The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Chef dr 3 variable angle system

Manufactured by Bio-Rad
Sourced in United States

The CHEF-DR® III variable angle system is a pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) instrument used for the separation and analysis of large DNA molecules. The system allows for the generation of uniform electric fields with adjustable pulse time and field angle, enabling the separation of DNA fragments ranging from 50 kilobase pairs to 10 megabase pairs.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

9 protocols using chef dr 3 variable angle system

1

Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis of Genomic DNA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
90% confluent U-2 OS cells grown on 6 cm dishes were treated as indicated and then trypsinized. 1 × 106 cells per condition were resuspended into 25 μl of PBS, then embedded into 60 μl of molten 0.9% Low Melting Point Agarose (Invitrogen) in 0.5× TAE Buffer (20 mM Tris pH 8.5, 10 mM acetic acid, 0.5 mM EDTA). The mixture was cast into a mold on ice to form a gel plug of volume 80 μl. Each plug was then digested with agitation at 32°C in 0.5 ml of PFGE Lysis Buffer (100 mM EDTA, pH 8.0, 1% N-laurylsarcosine, 0.2% sodium deoxycholate, 1 mg/ml Proteinase K) for 48 h. The treated plugs were then washed three times 15 min each in TE Buffer (20 mM Tris–HCl pH 8.0, 50 mM EDTA) with gentle agitation at room temperature, then cut in half. The half-plugs were electrophoresed at 14°C, in duplicate, in a 0.9% Certified Megabase Agarose (Bio-RAD)/0.5× TAE gel containing 0.25 μg/ml ethidium bromide via the CHEF-DR III Variable Angle System (Bio-RAD). The running parameters were as follows: Block 1 (9 h, 120° included angle, 5.5 V/cm, 30–18 s switch time); Block 2 (6 h, 117° included angle, 4.5 V/cm, 18–9 s switch time); Block 3 (6 h, 112° included angle, 4.0 V/cm, 9–5 s switch time). Resolved gels were visualized on a Typhoon 9400 Variable Mode Imager (GE Healthcare), then quantified with ImageQuant 5.2 (GE Healthcare).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

PFGE Gel Electrophoresis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PFGE was performed as described in [66 (link)], and the CHEF-DR® III variable angle system was used for gel electrophoresis (Bio-Rad). 150 ml 1% PFGE certified agarose (Biozym Gold Agarose) prepared in 0.5 × TBE was used for gel casting. The gels were run in 0.5 × TBE for 24 h under the following conditions: 6 V/cm, 120 degree included angle, 8–50 sec switch time ramp, 14°C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Genetic Relatedness Analysis of CRKP Isolates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MLST and PFGE were used to determine the genetic relatedness among the 45 CRKP isolates. PCR and sequencing for MLST were carried out for seven housekeeping genes (gapA, infB, mdh, pgi, phoE, rpoB, and tonB) for K pneumoniae and the sequences were compared in the MLST database, so that the allelic numbers and sequence types (STs) could be determined.33 The allelic profiles and STs were assigned using an online database (https://pubmlst.org/). For PFGE, bacterial DNA was cleaved with XbaI endonuclease (Roche, Penzberg, Germany), and the XbaI‐digested genomic DNA was subjected to PFGE using a CHEF‐DR® III Variable Angle System (Bio‐Rad, USA).34 The PFGE patterns were compared using BioNumerics software (Applied Maths, Kortrijk, Belgium) with dice correlation for band matching at a 1.5% position tolerance and the unweighted pair group method with an arithmetic average (UPGMA). Clusters were defined as DNA patterns sharing >80% similarity.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Genetic Relatedness Analysis of Klebsiella pneumoniae

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) were used to determine the genetic relatedness among the 18 K. pneumoniae isolates. PCR and MLST were conducted for seven housekeeping genes (gapA, infB, mdh, pgi, phoE, rpoB, and tonB), and the sequences were compared using the MLST database (see test footnote 1) to determine the allelic numbers and sequence types (STs). The allelic profiles and STs were assigned using an online database.2 For PFGE, bacterial genomic DNA was cleaved with XbaI endonuclease (Roche, Penzberg, Germany) and subjected to PFGE using the CHEF-DR® III Variable Angle System (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). The PFGE patterns of the 18 strains were compared using BioNumerics software (Applied Maths, Kortrijk, Belgium) with Dice correlation for band matching at a 1.5% position tolerance and the unweighted pair group method with an arithmetic average. Clusters were defined as DNA patterns sharing more than 80% similarity (Neoh et al., 2019 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Molecular Typing of Bacterial Isolates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Repetitive extragenic palindromic PCR (REP-PCR) typing was performed on all isolates as described elsewhere39 (link). Amplicons were run in a 1.5% agarose gel for 100 min, stained with ethidium bromide, and photographed. When at least two different bands were observed among isolates clonal relationship was also determined by PFGE. For this purpose, bacterial DNA embedded in agarose plugs was digested with the restriction enzyme XbaI and DNA separation was then performed in a CHEF-DRIII variable angle system (Bio-Rad, California, USA). Finally, the PFGE patterns were analysed with Fingerprinting II v4.5 software (Bio-Rad) and interpreted according to the criteria established by Tenover et al.40 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Genotyping Clostridium striatum Isolates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We obtained XbaI macro-restriction patterns of the 63 C. striatum with a published protocol48 (link) and a CHEF-DRIII variable angle system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, California, USA). The PFGE patterns were analysed with Fingerprinting II v4.5 software (Bio-Rad). Each isolate was compared with all other isolates using the Dice similarity coefficient and the unweighted pair Group method with arithmetic means (UPGMA), with 1% of optimization and tolerance. Isolates were classified as indistinguishable if they showed 100% similarity, as closely related subtypes if they showed 95–99% similarity, and as different strains if they showed <95% similarity.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

PFGE and MLST analysis of blaNDM-5 E. coli

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PFGE and MLST were used to investigate the homology levels among the blaNDM‐5‐positive E coli isolates. Bacterial DNA was prepared and cleaved with XbaI endonuclease (Roche) as described previously.21 The XbaI‐digested genomic DNA was subjected to PFGE using a CHEF‐DR® III Variable Angle System (Bio‐Rad), and then the PFGE patterns were compared using BioNumerics software (Applied Maths). Clusters were defined as DNA patterns sharing >85% similarity. PCR and sequencing for MLST were carried out for seven housekeeping genes per species: adk, fumC, gyrB, icd, mdh, purA, and recA for E coli22 and the sequences were compared in the MLST database, so that allelic numbers and sequence types (STs) could be determined.3 The allelic profiles and STs were assigned using an online database (http://mlst.warwick.ac.uk/mlst/dbs/Ecoli).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

PFGE Analysis of Bacterial Isolates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The PCR confirmed isolates were subjected to pulse field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) using BcuI (SpeI) and XbaI restriction enzymes (Pournaras et al., 2005[30 (link)], Siarkou et al., 2009[37 (link)]) with minor modifications to the previously reported method (Hu and Manos, 2015[20 (link)]). Overnight cultures (250 µl) were centrifuged and washed twice with 0.9 % NaCl. The bacterial suspension was mixed with 1.2 % PFGE agarose to make gel plugs. These plugs were digested overnight with proteinase K. The plugs were washed thrice with 1X TE buffer and digested with respective restriction enzyme. The plugs were loaded in 1.2 % PFGE agarose gel along with molecular marker (Lambda ladder PFG, New England Biolabs). The gel was run in 0.5X TBE buffer containing 100 µmol/L thiourea using CHEF DR-III variable angle system (Bio-Rad). The equipment was set as angle 120°, voltage 6V, pulse of 5-50, duration 22 h. Then the gel was immersed in ethidium bromide (0.5 µg/ml) for 15 min and then visualized by gel doc system. The isolates having three or more different bands were considered as different PFGE type.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

MLST and PFGE Typing of P. aeruginosa

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The epidemiological relatedness among the CRPA isolates was determined using MLST and PFGE. MLST typing of P. aeruginosa isolates was carried out using PCR and the DNA sequencing of seven housekeeping (acsA, aroE, guaA, mutL, nuoD, ppsA, and trpE).24 (link) To determine the allelic numbers and STs, the nucleotide sequences were compared with the sequences in the MLST database (http://pubmlst.org/paeruginosa). PFGE analysis was performed as previously described.25 (link) DNA fragments digested with XbaI (Promega, Southampton, UK) were separated using a CHEF-DR® III variable angle system (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA) according to the following conditions: initial switch time, 0.5 s; final switch time, 30 s; voltage, 6 V/cm; included angle, 120°; and run time, 17 hours. The DNA of Salmonella enterica serovar Braenderup H9812 (ATCC BAA-664) digested with XbaI (Promega) was used as a molecular size marker. BioNumerics software (Applied Maths, Kortrijk, Belgium) was used to analyze the PFGE patterns. If the Dice similarity was >80% using Dice correlation for band matching at a 1.5% position tolerance and the unweighted pair group method with arithmetic average, CRPA isolates were classified into the same PFGE cluster and considered to be closely related.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!