The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

46 protocols using sc7620 mini sputter coater

1

Atomic Force Microscopy and Scanning Electron Microscopy Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All AFM images were acquired using ScanAsyst Fluid
+ probes (Bruker)
in peak force tapping mode with a nominal spring constant of 0.4 N·m–1. Each probe was calibrated using the thermal tuning
module before use. The images were obtained in an air atmosphere.
For the SEM analysis, a low electron beam energy of 3 kV and a current
of 30 pA were employed. Before the examination, each sample was coated
with a thin film (1–3 nm) of Au–Pd alloy to prevent
electrical charging of the sample surface. The alloy layers were deposited
using a Polaron SC7620 Mini Sputter Coater.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Scanning Electron Microscopy of Egg Cases

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Eggs found immediately after activation in water were fixed in a 4% formalin solution. The fixed samples were dehydrated in an increasing series of alcohols and then in acetone. The eggs thus prepared were dried with liquid CO2 at the so-called critical point, after which the samples were mounted on saucers and sputtered with a thin layer of gold and palladium alloy (Polaron SC7620 Mini Sputter Coater, Laughton, UK). The slides were then observed using a scanning microscope (SU8000, Hitachi, Japan), and images of the egg cases were stored in a computer’s memory for later analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Characterization of 3D Printed Porous Scaffolds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy was performed in an attenuated total reflectance mode (ATR-FTIR) on a NICOLET NEXUS model spectrometer. All spectra were recorded in a spectral range of 4000–650 cm−1 with an accumulation of 32 scans at a resolution of 4 cm−1.
The morphology of CNC, extruded PLA and composite filaments as well as 3D printed scaffolds were observed using HITACHI S4800 scanning electron microscopy. The samples were sputter-coated for 30 s with platinum using a Polaron SC7620 Mini Sputter Coater for SEM analysis. Image J software was employed to calculate the mean filament diameter by taking average at 20 points and the pore size by taking average of 8 pores, which is denoted as mean ± standard deviation. Topography of the scaffolds’ surfaces was analyzed using 3D optical microscopy (Keyence) and a confocal chromatic roughness tester (STIL SA) equipped with a CHR1000 sensor.
The porosity of the scaffold was obtained by a liquid displacement method as reported in the literature64 (link). Briefly, the scaffolds were immersed in tubes containing a specific amount of ethanol (W1) for 30 min. Then, the total weight of immersed scaffolds and ethanol was noted as W2. After removing the scaffolds, the residual ethanol in the tubes was noted as W3. The porosity of the scaffolds was measured according to the following equation: Porosity%=100W1-W3W2-W3
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Scanning Electron Microscopy of Hydrogel Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The
morphology of the gel samples was analyzed with a Zeiss Merlin
field emission scanning electron microscope. Before the examination,
one sample of the electrode modified with the thin hydrogel layer
was lyophilized, and a second sample was dried in air. Samples before
the analysis were coated with a thin, approximately 3 nm layer of
Au–Pd alloy using a Polaron SC7620 mini-sputter coater.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Scaffold Characterization through SEM and Profilometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The size, morphology, and microstructure of the scaffolds were analyzed using a HITACHI S4800 scanning electron microscopy (SEM) system. For this, scaffolds were coated with platinum using a Polaron SC7620 Mini Sputter Coater. The Image J software was used to calculate the diameter of the struts and of the obtained pores. A stylus profilometer STIL equipped with a CHR1000 captor was used to characterize the 3D topography of 10mm cylinder surface areas of 3D printed PLA and PLA/EBN scaffolds.
Determinations were made on two different locations of 2*2 mm for each scaffold with 5 µm step. The SurfaceMap software was used for data post-treatment. The chosen area roughness parameter was Sa (i.e., the surface arithmetical mean height).
A B-CAM-21-BW (CCCIR) monochrome camera and a Led R60 lamp (Conrad) were used to measure the contact angles of ultrapure water on 3D printed PLA and PLA/EBN scaffolds by the sessile drop method 48 . Equilibrium contact angles (considered at 60 seconds) were measured for 5 μL droplet volumes in three different locations for each condition. One Touch Grabber and Image J were used to calculate the obtained contact angles.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Scanning Electron Microscopy of PLGA Scaffolds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The PLGA microspheres, CPC and CPC/PLGA scaffold morphology, and microstructure were analyzed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (HITACHI S4800 system). Voltage was fixed at 2 KeV. For SEM observation, scaffolds were coated with platinum using a Polaron SC7620 Mini Sputter Coater. Three pictures were taken per samples and 2 samples were analyzed per condition.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Electron Microscopy Sample Preparation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples were fixed in 2% formaldehyde, 2.5% glutaraldehyde (Sigma Aldrich, G5882) in 0.1 M cacodylate (Sigma Aldrich, C0250) for 24 h. Samples were rinsed with 0.1 M cacodylate, dehydrated in a graded ethanol series, and dried in hexamethyldisilazane (Sigma Aldrich, 440191). Samples were sputter-coated with a thin gold layer (SC7620 Mini Sputter Coater, Quorum Technologies) prior to observation on a scanning electron microscope (JSM-IT200, JEOL).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Surface Topography Analysis of Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The surfaces of the samples were sputter-coated with gold to a layer of thickness approximately 60 Å in a vacuum evaporator coater (SC7620 Mini Sputter Coater, Quorum Technologies Ltd., West Sussex, United Kingdom). The upper surface topography of the 2-mm-thick samples was examined under a scanning electron microscope (SEM; JSM-6390LV, JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) at 500× and 1000× magnifications and 20 kV of accelerating voltage.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Antimicrobial Effects of Propolis and Chitosan

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
E. faecalis biofilm was grown on glass coverslips placed in 6-well plate and treated with 100 μg/mL of propolis Eth extract, EA extract or chitosan-propolis nanoparticles for 24 hours. The biofilm on the coverslips was fixed with 2.5% (v/v) glutaraldehyde and the samples were serially dehydrated, air-dried, sputter coated with gold (SC7620 Mini Sputter Coater, Quorum Technologies, UK) and viewed with a scanning electron microscope (TM3000 Tabletop Scanning Electron Microscope, Hitachi, Japan). Data are representative of at least three independent experiments.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

SEM Analysis of Nanofiber Diameters

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SEM micrographs of the prepared formulations coated with a sputtered gold/palladium layer (SC7620 Mini Sputter Coater, Quorum Technologies, Lewes, UK) were obtained on Nova NanoSEM 450 scanning electron microscope set to 5 kV. Mean values for fibre diameter and related distribution were estimated from SEM images, facilitated by measuring the diameters of fifty randomly selected nanofibers with the aid of image analysis software (ImageJ 1.46r; 2012).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!