The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Ultimate 3000 autosampler

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States, Canada

The UltiMate 3000 autosampler is a liquid handling device designed for automated sample introduction in analytical instrumentation, such as high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography (UHPLC) systems. It handles a variety of sample types and volumes, and can be programmed to perform sample preparation tasks.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

21 protocols using ultimate 3000 autosampler

1

Phosphopeptide HILIC Fractionation and MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Phosphopeptides eluted from IMAC were subjected to an offline HILIC fractionation method as previously described (Albuquerque et al. 2008 (link)). Fractionated samples were run on an LTQ Orbitrap XL using a 1100 Quad PUMP HPLC system (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA) with Ultimate 3000 autosampler (Dionex, Sunnyvale, CA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

SEC Analysis of Lignin and DHP Molar Mass

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
10 mg of samples was weighed and tetrahydrofuran (THF) containing 5% of toluene (internal standard) was added in order to reach a concentration of 5 mg/mL. After 5 min of shaking, samples were filtered on 0.45 µm GHP microfilters (PALL) prior to analysis by size-exclusion chromatography (SEC). SEC analyses were performed using THF stabilized with BHT as the eluent at 1 mL/min (Ultimate 3000 Pump, Dionex). 10 μL was injected (Ultimate 3000 Autosampler, Dionex) on either a PLgel Mixed C column (5 μm, 7.5 mm × 600 mm, Agilent) in the case of DHPs, or a PLgel Mixed E column (3 μm, 7.5 mm × 600 mm, Agilent) in the case of lignins, and the signal was observed at 280 nm (Ultimate 3000 UV/vis detector, Dionex). The molar mass distributions were determined using a calibration curve based on 10 polystyrene standards ranging from 580 to 364,000 g/mol (Agilent) for the Mixed C column (Supplementary Figure S1) or from 162 to 22,290 g/mol (Agilent) for the Mixed E column (Supplementary Figure S2).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

HPLC Analysis of Tryptophan Metabolites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tryptophan (TRP), L-kynurenine sulfate (KYN), and kynurenic acid (KYNA) were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich, Co. (St. Louis, MO, USA) and used as a standard. HPLC-grade chemicals were purchased from J.T. Baker Chemicals (Aventor Performance Materials Poland S.A., Gliwice, Poland) or Sigma-Aldrich. TRP, KYN, and KYNA were analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), according to the protocol of Zhao et al. (2010) [56 (link)], with minor modifications. Briefly, each serum sample was added 6% HClO4 and centrifuged at 12,000× g for 30 min at 4 °C. The resulting supernatant was applied to an HPLC system consisting of the Dionex P680 Pump, UltiMate 3000 Autosampler with column compartment, RS Variable Wavelength UltiMate 3000 Detector, and RF 2000 Fluorescence Detector (Dionex, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). An Agilent HC-C18 column (250 × 4.6 mm i.d.; 5-µm particle size) was used. The mobile phase was composed of 20 mM sodium acetate, 5 mM zinc acetate, and 4% acetonitrile; the flow rate was 1.0 mL/min. Detectors were set at wavelengths 250 nm for TRP, 365 nm for KYN, and at excitation wavelength of 348 nm and emission at 398 nm for KYNA determination. Control of the HPLC system and data analysis were performed with the Chromeleon software (DionexTM ChormeleonTM version 7.2.6 (10049), serial number 117836).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Spectroscopic Characterization of Natural Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Optical rotations were measured on a JASCO P1020 digital polarimeter, and UV data were obtained with a JASCO V-550 UV/vis spectrometer. The CD spectra were recorded in MeOH using a JASCO J-810 spectrophotometer at room temperature. IR data were recorded using JASCO FT/IR-480 Plus spectrometer. HRESIMS spectra were obtained on Waters Synapt G2 TOF mass spectrometer. The NMR data were acquired with a Bruker AV 400 NMR spectrometer using solvent signals (CD3OD: δH 3.30/δC 49.0) as standards. Column chromatography (CC) was carried out on Sephadex LH-20 (Pharmacia, USA), and ODS (60–80 μm, YMC). TLC was performed on precoated silica gel plate (SGF254, 0.2 mm, Yantai Chemical Industry Research Institute, China). Analytical HPLC was performed on a Dionex HPLC system equipped with an Ultimate 3000 pump, an Ultimate 3000 diode array detector, an Ultimate 3000 column compartment, an Ultimate 3000 autosampler (Dionex, USA), and an Alltech (Grace) 2000ES evaporative light scattering detector (Alltech USA) using a Phenomenex Gemini C18 column (4.6 × 250 mm, 5 μm). Preparative HPLC was carried out on Shimadzu LC-6AD system equipped with UV detectors, using a Phenomenex Gemini C18 column (21.2 × 250 mm, 5 μm). Semi-preparative HPLC was carried out on Shimadzu LC-6AD system equipped with UV detectors, using a YMC-Pack ODS-A column (10.0 × 250 mm, 5 μm).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

DEHP Analysis by ESI-MS/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DEHP was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Formamide was purchased by Promega (Madison, WI, USA). ReproSil-Pur C4 size 5 μm stationary phase was supplied by Dr. Maisch GmbH (Ammerbuch-Entringen, Germany). Chromatography columns were obtained from Polymicro Technologies (Phoenix, AZ, USA) and PicoFrit Emitter were obtained from New Objective (Woburn, MA, USA). The Sorvall ST 16R Centrifuge was supplied by Thermo Scientific (Waltham, MA, USA). The UltiMate 3000 autosampler was purchased from Dionex (Ottawa, ON, Canada) and the AB Sciex QTRAP 4000 ESI-MS/MS Hybrid Triple Quadrupole/Linear Ion Trap was purchased from AB Sciex (Framingham, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

HPLC-based iTRAQ Peptide Fractionation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples were separated using a Dionex HPLC system equipped with a P680 HPLC pump, UltiMate 3000 autosampler, Thermostatted Column Compartment-100, and Photodiode Array Detector-100 (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA). The iTRAQ-labeled peptide mixtures were reconstituted with 4 mL of buffer A (10 mmol KH2PO4, 25% acetonitrile, pH = 3.0) and loaded onto a column containing 5 μmol particles. The peptides were eluted at a flow rate of 1 mL/min with a gradient of buffer A for 10 min, 5–60% buffer B (10 mmol KH2PO4, 1 mol/L KCl, 25% acetonitrile, pH = 3.0) for 27 min, and 60–100% buffer B for 1 min. The system was maintained at 100% buffer B for 1 min before equilibrating with buffer A for 10 min prior to the next injection. Elution was monitored by measuring the absorbance at 214 nm, and fractions were collected every 1 min. The eluted peptides were pooled into 20 fractions, desalted with a column and vacuum dried.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Characterization of Phytochemical Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
High-performance liquid chromatography was used for peak separation in order to characterize potential components from the elution profile detectable at 550 nm. The system consisted of an UltiMate 3000 Autosampler, an UltiMate 3000 pump module, an UltiMate 3000 column compartment and an UltiMate 3000 Diode Array Detector (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. Waltham, MA, USA). As the stationary phase, a Kinetex column (2.6 μm C18, 100 Å, 150 × 2.1 mm Phenomenex, Aschaffenburg, Germany) was used. Solvent A (water + 0.1% (v/v) formic acid) and Solvent B (acetonitrile + 0.1% (v/v) formic acid) were mixed in gradient mode (0–0.5 min 80% A + 20% B; 1–10 min linear gradient to 100% B; 10.5–13 min 100% B; 13.5–15 min 80% A + 20% B). The flow rate was 0.5 mL min−1, the injection volume was 50 μL and the detection wavelength was 550 nm. Data evaluation was performed using Chromeleon 6.80 Software from Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Reversed-phase HPLC Analysis of Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Reversed-phase
high-performance
liquid chromatography analysis was carried out with a setting as follows:
UltiMate 3000 RS UHPLC pump, UltiMate 3000 autosampler, UltiMate 3000
Variable Wavelength Detector (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Vienna, Austria)
and a radio detector (GabiStar, Raytest; Straubenhardt, Germany).
A Jupiter 4 μm Proteo 90 Å 250 × 4.6 mm (Phenomenex
Ltd. Aschaffenburg, Germany) column with a flow rate of 1 mL/min and
UV detection at 220 nm was used. Acetonitrile (ACN)/H2O/0.1%
trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) was used as mobile phase with following
multistep gradient: 0.0–1.0 min 10% ACN, 1.0–12.0 min
10–60% ACN, 12.0–13.0 min 60–80% ACN, 13.0–16.0
min 80% ACN.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Nano-LC-MS/MS Analysis of Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
1 μl of sample was injected using a Thermo Fischer Scientific Ultimate 3000 Autosampler (San Jose, CA) onto a 15 cm x 75 μm Thermo Fischer Scientific ES812 Easyspray nano column with 5 μm particle size. Separation was performed using an Thermo Fischer Scientific Ultimate nano 3000 UHPLC with a 300 nl/min flow rate (solvent A (0.1% formic acid) and solvent B (90% acetonitrile, 0.1% formic acid)) with a gradient from 3% solvent B to 35% (60 min), then 3% to 9% (15 min), holding at 90% for 5 min, and finally re-equilibrating for 20 min at 3% solvent B. Mass spectrometric analysis was performed using a ThermoFischer Scientific Q-Exactive HF using a data dependent acquisition. Precursor scans from 350–1200 m/z as performed at 120 K resolution using 50 ms maximum fill time and 3e6 AGC target. The top 15 ions were selected for MSMS analysis at 15 K resolution using normalized collision energy of 27 with a 50 ms fill time and 1E5 AGC target. Each sample was analyzed three times.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Characterization of Phytochemical Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
High-performance liquid chromatography was used for peak separation in order to characterize potential components from the elution profile detectable at 550 nm. The system consisted of an UltiMate 3000 Autosampler, an UltiMate 3000 pump module, an UltiMate 3000 column compartment and an UltiMate 3000 Diode Array Detector (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. Waltham, MA, USA). As the stationary phase, a Kinetex column (2.6 μm C18, 100 Å, 150 × 2.1 mm Phenomenex, Aschaffenburg, Germany) was used. Solvent A (water + 0.1% (v/v) formic acid) and Solvent B (acetonitrile + 0.1% (v/v) formic acid) were mixed in gradient mode (0–0.5 min 80% A + 20% B; 1–10 min linear gradient to 100% B; 10.5–13 min 100% B; 13.5–15 min 80% A + 20% B). The flow rate was 0.5 mL min−1, the injection volume was 50 μL and the detection wavelength was 550 nm. Data evaluation was performed using Chromeleon 6.80 Software from Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!