The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Activity monitors

Manufactured by Trikinetics
Sourced in United States

Activity Monitors are laboratory equipment designed to track and record physical activity data. They serve as tools for researchers and scientists to collect objective measurements of movement and behavior in various experimental settings.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

10 protocols using activity monitors

1

Circadian Locomotor Activity of Flies

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The locomotor activity of 4–6 day old male flies was recorded using Trikinetics Activity Monitors. Flies were entrained to 12:12 h LD cycles for 6 days and then released into constant darkness (DD) for 9 days.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Drosophila Circadian Rhythm Monitoring

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To over-express NE, cryGAL4-39 and cryGAL4-16 (Emery et al., 2000 (link)) were crossed to MAN1GS2297 (Kyoto Stock Center; Japan), UASLam (Padiath et al., 2006 (link)) and LBRGS2162 (Kyoto Stock Center). To knock down NE, cryGAL4-39;UASdcr2 and UASdcr2;cryGAL4-16 were crossed to UASMAN1RNAi (3167R-1, NIG; Japan), UASLamRNAi (45,635, VDRC; Vienna) and UASLBRRNAi (KK110508, VDRC). For controls, the UAS and GAL4 lines were crossed to w1118 or yw strains. Male progenies were assayed for behavior.
Locomotor activity levels of flies were monitored using Trikinetics Activity Monitors (Waltham, MA) for 7 days of 12 hr light-12 hr dark (LD) conditions followed by 7 days of constant darkness (DD). For DD rhythmicity, chi-squared periodogram analyses were performed using Clocklab (Actimetrics). Rhythmic flies were defined as those in which the chi-squared power was ≥10 above the significance line. Period calculations also considered all flies with rhythmic power ≥10.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Circadian Rhythms in Young and Aged Flies

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fly activity was monitored as described [44 (link)]. Briefly, newly eclosed male flies were trained under 12 h light-darkness (LD) cycles until the beginning of the experiment. Then, young (5 days-old) and aged (21 days-old) flies were placed in glass tubes and monitored for activity with infrared detectors. Fly activity was monitored under LD conditions for 3 days and then released into constant darkness (DD) for at least one week employing commercially available activity monitors (TriKinetics, Waltham, MA). Period and rhythmicity were estimated using the ClockLab software (Actimetrics, Evanston, IL) from data collected under DD. Each experiment was repeated at least two times from two independent biological replicates.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Drosophila Locomotor Activity Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All locomotor activity experiments were conducted with 2–5 days-old male flies at 25°C using Trikinetics Activity Monitors as previously described [9 (link)]. We crossed Gal4 lines to w1118 to create control progeny. Locomotor activities were monitored for 6 days under different photoperiodic conditions, and then for 9 days under constant dark (DD). To analyze rhythmicity under constant conditions, we normalized the activity of flies from DD day 3 to day 9 and used χ2-periodogram analysis with a 95% confidence cut-off, as well as SNR analysis [68 (link)]. Arrhythmic flies were defined by a power value ≤ 10 and width value ≤ 2, and period outside the range, 18 to 30 hours. To analyze periods, we used Graphpad Instat (v. 8) software to run one-way ANOVA measures followed by the Tukey-Kramer Multiple Comparisons Test. We used Clocklab (Actimetrics) software to produce actograms and the Brandeis Rhythms Package [69 (link)] to produce average activity plots (group eductions). To analyze onset and offset phases of Morning and Evening activity bouts on the final two days of light:dark entrainment (LD 5&6), we followed the method of Kula-Eversole et al. [57 (link)]: [(An+2 + An+1)–(An-1 + An-2)  =  ΔActivity]. Experimental genotypes were tested in the han mutant background, pdfr5304[11 (link)], or in the pdf01 (null) mutant background [1 (link)], or in the w1118 background, as noted.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Locomotor Rhythmicity Assay in Flies

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We monitored locomotor activity in 4–6 d old males for 6 days under 12:12 LD and then for 9 days under in DD, using Trikinetics Activity Monitors. We assessed rhythmicity by normalizing activity from DD Days 3–9 and used a Χ2 periodogram with a 95% confidence cutoff, and also SNR analysis (Levine et al., 2002). We defined arrhythmic flies by displaying a power value less than 10 and width value less than 2, or a τ estimate < 18 hr or > 30 hr. See also Suppl. Information.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Fly Locomotor Activity Monitoring

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Male adult flies of indicated genotypes were 3–5 days post eclosion at initiation of behavioral analyses. Flies were raised on 12:12 LD light schedule at 25°C, 60% relative humidity.
Fly locomotor activity was monitored in Trikinetics activity monitors (Waltham, MA) for 5 days at 12:12 light:dark cycle, with 2 μW/cm2 intensity green LED light, at 22°C, 60% relative humidity. 16 to 32 male flies were used per condition, and activity monitor tubes contained a plug of fly food at one end. Data was analyzed using Clocklab software (Coulbourne Instruments, Whitehall, PA, USA) and Microsoft Excel.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Behavioral Analysis of CG9172 and CG5389 RNAi

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
10 day old males with D42-GAL4 activated RNAi against CG9172 and CG5389 or crossed with white1118 laboratory strain were used for behavioral analysis. Flies were monitored with a 2 μW/cm2 intensity green LED light for 7 days at 12:12 light:dark cycle, followed by 7 days of 24 hrs dark cycle in Trikinetics activity monitors (Waltham, MA). Flies were maintained at 22°C, 60% relative humidity. 32 male flies were used per condition, and activity monitor tubes contained a plug of fly food at one end. Experiments using the activity monitor were conducted in duplicate. Data were analyzed using the ShinyR-DAM program [23 (link)] and Microsoft Excel.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Circadian Rhythms in Drosophila Locomotor Activity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For behavioral experiments, adult male flies (2–4 days old) were used for testing locomotor activity rhythms. Flies were entrained for 4 full days LD cycle at 25°C, using about 500 lux light intensities, and then released into DD at 25°C for at least 6 days. Locomotor activity was measured with TriKinetics Activity Monitors in I36-LL Percival Incubators. Locomotor activity was averaged over the 4 days entrainment for LD and 6 days for DD. Analyses of period and power were carried out using FaasX software as previously described [48 (link)]. Actograms were generated using a signal-processing toolbox implemented in MATLAB (MathWorks) [49 (link)]. For GAL80ts experiments, flies were raised at 18°C and tested at 30°C. They were entrained for 5 days and then released in DD for at least 6 days. Morning anticipation was calculated by the ratio of activity counts between 2 hrs before light on and 6 hrs before light on. We first measured the single fly activity counts obtained in twelve 30-min bins between Zeitgeber Time (ZT) 17.5 and ZT24 (6 hr before lights on) and six 30-min bins between ZT22.5 and ZT24 (2 hrs before lights on). The first value is divided by the second to obtain the morning activity index. Morning anticipations of individual flies were then averaged and plotted on the graphs.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Circadian Behavior of Drosophila Under Temperature

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The following behavioral assays were conducted under extremely low (12°C), low (15°C), standard (25°C), or high (30°C) temperature. Adult males between 1 to 5 days old were entrained in TriKinetics Activity Monitors (TriKinetics, Waltham, MA) under a 12hr:12hr light:dark schedule for three days in a temperature-regulated Precision incubator model 818 (Thermo Electron Corporation; Marietta, Ohio). Flies were then placed in constant darkness (DD) and allowed to free-run for 4 days, after which locomotor activity – a commonly used metric of circadian behavior in Drosophila (Frenkel and Ceriani, 2011 (link)) – was scanned into 5 minute bins using the DAM File Scan (v.1.1.06, TriKinetics). We used ClockLab software (v.2.61; Actimetrics, IL) to score an individual fly as either rhythmic or arrhythmic, which we characterized based on the strength of the rhythm (FFT). Flies were scored as rhythmic only if they achieved an FFT value of ≥0.01. For each fly, we reported its behavioral state (rhythmic/arrhythmic); and, if it achieved rhythmicity, the strength of its rhythm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Fly Locomotor Activity Monitoring

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The locomotor activity of individual flies was measured in a Digitherm CircKinetics monitoring incubator (Tritech Research, Los Angeles, USA) at the appropriate temperature under a controlled 12:12-hour dark:light cycle. Individual flies were placed in capillary tubes with standard fly food, and their activity was monitored over 72 hours using TriKinetics Activity Monitors (TriKinetics Inc., Waltham, USA). The flies were acclimated for the first 24 h, and their activity was monitored during the next 48 h. The number of times that flies crossed the centre of the vial per hour was counted and integrated using TriKinetics software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!