The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Em ccd camera

Manufactured by Yokogawa

The EM-CCD camera is a specialized imaging device designed for low-light applications. It utilizes an Electron Multiplying Charge Coupled Device (EM-CCD) sensor to amplify weak signals, enabling high-sensitivity detection of faint light sources. The core function of the EM-CCD camera is to capture and digitize optical images with high quantum efficiency and low noise, making it suitable for applications that require accurate detection of subtle light signals.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

8 protocols using em ccd camera

1

Quantitative Live-Cell Imaging of GFP Probes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Imaging was performed under normal growth conditions using phenol-red free media. Cells were plated on Fluorodish poly-D-lysine coated plates (World Precision Instruments) and imaged using a 100X 1.4NA oil immersion objective on a Zeiss CSU spinning disk confocal microscope with a Yokogawa spinning disk scan head and an EM-CCD camera. 20–30 Z sections were obtained with a spacing of 0.5 μm and acquired at a rate of one stack every two seconds for 200 total time points or one stack every 40 seconds for 100 total time points. Laser intensity was 6% and exposure time was 30ms for 2 seconds intervals and 45ms for 40 seconds intervals. For fixed cell measurements, cells were fixed for 10 minutes in 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS and quenched 5 minutes in 0.1M Tris-HCl pH 7.4 and stained using a 1:2000 dilution of Alexa 488 conjugated rabbit monoclonal anti-GFP from Life Technologies (G10362). Axial elongation was corrected prior to calculating probe-to-probe distances (Figure S3).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Confocal Microscopy Imaging and Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Images were acquired using a Hamamatsu EM-CCD camera and a Yokogawa CSU-10 spinning disk confocal mounted on a Zeiss AxioImager microscope with a 100× Plan-Apochromat objective. The microscope was controlled by iVision software (Biovision Technologies, Exton, PA) or microManager (Edelstein et al., 2010 ). Acquired images were processed to enhance brightness/contrast using ImageJ 1.40g and Photoshop (CS6 Extended Adobe Systems, InC., San Jose, CA), and smoothened using a 0.8 pixel radius Gaussian blur filter. 3D reconstructions were built from confocal Z-stacks, analyzed, and exported as (.mov) files using IMARIS 7.4 (Bitplane, Inc., Saint Paul, MN). Figures and graphs were constructed using Illustrator (CS3 Extended Adobe Systems, Inc., San Jose, CA) and JMP (Version 10, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, 1989-2007). Movies were annotated using Photoshop. Timelapse imaging and invadopodia analysis was performed as described previously (Hagedorn et al., 2013 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Live-cell Microscopy of Fluorescent Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Images and time-lapse series were collected with Nikon inverted spinning disk confocal microscope equipped with Yokogawa CSU-X1 Spinning Disk, EMCCD camera, laser launch including 445 nm (to image Cerulean and CFP), 488 nm (to image GFP), 514 nm (to image Venus and YFP), 561 nm (to image mCherry), and 647 nm (to image Cy5), focus drift correction through the Perfect Focus System, and 60× Plan Apo 1.40 NA oil/0.13 mm WD, and controlled by the NIS-Elements software. For live-cell imaging experiments, cells were seeded in # 1.5 coverslip bottom dishes and incubated in a complete DMEM cell culture medium (described above) at 37°C with 5% CO2 within a Tokai incubator on the microscope stage. Imaging experiments were performed at 60–80% confluency of stably transfected cells or 48–72 h after transient transfection, unless otherwise specified in the figure legend.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Multicolor Confocal Microscopy Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All samples were imaged on a Nikon Eclipse Ti microscope base equipped with a Yokogawa CSUX1 spinning disk confocal scanner unit, using 100x / 1.49 NA oil objective and Andor EM-CCD camera. Images were acquired using MetaMorph software. A single Z-slice in the center of cell nucleus was acquired per image, with an average of 100–200 images acquired per sample. The lasers used were: 405nm, 488nm, 561nm and 637nm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Imaging and Tracking Cellular Structures

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell imaging was performed on a Zeiss Axiovert microscope equipped with a Cool Snap ES CCD camera (Ropper Scientific). Images were captured using 2×2 binning and 12 sequential z-planes were collected at 0.3-µm step intervals with an exposure time of 200 ms except for time-lapse video microscopy movies of Abp1–RFP and Sla1–RFP that were collected every second with five sequential z-planes (0.5 µm steps) and an exposure time of 100 ms.
For analysis of microtubules and vesicle motion, cell imaging was performed on a confocal spinning disk inverted microscope (Nikon TI-E Eclipse) equipped with a Yokogawa motorized confocal head CSUX1-A1 and an Evolve EMCCD camera. A dual color acquisition of six sequential z-planes (0.3-µm steps) was performed every second with an exposure time of 50 ms and 100 ms for GFP–Snc1 and Bik1–RFP, respectively. All image manipulations, montages, and fluorescence-intensity measurements were performed using ImageJ (Schneider et al., 2012 (link)). Tracking analysis and dot number quantifications were performed using Icy (de Chaumont et al., 2012 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Imaging Phytohormone Responses in Seedlings

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To observe the response of ethylene (EIN3-GFP), auxin (DR5v2-GFP), and cytokinin (TCSn-GFP) reporter lines to MBZ, 14-day-old seedlings grown on ½ MS media were transferred to a Chambered Coverglass (Thermo Scientific) that was filled with treatment medium. For chamber preparation, 6 mL of ½ MS medium (1% agar) supplemented with the different treatments (DMSO, 10 μM MBZ, 1 μM IAA, 50 μM ACC, and 10 μM tZ) was filled to each chamber. After 20 min of medium solidification, the seedlings were placed on the media surface and the lateral roots were adjusted to positions suitable for imaging.
For imaging, a Zeiss CSU Spinning Disk Confocal Microscope equipped with laser 488 mm and a Yokogawa spinning disk scan head with EM-CCD camera were used to set up the image acquisition every 20 min for a total of 4 h. Three z stack positions were automatically captured at each time point under 10X objective and Fiji was used to quantify the average intensity of GFP fluorescence. For proper comparison at different treatment conditions of each reporter lines, we normalized the average fluorescence data as the percentages (or relative fluorescence intensity as text label). In detail, the first time point of each treatment is set as 100% and the relative fluorescence intensity from the second time point is calculated as the fold-change in percentages comparing the first time point.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Multicolor Confocal Imaging of Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All samples were imaged on a Nikon Eclipse Ti microscope base equipped with a Yokogawa CSUX1 spinning disk confocal scanner unit, using 100×/1.49 NA oil objective and Andor EM-CCD camera. Images were acquired using MetaMorph software. A single Z-slice in the center of cell nucleus was acquired per image, with an average of 100–200 images acquired per sample. The lasers used were: 405 nm, 488 nm, 561 nm and 637 nm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantifying Collagen Localization in C. elegans

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Images were acquired using a Hammamatsu EM-CCD camera, a spinning-disk confocal microscope (CSU-10; Yokogawa Corporation of America) mounted on an AxioImager base (Carl Zeiss) with 40× and 100× Plan Apochromat objectives (1.4 NA) and controlled by μManager [101 ]. Worms were photobleached on a Zeiss AxioImager A1 microscope with a 100× plan-apochromat objective by exposing a portion of the uterine/vulval tissue to 561 nm light for 2 minutes. Acquired images were processed to enhance brightness/contrast using ImageJ 1.40g and Photoshop (CS6 Extended Adobe Systems, InC., San Jose, CA). Colocalization analysis was performed on confocal z-stacks using the “Coloc” module in IMARIS 7.4 (Bitplane, Inc., Saint Paul, MN). Measurements of collagen::mCherry intensity at the BM were collected in ImageJ by measuring the mean grey value of a 3 pixel width line drawn along the BM. Measurements at the surface of the muscle were acquired using the same method, except a 2 pixel width line was used. An equivalent line was drawn in an adjacent region of the worm to measure the background signal within the worm, which was subtracted from the signal at the BM or muscle surface.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!