The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

27 protocols using anti glut4

1

Antibody Characterization for GLUT and SNARE

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Anti-GLUT1 (#652) and anti-GLUT4 (#654) were from AbCam (Cambridge, United Kingdom). Anti-GAPDH (#4300) was from Ambion (Foster city, California, USA). Anti-VAMP1 (#104002), anti-VAMP2 (#104202), anti-VAMP3 (#43080), anti-VAMP4 (#136002), anti-VAMP5 (#176003), anti-VAMP7 (#232003), anti-VAMP8 (#104302), anti-SNAP23 (#111202), anti-SNAP29 (#111303), anti-SNAP47 (#111403), anti-syntaxin2 (#110022), anti-syntaxin3 (#110032), anti-syntaxin4 (#110042), anti-syntaxin5 (#110053), anti-syntaxin7 (#110072), anti-syntaxin8 (#110083), and anti-syntaxin16 (#110162) were from Synaptic Systems (Goettingen, Germany). Anti-syntaxin6 (#610635) was from BD Biosciences (Franklin lakes, New Jersey, USA). Fluorescent secondary antibodies were from LI-COR Biosciences (Lincoln, Nebraska, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Western Blot Antibody Validation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Anti-pan Akt (#2920), anti-phospho S473 Akt (#4058), anti-ERK1/2 (#9102), anti-phospho ERK1/2 (#9106) were from Cell Signalling (Danvers, Massachusetts, USA). Anti-Sx4 (#110042) and Anti-SNAP23 (#111202) were from Synaptic Systems (Goettingen, Germany). Anti-GLUT1 (#652) and anti-GLUT4 (654) were from AbCam (Cambridge, United Kingdom) and anti-GAPDH (#4300) was from Ambion (Foster city, California, USA). Detection antibodies were from LI-COR Biosciences (Lincoln, Nebraska, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Antibody Characterization for CK2 and Insulin Signaling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CK2α antisera was prepared as described44 (link), anti-p-Akt (Ser129) (catalog ab133458), anti-CK2β (catalog ab76025), anti-GLUT4 used for Wb (catalog ab62375) and anti-VAMP2 (catalog ab3347) antibodies were from Abcam (Cambridge, UK), anti-β-actin (catalog A5441) from Sigma-Aldrich. Antibodies raised against PTEN (catalog sc-7974), Akt1/2/3 (catalog sc-8312) Na/K ATPase (catalog sc-28800) and GLUT4 (catalog sc-1606) used for immunolocalization were from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA, USA), while anti-phospho-PTEN (Ser370) (catalog 07–889) was from Merck Millipore (Darmstadt, Germany). Anti-p-Akt (Thr308) (catalog #13038), anti-p-Akt (Ser473) (catalog #4060), anti-AS160 (catalog #2670), anti-p-AS160 (Thr642) (catalog #4288), anti-p-PRAS40 (Thr246) (catalog #13175), anti-GSK3β (Ser9) (catalog #5558), anti-p-FoxO1 (Ser253) (catalog #9461), anti-FoxO1 (catalog #2880) antibodies were from Cell Signaling Technology (Danvers, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Protein Extraction and Antibody Detection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Isolation and transfer of total protein onto PVDF membrane through SDS-PAGE. Incubated the membrane with the corresponding primary antibody, namely anti-SIRT1 (1:1000, Abcam), anti-GLUT4 (1:1000, Abcam), anti-Atrogin1 (1:1000, Abcam), anti- Myogenin (1:1000, Abcam), and anti-GAPDH (1:5000, Servicebio) overnight at 4°C. Then incubated the membrane with the second antibody at 37°C for 1 hour. Treated with a chemiluminescence substrate kit (Shanghai Yamei) and then use ImageJ software to detect protein bands.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Muscle Protein Expression Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CD31, Glut4, and Cav3 immunostaining were assessed in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded, 5µM gastrocnemius muscle sections using anti-CD31 (BD Biosciences), anti-Glut4 (Abcam), and anti-Cav3 (Santa Cruz) antibodies. CD31 staining was visualized with EnVision+HRP/DAB System (Dako). Glut4 and Cav3 staining were visualized with fluorescent secondary antibodies. Image analysis was performed using ImageJ (NIH).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Protein Isolation and Immunoblotting Procedures

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Protein isolation and immunoblotting procedures were as described previously [22 (link)]. For quantification of sAPP fragments, differentiated cells were treated in 10 ml Optimem (Gibco Life Technologies, Paisley, UK), and media were concentrated (30 kDa Amicon Ultra 15 ml filter) by centrifugation (4,000 g) and subjected to SDS-PAGE with amounts presented relative to total protein. Primary antibodies used were: anti-sAPPβ (Covance, Alnwick, UK; 1:1,000), anti-sAPPα (IBL International, Hamburg, Germany; 1:50), anti-APP (Ab54, GlaxoSmithKline; 1:4,000), anti-phospho-PKB (protein kinase B; Ser473), anti-PKB and anti-HKII (hexokinase II) (Cell Signaling, Hitchin, UK; 1:1,000), anti-GLUT1 (Millipore, Nottingham, UK; 1:1,000) and anti-GLUT4 (Abcam, Cambridge, UK; 1:1,000). Glut1 (also known as Slc2a1), Glut4 (also known as Slc2a4) and HkII (also known as Hk2) mRNA was determined by TaqMan RT-PCR (Applied Biosystems, Paisley, UK; Prism Model 7700) using commercial primers and probe sets.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Western Blot Analysis of Insulin Signaling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Protein concentrations of cells and tissue were measured with the Protein Quantitative Kit (Applygen Technologies Inc.). Protein samples were separated by 10% SDS/PAGE gel and transferred onto a poly(vinylidene difluoride) membrane (Merck Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA) by a semi‐dry transfer (Bio‐Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). After blocking with 5% milk, the membrane was incubated with primary antibodies overnight at 4 °C. The primary antibodies included: anti‐phospho (p)‐PI3Kp85 (1 : 2000, ab182651; Abcam, Cambridge, UK), anti‐p‐Tyr612‐IRS1 (1 : 2000; Thermo Fisher Scientific), anti‐p‐AKT (Ser473) (1 : 2000; CST, 4060 Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA), anti‐AKT (1 : 1000; CST, 4691 Cell Signaling Technology), and anti‐GLUT4 (1 : 1000; ab654 Abcam). After washing, the membrane was incubated with the corresponding peroxidase‐labeled secondary antibodies. Proteins were visualized using a chemiluminescence kit. (ZSGB‐BIO, Beijing, China). β‐Actin was used as an internal reference. The expressed proteins were quantified by densitometry analysis using imagej software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Immunofluorescence Analysis of Mouse Skeletal Muscle

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mouse skeletal muscle samples were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde overnight at 4°C, followed by dehydrated in PBS containing 30% sucrose. Mouse skeletal muscle samples were embedded in paraffin, 10mm-thick paraffin sections were used for immunofluorescence staining. The primary antibodies used were: rabbit anti-AKT (1:100, Cell Signaling Technology, 4685), anti-PDK1 (1:100, Cell Signaling Technology, 5662), anti-GLUT4 (1:100, Abcam, ab654), mouse anti-E-cadherin (1:100, Cell Signaling Technology, 14472). The secondary antibodies (1:1000, Thermo Fisher Scientific) used were: Alexa Fluor 488 donkey anti-mouse and Alexa Fluor 555 donkey anti-rabbit. Sections were examined suing a Zeiss LSM710 confocal microscope as mentioned above.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Antibody Validation for Glucose Transporter Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Anti-Sx4 (#110042), anti-Sx2 (#110022), anti-Sx3 (#110032), anti-Sx6 (#110062) and anti-Sx16 (#110161) were from Synaptic Systems (Göttingen, Germany) and were all used at 1:1000. Anti-GLUT1 (#652) and anti-GLUT4 (#654) were from Abcam (Cambridge, UK) (both used at 1:1000) and anti-GAPDH (#4300; used at 1:80,000) was from Ambion (Foster City, CA, USA). Detection antibodies were from LI-COR Biosciences (Lincoln, NE, USA) and were used at 1:10,000. Anti-sortilin (#12369-1-AP; 1:1000), anti-tankyrase (#18030-1-AP; 1:250) and anti-USP25 (#12199-1-AP; 1:1000) were from Proteintech. Anti-IRAP was from Paul Pilch (Boston College, Boston, MA, USA; 1:500). Anti-ACRP30 was as described previously (Clarke et al., 2006 (link); 1:1000).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Protein Expression Analysis in MIN6 Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total protein was extracted from MIN6 cells with cold RIPA lysis buffer containing proteases and separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, followed by electrotransfer onto a PVDF membrane (Millipore, Billerica, MA, United States) and immunoblotting. Then, the membrane was blocked in 5% skim milk in Tris-buffered saline containing 0.1% Tween-20 for 1 h and incubated overnight at 4°C with anti-Glut4, anti-INS-R, anti-IRS-1, anti-IRS-2, and anti-GAPDH primary antibodies (1:1,000; Abcam, Cambridge, MA, United States). The membranes were washed three times in Tris-buffered saline and incubated with goat anti-rabbit horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (1:5,000; Gaithersburg, MD, United States) for 1 h. The expression of the specific protein was visualized using a commercial electrochemiluminescence kit (Invitrogen).
Ultra-performance liquid chromatography was coupled with time-of-flight mass spectrometry analysis (UPCL-TOF/MSE).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!