The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

15 protocols using anti hla dr apc

1

Immune Activation Markers on Whole Blood

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immune activation markers were measured on fresh whole blood specimens. Specimens were stained with the following pre‐mixed four‐color fluorochrome‐conjugated antibody combinations: anti‐CD4‐FITC, anti‐CD38‐PE, anti‐CD3‐PerCP, anti‐HLA‐DR‐APC and anti‐CD8‐FITC, anti‐CD38‐PE, anti‐CD3‐PerCP, anti‐HLA‐DR‐APC (BD). Specimens were run on a four‐color FACSCalibur flow cytometer (BD), and flow cytometry data were analyzed and quality controlled using FlowJo software (Treestar, Ashland, OR, USA). Gates were set conservatively to capture high‐level expression of CD38/HLADR. Percentages of activated cells, defined as CD38+HLA‐DR+, CD38HLA‐DR+, or HLA‐DR+ (CD38+ or CD38), in both CD4+ and CD8+ subsets were used in analyses.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunophenotyping of Immune Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples were analyzed in a Becton Dickinson FACScalibur (San Jose, CA) with at least 10,000 positive events measured per sample. The following antibodies were used: anti-CD25-APC and anti-CD71-PE (eBioscience) and anti-CD83-FITC, anti-CD11c-PE, anti-CD80-PE, anti-CD14-APC, anti-HLADR-APC, anti-CD4-APC, and anti-CD8-PE (BD/Pharmingen). Intracellular Foxp3 staining was performed using the Human Regulatory T Cell Staining kit (eBioscience).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immunophenotyping of Immune Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For cell surface and intracellular staining, standard protocols were followed using monoclonal antibodies. Cells and antibodies were co-incubated on ice in the dark for 30 minutes. For intracellular staining of cytokines, cells were permeabilized using the Cytofix/Cytoperm Kit (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA) for 30 minutes on ice, followed by an additional 30-minute incubation with antibodies in the dark at 4°C. The following antibodies were used: Anti-HLA-DR-APC (BD, cat. no.: 339194), anti-human CD54-APC (BD, cat. no.: 561899), anti-human CD86-FITC (BD, cat. no.: 560958), anti-human CD3-Percp (BD, cat. no.: 552851), anti-Human CD4-PE (BD, cat. no.: 557344), anti-Human CD8-FITC (BD, cat. no.: 555366), anti-human Ki-67-APC (BioLegend, cat. no.: 350514), and anti-IFN-gamma-APC (BD, cat. no.: IC285A-100). Imaging flow cytometry was performed using the ImageStreamX MarkII quantitative imaging flow cytometer, while conventional flow cytometry was performed using the BD FACS Calibur flow cytometer.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Characterization of CD16+ Monocyte Inflammatory Profile

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The isolated CD16 and CD16+ monocytes were double-stained with anti-CD16-PE (BD Biosciences, USA) and anti-TLR4-APC (BD Biosciences, USA) antibodies. In a dose-finding preliminary experiment, the most potent stimulation of TLR4 expression on cells analyzed by flow cytometry (FACScan, BD Biosciences) was presented at 100ng/mL of Escherichia Coli LPS (Sigma-Aldrich, St, Louis, MO). Therefore, all the following acute in vitro experiments were divided into un-stimulated and stimulated [LPS, 100ng/mL] groups. The HLA-DR expression on CD16- (classical) and CD16+ (non-classical) monocytes were measured by staining with anti-HLA-DR-APC, anti-CD14-FITC (BD Biosciences, USA) and anti-CD16-PE antibodies.
Our preliminary experiments revealed that the TLR4 expression was not different between CD16- (classical) monocytes between groups. It is well-established that classical monocyte are phagocytic with no inflammatory attributes [15 (link)–17 (link)], so the LPS-stimulated extra- and intra-cellular inflammatory cytokines production and corresponding signals were only evaluated in cultured CD16+ (non-classical) monocytes.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Multiparameter Flow Cytometry Immunoassay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antibodies used for surface staining included anti-CD14 Qdot 655, anti-CD20 Qdot 655, anti-CD4 PeCy5.5, anti-CD8 Qdot605 (Invitrogen; Carlsbad, California), anti-CD14 BV650, anti-CD20 BV650 (Biolegend; San Diego, California), anti-CD28 ECD (Beckman Coulter; Fullerton, CA), anti-CD25 APC-Cy7, anti-CD95 PE-Cy5, and anti-HLA-DR APC (BD Pharmingen; San Diego, California). Antibodies used for intracellular staining included anti-interleukin-2 (IL-2) Alexa700 (Biolegend), anti-interferon-gamma (IFNγ) Alexa 700 (Invitrogen), anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNFα) Alexa 700, anti-CD3 Pac Blue, anti-CD69 PE, and anti-Ki67 FITC (BD Pharmingen).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Multicolor Flow Cytometry Panels

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The following flow cytometry antibodies were purchased from BD Biosciences (San Jose, CA): anti-CD3-PE Cy7, anti-CD4-Alexa488, anti-CD8-PacBlu, anti-CD28-PE, anti-CD57-APC, anti-CD45RO-Alexa 700, anti-HLA-DR-APC, anti-CD14-PacBlu, anti-CD11a-FITC, anti-CD16-PE-Cy7, anti-CD163-PE, anti-CD62L-APC, and anti-CD86-Alexa 700. Two multi-color panels were used for T cells, and two panels were used for monocytes. Data were collected using a BD LSRII flow cytometer and analyzed with FCS Express software (DeNovo Software, Los Angeles, CA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Multiparametric Flow Cytometry Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
5-Azacytidine was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (Munich, Germany) and used at a final concentration of 5 μM or 20 μM. All flow cytometry experiments were performed using a FACS Canto II (BD Bioscience, Heidelberg, Germany). For flow cytometry the following antibodies were used: anti-CD3-PE, anti-CD4-FITC, anti-CD8-APC, anti-CD25-PE, anti-CD45-FITC, anti-CD45RO-PE, anti-CD45RA-FITC, anti-CD62L-PE, anti-CCR7-PE, anti-HLA-DR-APC, anti-Granzyme-PE antibodies (obtained from BD Bioscience) anti-CD127-PC5, anti-IFNγ-PE/Cy7, anti-IL17-APC, anti-IL4-FITC, and anti-FoxP3-APC antibodies obtained from eBioscience (San Diego, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Comprehensive Immune Cell Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The following mAbs were used for flow cytometry: anti-CD3 PerCP, anti-CD4 FITC, anti-CD4 PerCP, anti-CD4 PE-Cy7, anti-CD8 PErCP, anti-CD8 APC-Cy7, anti-CD28 FITC, anti-CD95 APC, anti-CD195 (anti-CCR5) PE, anti-Ki67 PE, anti-HLA-DR APC, and anti-HLA-DR FITC (BD Biosciences). Additionally, annexin V PE was purchased from BD Biosciences, anti-CD8 APC and anti-CD8 PE were obtained from Beckman Coulter (CA, USA), and anti-CD38 FITC was purchased from StemCell Technologies (Vancouver, Canada). Flow cytometry data were acquired on a FACSAria II (BD Biosciences). All data were analyzed using FlowJo software (Tree Star, Ashland, OR, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Monocyte Phenotyping by Flow Cytometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In our study, classical monocyte was marked by CD14+ CD16− HLA-DR+ referred to previous study [15 (link)]. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were isolated from freshly obtained EDTA-anti-coagulated whole blood samples according to Ficoll PBMC isolation protocols [23 (link)], and then stained with following murine anti-human monoclonal antibodies: 5 μl of anti-CD16 PE (Clone: B73.1, cat No.: 561313), 10 μl of anti-CD14 FITC (Clone: M5E2, cat No.: 555397), and 10 μl of anti-HLA-DR APC (Clone: TU36, cat No.: 559868) (all from BD Biosciences) and incubated for 30 min at room temperature in the dark. Next, cells were washed twice with cold phosphate-buffered saline and fixed with Cell Fix (BD Biosciences) [24 (link)]. Flow cytometry was performed using FC500 MPL software (Beckman Coulter) and data of CMF were analyzed using MXP Cytometer software (version 2.0, Beckman Coulter) (Supplementary Figure S1A,B).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Characterization of hUC-MSCs Multilineage Potential

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
During the passaging of hUC-MSCs, their morphology was observed by an inverted microscope (CKX41, OLYMPUS, Tokyo, Japan).
To test the multilineage differentiation capacity of the hUC-MSCs, adipogenic, chondrogenic, and osteogenic differentiation kits (VivaCell, Shanghai, China) were used following the manufacturer’s specifications. Finally, adipogenic, chondrogenic, and osteogenic differentiation results were tested through Oil red O staining, Alcian blue staining, and Alizarin red staining, respectively.
Surface markers on hUC-MSCs were evaluated by flow cytometry (Canto II, BD Biosciences, CA, USA). Briefly, hUC-MSCs were washed twice with staining buffer (BD Biosciences) and stained with anti-CD11b-PE, anti-CD19-FITC, anti-CD34-PE, anti-CD45-APC-Cy7, anti-CD73-PE, anti-CD90-FITC, anti-CD105-APC, anti-HLA-DR-APC, and the corresponding isotype control antibodies (all antibodies were purchased from BD Biosciences) for 30 min at room temperature in the dark. Then, the hUC-MSCs were washed twice with staining buffer and resuspended in staining buffer for flow cytometry analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!