The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

91 protocols using cxcr4

1

Immunofluorescence Staining of CXCR4 in Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde solution for 15 min and then were blocked with PBS buffer containing 1% BSA at 37 °C for 30 min after washing with PBS. CXCR4 (Abcam, UK) antibody was added to cells and incubated overnight at 4 °C. Alexa Fluor 488 goat anti-rabbit IgG (Invitrogen) secondary antibody was used at a dilution of 1:200. Nuclei were stained with DAPI (1 μg/ml, Sigma-Aldrich). Fluorescence intensity was evaluated using a confocal microscope (Olympus Corp., Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunohistochemical analysis of CXCR4 and CD133

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
EC patient tissue samples were obtained, fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, and embedded into paraffin for sectioning with a microtome. The specimens were incubated with primary antibodies against CXCR4 (1:500, Abcam, UK), CD133 (1:100, Novus Biologicals USA) over night. The sections were treated with biotinylated anti-rabbit IgG antibody (Nichirei biosciences, Japan). Color developing agent was obtained by treatment with DAB kit (Nichirei biosciences, Japan). The samples were examined using a Leica microscope (Leica DMRBE, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Western Blot Analysis of Exosomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Exosomes and total protein were run on 10% denaturing SDS‐PAGE gels, then transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (BioRad), which were incubated with primary antibodies anti‐GAPDH (1:1000, rabbit monoclonal, Santa Cruz), anti‐CD9 (1:2000, rabbit monoclonal, Abcam), anti‐Rab5 (1:1000, rabbit monoclonal, Abcam), anti‐TSG101 (1:1000, rabbit monoclonal, Abcam), β‐actin (1:1000, mouse polyclonal, CST), CXCR‐4 (1:100, rabbit monoclonal, Abcam), IL‐6 (1:1000, rabbit monoclonal, Abcam), IL‐10 (1:1000, rabbit monoclonal, Abcam), Arg‐1(1:1000, rabbit monoclonal, CST), iNOS (1:1000, rabbit monoclonal, Abcam), STAT3 (1:1000, mouse monoclonal, CST), Phospho‐STAT3 (1:2000, rabbit monoclonal, CST), Bax (1:1000, mouse monoclonal, Abcam), PCNA (1:1000, mouse monoclonal, Abcam) at 4°C overnight. Blots were detected with horseradish peroxidase (HRP)‐conjugated goat anti‐rabbit or rabbit anti‐mouse secondary antibody (Invitrogen) for 1 hour at room temperature. Images were quantified using the Super Signal West Pico or Femto chemiluminescent detection system (Pierce).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Western Blot Analysis of Cardiac Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell lysates were prepared using lysis buffer [10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EGTA, 1 mM EDTA, 0.2 mM sodium orthovanadate, 0.5% Nonidet P-40, 1% Triton X-100, and 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride]. Left ventricular (LV) lysates were prepared in RIPA buffer [10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.2), 158 mM NaCl, 1 mM EGTA, 0.1% SDS, 1% sodium deoxycholate, 1% Triton X-100, 1 mM sodium orthovanadate, 0.2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride] using a tissue homogenizer. Equal amounts of total proteins (20 or 60 μg) were resolved on 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gels. The proteins were transferred onto PVDF membrane. The blots were then probed with primary antibodies directed against p-Akt (1:1000 dilution; Cell Signaling Tech.), p-GSK-3β (1:1000 dilution; Cell Signaling Tech.), CXCR4 (1:1000 dilution; Abcam), caspase-9 (1:1000 dilution; Millipore), and appropriate secondary antibodies. Membranes were then stripped and probed with Akt, GSK-3β (cell Signaling Tech.) or GAPDH (Santa Cruz Biotech.) antibodies to normalize protein loading. Band intensities were quantified using Kodak photo documentation system (Eastman Kodak Co.).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Western Blot Analysis of Protein Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RIPA buffer containing proteinase inhibitors (Beyotime, China) was used to create tissue extracts, which were then used to perform the analyses., and the concentration of protein was measured by BCA Protein Assay Reagent (Beyotime, China). The tissue lysate containing 40μg of total protein was loaded onto the SDS-PAGE gel and electrophoresed at 120V for 90 minutes, and then the protein to be tested in the gel was transferred to a 0.45m polyvinylidene fluoride membrane (Merck Millipore, Germany). After blocking the membrane in TBST buffer containing 5% skimmed milk powder for 30 minutes, the membranes were incubated for 12 hours at 4 °C with the following antibodies: CXCR4 (Abcam, UK), GAPDH (Proteintech, China), β-tubulin (Proteintech, China), ERK1/2 (Abcam, UK), p-ERK1/2 (Abcam, UK). The membranes were rinsed three times with TBST (5 minutes/wash) the next day before being incubated with goat anti-rabbit secondary antibody (Thermo Fisher, USA) or goat anti-mouse secondary antibody (Thermo Fisher, USA) in 5% skimmed milk powder /TBST, and then rinsed 3 times. Membrane development was carried out using ECL Substrate (Thermo Fisher, USA), and the chemiluminescence was captured using the bioanalytical imaging system C300 (Azure Biosystems, USA) and analyzed using ImageJ software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantitative Western Blot Analysis of Stem Cell Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
At the end of H/R, MSCs were collected. As we described elsewhere [18 (link), 19 (link)], lysates were separated on 10% SDS-PAGE gels and then transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride membranes. The membranes were incubated with the following primary antibodies: TRPC6 (1:500, Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA), HIF-1α (1:500, Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA), CXCR4 (1:1000, Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA), VEGF (1:1000, Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA) and GAPDH (1:5000, Beyotime Biotechnology, Shanghai, China) overnight at 4 °C. After washing, membranes were incubated with horse radish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies for 1 h. Blotting bands were visualized using an ECL kit and captured by the BIO-RAD ChemiDoc Touch Imaging System.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Immunostaining and Confocal Imaging of Organoids

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All immunostaining was performed after imaging studies with organoids maintained within the devices, and all reagents were delivered via microfluidic lines. After fixing and blocking, organoids were stained for CXCR4 (Abcam), DDR2 (Abcam) and K14 (Abcam); all primary antibody staining was incubated overnight at 4C. Species-specific secondary antibodies (488 or 566 wavelength) and nuclei staining (DAPI) were also used. Imaging was performed via confocal microscopy (Zeiss, 63X). Analysis was performed using FIJI to quantify fluorescence intensity and localization. Fluorescence was calculated in the same manner as K14-GFP localization (described above).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Western Blot Analysis of Cartilage Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Protein samples were separated by 8% or 10% (wt/vol) sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel (SDS-PAGE) electrophoresis and transferred onto polyvinylidene fluoride membranes (Millipore, Billerica, MA, United States). After blocking with 5% non-fat milk in Tris-buffered saline with Tween 20 (TBS-T) for 2 h at 37 °C, the membranes were incubated with primary antibodies for CXCR4 (1:100 dilution), Sox-9 (1:1000 dilution; Abcam), aggrecan (1:1000 dilution), collagen II (1:1000 dilution), and GAPDH (1:10000 dilution; Abcam) overnight at 4 °C. The membranes were then incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (Abcam) for 1 h at room temperature. An electrochemiluminescence reagent was added to the surfaces of membranes, and immunolabeling was visualized using an ImageQuant LAS4000 (GE Healthcare, United States). The relative protein concentrations were measured using Image-Pro Plus 6.0 software. The expression level of GAPDH was used as an internal control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Western Blot Analysis of Cellular Signaling Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Protein was extracted, quantified, and probed with antibody, as previously described.69 (link) Whole cell lysates were extracted using RIPA buffer (Cell Signaling). Nuclear and cytoplasmic lysates were extracted using the NE-PER Nuclear and Cytoplasmic Extraction Kit, according to the manufacturer (Thermo Scientific). Antibodies included AKT (Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA), phospho-AKT (S473) (Cell Signaling), CXCR4 (Abcam, Cambridge, MA), phospho-CXCR4 (S339) (Abcam), eEF2 (Cell Signaling), GRK4-6 (EMD Millipore, Billerica, MA), GRK5 (C-20) (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Santa Cruz, CA), KCNA1 (Abcam), Lamin B1 (Cell Signaling), NPR3 (Abcam), WIP1 (Bethyl, Montgomery, TX), and β-actin (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO). Secondary antibodies Alexa Fluor 680 goat anti-mouse IgG (Life Technologies) or IRDye 800 goat anti-rabbit IgG (Rockland, Gilbertsville, PA) were used at a dilution of 1:5,000. Immunoblots were imaged and quantified, as previously described.27 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantification of Renal Cell Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The procedure and protocols have been described by previous reports [8 (link),16 (link),29 (link),30 (link)]. Briefly, sections were incubated with primary antibodies specifically against CD31 (1:200, BD Pharmingen, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA), vWF (1:200, Abcam), CXCR4 (1:200, Abcam) and SDF-1α (1:100, Santa Cruz), while sections incubated with irrelevant antibodies served as controls. Three sections of kidney specimens from each rat were analyzed. For quantification, three random HPFs (400× for IHC and IF studies) were analyzed in each section. The mean number (expressed as a percentage) of positively-stained cells per HPF for each animal was first divided by the total positively DAPI-stained cells, then determined by the summation of all numbers divided by 9.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!