The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Ultra centrifugal filters

Manufactured by Merck Group
Sourced in United States, Germany

Ultra centrifugal filters are laboratory equipment designed to separate and concentrate macromolecules, particles, or cells from complex solutions through high-speed centrifugation. They feature a specialized membrane that allows selective separation and retention of the desired components based on size and molecular weight.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

14 protocols using ultra centrifugal filters

1

DOTA and CXCR4L Conjugation to PLGA Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the conjugation of DOTA and CXCR4L to the empty PLGA and PLGA(RGF) nanoparticles, a solution of DOTA [1 mg DOTA, 5 μL of 0.02 M HCO3 (pH 9.0), 100 μL of 0.5% PVA (w/v)] and CXCR4L [1 mg CXCR4L in 100 μL of 0.5% PVA(w/v)] was prepared and added to the previously-activated carboxylate PLGA nanoparticle solution. The mixture was incubated at 37° C for 90 min. The nanoparticle systems DOTA-PLGA, DOTA-PLGA(RGF), PLGA-CXCR4L, PLGA(RGF)-CXCR4L, DOTA-PLGA-CXCR4L, and DOTA-PLGA(RGF)-CXCR4L were purified by ultracentrifugation (Ultra Centrifugal filters, MWCO 30,000 Da; Millipore; 16,000 g) until neutral pH was achieved. Finally, each filtrate was resuspended in PVA (0.5% w/v), lyophilized, and stored for further use.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

IPMK-Dependent Endothelial Cell Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
1×106 wild type or IPMK KO MEFs were cultured for 24 hours; the cell-culture media were filtered (0.22 μm filter) and concentrated (ratio 1:10) by ultracentrifugal filters (10 kDa, Millipore). The concentrated cell-culture media were added to EGM2 medium (ratio 1:10) to suspend HUVECs (1×105 /ml). As controls concentrated fresh DMEM was added to EGM2 medium. The HUVECs suspensions were then plated onto Matrigel. Photos were taken 4 hours later43 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Radiolabeling of PLGA Nanoparticles with 177Lu

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The bifunctional chelator DOTA was the radiolabeling site for the different PLGA nanoparticles using acidic conditions for the 177Lu complexation reaction. In brief, 9.25 MBq (50 μL) of 177LuCl3 in 1 M acetate buffer (pH 5.0) was added to each PLGA nanoparticle system: DOTA-PLGA(RGF)-CXCR4L, DOTA-PLGA(RGF), DOTA-PLGA-CXCR4L, and DOTA-PLGA (1 mg/mL), and incubated for 1 h at 37° C. After radiolabeling, the nanoparticles were purified by ultracentrifugation (Ultra Centrifugal Filters, MWCO 3,000 Da; Millipore; 2,500 g). Both fractions (filtered and unfiltered) were measured in a dose calibrator (Capintec, United States) to calculate the radiolabeling yield. The radiochemical purity of PLGA nanoparticles was evaluated by size-exclusion high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and Instant Thin Layer Chromatography with Silica Gel (ITLC-SG), as further described.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Encapsulation Efficiency and Drug Loading Capacity Determination

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For EE, 22 NPs were ultra-filtrated by Milipore Ultra centrifugal filters (NMWL = 10 kDa). The filtrate was used for determination. For DLC, 22 NPs were treated with vacuum freeze-drying, and weighed. The EE (%) and DLC (%) for 22 NPs were detected via high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC, Agilent Technologies 1260 Infinity, Germany) by analyzing COP-22. For HPLC detection, methanol/H2O (90/10, v/v) was used as the mobile phase at the flow rate of 1 mL/min. The standard curves were determined using 20 μL of 20, 15, 10, and 5 μM COP-22 in methanol/H2O (1/1, v/v) solution (Figure 13). (COP-22, 3.812 min, 310.4 nm, S (mAU∗S) = 5.414 + 21.8824 C (μM)).
EE (%) and DLC (%) were calculated as follows.

EE (%) = (Total amount of the bound drug in the NPs)/(Total feed amount of the drug) × 100%

= (Total feed amount of the drug—the amount of free drug)/(Total feed amount of the drug) × 100%

DLC (%)

= (Total amount of the bound drug in the NPs)/(Total weight of the NPs) × 100%

= (Total feed amount of the drug—the amount of free drug)/(Total weight of the NPs) × 100%.

+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

His-tagged Protein Expression and Purification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
pET-28a was used as the vector for His-tagged protein expression with E. coli BL21(DE3) as the host strain. Expression of the protein was induced with 1 mM isopropyl-d-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) at 28°C for 8 h. According to the manufacturer’s instructions, His-tagged proteins were purified using nickel-nitrilotriacetic acid (Ni-NTA) columns (GE Healthcare). Ultra centrifugal filters (Millipore) were used to desalt the purified protein in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) buffer. The quality and amount of isolated proteins were evaluated by using SDS-PAGE and a Micro BCA protein assay kit (Cwbiotech), respectively. The purified protein was then kept at 80°C for storage.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Plasma Protein Binding Determination of NQ

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Plasma protein binding (PPB) of NQ (0.1 and 1.0 μg/mL) was determined in pooled plasma collected from female or male mice, rat or human, using the ultrafiltration method. Briefly, stock solution of NQ was diluted with blank plasma to achieve the test concentrations. Incubations were performed in a shaking water bath at 37 °C for 1 h to allow equilibration. Plasma samples were loaded into the Ultra centrifugal filters (Millipore, USA) with 10 kDa molecular weight cutoff, and the filtrate was centrifuged at 6000 rpm for 20 min at 37 °C. Phosphate buffered saline (PBS) was used to test non-specific binding (NSB). The NSB was calculated according to the equation: NSB=CBD-CBF/CBD, where CBD was the total drug concentration in PBS before centrifugation and CBF was the drug concentration in the PBS filtrate after centrifugation. The PPB was calculated based on the equation: PPB%=100×1-CSF/1-NSB×CSD, where CSF was the NQ concentration in the plasma ultrafiltrate and CSD was the nominal plasma concentration. All drug concentrations were determined by LC–MS/MS.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Lipid Nanoparticle Formulation for mRNA Encapsulation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Purified capped mRNAs were first diluted with sodium acetate buffer at desired concentration. The lipid molecules were dissolved in ethanol and mixed well. Lipids (MC3: DSPC: Cholesterol: DMG-PEG2000) were combined in the molar ratio of 50:10:38.5:1.5 [15] (link), [16] (link), [17] , [18] . Then, sodium acetate buffer containing mRNA and lipid samples were mixed at a ratio of 3:1 and passed through the liposome extruder (Genizer, USA) to encapsulate the mRNA. The size distribution was checked after encapsulation of mRNA into nanoparticles. Then the formulations were dialyzed against 50 mM HEPES/sodium acetate buffer and phosphate-buffered saline for 18 h. The size distribution was again checked after dialysis by Zetasizer Nano ZSP (Malvern, USA). LNP samples were analyzed for size distribution in PBS. The formulation was concentrated using Ultra centrifugal filters (Merck, Germany), passed through 0.22 µm filter, and stored at 5 ± 3 °C [19] (link). The formulation was confirmed by quality control for the particle size, encapsulation efficiency, endotoxin limit and sterility.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Enzymatic Loading of Peptidyl-CoA onto PCP

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Loading of the PCP containing proteins (PCP or PCP-X) with peptidyl-CoA substrates (T7P(d/l-Hpg7)-CoA, T7P(d-Hpg7)-CoA, T7P(l-Hpg7)-CoA) was catalysed by an engineered phosphopantetheinyl transferase from B. subtilis (Sfp R4-4)36 (link). PCP proteins (60 μM) were incubated with a 3-fold molar excess of peptidyl-CoA and 6 μM Sfp in PCP-loading buffer (50 mM Hepes pH 7.0, 50 mM NaCl, 10 mM MgCl2) for 1 h at 30 °C. Following the loading reaction, the excess of free peptidyl-CoA was removed from the loading reaction by a concentration dilution (4 × 1:5 dilution) procedure using 50 mM Hepes pH 7.0, 50 mM NaCl low salt buffer (0.5 mL Ultracentrifugal filters, 10,000 MWCO, Merck Millipore). The generated peptidyl-PCP constructs were used immediately after the PCP-loading reaction as substrates for the P450 activity assays.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Purification of Recombinant Cathepsin D

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Purified from the E. coli-based expression system, recombinant cathD is prone to aggregate into insoluble inclusion bodies. Therefore, we applied a mammalian expression system to produce recombinant proteins from transient or stably transfected HEK293T cells. Cells were collected and disrupted in 5 mM imdazole, 500 mM NaCl, and 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.9) by sonication. His-tagged cofilin, cathD and its mutated proteins were subsequently purified under native conditions by standard affinity chromatography procedures using a purification resin (Roche Applied Science). Eluted proteins were desalted and concentrated twice by sequential centrifugation using 100-kDa and 50-kDa ultra centrifugal filters (Merck). The molecular weights of purified proteins were checked by silver staining following SDS-PAGE separation for quality control. The protein stability and the secondary structure of mutated cathD proteins were evaluated by a circular dichroism spectroscopy. Purified cathD was mainly in the 48-kDa immature form and stored at −80 °C in 150 mM NaCl, pH 7.4, 0.05% sodium azide and 25% glycerol.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Recombinant Protein Production Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All the chemicals were purchased from commercial sources and were either analytical grade or molecular grade. The growth media components were obtained from BD Difco (Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) and Himedia (Mumbai, India). The amino acids, glutathione (GSH) (reduced), β‐nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate sodium salt hydrate (NADP), glucose 6‐phosphate (G6P), mevalonolactone and 6‐phosphogluconic dehydrogenase from yeast were obtained from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). Zymolase‐20T was obtained from MP biomedicals (USA). Ultra centrifugal filters were obtained from Merck (Burlington, MA, USA). Oligonucleotides were obtained from Integrated DNA Technologies (IDT) and Merck (Bangalore, India). Vent DNA polymerase and restriction enzymes were obtained from New England Biolabs (Ipswich, MA, USA). Plasmid miniprep and gel/PCR clean‐up kits were purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA, USA). The NADPH kit was obtained from Promega (Madison, WI, USA), nickel‐nitrilotriacetic acid agarose (Ni‐NTA), and polypropylene columns were obtained from Qiagen (Hilden, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!