The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

4x44k oligonucleotide microarrays

Manufactured by Agilent Technologies

The 4x44K oligonucleotide microarrays are a product offered by Agilent Technologies. These microarrays contain 44,000 oligonucleotide probes designed for gene expression analysis. The core function of these microarrays is to provide a platform for the simultaneous measurement of the expression levels of thousands of genes in a biological sample.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

4 protocols using 4x44k oligonucleotide microarrays

1

Comparative Genomic Hybridization Microarray

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
4x44K oligonucleotide microarrays (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA) were used for direct array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) as described previously to compare indicated cell lines to normal human reference DNA as published.18 Labeling and hybridization of genomic DNA was performed according to the manufacturer's recommendations.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Microarray and RNA-seq for Expression Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For microarray analysis, the gene expression profiles were generated using customized 4 x 44 k oligonucleotide microarrays (Agilent Technologies). Sample preparation, labeling, and hybridization were performed according to the manufacturer's protocol. The microarray expression profiles were generated using Agilent's Feature Extraction software (Version 9.5.1). For RNA sequencing, the Dynabeads® mRNA Purification Kit (Invitrogen) was used to purify mRNA from total RNA, and ERCC RNA spike-in was added according to the user guide. Then, library construction was performed according to the non-stranded TruSeqs™ protocol, and clusters were generated according to the TruSeq PE cluster Kit v3 reagent preparation guide (for cBot-HiSeq/HiScanSQ). The high-throughput shotgun sequencing was performed on the Illumina HiSeq 2000 platform. Paired-end reads with lengths of 90 and 100 nucleotides were generated for 12 samples and 486 samples, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Tumor Profiling via Microarray and RNA-Seq

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tumor material preparation was performed as described previously [16 (link)]. For microarray analysis, gene expression profiles were generated using customized 4x44k oligonucleotide microarrays (Agilent Technologies). Sample preparation, labeling, and hybridization were performed according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Microarray expression profiles were generated using Agilent’s Feature Extraction software (Version 9.5.1) [35 (link)]. For RNA sequencing, Dynabeads® mRNA Purification Kit (Invitrogen) was used to purify mRNA from total RNA, and ERCC RNA spike-in was added according to the user guide. Library construction was performed according to the non-stranded TruSeqs™ protocol. Clusters were generated according to the TruSeq PE cluster Kit v3 reagent preparation guide (for cBot-HiSeq/HiScanSQ). High-throughput shotgun sequencing was performed on the Illumina HiSeq 2000 platform. Paired-end reads with lengths of 90 and 100 nucleotides were generated for 12 samples and 486 samples, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Neuroblastoma Gene Expression Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Gene expression profiles of all 695 neuroblastoma samples had been generated previously using customized 4x44K oligonucleotide microarrays (Agilent Technologies) [23] (link). Gene expression–based classifiers had been developed on a cohort of 75 tumors (discovery set) from patients with maximally divergent clinical courses as described elsewhere [23] (link) (see Supplementary Material). Expression data and basic clinical information are available through ArrayExpress (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/arrayexpress; accession: E-MTAB-1781). As the classifiers led to discrepant results for a number of patients in the training set (Figure 2A), we considered all four predictors for risk score building.

(A) Venn diagram of concordant and discordant classification results of the four different gene expression classifiers (NB-th10, -th24, -th26, and -th44) within the training set. The numbers of tumors classified as favorable or unfavorable are highlighted in green and red, respectively. (B) Schematic representation of the NB-Risk Score that considers classification results and hazard ratios of the two gene expression–based classifiers, NB-th24 and NB-th44. Favorable classification, 0; unfavorable classification, 1; LR, low risk; IR, intermediate risk; HR, high risk.

Figure 2
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!