The adhesive-composite resin systems used in this study are listed in Table 1 . Silorane FiltekTM P90's adhesive (3M ESPE, St. Paul, USA) is a two-step self-etching adhesive system. FiltekTM Z250XT was used with AdperTM Single Bond 2 (3M ESPE, St. Paul, USA) which is a two-step acid-etch system. Amelogen® Plus was used with Peak SE Primer combined with Peak® Universal Bond (Ultradent, Inc, South Jordan, USA) constituting a two-step self-etching adhesive system. All the bonding systems were used according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Amelogen plus
Manufactured by Ultradent
Sourced in United States
Amelogen Plus is a light-cured, radiopaque, fluoride-releasing, nanofilled composite resin material designed for use in anterior and posterior direct restorations. It is formulated to provide excellent handling characteristics and high esthetics.
Automatically generated - may contain errors
Lab products found in correlation
4 protocols using amelogen plus
1
Adhesive-Composite Resin Protocols
2
Cementing Shade Stability over Time
Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
+ Expand
Colour measurements were done using a spectrophotometer (CM5, Konica Minolta, Tokyo, Japan) before the cement placement and repeated three times for each sample. Cements were placed for a thickness of 2 mm and covered with a damp cotton pallet until setting. After one day, 1 mm of glass ionomer cement (Riva Self cure, SDI, Bayswater, Australia) was placed on top of the cement and the cavity was sealed with resin composite (Amelogen Plus, Ultradent, South Jordan, USA). Readings were recorded immediately after cement placement as baseline (T0), then samples were again stored in saline and kept in incubator. Colour change was assessed at different time intervals after 1 day (T1), 1 week (T2), 2 weeks (T3), 4 weeks (T4), 6 weeks (T5),8 weeks (T6) and 17 weeks (T7).
3
Resin Composite Layering Techniques
Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
+ Expand
A2 dentin, enamel white, enamel grey and enamel neutral resin composite (Amelogen plus, Ultradent) were used in the current study.
The specimens were divided into the following groups (a) control, an entire build-up of dentin composite (n = 10); (b) Group 1: Dentin with 0.5 mm thickness of enamel white shade (n = 10); (c) Group 2: Dentin with 0.75 mm thickness of enamel white shade (n = 10); (d) Group 3: Dentin with 1 mm thickness of enamel white shade (n = 10); (e) Group 4: Dentin with 0.5 mm thickness of enamel neu-tral shade (n = 10); (f) Group 5: Dentin with 0.75 mm thickness of enamel neutral shade (n = 10); (g) Group 6: Dentin with 1 mm thickness of enamel neutral shade (n = 10); (h) Group 7: Dentin with 0.5 mm thickness of enamel grey shade (n = 10); (i) Group 8: Dentin with 0.75 mm thickness of enamel grey shade (n = 10); (j) Group 9: Dentin with 1 mm thickness of enamel grey shade (n = 10).
The specimens were divided into the following groups (a) control, an entire build-up of dentin composite (n = 10); (b) Group 1: Dentin with 0.5 mm thickness of enamel white shade (n = 10); (c) Group 2: Dentin with 0.75 mm thickness of enamel white shade (n = 10); (d) Group 3: Dentin with 1 mm thickness of enamel white shade (n = 10); (e) Group 4: Dentin with 0.5 mm thickness of enamel neu-tral shade (n = 10); (f) Group 5: Dentin with 0.75 mm thickness of enamel neutral shade (n = 10); (g) Group 6: Dentin with 1 mm thickness of enamel neutral shade (n = 10); (h) Group 7: Dentin with 0.5 mm thickness of enamel grey shade (n = 10); (i) Group 8: Dentin with 0.75 mm thickness of enamel grey shade (n = 10); (j) Group 9: Dentin with 1 mm thickness of enamel grey shade (n = 10).
4
Comparing Dental Filling Materials
Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
+ Expand
Data were analyzed using Statistical Software Package for the Social Sciences (version 17.0, Chicago, Illinois, USA). The significance level was set to p ≤ 0.05. Indicators to be measured in this study were color match, marginal discoloration, marginal adaptation, secondary caries, surface texture, anatomic contour, and postoperative sensitivity. For each of the criteria, a score of alpha was used to indicate the highest degree of clinical acceptability, and scores of Bravo, Charlie, and Delta were used to indicate progressively lessening degrees of clinical acceptability (Table 1).
Each of these indicators has been studied as a function of two factors: 1. Time: Baseline-3, 6, and 9 months (intrasubject factor).
2. Nature of the filling materials: Amelogen Plus (Ultradent, South Jordan, USA) and EQUIA (GC Tokyo, Japan). Fisher exact tests were used to compare scores with time and between groups.
Each of these indicators has been studied as a function of two factors: 1. Time: Baseline-3, 6, and 9 months (intrasubject factor).
2. Nature of the filling materials: Amelogen Plus (Ultradent, South Jordan, USA) and EQUIA (GC Tokyo, Japan). Fisher exact tests were used to compare scores with time and between groups.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!