The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Bx61 light microscope

Manufactured by Olympus
Sourced in Japan

The BX61 is a light microscope designed for a variety of biological and materials science applications. It features an infinity-corrected optical system, providing high-quality images. The microscope offers multiple illumination methods, including bright-field, dark-field, and phase contrast, allowing users to visualize a range of sample types. The BX61 is suitable for a wide variety of magnification and resolution requirements.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

74 protocols using bx61 light microscope

1

Immunohistochemical and TUNEL Analysis of Tumor Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tumor tissues were fixed with 10% formaldehyde and embedded in paraffin. After dewaxing, rehydration, and antigen retrieval, sections were blocked with goat serum blocking solution and were then stained using rabbit polyclonal anti-EGFR (1:200, Beyotime, AF5153) or rabbit polyclonal anti-Ki-67 (1:500, Abcam, ab15580) antibodies overnight at 4 °C. After staining with the HRP-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (H + L) antibody (Zhongshan Goldbridge Biotechnology, PV6001, 100 μL per sample) at 37 °C for 30 min, tumor tissue sections were visualized by a DAB detection kit (Boster Biological Technology, AR1026) and an Olympus BX61 light microscope (Olympus, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan). For detection of apoptosis, paraffin-embedded sections of tumor tissues were labeled by a POD-TUNEL Kit (Roche Inc.) according to the manufacturer’s instruction. All images were acquired by an Olympus BX61 light microscope. Quantification was performed at ×400 magnification (3 images per tumor) using ImageJ 1.52a software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Histological Analysis of Tissue Tear Points

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sections of 2–3 mm thickness were cut from both sides of the initial tear points as well as from the middle point of the tear, using a sterile scalpel. Sections were then treated with 60% FAA solution for 4 h. Subsequent sample preparation followed a standard FAA protocol. Samples were embedded in Technovit 7100 resin (Kulzer GmbH, Hanau, Germany) and then cut into 100 µm sections on a SLEE CUT 5062 microtome (SLEE medical GmbH, Mainz, Germany), stained with Toluidine‐blue and imaged on an Olympus BX61 light microscope (Olympus Corp., Tokyo, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Fluorescence Microscopy Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Slides were viewed with an Aperio FL Slide Scanner (Leica Biosystems, Nussloch, GmbH) with appropriate excitation and emission filters or Olympus BX61 light microscope (Olympus, Shinjuku, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Anatomical Analysis of Arabidopsis Transgenic Plants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Midribs from the fifth leaf and stem tissue taken from ~2 cm from the bottom of Arabidopsis plant were collected from 40-day-old PeUGDH4 transgenic and wild-type Arabidopsis plants. These tissues were fixed in the solution including 75% ethanol and 25% acetic acid. The procedures of paraffin sectioning as described by Cai and Lashbrook57 (link). After that, sections were dewaxing for 30 min and stained for 2–3 min in 0.02% toluidine blue (Sigma, USA), imaged using an Olympus BX-61 light microscope (Olympus Co.).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantitative Lung Histomorphometry Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The anterior halves of the paraffin-embedded lungs (4-μm sections) were deparaffinized in dimethylbenzene and hydrated by ethanol. Three E21.5 lung tissue slices from each group were selected randomly for H&E staining; H&E staining was performed according to the manufacturer's protocol (cat. no. G1120, Solarbio Science & Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China). Five fields (upper, middle, lower, left, and right) in each section were also selected randomly (avoiding large vessels and bronchi), observed under Olympus BX61 light microscope (Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) at ×100 magnification, and images were captured using a digital camera. Cross lines were drawn at the center of each field of view, and the number of alveolar spaces (Ns) intersecting the cross line and the number of alveoli in each visual field (Na) were calculated. The total length of the line (L) and the area of each visual field (S) were also measured. The mean linear intercept (MLI) and mean alveolar number (MAN) in the lung tissues were calculated according to the following formulae: MLI = L/Ns (which reflects the mean alveolar diameter) and MAN = Na/S (which reflects alveolar density). Image analysis was performed using Image Pro-Plus 6.0 (Media Cybernetics, Inc., Washington, DC, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Histological Analysis of Lung Injury

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Animals were sacrificed by anaesthesia overdose and transcardially perfused with 1x PBS for the analysis of lung injury. The lungs were dissected, and one-third of each lobe for histological and immunofluorescence analysis was fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) for 24 h at room temperature (RT), embedded in paraffin, and cut into 3–5 μm-thick-sections. The sections used for histological studies were stained with H&E, and two researchers independently evaluated the slides in a double-blind manner. About 20% of the total lung tissue per section of each animal was photographed in the Olympus BX61 light microscope (Olympus BX61 Upright Microscope, Tokyo, Japan) coupled with Olympus DP70 digital camera using a magnification of 400×. The lung injury score was quantified considering alveolar wall thickness, congestion of the alveoli, immune cell infiltration, number of macrophages and neutrophils, and formation of hyaline membranes. The semiquantitative score, ranging from zero to twenty-three, was independently assessed by two different individuals in a blinded manner (Table 1). Two independent experiments were conducted and subjected to statistical analysis. Since both experiments yielded statistical differences, the data from one of them are presented herein.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Endocan Immunoreactivity and Microvessel Density

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For evaluation of endocan, the immunoreactive score (IRS) was obtained by multiplying the staining intensity (SI: 0 = negative; 1 = weak; 2 = intermediate; 3 = strong) and percentage of positive tumor/endothelial cells (PPC: 0 = 0 %; 1 = 1–10 %; 2 = 11–50 %, 3 = 51–80 %; 4 = >80 %) as established previously 24. IRS = SI × PPC. Five high power fields (HPFs) (400×) were randomly selected from each slide for IRS calculation. To determine the MVD, tissue sections stained with CD105 and CD34 were examined using an Olympus BX61 light microscope. According to the methods exposed by Weidner previously [25 (link)]. The sections were firstly examined at 100× magnification for the location rich of blood vessels. Then, pictures of five different fields were taken at 200× magnification. Finally, the number of blood vessels in each picture was counted independently by two researchers. Every single cell and cell cluster stained were assessed as a blood vessel, regardless of whether the structure of vascular lumen was observed. Every 40 microns of one large lumen was recorded as one blood vessel. The average value of five fields was recorded as the MVD score [25 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Leg Morphometry of Octopamine Receptor

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fore and hind legs were removed by forceps from F1 of UAS-OctαR-dsRNAi × mhc-GAL4. Then transferred to glass slides using a fine brush for microscopic examination using an Olympus BX61 light microscope at magnification 2.5 × 10. Photographs were taken and the length and width of each leg segment (coxa, trochanter, femur, tibia and tarsi) were measured using ImageJ software. In parallel, F1 of w1118 crossed to: (i) OctαR-dsRNAi and (ii) GAL4-mhc was used as controls for RNAi experiment. Additionally, morphometric analysis of OctαR KO adult legs was done. W1118 was used as control for knock out (KO) experiment.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Histopathological Evaluation of Brain and Liver

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The fixed brain and liver samples were dehydrated using increasing ethanol grades, cleared in xylene, and finally embedded in paraffin; subsequently, paraffin sections were obtained (4 μm thickness). These sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) as reported previously by Suvarna et al. [29 ]. The slides were examined using an Olympus BX61 light microscope (Tokyo, Japan).
For lesion scoring, five non-repeated, randomly selected microscopic fields (magnification, 40×) were examined in three different slides per animal/group. The mean values of the five microscopic fields examined were considered the final lesion score of each animal. The histopathological lesions observed in the liver, cerebellar, and cerebral cortices, and hippocampus in all examined groups were assessed using the following scoring method; 0, _1, _2, _3, _4, and _5 corresponding to no change, mild change, mild-to-moderate change, moderate change, moderate-to-severe change, and severe change, respectively [30 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Avian Haemosporidian Infection Surveillance

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Common starlings were caught using permanent traps (large ‘Rybachy’ type, zigzag and funnel traps) and mist nets at the Ventes Ragas Ornithological station (55°20′38.93” N, 21°11′34.05” E), Lithuania in May 2019. This period corresponded to the beginning of the breeding season of Common starlings at the study site. Blood samples were collected by puncturing the branchial vein and fixed in SET-buffer [28 (link)] for further molecular analyses. A drop of fresh blood was used to prepare 2–13 blood films on ready-to-use glass slides. The films were fixed by immersion of the slides in absolute methanol for one second and then stained with 10% Giemsa [1 ]. In all, 19 Common starlings were sampled. Microscopic examination of blood films determined the presence of haemosporidians, and species of H. pastoris was identified [1 ]. Later, the species identification was confirmed by using molecular barcoding in the laboratory (see description below). Microscopic examination of blood films was performed using a BX61 light microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). Five microscopy-positive birds with gametocyte parasitemia between 1 and 26% of infected red blood cells (calculated according to [29 (link)]) were euthanized (by decapitation) and their organs were processed for histological examination.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!