The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

490 protocols using lc 20at

1

HPLC Analysis of Chromatographic Purity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All reagents for high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) were chromatographic grade, reaction reagents were analytical grade and the water phase was double-distilled water. TU-1810 ultraviolet–visible spectrophotometer (Persee General Analysis Co., Beijing, China) was used to detect wavelength. HPLC data were obtained on a SHIMADZU LC-20AT (SHIMADZU Co., Kyoto, Japan), equipped with a binary pump (Shimadzu, LC-20AT), a UV–vis detector (Shimadzu, SPD-20A), an auto sampler (Shimadzu, SIL-20A), a Shimadzu shim-pack VP-ODS column (5 μm, 250 × 4.6 mm, C18 reversed phase chromatography) connected to a Shimadzu shim-pack GVP-ODS (10 × 4.6 mm) guard column, a column oven (Shimadzu, CTO-20AC) and a computer (model Dell) for carrying out the experimental data analysis. Column chromatography purification was carried out using silica gel (200–300 mesh). A SHZ-88 thermostatic oscillator (Jintan Medical Instrument Factory, Changzhou, China), Thermo Scientific Legend Mach 1.6 R centrifuge (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc, Waltham, MA USA) and SPX-150B-Z biochemical incubator (Boxun Industrial Co., Shanghai, China) were used in the degradation experiment.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Preparative RP-HPLC Purification of Synthetic Peptides

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Crude synthetic linear peptide was purified by preparative RP-HPLC on a Shimadzu LC-20AT (Kyoto, JPN) system using a preparative column (C18 Jupiter®, 300 Å, 250 x 21.2 mm, 5 µm particle size) and a flow rate of 8 mL/min. Semi preparative RP-HPLC was run on a Shimadzu LC-20AT (Kyoto, JPN) system using a preparative column (NX-C18 Gemini®, 110 Å, 250 x 10 mm, 5 µm particle size) and a flow rate of 3 mL/min. Solvent A was 0.05% TFA in MilliQ water and solvent B was 0.045% TFA in 90% ACN/10% MilliQ water. The purification gradient was from 0-60%B over 60 min and the purification was monitored at 214 and 280 nm. Fractions were collected using a fraction collector (Shimadzu FRC-10A), mass determined by ESI-MS and fractions of interest were lyophilized and stored at -2 °C prior to use.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Isolation and Characterization of Glycosylated Polysaccharides from Air-Dried SWFs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Air-dried SWFs (1.8 kg) were extracted by refluxing them with 95% ethyl alcohol three times for 3 h each time. The evaporated crude extract suspended in H2O was extracted by petroleum ether, ethyl acetate and n-butyl alcohol successively. Briefly, the ethyl acetate extract was sequentially partitioned with a gradient of MeOH-H2O (3:7 to 1:0), CH2Cl2-MeOH (200:1 to 0:1), MeOH (100%) and a MeOH-H2O elution system via an MCI gel column, a silica gel column (100−200 mesh), a Sephadex LH-20 chromatography and a semipreparative HPLC (SHIMADZU LC-20AT, DAD-detector, Shim-pack GIS-C18 (5 μm, 10×250 mm)). Thirty-three GPIFs were purified, and the elucidation of silexcrins A-U (1-21) as well as NMR data, HRESIMS, ECD, UV, and IR spectra are shown in the supplementary materials.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

HPLC Identification of ROE Polyphenols

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The main polyphenols in ROE were determined using high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC, SHIMAZU LC-20AT liquid chromatography, Japan) with a photodiode array (PDA, SHIMAZU SPD-M20A) detector. Separation and identification were based on our previous report16 (link) and performed with a COSMOSIL 5C18-MS-II (4.6 mm × 250 mm, 5 μm) at 30 °C with a gradient elution solution A, composed of a formic acid–water solution (0.1% formic acid), and solution B, comprising an acetonitrile and formic acid–water solution (0.1% formic acid) (6 : 4; v/v), which were delivered at a flow rate of 0.7 mL min−1 as follows: 0 min, 96% (A); 180 min, 70% (A); 205 min, 96% (A); and 210 min, 0% (A). The UV spectra of every identified peak were recorded at 280 nm. The tested standards, including procyanidin B3 (1), EGC (2), catechin (3), epicatechin (4), (−)-fisetinidol-(4α,8)-(−)-catechin (5), (4α,8)-(−)-fisetinidol-(−)-epicatechins (6), and (+)-guibourtinidol-(4β,8)-epicatechin (7), were made by our laboratory. These compounds were isolated and identified from ROE by our group and the purity of each standard was higher than 95%.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantitative Analysis of IMM-H014 in Tablets

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Twenty tablets were taken at random from each lot and weighed before being placed in a mortar and being porphyrized with a pestle. A quantity equivalent to 5 mg of IMM-H014 (40 mg of powder) was pulled out with 100 mL of hydrochloric acid solution (0.1 N) and supersonically extracted over 30 min. Then, the resulting 10 mL solution was filtered through a polytetrafluoroethylene filter membrane (PTFE, 0.45 μm pore size, Jinteng, Tianjin, China). A C18 column was used in the stationary phase. The collected samples (20 μL) were analyzed using HPLC (Shimazu LC-20AT, Kyoto, Japan) with a UV detector wavelength of 230 nm. IMM–H014 was separated under a mobile phase consisting of ammonium formate PBS (pH 4.0) to acetonitrile at a 60:40 (v/v) ratio using a C18 column (4.6 mm × 25 cm, 5.0μm). The flow velocity was 0.7 mL/min and the column temperature was 35 °C. The linearity of IMM-H014 ranged from 20.01 μg/mL to 60.02 μg/mL. The validation was conducted following the ICH guidelines.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

In-vitro EGCG Release Kinetics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In-vitro release study was performed using simulated gastric digestive fluid as described by Xie et al. [29] (link). For simulated gastric fluid (SGF) preparation, pepsin (1.0 g) and NaCl (0.2 g) were dissolved in water and 1 M hydrochloric acid solution was added to adjust the pH value (0.9-1.2) with a final volume of 100 mL. The prepared solution was centrifuged at 5000 rpm for 10 min, and the supernatant used as SGF. The powdered LK-CG-TP was added to the SGF solution with a water bath at 37 • C. Centrifugation was performed subsequently after 0 h, 0.5 h, 1.0 h, 1.5 h, 2.0 h, 2.5 h, and 3 h of digestion. The supernatant was obtained and was used to determine the content of EGCG by HPLC.
HPLC (Shimazu LC-20AT, Japan) with a PDA detector (SPD-M20A) and a C 18 column (4.6 mm × 250 mm, 5 µM, Agilent ZORBAX Eclipse XDB-C 18 ) was used for the qualitative and quantitative analysis of EGCG under 226 nm. The supernatant sample (20 µL) was eluted with a mobile phase, comprising 15% acetonitrile and 85% water with 0.1% acetic acid for 30 min. The elution flow rate was set at 1.0 mL/min and EGCG standard was used to construct a calibration curve by HPLC analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

HPLC Analysis of Enzymatic Reactions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The HPLC analysis was performed on a Shimadzu-LC-20AT (Japan) with an Ultimate® XB-C18 column (4.6 mm × 250 mm I.D., 5 μm, Welch Materials, Inc., China) at a flow rate of 0.8 mL/min, using the mobile phase of (A) 0.1% formic acid in deionized H2O and (B) 100% MeCN. The gradient settings for separating the products and substrates were 0–20 min 10% B to 50% B, 20–25 min 50% B to 100% B, 25–28 min 100% B to 10% B, and 28–35 min 10% B to 10% B. The products were further confirmed using an LTQ XL Orbitrap mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.) The MS/MS analysis was carried out in a positive ionization mode with 35% relative collision energy. The relative activities of the mutants were determined by HPLC and calculated by the product’s peak area dividing the wild-type’s peak area. All experiments were performed in triplicate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

HPLC Profiling of TMZY Herbal Extracts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The extraction process of TMZY extracts was conducted as previously reported. Briefly, one dose of TMZY medicines were added in 10 volumes of water, soaked for 60 min, and decocted two times (3 h at the first time and 2 h at the second time). The two decoctions were then combined together. In order to control the quality of extracts, the fingerprint spectrum was measured by a high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method, and the chromatographic profile of the TMZY extracts is presented in Figure 1. The analyses were conducted by Shimadzu system (LC-20AT, Shimadzu Corp., Japan) equipped with an auto-sampler, a quaternary gradient pump, and a SPD-20A detector. The mobile phase was acetonitrile (A) – 0.2% formic acid solution (B). The mobile phase gradient elution program is shown in Table 1 and the flow rate was 1.0 ml/min. The chromatographic column was Shim-pack VP-ODS C18 (4.6 mm × 250 mm, 5 μm) with working temperature of 30°C. The detector wavelength was set at 254 nm. The peak assignment in Figure 1 is listed in Table S1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantification of Kuwanon G and Morusin in Morus alba L.

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The HPLC equipment used for the quantitative analysis of the two flavones, kuwanon G and morusin, in M. alba L. was a Shimadzu LC-20A series (Kyoto, Japan) consisting of a pump (LC-20AT), degassing unit (DGU-20A3R), column oven (CTO-20A), auto sampler (SIL-20A), and PDA detector (SPD-M20A). The acquisition and processing of chromatographic data was performed using the LabSolution software (Version 5.53, SP3, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). The column used for the separation of kuwanon G and morusin was the Phenomenex Gemini C18 analytical column (250 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 μm, Torrance, CA, USA), which was maintained at 45 °C. The mobile phase for the efficient separation of analytes was composed of 0.1% (v/v) aqueous formic acid (A) and acetonitrile (B), and flowed from the initial 20% B to 90% B for 50 min. The flow rate was kept constant at 1.0 mL/min, the injection volume was 10 μL, and the PDA scanned for quantification was 190–400 nm. For HPLC analysis of the two biomarker compounds in M. alba L., 500.0 mg of the ground raw M. alba L. sample material was dissolved in 20 mL of 70% methanol and extracted for 60 min at 25°C using a Branson ultra-sonicator, 8510E-DTH (Danbury, CT, USA). Then, the extracted solution was filtered through a 0.2 μm membrane filter (Pall Life Sciences, MI, USA), before injection into the HPLC equipment.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Characterization of Magnetically-Functionalized Activated Carbon

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The TEM and SEM images of the MGAC were examined on an transmission electron microscope (JEM-2100, JEOL, Japan) with a high voltage of 200 kV and an scanning electron microscopy (JSM-6360LV, JEOL, Japan) with 5.0 kV, respectively. The specific surface area was calculated by the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) method and the pore volume and pore size distribution were estimated based on Barrett–Joyner–Halenda (BJH) model. The X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) spectrum of this adsorbent was obtained by an XPS instrument (ESCALAB 250Xi, Thermo Scientific, USA) with the Al-KR as the excitation source. The zeta potentials of the MGAC were determined by a zeta potential instrument (Nano ZS, Malvern, UK) following the method of Wang et al.25 (link) Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectra of the MGAC before and after adsorption were recorded from samples in the wavenumber range of 4000–400 cm−1 in KBr pellets on a FTIR spectrometer (NICOLET 6700, Thermofisher, USA). The concentrations of TBBPA in solutions were determined by a high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) (LC-20AT, Shimadzu, Japan) equipped with an UV detector and a C18 reverse-phase column (Inertsil ODS) (250 mm × 4.6 mm i.d., particle size 5 μm) using methanol/water (80 : 20 (v/v)) mobile phase. The pH values of solutions were measured with a pH meter (HQ30d, HACH, USA) after calibration.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!