The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Spss statistic v 23

Manufactured by IBM
Sourced in United States

SPSS Statistics V.23 is a software package used for statistical analysis. It provides a range of statistical and analytical tools for data management, data analysis, and reporting. The core function of SPSS Statistics V.23 is to enable users to perform various statistical procedures and analyses on data.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Lab products found in correlation

8 protocols using spss statistic v 23

1

Determination of Glucosinolate and Isothiocyanate Recovery

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To further
evaluate the applicability of the
method for analyzing extracts, recovery was determined by analyzing
the three different Brassicaceae seed extracts (i.e. S. alba, B. napus,
and B. juncea), spiked with 14 GSL
and 15 ITC standards (each at two levels: 10 and 30 μM), derivatized
with NAC. Recovery (%) was calculated as where xspiked was
the measured concentration of the analyte in the spiked experiment, xunspiked was the measured concentration of the
analyte in the unspiked experiment, and xref was the true concentration which was spiked to the extract. Four
repetitions were performed.
According to FDA,40 a good recovery for the working analyte concentrations
in this study should be between 80 and 110%. To test whether the recovery
was within the range, the recovery whose average outside the range
was statistically evaluated by analysis of variance (ANOVA) one-sample t-test using IBM SPSS Statistic v.23 software (SPSS Inc.,
Chicago, IL, U.S.A.).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Statistical Analysis of Gene Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Normality was assessed with a Kolmogorov–Smirnov. Normally distributed continuous variables were provided as mean ± standard deviation and non-normally distributed continuous variables as median (interquartile). A chi-square test was used for reporting associations between two categorical variables. Differences of continuous variables between groups were analyzed by the Mann–Whitney test. The correlation between gene expression levels was represented by the Pearson correlation coefficient. Models were otherwise validated by examining standardized residuals for normal distribution. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS statistic V.23 (Armonk, New York, USA). A P value of less than 0.05 was considered significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Statistical Analysis of Gene Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Normality was assessed with a Kolmogorov–Smirnov. Normally distributed continuous variables were provided as mean ± standard deviation and non-normally distributed continuous variables as median (interquartile). A Chi-square test was used for reporting associations between two categorical variables. Differences of continuous variables between groups were analyzed by the Mann–Whitney test. The correlation between gene expression levels was represented by the Pearson correlation coefficient. The models were otherwise validated by examining standardized residuals for normal distribution. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS statistic V.23 (Armonk, New York, USA). A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Gene Co-Expression Network Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We constructed the gene co-expression network of the healthy control group, the untreated TAK group, the treated TAK group, the inactive-treated TAK group, and the active-treated TAK group based on the qPCR dataset, respectively. The Pearson correlation has an advantage in predicting the interaction of molecules and is widely used as a measure of gene co-expression in many public databases (37 (link), 38 (link)), so it was adopted the main approach in the network analysis and the results were available in the main text. However, Spearman correlation has an advantage in revealing the functional associations, so it was adopted as a complementary approach and the results are available in the Supplementary Information (39 (link)). Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS statistic V.23 (Armonk, New York, USA). A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered significant. Cytoscape V. 3.8.2 was used to edit the networks.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Statistically Evaluating Treatment Effects

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To test for significance between
treatments within species, the data were statistically evaluated by
analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by Tukey post hoc analysis
using IBM SPSS Statistic v.23 software (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, U.S.A.).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

ARPE-19 Cell Proliferation Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All data were collected in a database created in Excel (Microsoft Office Excel 2016; Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, USA) and subsequently analyzed by SPSS software (IBM SPSS statistic v23, SPSS Inc. Chicago, IL, USA). Values were expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM), and differences were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05 in all cases. Before statistical analysis, fluorescence data were normalized by log-transforming using the logarithm base two to obtain a normal distribution. Analysis of ARPE-19 cell proliferation at follow-up times was performed by repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Bonferroni corrections for multiple testing and Tukey's post hoc tests since the homogeneity of variance was validated (Levene's test). A comparison of means in other experiments with a normal distribution, where the homogeneity of variance was not validated (Levene's test), was performed by Welch test with Games-Howell post hoc test. Finally, in the case of nonparametric variables, group means were compared using the Kruskal-Wallis test. Graphs were made using Excel.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Comparison of Dietary Treatments

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All data were presented as the means±standard deviations. Data were analyzed for difference among the groups by Duncan’s multiple range tests following the one-way analysis of variance using SPSS (SPSS Statistic v.23.0, IBM Corp.). Differences were considered statistically significant at P<0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Means of groups were compared by ANOVA Tukey's multiple comparison test, performed using SPSS statistic v. 23.0 (IBM). Jitterplot drawing and correlation analysis was performed using RStudio v. 3.6.3 (https://www.rstudio.com/).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!