The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Star ccm

Manufactured by Siemens
Sourced in Germany, United States

STAR-CCM+ is a comprehensive computational fluid dynamics (CFD) software suite developed by Siemens. It provides a robust and versatile platform for simulating complex fluid flow, heat transfer, and multiphysics phenomena. The software offers a wide range of modeling capabilities and advanced numerical techniques to help engineers and scientists analyze and optimize their designs.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Lab products found in correlation

11 protocols using star ccm

1

Numerical Simulations of Blood Flow in HM3 Pump

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Numerical simulations of the blood flow within the HM3 with and without the AP were conducted in STAR-CCM+ (Siemens, Munich, Germany). The HM3 pump geometry and mesh were obtained from Boraschi et al. (17 (link)). The mesh contained 10 million polyhedral grid elements, including an 8-element boundary layer along the rotor, a 10-element boundary layer along the stator, and local mesh refinement where needed. Unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes simulations were conducted using implicit second-order temporal and spatial discretization, Menter's Shear Stress Transport (SST) k-ω turbulent modeling, dynamic time-stepping (programmed to correspond to 2° of rotation per time step), and a 10−5 convergence criterion for the residual error. Blood was considered as an incompressible Newtonian fluid (ρ = 1, 050 kg/m3 and μ = 3.5 mPa·s). For regional analysis, the pump fluid volume was divided into three parts: the inflow cannula, the pump core, and the outflow cannula (Figure 1). More detailed information on the HM3 geometry, grid independence tests, validation, and computational methods can be found in our previous studies (17 (link), 18 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Optimized Cerebrovascular CFD Simulations

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The simulations were developed in the commercial CFD package STAR-CCM+ (V12, Siemens, Germany) and followed recommendations for development of cerebrovascular simulations (Berg et al. 2019 (link)). We used a combination of a polyhedral element mesh for the core of the fluid domain and 20 prism layer elements in the near wall boundary to sufficiently capture the velocity gradients and ensure accurate calculation of wall shear stress. In addition, we prescribed extrusions at the fluid boundaries equal to 11 times the boundary diameter to ensure adequate development of flow upstream and downstream of the fluid domain (Bluestein et al. 1997 (link)). Mesh core density was set proportional to local vessel diameter, and the mesh settings were prescribed as per our previously published work (Thomas et al. 2020 (link)). These settings were optimised to ensure mesh independence using the grid convergence index (Roache 1994 (link)) and used the subject with the greatest inlet velocity measurements for this optimisation. Optimal mesh size settings were deemed sufficient when the grid convergence index for wall shear stress within the CoW was found to fall below 3% (Thomas et al. 2020 (link)). Final mesh sizes ranged from 9.1 to 16.7 million cells per geometry. Further details regarding the computational mesh and extrusion specification are given in online resource 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Simulating Backward-Facing Step Flows

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The expected wall shear stress in the backward-facing step chamber was estimated by dynamical fluid simulations in a commercially available software environment (StarCCM+, Siemens). The geometrical negative of the internal channel volume was discretized into 9.63·106 hexahedral cells, which were condensed around the step to ensure sufficient resolution in the step vicinity. The turbulence in the step wake was captured using a large eddy vortex model (LES) that resolves bigger structures in the interior of the flow, whereas smaller near-wall vortices were described with a simpler Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) approach. For further details of the discretization, the reader is referred to Supplementary Figures 13.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Computational Fluid Dynamics in Vascular Stenosis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The geometries were imported into the destination CFD software STAR-CCM+ (Siemens, Munich, German). A high-quality finite volume mesh was generated following a grid independence study using tetrahedral elements [35 (link)], with a base size of 0.3 mm and three prism layers at the wall boundary (Figure 4). The nominal HCSII geometry was modeled with 100% stenosis to replicate the complete obstruction of the distal arch. The number of cells varied between 1.5 million and 2.3 million across all geometries modeled.
An extensive grid independence analysis was carried out to calculate the optimum mesh density of the in-silico models, as described in our previous studies [23 (link),29 ]. This analysis was performed by running steady-state simulations and monitoring the pressure and the mass flow rate at the different locations (MPA root, SVC, RPA, DA, AO, and LPA) of the CFD domain. In this study, three different levels of mesh refinements were carried out, and relative percentage changes were evaluated at those respective locations in the CFD domain, which were shown to be lesser than 0.15% between the current mesh and the next coarsest mesh, as shown in [29 ] (pp. 49–50).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Aorta Hemodynamics with LVAD Simulation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The aorta is assumed to be rigid with a pressure outlet in each artery modelled using the Windkessel model (Sridharan et al., 2012 (link); Black et al., 2023 (link)) (Figure 2A). In Star CCM+, a three-element WK model can be represented by adding Ordinary Differential Equations in the field functions (Siemens Community, 2020 ). The calculation of the Windkessel conditions is detailed in the Supplementary Material.
The RCR values for each artery (Table 3) are calculated by relating the haemodynamic parameters to a circuit in parallel, where the proximal resistance is related to a viscosity resistance, the distal resistance is related to the resistance of capillaries and veins, and the capacitor is equivalent to the vessel compliance. For the HMIII LVAD, constants calculating the following values were assumed: systolic pressure, 78 mmHg; diastolic pressure, 69 mmHg; mean arterial pressure, 73 mmHg; cardiac output, 6.7 × 10−5 m3/s; heart rate, 30 BPM; and aortic distensibility, 7.9 × 10−3 mm/Hg. For this simulation, the velocity and mass flow rate distribution are used for the inlets and resistances and the compliance parameters of the Windkessel model are applied at the outlets.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

3D Aneurysm Model Reconstruction and CFD Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In this research, the 3D aneurysm model was reconstructed from the CT scan slices using MIMICS. The original CT image file format was DICOM. The total number of scanning slices is 600 and the range of scanning was from neck to legs. The distance between neighbouring layers was 1 mm. The CT data was imported into MIMICS software and data of the aortic vessel was extracted by means of 3D threshold segmentation. Then, the model is imported to Star CCM+ (Siemens, USA) for CFD analysis. The domain is discretized using polyhedral mesh with prism layers to capture the boundary more accurately based on the following reasons.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Turbulent Airflow Simulations for Voice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The numerical setup is identical to the previous studies (Sadeghi et al., 2018 (link), 2019a (link),b (link)). To perform the simulations of simVoice, we use the software package STAR-CCM+ (Siemens, PLM Software, Plano, TX, USA) with a finite-volume cell-centered non-staggered grid. For modeling the turbulence, Large Eddy Simulations (LES) in combination with a Wall-Adapting Local Eddy-Viscosity (WALE) subgrid-scale model (Nicoud and Ducros, 1999 (link)) were carried out. The convective and diffusive terms of the Navier-Stokes equations were discretized with a central difference scheme with second-order accuracy. Subsequently, the pressure-correction PISO algorithm (Pressure-Implicit with Splitting Operators) solves the pressure-velocity linked equations non iteratively. Finally, an Algebraic Multigrid (AMG) method with a Gauss-Seidel relaxation scheme was applied to solve the final linear system of equations.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Aligning Virtual and Physical Phantoms

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
From the simulation results, we extracted 2D cross-sections in the virtual coiled phantoms to match those in the experiments. This was done by aligning the virtual phantoms with cross-section images of the physical phantoms in Star-CCM+ (Siemens, Melville, NY), using the outlines of the parent artery and IA sac as reference.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Computational Fluid Dynamics for Cerebrovascular Modeling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Both computational unstructured volumetric grid generation and CFD analysis were performed on the generated STL data according to settings of previous studies using STAR-CCM+ (v10.06.010) multiphysics CFD software (Siemens PLM software). 20, 23 In anterior circulation cases, the inlet pulsatile conditions were imposed according to the mass flow rate at the ICA determined in healthy adult volunteers and measured by Ford et al. 24 On the other hand, in posterior circulation cases one-third of the ICA flow rate was imposed at the VA. 24 We assumed static pressure of 0 Pa at all outlets. The detailed method is included in the Supplemental Material.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Aortic Blood Flow Simulation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Blood flow was simulated in the 3D aortic models using STAR-CCM+ (v13.06.12, Siemens, Munich, Germany). Briefly, we utilized well-established 10, (link)11, (link)13 and fully automated methods to apply patient-specific inputs to reconstructed geometries. The height and weight of participants were used to estimate the expected cardiac output which was used to scale the amplitude of a generalized infrarenal aortic waveform 9 (link) applied at the model inlet. The mean heart rate of the cohort was used to scale the period of the cardiac cycle. Patient-specific systolic and diastolic pressures were used with Windkessel models applied to the iliac artery outlets. Simulations were run for
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!