The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Version 20

Manufactured by IBM
Sourced in United States

Version 20.0 of the IBM lab equipment product is a comprehensive, versatile, and high-performance system designed for a wide range of laboratory applications. The core function of this product is to facilitate the accurate and efficient collection, analysis, and processing of data from various experimental and research activities. The product specifications and technical details are available upon request.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Lab products found in correlation

23 protocols using version 20

1

Comparative Analysis of Experimental Methods

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All data obtained from analyses were presented in tables as the mean standard deviation. The mean standard deviation was presented for all data acquired from analyses. A statistics software (SPSS, IBM version 20, Armonk, NY, USA) was used for the statistical analysis. To assess the significant differences (p < 0.05), one-way ANOVA was employed, and Tukey’s post hoc test was utilized for comparisons of the means.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Malaria Mortality Rates in Mozambique

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The malaria crude mortality rate was calculated per malaria year by age-specific, gender and residential area (Bairro). Malaria crude mortality rate (MCMR) was calculated dividing the number of deaths-per year of residents by the total population for the same geographic area and multiplied by 100,000: MCMR=Number of deaths-per yearTotal population for the same geographic×100,000
Age-specific malaria mortality rate was calculated dividing the number of deaths-per age per year of residents by the total age population and multiplied by 100,000 [14 (link)]. The ages (categories) used were: 0 (infants), 1–4 (Children), 5–14 (adolescents), 15–44 (young adults), 45–59 adults and over sixty (elderly).
Chi square for a proportion of gender and age-specific category was performed and Phi, Cramer’s V test was used for statistical significance. Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was used to test difference between years and months using the following model: Yij=μ+ti+eij
Intervention analysis with the specification zt=δ01-wBPt , where w<1 , B stands for the traditional time series backshift operator, Bzt=zt-1 , and Pt denotes a pulse function such that Pt=0,t<t0or,t>t0 and Pt=1,t=t0 , where t0 is the moment of intervention [15 (link)] was used.
All tests were performed using R 3.3.2, SPSS, IBM version 20 and Biosat 5.0. Spatial maps for year variation were produced using ArcGIS version 10.1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Infestation Risk Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analysis was performed with IBM version 20; (SPS Inc., Chicago IL). Descriptive statistics intensity of infestation were expressed as means and standard deviations while the student's t-test and Chi square analysis were used for risk analysis of infestation. Proportional test was performed by R console version 3.0.1. The level of significance was set at p value < 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Analyzing Cellular Responses to Coal Chemistry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Differences in cellular responses were analysed using one‐way repeated measures ANOVA with a Tukey honestly significant difference post hoc test using SigmaPlot (v. 13; Systat Software, San Jose, CA). Data were log2‑transformed to satisfy the assumptions of homoscedasticity and normal distribution of the error terms as appropriate. Due to the collinearity between the cellular responses, principal component analysis (PCA) was conducted to characterize the overall cellular response (version 20.0; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated, and stepwise multiple regression analysis was used to evaluate the association between coal chemistry and the cellular response. Significant associations identified from stepwise multiple regression analysis were further assessed by linear regression with adjustment for particle size as a co‐variate. Data are presented as mean (SD). Differences were considered statistically significant if p <0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Groups

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical product and service solutions, version 20.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used in analysis. Statistical analysis was performed by using the one-way ANOVA. The
post hoc Tamhanes test was applied for comparisons between the groups (intergroup analysis) and within the groups (intragroup analysis). The level of significance (P) was kept at 5%.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All the data was analyzed using the SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences) version 20.0 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The data was expressed as Mean ± SEM. The significance among different groups was determined by using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test. P value of P < .05, ∗∗P < .01, and ∗∗∗P < .001 were considered to be statistically significant, when compared with the control group.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

One-way ANOVA Statistical Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were subjected to ANOVA (one-way procedure) using a general linear model (GLM), and mean comparisons were done using the Student Newman Keuls test to compare significant differences among means for all analyses (Version 20.0, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The differences among means were considered significant at p ≤ 0.05.
The statistical model was as follows:
Model:
Xij=u+ Ti +eij 
where
Xij = Any observationu = Overall meanTi = Treatments (i = 1, 2…and 4)
eij = Experimental errorThe number of samples used in the statistical analyses was six per treatment as two samples per replicate considering the sample as the experimental unit. This was done to improve the precision of analyses of variance. Before analyses of variance, all percentage data were transformed to their analogous arcsine.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Statistical Analysis of Animal Experiments

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical calculations of animal experimentations were executed through one-way ANOVA using SPSS, version-20.0 for windows following Dunnet's post hoc t-test, and Pearson correlation (r = correlation coefficient, p = significance value). Data were presented as the average value ± standard error of the mean (Mean ± SEM). The results incurred from study groups then compared with the control group and p < 0.05, p < 0.01, and p < 0.001 were statistically significant, highly significance plus very majorly significant individually.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Diabetes Knowledge and Healthcare Utilization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All questionnaires were checked manually after the interviews for missing data and inconsistencies which were cross cheeked with repeating the question. Internal consistency was checked among the interviewer. Data were entered into Microsoft Excel sheet and after cleaning, transferred into the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software program version 20.0 (Armonk, New York, USA) for analysis. Data were verified through internal consistency checking and comparing with other findings. Assuming, the number of doctor visit for utilization of diabetic services is 50%, at 95% confidence interval actual estimated sample size of this study was 384. Continuous data were presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) or median (inter quartile range) and categorical data were presented as number and percentage. Categorical data were analyzed by Pearson’s chi square test, as appropriate. Univariate and multivariate models were performed to access factors associated with diabetes knowledge and healthcare service utilization for diabetes. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

HCP Step Scores and Demographic Factors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All the data were analyzed using SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Sciences) Version 20.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The level of significance was set at α-level of P < 0.05.
Descriptive statistics of mean and standard deviation, frequency, and percentages was used to summarize parametric data from study outcome variables. Independent t-test was used to examine gender differences in step scores while one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to determine the difference among the step scores of the various professional cadres. Pearson moment correlation coefficient test was used to determine any relationships between HCPs step scores, age, BMI, and BF%.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!