The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

40 protocols using facsaria 2 sorp cell sorter

1

Embryonic Intestinal Cell Isolation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Small intestines were dissected from mouse embryos at day 13.5 (E13.5), cut into 2 mm pieces, and incubated for 10 min with 0.15 mg/mL collagenase (Sigma, Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) in PBS at 37 °C with shaking at 800 rpm. Single-cell suspensions were collected via centrifugation at 200× g for 5 min and resuspended in 200 mL of PBS supplemented with 2% goat serum. Cells were stained with APC-conjugated anti-EpCAM antibody 1:1000 (eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA) for 30 min at room temperature. Living cells were gated via DAPI dye exclusion. Fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis was performed using the BD FACS Aria II SORP cell sorter (85 μM nozzle).
For ultralow cell number RNA-sequencing five hundred EpCAM+ embryonic intestinal cells were isolated by FACS directly in 7 μL of lysis buffer (Takara Bio, Kusatsu City, Japan) supplemented with 5% RNase inhibitor and stored at −80 °C. cDNA was synthesised using SMARTer v4.0 kit (Takara Bio) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Amplification was performed for 15 cycles. After cDNA fragmentation (Covaris, Woburn, MA, USA), libraries were prepared using the Ovation Ultralow v2 Library System (NuGEN, Houston, TX, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Isolation and Characterization of Immune Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Non-specific binding of the immunoglobulin to the Fc receptors was blocked by incubating cells 10 min on ice in 0.5% BSA in DPBS (without Ca2+ or Mg2+) with 2 mM EDTA supplemented with TruStain fcX (anti-mouse Cd16/32, BioLegend, #101319, clone 93, 1:100). Cells were stained with anti-CD11B-Alexa647 (clone M1/70, 1:100) and anti-CD45-PE-Cy7 (clone 30-F11, 1:100) for 30 min on ice. Finally, cells were washed with 1 mL DPBS (without Ca2+ or Mg2+) with 0.5% BSA and 2 mM EDTA and were centrifuged at 300 × g for 10 min, resuspended in 0.5% BSA, 2 mM EDTA in DPBS (without Ca2+ or Mg2+) and passed through a 35 mm nylon mesh strainer (BD Falcon). DAPI was added to cells at final concentration of 1 μg/ml. Live cells were sorted using a BD FACSAria II SORP Cell Sorter. Sorted cells were directly lysed in RLT Plus buffer (QIAGEN) and RNA was extracted using the RNeasy Plus RNA isolation kit (QIAGEN) according to manufactures protocol following appendix D.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immunophenotyping of Myeloid Cells in Tumor

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To block non-specific binding of immunoglobulin to the Fc receptors, cells in suspension were incubated for 10 min on ice with TruStain fcX™ (anti-mouse CD16/32, BioLegend, #101319, clone 93, 1:100). Cell identification was based on levels of expression of CD45 and CD11b (microglia), CD45, CD11b, F4/80, Ly6C, and CCR2 (monocytes/macrophages). For microglia, we used anti-CD45-pacificBlue (BioLegend, #103125, clone 30-F11, 1:100) and anti-CD11b-Alexa647 (BioLegend, #101220, clone M1/70, 1:100) for tumor bearing mice. For monocytes/macrophages, anti-CD45-pacificBlue (BioLegend, #103125, clone 30-F11, 1:100), anti-CD11b-PE-Cy7 (BioLegend, #101215, clone M1/70, 1:100), anti-Ly6C-BV605 (BioLegend, #128035, clone HK1.4, 1:500), and anti-F4/80-APC (BioLegend, #123115, clone BM8, 1:75) were used. Cells were stained for 30 min on ice with gentle mixing every 10 min by pipetting the mixture up and down. To remove unbound antibodies, cells were centrifuged at 400×g for 8 min, resuspended in 0.2% FBS in PBS, and passed through a 35-μm nylon mesh strainer (BD Falcon). Cells were than sorted using a BD FACSAria II SORP Cell Sorter.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Isolation and Characterization of Immune Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Non-specific binding of the immunoglobulin to the Fc receptors was blocked by incubating cells 10 min on ice in 0.5% BSA in DPBS (without Ca2+ or Mg2+) with 2 mM EDTA supplemented with TruStain fcX (anti-mouse Cd16/32, BioLegend, #101319, clone 93, 1:100). Cells were stained with anti-CD11B-Alexa647 (clone M1/70, 1:100) and anti-CD45-PE-Cy7 (clone 30-F11, 1:100) for 30 min on ice. Finally, cells were washed with 1 mL DPBS (without Ca2+ or Mg2+) with 0.5% BSA and 2 mM EDTA and were centrifuged at 300 × g for 10 min, resuspended in 0.5% BSA, 2 mM EDTA in DPBS (without Ca2+ or Mg2+) and passed through a 35 mm nylon mesh strainer (BD Falcon). DAPI was added to cells at final concentration of 1 μg/ml. Live cells were sorted using a BD FACSAria II SORP Cell Sorter. Sorted cells were directly lysed in RLT Plus buffer (QIAGEN) and RNA was extracted using the RNeasy Plus RNA isolation kit (QIAGEN) according to manufactures protocol following appendix D.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Identifying Brain-Infiltrating Monocytes/Macrophages

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Prior to antibody staining, cells were incubated for 10 min on ice with TruStain fcX (anti-mouse CD16/32, BioLegend #101319, clone 93, 1:100). To identify infiltrating monocytes/macrophages from the brain, anti-CD11b-PE-Cy7 (BioLegend, M1/70, 1:100), anti-CD45-pacificBlue (BioLegend, 30-F11, 1:100), anti-F4/80-APC (BioLegend, BM8, 1:75) and anti-Ly6C-BV605 (BioLegend, HK1.4, 1:500) were used. Blood-derived monocytes were identified using anti-CD45-pacificBlue (BioLegend, 30-F11), anti-Ly6C-BV605 (BioLegend, HK1.4, 1:100), anti-Cd115-APC (BioLegend AFS98, 1:100) and anti-Cd11c-APC-Cy7 (BioLegend, N418, 1:100). Cells were stained by incubation with antibodies for 30 min on ice. Finally, cells were washed using 1 ml PBS and centrifuged at 400 × g for 8 min. Cell pellets were resuspended in 300 µl PBS supplemented with 0.2% FBS and filtered through a 35 µm cell strainer (BD Falcon). Cell subpopulations were finally sorted into RLT buffer (Qiagen) using a BD FACSAria II SORP Cell Sorter.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

FACS-based Cell Viability Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were harvested with trypsin and made single cell prior to FACS assays. All sorting experiments using FACS were performed on a BD FACS ARIA™ II SORP Cell Sorter (BD Biosciences). All FACS analysis experiments were performed on a BD FACSCanto™ II (BD Biosciences). Unstained or untransduced wildtype (WT) cells functioned as negative controls. 7-AAD (Cat. #559925, BD Biosciences) at a 1:100 dilution was added to samples to exclude dead cells. FACSDiva v8 software was used to acquire data, data analysis was performed with FlowJo software.
For the Nicoletti assay, 190,000 (HuTu-80) and 125,000 (MDST8) cells were plated per well of a 6 well plate. Medium was collected and combined with cells harvested using trypsin 48 hr. later. Cells were pelleted, taken up in freshly prepared Nicoletti buffer (50 μg/ml propidium iodide, 0.1% sodium citrate and 0.1% Triton X-100 in ddH2O) and left at 4 °C overnight before analysis on BD FACS Canto II.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Fluorescence-based Cell Sorting Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples from aerobic 100-ml cultures in 500-ml shake flasks were vortexed thoroughly to disrupt cell aggregates and used for flow cytometry on a BD FACSAria II SORP cell sorter (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ) equipped with 355-, 445-, 488-, 561-, and 640-nm lasers and a 70-μm nozzle and operated with filtered FACSFlow (BD Biosciences). Cytometer performance was evaluated prior to each experiment by running a CST cycle with CS&T beads (BD Biosciences). The fluorophore mRuby2 was excited by the 561-nm laser, and emission was detected through a 582-nm bandpass filter with a bandwidth of 15 nm. The fluorophore Venus was excited by the 488-nm laser, and emission was detected through a 545-nm bandpass filter with a bandwidth of 30 nm. For each sample, 10,000 events were analyzed, and the same gating strategy was applied to all samples from the same culture. The reference sample for no fluorescent cells was a mid-exponentially growing culture of IMX585 on SMG. The Venus and mRuby2 fluorescence reference was obtained from mid-exponential aerobic cultures on SMG of IMX2240 or IMX2212 and IMX2238, respectively. Cells without fluorescence and doublets or with Venus and mRuby2 fluorescence were selected in a Venus/mRuby2 plot.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Isolation and Analysis of T Cell Subsets

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Naïve or KP tumor bearing C57BL/6 mice were sacrificed and total splenocytes were harvested. Spleens were digested with collagenase D (Roche) and DNase I (Roche) at 37 °C for 30 min, followed by 1×ACS lysis buffer (Biolegend) incubation to lyse red blood cells. The collected total splenocytes were stained with the fluorochome-conjugated cell surface markers CD3, CD4, CD8 and CD25 to isolate different T cell subpopulations, including conventional T cell Tconv (CD3+CD4+CD25), Treg (CD3+CD4+CD25+), and CD8+ (CD3+CD8+) using BD FACSAria II SORP cell sorter (BD Bioscience). DAPI (4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole) staining was used to exclude dead cells. Sorted cells were cultured in 96-well plates pre-coated with CD3 antibody (eBioscience) and treated with trilaciclib in the presence of CD28 (eBioscience). Cells were collected 3 days after culturing and cytokine production of IFNγ and IL-2 was determined by intracellular staining and analyzed on BD LSRFortessa (BD Bioscience).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Isolation and Characterization of Thymic T Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
T lymphocytes were mechanically dissociated from thymus using frosted glass slides in DMEM with 5% FBS. Red blood cells were lysed using ACK buffer, and passed through 40 μm mesh filter. T cells were incubated with Fc Block (BD Biosciences) in 3% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (v/v) in PBS for 20 minutes on ice. 1–2 million cells were incubated with or without fluorescent-conjugated antibodies that recognize CD4, CD8, CD45, B220, or isotype control antibodies (BD Biosciences) in the dark for 30 minutes at 4°C. Cells were washed 3x and resuspended in 1% FBS (v/v) in PBS. For FACS sorting, CD45 stained cells were sorted using BD FACSAria II SORP cell sorter (BD Biosciences). CD45+ T cells and CD45- thymic stromal cells were subjected to RNA extraction using Ambion RiboPure RNA purification Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and RT-PCR (Supplementary Methods). For CD4 and/or CD8-stained cells, they were fixed with paraformaldehyde at a final concentration of 1% (v/v). Cells were then run on Dako CyAn ADP flow cytometer or BD FACSCanto II Analyzer, and analyzed using FlowJo software (FlowJo, LLC., Ashland, OR). At least 30,000 viable events were collected for analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Isolation and Characterization of Neural Stem Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
FACS of NSCs was performed according to the protocol described by Yuan et al. [29 (link)] at the Human Embryonic Stem Cell Core Facility at Sanford Consortium for Regenerative Medicine (2880 Torrey Pines Scenic Dr., 92037, La Jolla, CA) using BD FACS ARIA II SORP cell sorter (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). After sorting of CD184+/CD271/CD44/CD24+ NSCs, cells were plated on P/L-coated cell culture dishes in the density 25,000/cm2.
Expression of extracellular and intracellular markers was determined using flow cytometry on fixed cell samples using BD LSRFortessa™ (BD Biosciences, USA). All buffer compositions are listed in Additional file 1: Table S1. All antibodies and corresponding isotype controls are listed in Additional file 2: Table S2).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!