The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

35 protocols using emotion 16

1

Unenhanced Chest CT Examination Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Unenhanced chest CT examinations for all enrolled patients were obtained before P-pGGNs resection via scanning machines (Optima CT660, Discovery CT750 HD, Revolution CT or LightSpeed16 from General Electric, SOMATOM Perspective or Emotion 16 from Siemens, Brilliance 16P from Philips). All patients underwent chest examinations with their hands in a supine position on either side of the head from the lung apex to the lung base. All patients were instructed to hold their breath for the whole scan period in a deep-inhalation state. Though various chest CT imaging protocols were used in this study, all examinations were performed with contiguous 1.00–1.50 mm axial sections and 1.00–1.50 mm slice intervals and 0.625–1.50 mm section thickness after reconstruction. Imaging parameters as follows: a matrix of 512 × 512, a tube current of 170–200 mA, a tube voltage of 120 kVp, rotation times of 0.5–0.6 s, and a full field of view. Data were reconstructed with a lung kernel algorithm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

CT Imaging Protocol and Parameters

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CT examinations were performed on the following scanners: SOMATOM Definition Edge (n = 68), SOMATOM Definition AS+ (n = 52), SOMATOM Definition Flash (n = 86), SOMATOM Force (n = 3), Emotion 16 (n = 11) (all Siemens Healthcare), and GE LightSpeed VCT (n = 1) (GE Healthcare). Slice thickness was 1.49 ± 0.1 mm. Mean tube current was 327.9 ± 133.4 mAs and mean peak kilovoltage was 109.1 ± 9.9 kVp. Contrast agent was administered with injection rates ranging from 1.5 to 3.5 mL/s, using Ultravist or Iopamiro (both 370 mg iodine per mL).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

3D Anatomical Model Reconstruction from CT/MRI Scans

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In order to obtain the virtual model, we analyzed the CT and MRI images of six patients, aged between 21 and 80 years old, dating from February 2013 until January 2019. These scans totalized 4226 images. The scans were performed at the Emergency County Hospital Craiova using a Emotion 16 (Siemens) equipment consisting of a magnetic resonance and a computer tomography device. After the scan analysis, we selected to use for the reconstruction of the model CT images of a male patient of 54 years old, as the other scans had pathological changes.
The images were imported in InVesalius 3.0 version, a free and open source software, which was used to convert the tomography tissues into three-dimensional geometry, performing the segmentation of the interest region. InVesalius is a medical imaging program for 3D reconstruction, using DICOM 2D image file sequences obtained with CT or MRI scanners. It allows the export of volumes or 3D surfaces as STL files in order to create the accurate anatomical model of the analyzed region, using three-dimensional scanning. This software is supported by several medical organizations and the Brazilian Ministry of Health. The STL format information was further processed using Geomagic for SolidWork.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Detailed RF Ablation Protocol for Tumors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All patients underwent RF ablation, under general anesthesia. The ablation procedures were performed with the Cool-Tip RF ablation device (200 W RF 2000 generator, Covidien, Sunnyvale, California, USA) by one interventional radiologist (12 years of experience). The electrodes were inserted into the tumor under CT-guidance (Emotion 16, Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) and activated during at least 12 min depending on the size of the lesion. If required, the electrodes were repositioned during the procedure in order to effectively ablate the tumor [13 (link)]. In cases of multifocal tumor, several lesions were ablated during the same session.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Brain Imaging Protocol Across Modalities

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Brain computed tomography was performed using one of our multi-detector CT scanners, including GE LightSpeed 16, VCT (GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI, USA), SOMATOM Sensation 64, and Emotion 16 (Siemens Medical Solutions, Erlangen, Germany). Axial cuts were taken at the top of the C1 lamina through the top of the calvarium. Axial images were reconstructed with 5-mm-thick sections at 5-mm intervals. In some of our subjects, coronal reconstructed images of 5 mm thickness were also available.
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain was performed on a 1.5TMR unit, either GE Excite (GE Healthcare) or MAGNETOM Sonata (Siemens Healthcare). The scanning protocol included axial FLAIR, fast spin-echo T2-weighted sequences, and a coronal T1WI or a 3D T1WI. The axial slices were positioned to run parallel to a line that joins the most inferoanterior and inferoposterior parts of the corpus callosum and had a thickness of 5 mm with a gap of 1.5 mm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Low-Dose CT Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Non-enhanced chest CT scan were performed in supine position, during inspiratory breath-hold, from the apex to the lung bases, with a 16-slice scanner (Emotion 16; Siemens AG, Forchheim, Germany). Low-dose CT acquisition was executed as follows: tube voltage, 110 KV if body weight ≤80 kg and 130 KV for patients >80 kg; tube current, 40 mAs; pitch, 1; collimation, 0.625 mm. Image data sets were reconstructed with 1-2 mm slice thickness range using both sharp kernels (B70f) with a standard lung window (1500 width; -500 center) and medium-soft kernels (B40f) with a soft-tissue window (300 width; 40 center).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Multidetector CT Scanning Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Subjects underwent multidetector CT spiral scans with 16 detector rows (Emotion 16; Siemens, Erlangen, Germany; Aquillion™ 16; Toshiba Medical Systems Corp, Tokyo, Japan) or dual‐source CT instrument (Siemens SOMATOM Definition; Flash, Germany) with the following scanning conditions: (1) 120 kVp; automatic milliamperes; pitch, 1.2; and 0.6‐s rotation; (2) 120 kV; 120 mAs; pitch 1.33; and 0.6‐s rotation; (3) 120 kVp; CareDose 4D intelligent mode, pitch, 1.2; and collimation, 128 × 0.6 mm, respectively. All imaging data were reconstructed using a lung sharp reconstruction algorithm with a thickness of 1.25 mm. CT images were acquired in the supine position at full inspiration; the scanning direction was from the head to the foot.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Standardized CT Scanning Protocol for COVID-19

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Plain CT scans were performed for all patients using multi-detector CT scanner (Toshiba, Tokyo, Japan; Emotion 16, Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) at the time of admission. Patients were placed in a supine position with their breath held at the end of inspiration, and the scanning range was from the chest entrance to the bottom of the lungs. The parameters used were as follows: thickness of the slices 1 mm, interslice gap 1 mm, matrix 512 mm × 512 mm; and tube voltage 80 kV, current 200 mA, pitch 0.813/HP 65.0, and dose-length product 36–51 mGy∙cm. The CT scan was performed by technicians with over 5 years of experience. Comprehensive protective measures for technicians included wearing isolation gowns, caps, masks, protective goggles, gloves, and shoe covers. Scanning rooms were regularly disinfected. Children under the age of 4 years were examined after sedation to reduce artifacts. All patients wore masks for protection.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Multidetector CT and Chest Radiograph Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All noncontrast CT scans were obtained in the supine position at full inspiration using a multidetector CT scanner with 16 or more detector channels (Emotion 16, Somatom Sensation 64, Somatom Definition, Somatom Definition AS+, and Somatom Force; Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany). The CT tube voltage and current were 120 kVp, and a standard-dose or low-dose setting with automatic exposure control was used according to institutional protocols. Axial CT images were reconstructed with a slice thickness of 1 mm (3 mm in a minority of the cases) and a sharp reconstruction kernel. Chest radiographs were obtained using the following devices: DRX-Revolution (Carestream Health, Rochester, NY); Optima XR220 (GE Healthcare, Chicago, Ill); Fluorospot Compact FD (Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany); and CXDI (Canon, Tokyo, Japan). All chest radiographs consisted of single frontal view. Fourteen chest radiographs were taken at upright position with posteroanterior projection, and the remaining were taken with anteroposterior (AP) projection in supine position or sitting position.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Finite Element Modeling of Flatfoot Biomechanics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Computer tomography scan (Emotion 16, Siemens Medical Solutions, Erlangen, Germany) was performed on the patient's right foot one-month postoperatively as determined by the orthopedic surgeon based on the patient condition. The resolution was 0.425 ​mm at 1-mm slice interval. The ankle joint was put at 90° with minimal support or compression on the plantar foot during the scan [18 ].
The geometry of the osseous structure and the encapsulated bulk tissue was segmented and reconstructed using commercially available software Mimics (Materialise, Leuven, Belgium) and Rapidform (INUS Technology Ltd., Seoul, Korea) (Figure 1). Ligaments, muscles/tendons, and plantar fascia were built using one-dimensional truss and connectors linking relevant insertion points on the reconstructed osseous geometry. The reconstructed geometry was confirmed with colleagues with expertise in anatomy [15 ]. The skin layer was defined by assigning a 2-mm membrane thickness over the encapsulated bulk tissue [19 (link)]. The geometry of the cartilage was disregarded but resembled by frictionless and nonlinear contact behavior between cartilaginous layer [20 ], whereas the coefficient of friction between the encapsulated bulk tissue and ground plate was 0.6 [21 (link)].

Finite element model of the foot and ankle complex of a patient with flatfoot.

Fig. 1
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!