The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

9 protocols using mlct c

1

Live VSMC Cytoskeleton Imaging by AFM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Contact mode AFM imaging was used to study live VSMCs cytoskeleton. Using a stylus AFM probe (model MLCT-C, k=15 pN/nm, Bruker, Santa Barbara, CA, USA), a 40×40 μm cell surface area was imaged with the digital density of 512×512 pixels. The scanning frequency was 0.3 Hz. The obtained height and deflection images were analyzed using a proprietary code written in MATLAB (R2016a, Mathworks). All experiments were conducted in previously warmed CO2 independent medium at room temperature for a 1-2 h duration (Sanyour et al., 2019 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Atomic Force Microscopy of Cell Morphology

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
AFM imaging was conducted at room temperature in PBS using a Bioscope Catalyst (Bruker Corporation, Billerica, MA, USA). Two different AFM working modes, contact mode and PeakForce-Quantitative Nano Mechanics mode (PF-QNM) mode [31] (link), were applied in the measurements. All AFM probes with reflective gold-coated triangular cantilevers and pyramidal tips were purchased from Bruker Corp, in which MLCT-C and MSNL-10-C cantilevers were used in contact mode while MLCT-E and Scansyst Fluid cantilevers were used in PF-QNM mode. The external dimensions and spring constant of the cantilevers were summarized in Table S1. NanoScope analysis software (Bruker Corporation, v1.80) was used for generating the images of cellular morphology (deflection error) and height.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Nanomechanical Analysis of sEVs and Cells using AFM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The cantilever of an AFM can
be applied to sense and amplify the
force between the probe on the cantilever beam and the atoms of the
tested samples. Owing to its atomic resolution, we performed a nanomechanical
analysis of living sEVs and GC cells. Dimension Icon AFM (Bruker,
Santa Barbara, CA, USA) can detect sEVs; the type of probe was a ScanAsyst-Fluid
(Bruker, Santa Barbara, CA, USA). In the experiment, we used AFM peak
force QNM mode to image sEVs, which can probe the topography and Young’s
moduli of samples. To detect force curves of cell lines, we utilized
the AFM catalyst (Bruker, Camarillo, CA, USA) and calculated the Young’s
moduli of the cells based on the Hertz model. For experiments related
to TGF-β1 treatment, we employed the AFM JPK NanoWizard (Bruker,
Santa Barbara, CA, USA) to acquire force curves and determined the
Young’s moduli of the cells using the Hertz model. The probe
used for all cell detection was the MLCT-C (Bruker, Santa Barbara,
CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Live AFM Imaging of VSMC Topography

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Contact mode live AFM imaging (MFP-3D-BIO, Asylum Research, Santa Barbara, CA) was used to study live VSMC topography. A 30 × 30 μm area of the cell surface was scanned at a digital density of 512 × 512 pixels using a stylus AFM probe (model MLCT-C, k = 15 pN/nm, Bruker, Santa Barbara, CA). The cell surface scanning frequency was 0.3 Hz. All experiments were conducted in the CO2-independent medium at room temperature for a period of 1–2 h.28 (link),31 (link) AFM height images were used to compute actin stress fiber density (Figure S2). AFM deflection images were used to compute VSMC cortical actin stress fiber orientation using a modified method of Karlon et al. (Figure S3).33 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Measuring Cell Elasticity with AEA Treatment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The elasticity of a single cell treated with AEA was measured using a commercial atomic force microscope (XE120 model, Park Systems, Suwon, Korea) and an optical microscope to control the position of the gold-coated silicon nitride cantilevers (MLCT-C, Bruker Corporation, Billerica, Massachusetts, USA) with a nominal spring constant of 0.01 N/m. Cells were seeded at the density of 3 × 104 cells/well on glass coverslips and next treated with 1 µM AEA or 0.07% v/v DMSO (CTR) for 24 h. All measurements were performed at RT in a medium without FBS.
Force curves were collected randomly from chosen cells from the region around the cell center. The force was set up to 4 nN, the approach velocity to 9 µm/s and a grid of 4 × 4 points on each cell was selected. The elastic modulus (E) values were calculated based on the subtraction of the two force curves: the calibration curve recorded on the glass coverslip without the cells and the other curves collected on a given cell [41 (link)]. The obtained force-versus-indentation-curve was analyzed by means of the Sneddon extension of the Hertz model assuming that the tip is an infinitely stiff indenter modeled by a parabola [42 (link)]. The results were presented for the indentation depth of 300 nm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Topographical Cell Imaging with AFM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To obtain a topographical cell image, the AFM tip was placed on the cell surface and then using scanning mode was moved horizontally along the cell surface while applying a constant force (500 – 800 pN) to the cell surface. Scanned images were 100 μm × 100 μm at the digital density of 512 pixels × 512 pixels. A stylus-type AFM probe (model MLCT-C, k = 15 pN nm-1, Bruker, Santa Barbara, CA, United States) was used to perform the cell surface scanning at 0.15 Hz frequency at room temperature. Height and deflection images were collected with Bioscope software and analyzed using Nanoscope software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Mechanical Properties of BD PuraMatrix Hydrogel

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mechanical properties of BD PuraMatrix Peptide Hydrogel (Corning, Tewskbury, MA, USA) were investigated using atomic force microscopy (AFM, CellHesion head, JPK Instruments, Berlin, Germany) in force mapping mode. To probe hydrogel samples, commercially-available silicon nitride cantilevers (MLCT-C, Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA) with a nominal spring constant of 0.01 N/m were applied. Force curves, i.e., dependencies between cantilever deflection and relative sample position, were acquired over a grid of 8 × 8 pixels within a scan area of 50 × 50 μm. The maximum load force (F) was 5 nN and load speed of 8 μm/s was maintained. Young’s modulus was determined using Hertz contact mechanics as described previously [77 (link)]. Briefly, the following relation between the load force (F) and resulting indentation (Δz) for the paraboloidal assumption of the probing tip was applied: F=4·R·E3·(1v2)·Δz32
JPK Data Processing software was used to apply this equation to the experimental data to obtain the value of Young’s modulus for each force curves. The final Young’s modulus was obtained by averaging all force curves and was expressed as a mean and standard deviation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Biophysical Characterization of Living Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A Dimension Fastscan with ScanAsyst™ AFM (Bruker, Santa Barbara, CA) was used to analyzed biophysical changes in a single living cell [31 (link)-35 (link)]. The pyramidal tip of silicon nitride cantilevers (nominal spring constant k=0.01N/m, tip radius 20.0nm, tip half angle 18.0°, MLCT-C, Bruker, USA) was used for the contact mode of AFM. This experiment was performed as described previously [35 (link)]. The cells were imaged over an area of 20×20μm2 with a resolution of 128×128 pixels. NanoScope Analysis (Bruker, USA) was used to calculate cell elasticity values and roughness values. The Young's modulus was calculated using Hertz model, which was selected from 10-12loci (2μm×2μm) on each cell [33 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Atomic Force Microscopy of Biomaterial Surfaces

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
AFM images were collected on a Bruker Dimension Icon (Bruker Nano Surfaces, Santa Barbara, CA). The probes used were MLCT-C (0.01 N/m spring constant, Bruker Nano Surfaces, Camarillo, CA) and MLCT-D (0.03 N/m spring constant, Bruker Nano Surfaces, Camarillo, CA) for the collagen hydrogel, Scanasyst Air (0.4 N/m spring constant) for the PNIPAAm topography, and OTESPA-R3 (29.13 N/m calibrated spring constant, Bruker Nano Surfaces, Camarillo, CA) for Peak Force quantitative nanomechanical mapping (PF-QNM) of PNIPAAm. PF-QNM was done using a relative calibration method and a polystyrene (2.8 GPa) reference sample. AFM analysis was done in Bruker Nanoscope Analysis 1.8 (Bruker Nano Surfaces, Santa Barbara, CA). To study protein deposition and organization on the substrates, collagen and PNIPAAm samples were incubated in Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS) solution for 4 h at 37°C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!