The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Sds software v2

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States

SDS Software v2.3 is a data management software suite developed by Thermo Fisher Scientific. The software's core function is to facilitate the storage, organization, and retrieval of safety data sheets (SDS) for chemical substances and mixtures. The software provides a centralized platform for managing SDS information, enabling users to access critical safety data quickly and efficiently.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

41 protocols using sds software v2

1

Genotyping of rs671 Variant by High-Resolution Melting

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genotyping of rs671 by HRM was performed in 384-well plates on a 384-well 7900HT Fast Real-Time PCR System (7900 HT, Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) as previously described [9 (link)]. Briefly, two primers (as shown in Table 1) were designed to amplify a 78 bp fragment cover target locus rs671 and SYTO 9 (Invitrogen, Eugene, Oregon, USA), a saturating dye was added to the standard PCR reaction mixture before amplification. The PCR reaction mixture contained 5 μl 2x GC Buffer, 6.25 μmol of each dNTP, 0.25 U Taq DNA Polymerase (TaKaRa Biotechnology, Tokyo, Japan), 1 μl genomic DNA, 100 pmol SYTO 9 and 5 pmol of each primer in a reaction volume of 10 μl. PCR conditions were as follows: initial denaturation at 95°C for 10 min, followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 15 sec, annealing/extending at 60°C for 1 min. After PCR, the samples were melted at a ramp rate of 1% from 60°C to 95°C. The fluorescence signals were measured during this process and the melting curve was automatically converted to melting peaks. SDS Software v2.3 and High Resolution Melt v2.0 (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) were used for data analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantitative miRNA Expression Analysis in PDAC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Quantitative Real-Time (qRT) PCR was performed using the miScript PCR system (Qiagen). Total RNA samples (1μg) of PDAC cell lines were reverse transcribed to cDNA using miScript Reverse Transcription Kits (Qiagen). For each sample, 5μL of the generated cDNA was mixed with 10μL 2x QuantiTect SYBR, 2μL 10x miScript Universal Primer, 2μL gene specific 10x miScript Primer Assay and 1μL nuclease free water. All samples were analyzed in triplicate reactions using Applied Biosystems 7900HT Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Darmstadt, Germany) with miScript SYBR Green PCR Kit (Qiagen). The cycling program involved preliminary denaturation at 95°C for 10min, followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 15s, annealing at 60°C for 60 s and elongation at 60°C for 60s. Quantitative miR analysis was performed using SDS-Software v2.3 (Applied Biosystems). Expression of each miR was analyzed quantitatively relative to the housekeeping genes RNU6-2, SNORD68, and SNORD96A by the 2–ΔΔCT method.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

RNA Extraction and qPCR Analysis of FoxM1 Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA from tissues or cells was extracted using TRIzol reagent (cat. no. 15596026; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), according to the manufacturer's protocol. Complementary (c) DNA was produced with reverse transcription using the PrimeScript First Strand cDNA Synthesis kit (cat. no. DRR047A; Takara Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Dalian, China) according to the manufacturer's protocol. qPCR assays were performed using the MX3000P system (Stratagene; Agilent Technologies, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA) and the SYBR Premix ExTaq kit (cat. no. DRR042A; Takara Biotechnology Co., Ltd.). GAPDH was used as an internal control. The primers for qPCR were as follows: FoxM1-Forward, GGA GCA GCG ACA GGT TAA GG; FoxM1-Reverse, GTT GAT GGC GAA TTG TAT CAT GG; GAPDH-Forward, TGA AGG TCG GAG TCA ACG G; GAPDH-Reverse, CTG GAA GAT GGT GAT GGG ATT. The reaction mixture consisted of 2 µl of cDNA template in a final reaction volume of 20 µl; there were three replicates of each sample. Initial denaturation at 95°C for 5 min was followed by 40 cycles of amplification at 95°C for 10 sec, 58°C for 20 sec and 72°C for 20 sec. A melting curve analysis was performed following the PCR cycles. Data was analyzed with SDS software v2.3 (Applied Biosystems; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). Relative expression levels were calculated using the 2−∆ΔCt method (24 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantitative Analysis of miRNA Levels

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Quantitative miRNA levels were determined using qRT-PCR with the Applied Biosystems 7900 HT Sequence Detection System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) and TaqMan MicroRNA Assay (Applied Biosystems). Cycle threshold (Ct) values were calculated using SDS Software v2.3 (Applied Biosystems). Expression levels of miRNAs were normalized to those of the following reference genes: spike-in Caenorhabditis elegans (cel)-miR-39, endogenous miR-16-5p, or the average levels of endogenous miR-92a-3p and miR-486-5p for analyses using plasma samples; spike-in cel-miR-39 for EVs; and endogenous RNU6B for liver tissues. The expression levels were determined by the 2−ΔCt method in which ΔCt was calculated as follows: ΔCt = Ct (miRNA of interest) – Ct (reference gene).
Further information about methods is provided in Supporting Material and Methods.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Analyzing miRNA Expression Profiles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data are presented as the mean values ± SD of individual experiments. Because of the nonparametric distribution of data, the Mann-Whitney U test was performed to assess statistical differences between the two experimental groups. In all cases a P value < 0.05 was considered significant. The miRNA gene expression values were normalized according to endogenous control RNU6B and relative expression values were obtained using the ΔCt method with SDS software v 2.3 (Applied Biosystems, CA, USA). The relative target miRNA expression levels were determined by the equation 2−ΔCt, in which ΔCt was calculated as follows: ΔCt = CtmiR-of-interest − Ct RNU6B. Different miRNA expression between the groups was identified according to fold change. Fold change cut-off was 2-fold, if the changes were observed in both cell samples simultaneously. The miRNA expression levels were visualized through heat maps (TIGR MultiExperiment Viewer 4.0, The Institute for Genomic Research, USA), dendrograms, and column charts. The Spearman correlation test was used to correlate miRNA expression data with interleukin production.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Genotyping of COL12A1 rs970547

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genotyping for COL12A1 rs970547 polymorphism was performed in duplicate using an allelic discrimination assay on a 7900HT Fast real-time polymerase chain reaction instrument (Applied biosystems™, Life Technologies, 2012, Carlsbad, CA, USA) with TaqMan probes (TaqMan® Pre-Designed SNP Genotyping Assay ID: C_7580617_10). Genotypes were assigned using software (SDS Software v2.3, Applied BiosystemsTM). To ensure proper internal control, positive and negative controls from different DNA aliquots were used for each genotype analysis. The average genotyping rate was ~98%.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantitative PCR Gene Expression Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
TaqMan PCR assays were used to measure RREB1 (Hs00366111_m1), INS (Hs00355773_m1), CAMK2A (Hs00392405_m1), GPR56 (Hs00173754_m1), RFX2 (Hs00172177_m1), RFX3, (Hs01060440_m1) and TBP (Hs00427620_m1) gene expression (ThermoFisher Scientific, UK). qPCR reactions were performed on a 7900HT Fast Real-Time PCR System (ThermoFisher Scientific, UK) using SDS software (v2.3; Applied Biosystems) and the following conditions: 50°C for 2 min and 95°C for 10 min followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 15 s and 60°C for 1 min. Cycle thresholds were transformed to gene copy numbers and normalised to the geometric mean of the housekeeping genes TBP and PPIA, except for Fig. 7, in which gene expression was normalised to TBP only.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Gene Expression Analysis by qRT-PCR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cycle threshold (Ct) values were calculated using the SDS software v.2.3 (Applied Biosystems) using automatic baseline settings and a threshold of 0.2. GAPDH was used as endogenous control. Data are presented as target gene expression = 2−ΔCt, with ΔCt = (target gene Ct-GAPDH Ct). Gene expression was computed by real-time Statminer® software v.4.2 (Intergromics, Inc), using the Benjamini-Hochberg algorithm [35 ] with the FDR set at a value of 5%. Gene expression had to be detected in at least 50% of samples in each study group in order to be considered for analysis. PCR GEO accession number GSE52513.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

RNA Isolation and qRT-PCR Analysis of Mouse Myocardial Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For RNA isolation of snap-frozen mouse myocardial tissue or NRVM, RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen) was used according to the manufacturer protocol. Total RNA (500 ng) was transcribed into cDNA using QuantiTect Reverse Transcription Kit (Qiagen) and qRT-PCR was performed in triplicates (20 ng cDNA per reaction) with appropriate primers in 5′–3′orientation (Table 1) using QuantiFAST SYBR Green PCR Kit including ROX dye (Qiagen). Forty-five cycles (95°C, 10 s; 60°C, 30 s) were performed on an ABI prism 7900HT Fast system (Applied Biosystems). Relative gene expression values, adjusted for the same CT-threshold and baseline settings, were calculated according to the 2−ΔΔCT method (40 (link)) using Gapdh as housekeeping gene (SDS Software v2.3, Applied Biosystems).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Profiling Kidney miRNA Signatures in DOCA-Salt Mouse Model

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To assess the different signature of the miRNAs of the mouse kidney induced by DOCA-salt treatment and the control, we profiled the production of 588 miRNAs in the kidney with the ABI TaqMan MicroRNA Array kit (Applied Biosystems) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. In brief, 333 ng of mouse kidney total RNA was reverse-transcribed with megaplex RT primers (Megaplex RT Rodent Pool A or B) followed by a pre-amplification reaction with megaplex preamp primers; subsequently, a real-time PCR with TaqMan Rodent MicroRNA Array (Pool A or B) was performed on an Applied Biosystems 7900HT System. SDS software V2.3, and RQ Manage1.2 (Applied Biosystems) were used to obtain the comparative threshold cycle (Ct) value. U6 small nuclear RNA included in the TaqMan Rodent MicroRNA Array was used as an endogenous control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!