The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Software

Manufactured by Arlequin
Sourced in Switzerland

ARLEQUIN software is a data analysis tool designed to perform population genetic analyses. It provides a suite of statistical methods for the investigation of genetic diversity within and between populations.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Lab products found in correlation

15 protocols using software

1

Genetic Diversity and Bottleneck Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genetic diversity was measured by number of alleles (NA), expected heterozygosity (HE), and observed heterozygosity (HO) using CERVUS software (Ver. 3.0)48 (link). Allelic richness (AR was analyzed using FSTAT software (Ver. 2.9.3)49 to correct for population-level differences. Analyses of population inbreeding coefficient (FIS and Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE deviations were performed using GENEPOP software (Ver. 4.2)50 (link) and ARLEQUIN software (Ver. 3.5)51 (link).
Two methods were used to estimate bottlenecks. The first method used BOTTLENECK software (Ver. 1.2.02)52 (link), a program for estimating bottlenecks via heterozygous excess testing using the infinite allele model53 (link), two-phase model, and stepwise mutation model54 (link). Each model was run for 10,000 iterations, and significance was determined using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test55 (link). The second method used the M-ratio56 (link), which estimates bottlenecks by using the mean ratio of the range of allele numbers and allele sizes,this analysis was performed using ARLEQUIN (Ver. 3.5)51 (link). To determine the size of the effective population, LDNE software57 (link) was used for linkage disequilibrium estimation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Genetic Differentiation Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Pairwise FST was computed with 1,000 permutations using ARLEQUIN software, version 3.5 (Excoffier & Lischer, 2010). A phylogenetic tree was then generated from a matrix of pairwise FST estimates using Splits Tree software, version 4.13.1 (Huson & Bryant, 2006).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Genetic Structure of P. knowlesi in Malaysia

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To define genetic structure of the P. knowlesi parasite population in Malaysia based on the msp1p, STRUCTURE software (version 2.3.4) was used that deploys the Bayesian model based clustering approach. The most probable number of populations (K) was determined using an admixture model. Since the 19 kDa domain is largely conserved in all Plasmodium species, the 42 kDa domain (19 and 33 kDa) was used for population structure analysis. All sample data were run for values K = 1–6, each with a total of 15 iterations, 100,000 Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) generations for each run after a burn-in of 50,000 steps. The most likely number K in the data was estimated by calculating ΔK values and identifying the K value that maximizes the log probability of data, lnP(D). The most probable K value was then calculated according to Evanno’s method by using the webpage interface STRUCTURE Harvester. The ARLEQUIN software (version 3.5.1.3, University of Berne, Berne, Switzerland) was used to compute pairwise differences (FST) between populations (i.e., Sarikei, Betong, Kapit and Peninsular Malaysia) with 10,100 permutations. FST is a comparison of the sum of genetic variability within and between populations on the basis of the differences in allelic frequencies. FST values are interpreted as no (0), low (> 0–0.05), moderate (0.05–0.15), and high (0.15–0.25) genetic differentiation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Statistical Analysis of Genetic Variants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analysis was carried out using the computer packages EXCEL and SPSS® for WINDOWS softwares (version 16.0; SPSS® Inc, Chicago IL). Independent t-tests were used to analyse differences between the means of continuous variables. Discrete variables, genotype distribution and Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) were tested using χ2 test with Yates’s correction. Odds Ratios (OR’s) 95% confidence intervals (CI) and associated chi-squares were calculated for genotypes and alleles. Haplotype analysis was performed using Arlequin® software (version 3.11) (Excoffier, Laval, & Schneider, 2005 ). Two-tailed p values of <0.05 were considered to be statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Statistical Analysis of Research Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All data obtained were analyzed with an IBM PC computer by using the SPSS for
Windows statistical program, version 17.0 of 2008. The following tests were
used: Tukey, chi-square (χ2), analysis of variance (F) and
Pearson correlation. The statistical significance level adopted was 5%.
Categorical variables were presented as absolute values and their respective
percentages. Continuous variables were presented as mean ± standard
deviation. To assess the distribution of the variables studied, skewness
analysis was used. Gene and haplotype frequencies were tested for Hardy-Weinberg
equilibrium, using ARLEQUIN software, version 2000.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Genetic Differentiation Analysis of Malaysian Populations

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Even though Peninsular Malaysia and Malaysian Borneo were separated by the South China Sea, samples originating from these areas were considered as one for population differentiation analysis. The ARLEQUIN software (version 3.5.1.3) [44 (link)] was used to compute pairwise differences (FST) between populations, i.e., Thailand (n = 23), Malaysian Borneo (n = 42) and Peninsular Malaysia (n = 11) with 10,100 permutations. FST is a comparison of the sum of genetic variability within and between populations based on the allelic frequency differences. FST values are interpreted as no (0), low (> 0–0.05), moderate (0.05–0.15), and high (0.15–0.25) genetic differentiation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Genetic Diversity Analysis in Population Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Allele frequencies were obtained by direct counting and compared by 2X2
contingency tables using the chi-square test and Fisher's exact test. Only P
values ​​< 0.05 were significant. Significant P values ​​were corrected by
the number of specificities tested at each locus (Pc; Bonferroni correction).
Statistical analyses were carried out using the SISA statistics software
(http://www.quantitativeskills.com/sisa/). The Hardy-Weinberg
equilibrium was calculated through the Arlequin software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Genetic Diversity and Bottleneck Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MICROCHECKER software (ver. 2.2.3) [29 (link)] was used to examine the presence or absence of scoring errors at the microsatellite loci. Genetic diversity was measured as the number of alleles (NA), expected heterozygosity (HE), and observed heterozygosity (HO) using CERVUS software (ver. 3.0) [30 (link)]. Population inbreeding coefficient (FIS) and Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) variance analyses were performed using GENEPOP (ver. 4.2) [31 (link)] and ARLEQUIN software (ver. 3.5) [32 (link)]. Two methods were used to estimate the bottlenecks. These methods used BOTTLENECK software (ver. 1.2.02) [33 (link)], a program to estimate bottlenecks through excess heterozygosity testing, and an infinite allele model (IAM) [34 (link)]. A two-phase model (TPM) and stepwise mutation model (SMM) [35 (link)] were used for the estimation, and the TPM was performed with 10% variance and 90% SMM. In addition, each model had 10,000 iterations, and the significance was verified using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test [36 (link)]. Contemporary effective population size (Ne) was estimated for each population using NeEstimator ver. 2.1 software [37 (link)] with the Linkage Disequilibrium (LDNe) method under a random mating model [37 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Genetic Structure Analysis of Populations

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
ARLEQUIN software (ver. 3.05) [34 (link)] was used to analyze the differences in genetics between groups, as well as AMOVA. STRUCTURE software (ver. 2.3) [40 (link)] was used to perform genetic structure clustering analysis based on the Bayesian method model. To estimate the most suitable population, we set K to 1–10, and a suitable admixture model was applied to the mixture of water systems. The burn-in period was repeated 10 times with 10,000 iterations, and Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation was used with 100,000 iterations. To estimate a population-appropriate constant, we analyzed a study by the cluster results corresponding to K using STRUCTURE SELECTOR [41 (link)]. A discriminant analysis of principal components (DAPC) of the microsatellite dataset was performed on the population using the R package ADEGENET (ver. 2.1.3) [42 (link)], a non-model-based genetic clustering method.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Genetic Diversity Analysis of Pvs230 in Malaria Parasites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The degree of genetic differentiation in Pvs230 among global isolates was estimated by calculating Wright’s fixation index (FST) using Arlequin software, version 3.5.2.2 [33 (link)]. Interpretation of FST values is defined as described previously [34 (link)], with no differentiation (0), low genetic differentiation (≤ 0.15), moderate genetic differentiation (0.15–0.25), and high differentiation (≥ 0.25). A P-value < 0.05 was considered significant difference. To investigate the genetic relatedness among the Pvs230 haplotypes, a haplotype network was constructed using the median-joining (MJ) method implemented in the PopART v1.7 software with a haplotype frequency > 1 [35 (link)]. A phylogenetic tree of Pvs230 sequences (nt 52–2862) from the global isolates [36 (link)] was constructed by the NJ method [37 (link)] with a bootstrap of 1000 replicates using MEGA 7.0 software [22 (link)]. Final trees were drawn and edited using iTOL version 6 (https://itol.embl.de/).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!