining were performed on either 5-mm paraffin-embedded or OCT-frozen sections. For IHC, slides were deparaffinized in xylene and hydrated in gradient alcohols to water. Endogenous peroxidase activity was blocked with 3% H2O2 for 10 min followed by antigen retrieval in 10 mM citrate buffer (pH 6.0). After blocking with Biocare Blocking Reagent (Biocare), slides were incubated with primary antibodies (table S7), followed by incubation with secondary antibodies and DAB (BioGenex Laboratories) development. IHC images were captured using an Olympus IX73FL microscope. For quantification of cell numbers, at least five to six random high-magnification (×20) images were captured.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Immunohistochemical Analysis of PAF Receptor

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Bladders for immunohistochemistry were removed from animals and fixed in 10 % buffered formalin, embedded in paraffin, and cut into 5 μm thick sections. Tissue was deparaffinized and rehydrated in xylene and decreasing concentrations of reagent alcohol. Sections underwent heat‐induced antigen retrieval using a citric acid‐based antigen unmasking solution (Vector Labs). Sections were incubated with blocking buffer and primary antibody (PAF (1:50 Abbiotec, San Diego, CA), PAF receptor (1:50 Cayman Chemical Co., Ann Arbor, MI), overnight. Sections were washed and incubated with anti–rabbit secondary antibody. Immunohistochemistry was completed with use of the Vectastain Elite Universal ABC system and DAB (Biogenex). Slides were counterstained with filtered Gills III hematoxylin and blued in saturated lithium carbonate solution and viewed under a light microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantification of PCNA-Positive Acinar Cells in Parotid Gland

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Serial sectioned unstained slides were incubated at 37°C for 30 minutes. Paraffin removal, rehydration, peroxidase neutralization and antigen retrieval were performed as described above for amylase staining. Slides were washed with PBS, blocked with goat serum from the ABC Rabbit Kit (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) and then incubated with anti-PCNA antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) overnight at 4°C. Slides were washed and incubated in secondary antibody from the ABC Rabbit Kit. Color detection utilized DAB (Biogenex Laboratories, Fremont, CA) for 6 min per slide. Slides were counterstained using Harris hematoxylin (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO), dehydrated, and mounted using Protocol Securemount (Fisher Scientific). Images were obtained using a Leica DM5500 and 4 megapixel Pursuit camera. PCNA-positive and total acinar cells in the parotid gland were counted manually from at least 3 fields per slide at 200X. Data are graphed as a percentage of PCNA positive acinar cells to total acinar cells from 4 mice per treatment.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Hepatic TG2

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sections of human liver were obtained from formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded blocks of retrospective/archival samples (i.e., patient selection and liver biopsy were not for the purpose of the study). Replicate blocks, no longer required to be maintained on file within the local pathology archive, were used. Six cases of NAFLD and six cases of normal control tissue were selected; the presence of a hepatitis B or hepatitis C infection, or of alcoholic liver disease were considered as exclusion criteria.
For immunohistochemistry, deparaffinized and rehydrated sections were immersed in 10 mM sodium citrate, pH 6.0, and microwaved for antigen retrieval. Samples were incubated with mouse anti-TG2 (CUB 7402, Thermo Scientific, Rockford, IL, USA), for 1 h at room temperature. Reaction was visualized using a streptavidin–biotin–immunoperoxidase system with DAB (Biogenex, San Ramon, CA) as chromogen substrates. Negative control staining was performed by omitting the primary antibody. Sections were counterstained in Mayer’s acid hemalum.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!