The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Qiashredder kit

Manufactured by Qiagen
Sourced in Germany, United States

The QIAshredder kit is a laboratory equipment designed for the mechanical disruption and homogenization of tissue samples or cell lysates. The kit consists of disposable shredder columns that facilitate the efficient disruption of samples, enabling the release of cellular components and the preparation of samples for subsequent molecular biology applications.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

98 protocols using qiashredder kit

1

Quantification of Inflammatory Gene Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA was prepared from BAL cells using a QIAGEN® QIAshredder™ kit (Venlo, Limburg, Netherlands) and converted to cDNA. The cell samples for each treatment group were pooled into one larger sample for analysis. Thermocycling was used to analyze mRNA expression of CCL2 (mCCL2 1F103: CCT GCT GCT ACT CAT TCA CCA; mCCL2 1R259: GTC TGG ACC CAT TCC TTC TTG), IL1B (mIL1b1F216: TGT GGC AGC TAC CTG TGT CTT; mIL1b1R321: TCC CAT GAG TCA CAG AGG ATG), IL6 (mIL6F23: GAC TTC CAT CCA GTT GCC TTC; mIL6R125: TGG GAG TGG TAT CCT CTG TGA), CXCL10 (mCXCL10F12: AGT GCT GCC GTC ATT TTC TGC; mCXCL10R139: CCT ATG GCC CTC ATT CTC ACT) and IL12B (mIL12bF131: GTG ACA CGC CTG AAG AAG ATG; mIL12bR303: CTT CTT GTG GAG CAG CAG ATG). The ABI 7900HT Fast Real-Time PCR System by Applied Biosystems (Waltham, MA) was used and primers were designed with OligoPerfect™ Designer (lifetechnologies.com, Carlsbad, CA). Fold expression was calculated by the ΔΔCT method normalizing to the water (control) treatment group and using actin as the control gene (Sarkar et al., 2012 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Differential Expression Analysis of m6A-Modified Transcripts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA isolations were performed using the RNeasy mini kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s procedure, including homogenization using the QIAshredder kit (Qiagen). DNase treatment was performed on-column to eliminate DNA contamination (Qiagen). Concentration and quality of the total extracted RNA was checked via the Quant-it Ribogreen RNA assay (Life Technologies) and the RNA 6000 nano chip (Agilent Technologies). The QuantSeq 3′ mRNA library prep FWD kit (Lexogen) was used for library preparation. Library QC was performed using the high sensitivity DNA chip (Agilent technologies). Sequencing was performed on the NextSeq 500 SR 76 high output system (Illumina). All sequencing data was deposited in GEO under the following accession number: GSE201012.
To determine the difference in gene expression of m6A-methylated transcripts compared to unmethylated transcripts, differential expression was determined for transcripts binned by the amount of m6A residues they contain. Reads were aligned to the Sscrofa11.1 genome using STAR (Dobin et al., 2013 (link)). Differential expression was determined using DESeq2 (Love et al., 2014 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

RNA Extraction and RT-qPCR Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The RNA extraction and RT-qPCR were conducted as described recently (Pauly et al., 2018 (link); Stengel et al., 2020 (link)). In short, cell samples were homogenized (QIAshredder kit, Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and followed by purification of total RNA (RNeasy Mini Kit, Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Subsequently, RNA was transcribed to cDNA by the Maxima First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit for RT-qPCR (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, United States). Relative gene expression levels were analyzed using the comparative ΔΔCT method by regular RT-qPCR following the manufacture’s protocol for LightCycler FastStart DNA Master SYBR Green I Kit and LightCycler480 (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) (for the primer sequence see Supplementary Table 2). Unsupervised hierarchical gene expression and ventralization regime clustering were performed using seaborn (0.11.1) (Waskom, 2021 (link)) and the complete linkage method, while the standard scale was calculated for the genes (columns).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

qPCR Gene Expression Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were washed twice with PBS and homogenized with QIAshredder Kit (Qiagen). Total RNA was extracted with RNeasy Plus Mini Kit (Qiagen) which include a genomic DNA elimination step. cDNA synthesis was performed with iScript cDNA syntesys kit (Biorad). Quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) was performed in triplicate using iQ SYBR Green Supermix kit and CFX96 Real-Time System (Biorad). Thermocycling conditions were: 95 °C for 3 min, followed by 45 cycles at 95 °C for 10 s, 60 °C for 30 s. Gene expression was normalized (GAPDH or VE-Cad) and relative expression was calculated using the ΔΔCt method. A complete primer list is reported in Supplementary Table 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantitative RT-PCR for STS Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell lines were treated without T (as controls) or 1 nM T for 24 hr in respective phenol red-free medium supplemented with 10% CS-FBS as described in “Cell culture conditions”. RNA preparation and cDNA preparation were performed as described previously (Wu et al., 2013 (link)). Briefly, RNA was prepared using the QiaShredder Kit and the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). cDNA was generated using the SuperScript VILO cDNA Synthesis Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA). Real-time PCR primers for STS and β-actin were purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific. Real-time PCR reactions were performed using the Taqman Universal PCR Master Mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and an Applied Biosystems 7900HT Fast Real-Time PCR System (Foster City, CA). Expression levels of STS relative to the expression levels of β-actin were calculated using the equation: STS/ β-actin = 2−(CtSTS−Ctactin), where CtSTS and Ctactin were real-time PCR cycle numbers of STS and β-actin, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Extraction and Characterization of Total RNA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell pellets (1.6 × 106 cells) were first lysed and homogenized using the QIAshredder kit (Qiagen, Courtaboeuf, France), then total RNAs were extracted using the RNeasy mini kit (Qiagen) according to manufacturer’s instructions. The total RNA was quantified using a Nanodrop®ND-1000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Illkirch, France). The quality and integrity of RNA samples were assessed using the 2100 Bioanalyzer and RNA 6000 Nano LabChip kit series II (Agilent Technologies, Les Ulis, France). The RNAs extracted were of good quality, and the RNA integrity number (RIN) was >9 in all cases.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

RNA Extraction and qPCR Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were lysed over ice in RLT buffer from RNeasy Mini Kit (QIAGEN, #74104) supplemented with 10 µL/mL β-mercaptoethanol. Lysates were homogenized using the QIAshredder kit (QIAGEN, #79656) and stored at -80°C until extraction. All RNA extractions were done using the RNeasy Mini Kit (QIAGEN, #74104) including the optional DNase treatment step (RNAse-Free DNase Set, QIAGEN, #79254) and eluted in 35-50 µL RNAse-free water. RNA concentration was quantified with the Nanodrop 2000c. cDNA was made using the High-Capacity RNA-to-cDNA™ Kit (Applied Biosystems, #10704217). For each experiment, equal quantity of RNA was added across samples, using up to 9µL RNA. qPCR reactions comprised of 1 volume sample cDNA to 3 volumes master mix (Power SYBR™Green PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems, #4367659), forward and reverse primer mix, and nuclease-free water at a ratio of 5 µL: 1 µL: 2 µL respectively). Primers used are listed in supplementary table 5. Reactions were in run in triplicate in 384-well format, 6-8 µL/sample in the Applied Bioscience QuantStudio™ 5. Default cycling conditions were used (supplementary table 6). Analysis of gene expression was performed by normalization of Ct values to the average Ct value of two housekeeper genes, VIPAR and UBE4A, and displayed as fold difference as calculated by 2-ΔCt.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

RNA Extraction and Sequencing Workflow

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA was extracted using the Qiagen Qiashredder kit (79654) and the Qiagen RNeasy Mini Kit (74104) as per the manufacturer’s instructions (Qiagen Inc., Valencia, CA, USA). The RNA was DNase treated following the protocol in the RNeasy Mini Kit with Qiagen RNase-free DNase I (79254). Indexed PolyA libraries were prepared using 1 μg of total RNA and 13 cycles of amplification in the NEB Next Ultra Directional RNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina (New England Biolabs, Cat No: E7420S). RNA Integrity Values scores were >9 for all samples. Libraries were quantified by qPCR using a Kapa Library Quantification Kit for Illumina sequencing platforms (Kapa Biosystems, Wilmington, MA, USA, Cat No: KK4835). Pooled libraries were clustered at 15 pmol/l on the cBot and 2×100 bp sequencing was carried out using the High Throughput mode of a HiSeq 2500 using TruSeq SBS Kit v3 chemistry (Illumina)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantitative Assessment of cxcl13 mRNA Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples prepared from each CNS flow sorted or cultured microglial cell population were carefully thawed and removed from the PrepProtect RNA stabilization solution. Total RNA was isolated from each sample using QIAshredder Kit and the RNeasy Mini Kit according to the manufacturer's instructions (Qiagen, Germantown, MD). A cDNA template was then generated from each sample using the SuperScript® III First Strand Synthesis System for reverse transcriptase–PCR (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). Semi-quantitative PCR was undertaken using the MyiQ Single Color Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA) and the cxcl13 primer/probe set in the TaqMan® Gene Expression Assay (Applied Biosystems Inc., Foster City, CA). Data were analyzed against a β-actin mRNA standard and are shown as relative cxcl13 mRNA expression. For the flow-sorted cell populations, expression values were then normalized to the level present in CD45high/CD11b+ cells isolated from WT mice assigned an arbitrary level of 1.0. For the cultured microglial cells, expression values were then normalized to the level present in vehicle-treated (control) WT cells assigned an arbitrary level of 1.0 (Fig. 3D) or to the level present in IRF7−/− cells assigned an arbitrary level of 1.0 (Fig. 4D).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantification of cxcl13 mRNA Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples prepared from each CNS flow sorted or cultured microglial cell population were carefully thawed and removed from the PrepProtect RNA stabilization solution. Total RNA was isolated from each sample using QIAshredder Kit and the RNeasy Mini Kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Qiagen, Germantown, MD). A cDNA template was then generated from each sample using the SuperScript® III First Strand Synthesis System for reverse transcriptase–PCR (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). Semi-quantitative PCR was undertaken using the MyiQ Single Color Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA) and the cxcl13 primer/probe set in the TaqMan® Gene Expression Assay (Applied Biosystems Inc., Foster City, CA). Data were analyzed against a β-actin mRNA standard and are shown as relative cxcl13 mRNA expression. For the flow-sorted cell populations, expression values were then normalized to the level present in CD45high/CD11b+ cells isolated from WT mice assigned an arbitrary level of 1.0. For the cultured microglial cells, expression values were then normalized to the level present in vehicle-treated (control) WT cells assigned an arbitrary level of 1.0 (Fig. 3D) or to the level present in IRF7−/− cells assigned an arbitrary level of 1.0 (Fig. 4D).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!