The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Scaffold program

Manufactured by Proteome Software
Sourced in United Kingdom, United States

Scaffold is a software program designed for the analysis and visualization of proteomics data. It provides a comprehensive solution for processing, interpreting, and managing mass spectrometry-based proteomic data. The core function of Scaffold is to facilitate the identification and quantification of proteins from complex biological samples.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

13 protocols using scaffold program

1

Bovidae Protein Identification via MALDI-TOF

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Peptide masses of the samples were obtained using an Ultraflex III MALDI TOF/TOF mass spectrometer (Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany) and then screened against the Bovidae database deposited in UniProt using the MASCOT program (Matrix Science, London, UK) and a MASCOT Peptide Mass Fingerprinting database search. An accuracy of 0.5 Da was used in the search criteria. Trypsin was set as an enzyme with one allowed miscleavage. The fixed modification and variable modification factors used were carbamidomethyl and oxidation, respectively. The numbers of peptide matches, sequence coverage, molecular weight (MW), and isoelectric point (pI) were used to evaluate the database search results. The Scaffold program (Proteome Software, Portland, OR) was used to validate the proteins identified by the MASCOT program, with the identity for both proteins and peptides equal to 100%.
Protein abundance was quantified by spot densitometry analysis using ImageMaster 2D Platinum Software (GE Health Care, Little Chalfont-UK). The software used powerful algorithms for efficient spot detection, accurate spot quantification, and an accurate statistical comparison of spot density across gels.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Flag-Affinity Purification and Mass Spectrometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
3×Flag-ATX-3 transiently expressed in HEK293T cells was immunoprecipitated with anti-Flag M2 affinity gel and eluted with 3×Flag peptide (Sigma). Eluted proteins were identified with a gel-based liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (Gel-LC-MS/MS) approach and ion trap mass spectrometry (LTQ; Thermo Electron). A Mascot database search and the Scaffold program (Proteome Software) were used to visualize and validate results.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Shotgun Proteomics of High and Low Feed Efficiency Broilers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All procedures for animal care complied with the University of Arkansas Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC): Protocol #14012. A complete description of the procedures for this study is provided in Kong et al. (2016). Briefly, following protein extraction from breast muscle tissue (∼100 mg) obtained from PedM broilers exhibiting high and low FE phenotypes (n = 4 per group), proteins were subjected to shotgun proteomic analysis by in-gel trypsin digestion and tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) at the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (UAMS) Proteomics Core Lab (Little Rock, AR). Raw spectrometric data was analyzed by the Mascot (Matrix Science, Boston, MA) database search engine along with the UniProtKB (http://www.uniprot.org/help/uniprotkb) database, and compiled using the Scaffold program (Proteome Software, Portland OR). Normalization of data based on total spectral counts for each individual sample revealed no differences in actin, myosin, or tubulin expression that were used as house-keeping proteins in this study. A search for “CKMT” in the excel file of the normalized proteomic dataset revealed two CKMT protein isoforms (CKMT1A and CKMT2) that had been identified and given separate accession numbers. However, both isoforms but had not been assigned a gene name and therefore were not previously reported by Kong et al. (2016).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Shotgun Proteomics Analysis via Mass Spectrometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Extracted individual proteins were subjected to shotgun proteomics analysis by in-gel trypsin digestion and tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) at the University of Arkansas Medical Science (UAMS) Proteomics Core Lab (Little Rock, AR). In total, 25 gel slices per sample were analyzed. Raw mass spectrometric data were analyzed by database searching using the Mascot (Matrix Science, Boston, MA) search engine and the UniProtKB (http://www.uniprot.org/help/uniprotkb) database. Search results were compiled using Scaffold program (Proteome Software, Portland, OR).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Protein Identification via LC-MS/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
LC–MS/MS data were searched against an in-house protein sequence database containing Swiss-Prot and the protein constructs specific to the experiment, using the Mascot search engine program (Matrix Science, version 2.4). Database search parameters were set with a precursor tolerance of 5 p.p.m. and a fragment ion mass tolerance of 0.8 Da. Variable modifications for oxidized methionine, carbamidomethyl cysteine, pyroglutamic acid, and deamination of glutamine/asparagine were included. MS/MS data were validated using the Scaffold program (version 5, Proteome Software Inc.).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Mass Spectrometry-Based Peptide Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mass spectrometry was performed by the LMB Mass Spectrometry Facility. Briefly, peptides from in situ trypsin digestion were extracted in 2% formic acid/2% acetonitrile mix. Digests were analyzed by nano-scale capillary LC-MS/MS using an Ultimate U3000 HPLC and C18 Acclaim PepMap100 nanoViper (Thermo Scientific Dionex). LC-MS/MS data were searched against a protein database (UniProt KB) with the Mascot search engine program (Matrix Science). MS/MS data were validated using the Scaffold program (Proteome Software). MALDI-TOF mass spectrometric measurements were carried out in positive ion mode on an Ultraflex III TOF-TOF instrument (Bruker Daltonik), using sinapinic acid (Sigma) as matrix.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Shotgun Proteomic Analysis of Broiler Plasma

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Plasma collected from Con and WB broilers at 4 and 8 wks of age (32 plasma samples in total) were subjected to shotgun proteomics analysis by trypsin digestion and tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) at the University of Arkansas Medical Science (UAMS) Proteomics Core Facility (Little Rock, AR). Raw mass spectrometric data were analyzed by database searching using the Mascot (Matrix Science, Boston, MA) search engine and the UniProtKB (http://www.uniprot.org/help/uniprotkb) database. Search results were compiled using Scaffold program (Proteome Software, Portland, OR). The mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE (Perez-Riverol et al., 2019 (link)) partner repository with the dataset identifier PXD026896 and 10.6019/PXD026896. Normalization and statistical analyses are described in the “Statistical Analyses” section.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Affinity Purification of UBR5-Associated Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For affinity purification of UBR5-associated proteins, 20x 175 cm2 flasks of HEK293T cells transfected with UBR5 or control baits were used for each experiment. Cells were lysed in 40 mL lysis buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.4, 10% glycerol, 100 mM NaCl, 5 mM NaF, 2 mM Na3PO4, 0.2% Triton X-100, protease inhibitor cocktail), and sonicated 10x 10 s at 40% intensity with a Branson 250 Sonifier. Cell lysates were clarified by centrifugation (21,000x g, 30 min, 4°C) and incubated (while rotating) for 2 hr with Flag affinity gel at 4°C. Immunoprecipitates were washed 5x with lysis buffer, and subsequently eluted with lysis buffer supplemented with 250 μg mL−1 3xFlag-Peptide. Eluates were boiled in LDS sample buffer and resolved on 4%–12% Bis-Tris SDS-polyacrylamide gels. These were stained with Imperial Protein Stain, and gel lanes cut into 1-2 mm slices for in situ trypsin digestion. Resulting peptides were extracted in 2% formic acid / 2% acetonitrile mix. Digests were analyzed by nano-scale capillary LC-MS/MS using an Ultimate U3000 HPLC and C18 Acclaim PepMap100 nanoViper (Thermo Scientific Dionex). LC-MS/MS data were searched against a protein database (UniProt KB) with the Mascot search engine program (Matrix Science). MS/MS data were validated using the Scaffold program (Proteome Software).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Shotgun Proteomics Analysis of Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Individual extracted proteins were used in shotgun proteomics analysis with in-gel trypsin digestion followed by tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) conducted at the University of Arkansas for Medical Science proteomics core lab (UAMS, Little Rock, AR, USA) [11 (link)]. Raw data were analyzed by database searching using Masco (Matrix Science, Boston, MA, USA) and UniProtKB database (http://www.uniprot.org/help/uniprotkb) with the result compiled using the Scaffold Program (Proteome Software, Portland, OR, USA).
In Kuttappan et al. [2 (link)], digested sample homogenates were acidified with 1% formic acid, and purified by reversed phase chromatography using C18 affinity media (Omix-Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Each sample was subjected to three replicate analyses for LC-MS/MS using a hybrid-OrbitrapXL mass spectrometer (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) according to Voruganti et al. [14 (link)]. Mass spectrometry analysis was conducted in the DNA/Protein Resource Facility (Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Proteomic analysis of purified proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Purified proteins were prepared for mass spectrometric analysis by in solution enzymatic digestion, without prior reduction and alkylation. Protein samples were digested with trypsin or elastase (Promega), both at an enzyme to protein ratio of 1:20. The resulting peptides were analysed by nano-scale capillary LC-MS/MS using an Ultimate U3000 HPLC (ThermoScientific Dionex) to deliver a flow of approximately 300 nl/min. A C18 Acclaim PepMap100 5 µm, 100 µm x 20 mm nanoViper (ThermoScientific Dionex), trapped the peptides prior to separation on a C18 Acclaim PepMap100 3 µm, 75 µm x 250 mm nanoViper (ThermoScientific Dionex, San Jose, USA). Peptides were eluted with a 90 min gradient of acetonitrile (2% to 50%). The analytical column outlet was directly interfaced via a nano-flow electrospray ionization source, with a hybrid quadrupole orbitrap mass spectrometer (Q-Exactive Plus Orbitrap, ThermoScientific). LC-MS/MS data were then searched against an in house LMB database using the Mascot search engine (Matrix Science) 72 (link), and the peptide identifications validated using the Scaffold program (Proteome Software Inc.) 73 (link). All data were additionally interrogated manually.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!