The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

11 protocols using integrator system software

1

Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocyte Assessment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
FFPE tissue samples were retrieved and haematoxylin-eosin stained slides were obtained. The IBWG method for TIL assessment in the stromal compartment was applied by one pathologist (J Sanchez) (Figure 1). The densities of T lymphocytes were assessed following our previous report [6 (link)]. Immunostained slides were digitally scanned using a BX63 Olympus scanner (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) at 20× magnification. Digital images were viewed with Visiopharm Integrator System software version 6.6.1.2572 (Visiopharm, Hørsholm, Denmark). Density of CD3, CD8 and CD163-positive cells were calculated, in cases with enough stained tissue, by VisionPharm software by counting the number of positive cells for staining/total number of cells in five high power fields located in the stromal compartment (M Castillo and LA Bernabe) under supervision by a pathologist (J Sanchez) [6 (link)] (Figure 2).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunohistochemical Analysis of ErbB4 Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Animal perfusion and brain processing were performed as previously described64 (link). Immunohistochemistry was performed on 7 μm coronal sections as described in19 (link), 64 (link) using the anti-ErbB4 primary antibodies (1:400; Chemicon, HFR1/2G4), followed by Alexa Fluor-conjugated (Invitrogen) secondary antibodies. Negative controls were prepared identically, but the primary antibody was omitted.
Images were acquired using an Olympus BX-51 microscope and the Visiopharm Integrator System software (Visiopharm). Quantifications were performed in the sublesion area (3 sections per animal, Sham/KO/WT, n =4/6/8) using the computer-assisted Stereological Toolbox program with unbiased sampling (CAST-2, Olympus) by a researcher blind to treatment.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immunohistochemical Localization of Neuropeptide Y

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To localise the cerebral neuropeptide Y (NPY) in the brain tissue, brain sagittal sections (5 μm) were probed with primary antibody against NPY (rabbit, 1:3,000, ab30914, Abcam) and a biotin-conjugated secondary antibody (goat-anti-rabbit, 1:500, Vector Labs, Peterborough, UK) after standard deparaffinisation, rehydration, antigen retrieval, and blocking procedure. Staining was visualised with 0.04% 3,3′-diaminobenzidine (DAB, Sigma-Aldrich) using an ABC Peroxidase Staining Kit (Thermo Scientific). For the quantification of NPY expression in brain, whole sections were scanned at a 10 × objective magnification on a Zeiss Axio Scan Z1 (Zeiss). The region of interest was selected in similar anatomical regions across samples, and the number of NPY-positive cells was counted in the defined frames. Representative images were acquired with a BX-51 microscope (Olympus, Ballerup, Denmark) using Integrator System software (Visiopharm).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantifying Cortical Volumes and Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Perfused cerebral hemispheres were separated by a longitudinal cut in the midsagittal plane. The outline of the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC)—infralimbic cortex (ILC), prelimbic cortex (PLC), anterior cingulate cortex (ACC)—and the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC)—dorsal OFC (dOFC) and ventral OFC (vOFC), was defined in each section using established landmarks.22 Cavalieri's principle estimates of volumes and cell numbers were obtained using Integrator System software (Visiopharm, Copenhagen, Denmark) and a camera (PixeLINK, Ontario, Canada) attached to a motorized microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Histological Analysis of Mouse Middle Ear

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For histological analysis, formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded mouse middle ear tissues were sectioned (4–5 μm), and then stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) to visualize inflammatory responses and pathological changes in the middle ear as described previously (32 (link), 33 (link), 35 (link)). For IF assay, IF detection of CYLD protein was performed using mouse anti-CYLD (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), and FITC-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) in the paraffin section of mouse middle ear tissues as described previously (35 (link)). Images of stained tissue sections were recorded under light- and fluorescence-microscopy systems (AxioVert 40 CFL, AxioCam MRC, and AxioVision LE Image system, Carl Zeiss), and analyzed by using a quantitative image analysis system with the VISIOPHARM Integrator System software version 3.0.8.0 (Visiopharm, Horsholm, Denmark).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Histological and Quantitative Analysis of Liver Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After formalin fixation, dehydration, and paraffin embedding, 4 µm sections were stained for Hematoxylin Eosin (HE), PicroSirus red (PSR), and immunohistochemistry (IHC). IHC was performed on an automated Ventana Ultra system (Ventana Medical Systems, Roche Group, USA). The rat monoclonal (M3/38) antibody against MAC2 (Galectin-3, CL8942AP, Cedarlaine, 1:5000 dilution) or rabbit polyclonal antibody against COL1A1 (LS-C343921, LSBio, 1:1000 dilution) were used to detect macrophages or collagen deposits in liver sections, respectively. Antibody binding was visualized using DAB, hematoxylin was added as a nuclear counterstain.
Image analysis was performed on digital images of the HE, MAC2, and COL1A1 stained slides, using Visiopharm Integrator System software (v2019.2, Visiopharm). Lipidosis was calculated based on the unstained area (fat) on the HE stained slides and corrected to the total section area. For MAC2 and COL1A1 quantification, DAB positive area was quantified and normalized to the total section area. The areas were detected by threshold and machine learning.
Fibrosis score assessment was performed on PSR stained slides at 200x magnification, according to Kleiner et al.56 (link). The definitions of fibrosis stages are: 0= no fibrosis, 0.5-1= perisinusoidal or periportal, 2= perisinusoidal and portal/periportal, 3= bridging fibrosis, 4= cirrhosis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantifying PNPLA3 in Liver Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
FFPE sections were immunohistochemically stained for PNPLA3 (AF5208; R&D Systems), dilution 1:750 (mouse) and 1:300 (human), using an automated Ventana Ultra system (Ventana Medical Systems, Inc, Roche Group, USA).
The deparaffination and pretreatment were performed in the Ventana system as described in the Supporting Materials and Methods. After staining, slides were scanned into a slide scanner (Pannoramic Scan II; 3DHISTECH Ltd, Budapest, Hungary). Image analysis was performed on digital images using Visiopharm Integrator System software (version 2020.03.0.7300; Visiopharm, Hørsholm, Denmark) (Figure S1C–F).
In the PNPLA3 IHC‐stained slides, the diaminobenzidine‐stained area and the total section area were detected by threshold and machine learning in the Visiopharm image analysis system. The PNPLA3‐positive area was quantified and expressed as a fraction of the total section area excluding blood vessels (i.e., the reported PNPLA3 levels are semiquantitative). Artefacts such as folds in the sections, were removed before performing measurements.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Automated Quantification of Podocyte Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunohistochemistry staining was carried out for the podocyte markers nephrin and WT1 (see Table 1 for antibody details).
A novel method was introduced to allow automated unbiased quantification of nephrin and WT1 staining in multiple, adjacent, immunostained, 2‐μm transverse kidney sections that were digitized using slide scanners (Zeiss Axioscan or Zeiss Mirax, Carl Zeiss AG, Munich, Germany), fitted with a 20× air objective yielding images with 4.545 pixels/μm. The resulting virtual slides were imported into Visiopharm Integrator System software (version 5.3, Visiopharm, Hørsholm, Denmark).
For analysis, the tissues from sequential sections were aligned and then resampled at 1.138 pixels/μm using systematic random sampling of the cortical region with coverage of 60%. Machine learning and Bayesian classification (Visiopharm, Visiomorph DP module), followed by morphological filtering, identified tissues and stained areas. Individual glomeruli were identified using nephrin staining and then used to generate regions of interest on the adjacent tissue section that had been stained for WT1 expression. For each glomerulus, the number of WT1‐positive nuclei and the fractional area of WT1 staining were calculated.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantifying Hippocampal Cell Proliferation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To assess cell proliferation in the dentate gyrus (DG) using stereological analysis, brains were embedded in optimum cutting temperature compound and snap-frozen. Serial coronal 20 μm sections were cut in a cryostat, extending over the entire length of the hippocampus. To detect Ki67, a nuclear protein expressed in all phases of the cell cycle except the resting phase G0, a mouse monoclonal anti-Ki67 (Novocastra, UK; 1:100 dilution) was used accordingly with standard procedures. The primary antibody was detected by the Ultravision Detection System (Lab Vision, CA, USA), and the reaction developed with 3,3′-diamino- benzidine substrate (Sigma Aldrich, MO, USA; DAB: 0.025 and 0.15% H2O2 in Tris-HCl 0.05 M, pH 7.2). Sections were then counterstained with hematoxylin.
Hippocampal cell proliferation was measured by counting the cells expressing Ki-67 in the subgranular zone (SGZ), considered as the 3-cell-body-wide zone at the border of the DG and normalized by the respective area (results are presented as number of Ki67+ cells per mm2). The use of the visiopharm integrator system software (Visiopharm, Denmark) allowed the delimitation, at low magnification (40x), of the areas of interest and the identification of the Ki67+ cells within the defined areas was performed at higher magnification (400x). Counts were performed by one researcher blind to the experimental conditions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Evaluating Follicle Density in Xenografts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Follicle density was evaluated in the xenografts after 4 weeks. Only morphological ‘normal’ follicles with clear nucleus were counted, and follicles were defined and counted as previously described [26 (link)]. Primordial follicles were characterized by an oocyte surrounded by a single layer of flat granulosa cells. Primary follicles as oocytes surrounded by a layer of cuboidal granulosa cells, and secondary with two or more layers of cuboidal granulosa cells [46 (link)]. Morphologically, follicles were subcategorized as healthy follicles or atretic follicles [47 (link), 48 (link)]. For area measurement Olympus BH-2 microscope with Visiopharm Integrator System software (Visiopharm, Hoersholm, Denmark, version 4.6.1779) was used. Density was calculated by the total number of follicles and the volume of the graft based on the area measurements. Follicle morphology was subcategorized (healthy or atretic), percentages from total number of the subcategories was used to visualize the data (Fig. 6).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!