The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

9 protocols using anti ha hrp

1

Transient Protein Co-expression and Immunoprecipitation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Constructs were co-expressed in N. benthamiana leaves by Agrobacterium-mediated transient expression (as above). After 2–3 days, plant proteins were extracted from harvested leaves in 5 ml of extraction buffer as described earlier48 . Proteins were incubated with agarose or sepharose beads of indicated epitope tags for 2 h at 4 °C. For GFP and Myc IPs, GFP-Trap and Myc-Trap agarose beads (Chromotek) were used and for FLAG and HA IPs, anti-FLAG M2 agarose and anti-HA agarose (Sigma) beads were used. After washing with washing buffer five times, beads were resuspended with 50 μL of 1 × SDS loading buffer. Proteins were separated on 10% SDS-PAGE gel, transferred onto a PVDF membrane using a semi-dry electroblotter (Bio-Rad), and detected with antibodies. Mouse anti-FLAG (1:5000, Sigma), anti-cMyc-HRP (1:10000, Santa Cruz), anti-HA-HRP (1:1500, Santa Cruz), anti-GFP-HRP (1:10000, Santa Cruz), rabbit anti-phospho-p44/42 MAPKs (1:5000, Cell Signaling Technology) and rabbit anti-14-3-3 (1:2000, Argisera) were used. The chemiluminescent signal was detected using Amersham ECL-Plus blotting detection system (GE Healthcare). For Blue native PAGE, proteins were extracted in the same way, separated on an Invitrogen 4-16% gradient NativePAGE Bis-Tris Gel, and transferred onto a PVDF membrane following the manufacturer’s instructions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Western Blot Analysis of Cell Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Protein samples were collected in SDS sample buffer, separated using gel electrophoresis and transferred via wet transfer onto a PVDF membrane. The membrane was blocked with 5% milk in TBST and probed with primary antibodies at 1:1000 dilution overnight at 4°C and secondary HRP antibodies at 1:2000 for 1 hour at RT. Signal was assessed via chemiluminescence with the SuperSignal West Pico PLUS substrate (ThermoFisher, #34580) and visualized on a ChemiDoc MP system (Bio-Rad). Anti-Cas9 antibody (Cell Signaling, #14697), anti-β-actin (Sigma, #A3854), anti-c-Jun (Cell Signaling, #9165S), anti-c-Fos (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, #sc-52), anti-HA-HRP (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, #sc-805), anti-BRD4 (Active Motif, #39909), anti-BRD3 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, #sc-515729), anti-BRD2 (Cell Signaling, #5848S), and c-Myc (Cell Signaling, #9402) and anti-EGFR (BD Biosciences, #610017) were used for analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immunoprecipitation and Immunoblotting of Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Leaf samples were processed as described earlier [28] (link). Samples were centrifuged at 13000 g for 20 min at 4°C, adjusted to 2 mg/ml total protein concentration, and pretreated with Protein A-agarose (Roach) for 3 to 4 h. Immunoprecipitations were performed on 1.5 ml total protein by adding anti-HA (Santa Cruz; 1∶100) or anti-GFP (Roach; 1∶100) overnight at 4°C. After incubation with 20 µl protein A-agarose at 4°C for 3 to 4 h, beads were washed 4 times with Tris-buffered saline (TBS) containing 0.5% (v/v) ND-40, immunoprecipitates were analyzed by immunobloting.
Samples were electrophoresed on 8% SDS-acrylamide gels, transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes (BIO-RAD), blocked, incubated overnight with primary antibody [anti-GFP (Roach) 1∶5000; anti-HA-HRP (Santa Cruz) 1∶2000], and washed in TBST (TBS with 0.1% (w/v) Tween-20). For anti-GFP, blots were incubated with a secondary antibody anti-mouse-HRP [(Santa Cruz) 1∶5000]. Signals were visualized using chemiluminescent substrate (Thermo Scientific) before exposure to X-ray film.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Antibody Dilutions for Immunoblotting

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The following antibodies were used for immunoblotting at the indicated dilutions: Anti-FLAG-HRP (A8592, Sigma Aldrich, 1:1250), anti-V5 (46–0705, Invitrogen, 1:5000), and anti-GST (27–4577–01, GE Healthcare, 1:2000); anti-p-Tyr-HRP (sc-7020, 1:500), anti-p85 (sc-423, 1:500), anti-Hsp56 (sc-1803, 1:1250), anti-GAPDH (sc-47724, 1:5000), and anti-HA-HRP (sc-7392, 1:500) were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology; anti-ACK (07–757, 1:2000) and anti-ACK p-Tyr284 (09–142, 1:5000) were purchased from Millipore; anti-Histone H3 (ab1791, 1:5000) and anti-pTyr607 p85 (ab182651, 1:1000) were purchased from Abcam. The HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies donkey anti-mouse (sc-2318, 1:2000) and donkey anti-rabbit (sc-2317, 1:5000) were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. Anti-FLAG (F3165, Sigma Aldrich) was used for immunoprecipitation. If necessary, antibodies were diluted in PBS-0.1% Tween.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Co-immunoprecipitation of WBSCR22 Interactors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells electroporated with 200 ng (COS-7) or 1000 ng (HeLa) of plasmids pQM-CMV-E2-N/A, pQM-NTag-WB22, pQM-WBSCR22-KT/AA, pQM-WBSCR22-D117A, pQM-WBSCR22-MTD or pQM-TRMT112-E2Tag were collected 24 hours post-transfection and co-immunoprecipitation was performed as described previously [33 (link)], except for the antibody against E2Tag (clone 5E11; Icosagen) was used for immunoprecipitation. Alternatively, COS-7 cells were transfected by electroporation with plasmids pEGFP-C1 or pEGFP-WBSCR22-CTD and 24 hours after transfection, co-immunoprecipitaion using GFP-Trap_M magnetic beads (ChromoTek) was performed according to manufacturer´s protocol. The proteins of interest were detected by western blot using the mouse monoclonal antibodies anti-E2Tag antibody 5E11 (Icosagen), anti-C1QBP (sc-271201, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti-α-tubulin (Sigma Aldrich), anti HA-HRP (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), and rabbit polyclonal antibodies against TRMT112 (HPA040006, Sigma Aldrich), WBSCR22 (sc-135322, Santa Cruz Biotechnology) and EGFP (University of Tartu). Detection was performed using an ECL detection kit (GE Healthcare) following the manufacturer's manual.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Protein Extraction from Aerial Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Protein extraction from aerial tissues was performed with sample homogenization using protein extraction buffer (50 mM Tris–HCl, 150 mM NaCl, 0.1% Tween 20) supplemented with 1% β-mercaptoethanol, 0.1 M PMSF and protease inhibitor (protease inhibitor cocktail tablets; Roche). The homogenate was centrifuged for 10 min at 4 °C at 13,300g. The supernatant was recovered and analysed by western blot. The following antibodies were used to detect protein of interest: for HA-tagged proteins, anti-HA-HRP (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, catalogue no. sc-7392); for GFP-tagged proteins, anti-GFP (Abcam, catalogue no. ab290) followed by anti-rabbit HRP conjugate (Sigma-Aldrich, catalogue no. A6154). All of the antibodies were used with 1:5,000 dilution. After chemiluminescence detection, membranes were stained with Coomassie blue.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Western Blot Analysis of Fly Head Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Protein extracts were derived from adult fly heads, lysed in sample buffer or Urea Buffer (150 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl pH8, 0,5 mM EDTA, 10% glycerol, 5 mM EGTA, 50 mM NaF, 4 M urea, 5 mM DTT, Protease Inhibitor Cocktail (PIC) (Roche), fractionated by SDS-PAGE and transferred to nitrocellulose membrane. Primary antibodies were: anti-TBPH rabbit (1:1000; homemade [18 (link)]); anti-Actin goat (1:1000; Santa Cruz, sc-1616); anti-Vibrator rabbit (1:5000; also named Giotto [54 (link)]); anti-H3K9me2 mouse (1:400; Abcam ab1220), anti-H3K9me3 rabbit (1:1000; Abcam ab8898); anti-Tubulin mouse (1:5000; Sigma, T-5168); anti-HA HRP (1:1000; Santa Cruz sc7392); anti-Su(var)3-9 rat (1:50; [33 (link)]). As a secondary antibody, we used the appropriate HRP-conjugated antibody (GE Healthcare) diluted 1:5000 in PBS-Tween 0.1%. Membranes were incubated 5 min with ECL substrate (#1705062 and #1705060, Bio-Rad) and the HRP-ECL reaction was revealed using the ChemiDocTM XRS gel imaging system (Bio-Rad). Band intensity quantification was performed using the gel analyzer tool in Fiji/ImageJ software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Mitochondrial Protein Localization Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mitochondria were isolated as previously described in Diekert et al., 2001 [58 ]. The protease protection assay was performed as previously described in Diekert et al., 2001 with the following modification. 200μg of isolated mitochondria were used in each protease protection assay for both the ASY092 (Rad51-HA) and ASY127 (Rad59-HA) strains. 100μg of isolated mitochondria were used in the protease protection assay for DFS188 (WT). Samples were subjected to western blot analysis on 10% SDS-PAGE gels. Antibodies used for detection were as follows: 1:2500 dilution of anti-HA-HRP (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), 1:4000 anti-Cytb2 (generous gift from Dr. Tom Fox), 1:4000 anti-Cit1 (generous gift from Dr. Tom Fox), and 1:25,000 anti-POR1 (Invitrogen).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Co-immunoprecipitation of HAM1 and MRG2

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Co-IP experiments were performed as described previously with minor modifications (41 (link)). Briefly, 10-day-old seedlings (∼2 g) expressing pHAM1::HA-HAM1 35S::GFP-MRG2 or pHAM1::HA-HAM1 were harvested and total proteins were extracted and immunoprecipitated with anti-GFP antibody (Invitrogen, #A-11122). The HA-HAM1 protein in the immunoprecipitates was detected by western blotting with anti-HA-HRP (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, #sc-7392).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!