The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Medelec synergy

Manufactured by Cardinal Health
Sourced in United States, United Kingdom

The Medelec Synergy is a medical device used for electrophysiological testing. It is designed to assess the functional status of the nervous system and muscle activity.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Lab products found in correlation

15 protocols using medelec synergy

1

Standardized Nerve Conduction Study Methodology

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Standardized nerve conduction study (NCS) methodology was followed to conduct NCSs using Medelec Synergy (VIASYS Healthcare, Philadelphia, PA, USA) [14 (link),15 ]. Three nerves were tested bilaterally on all patients, namely, the median and sural sensory nerves, and the tibial motor nerve. The subject’s skin temperature over the upper and lower limbs was maintained above 32 °C throughout the process. During a sensory NCS, five parameters were reported, which were onset latency, peak latency, sensory nerve action potential (SNAP) amplitudes, conduction velocity (CV), and peak velocity (PV). In contrast, parameters recorded in motor NCSs included distal and proximal onset latencies, compound muscle action potential (CMAP) amplitudes, distance between distal and proximal stimulation points, and CV. The validated methodology by Ng Y.T. et al. was used in this study [13 (link)].
To reduce operational bias, a single machine was used at both clinical research centres and the technique to conduct nerve conduction studies (NCSs) was standardized and strictly followed throughout the study under the supervision of a clinical neurologist, Botross N.P. Hence, the NCSs were conducted in the same manner with the same machine by the same standardized method from screening to the washout visit for each patient.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Skin Sympathetic Response Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SSR study was carried out according to the technical standards of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology [40 (link)]. During the test, subjects were kept relaxed with comfortable light and temperature (26–28 °C); the test was started after 5 min of previous adaptation. The apparatus used was an electromyography and evoked potential equipment (MedelecSynergy, Viasys Healthcare, Madison WI USA). Recording electrodes consisted of a pair of superficial electrodes: recording was carried out on the glabrous skin on the flat port-wine stain, and the reference was placed 2 cm away from the lesion. The ground electrode was proximal to the recording electrodes. Electrical stimulation was applied through superficial electrodes over the right median nerve. The stimulus was strong but tolerable (not noxious). The electrical stimulus was applied four times at irregular intervals of 30–60 s (stimulus duration: 0.1 ms; intensity: 80 mA) to avoid habituation, and SSR waves were obtained. SSR recordings were carried out in quadruplicates at the angiomas lesion sites and onto a contralateral healthy skin region in each patient.
The amplifier bandwidth was 0.1–100 Hz. Responses were recorded on the skin with an impedance <5 kΩ. The mean latency and peak-to-peak amplitude were calculated and used for the following analyses.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Corticospinal Excitability Measurement in Stroke

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The corticospinal excitability of the non-lesioned hemisphere, as represented by the peak-to-peak amplitude of MEPs, was measured using single-pulse TMS with a figure-eight coil. The hotspot of ED M1 was marked on the scalp and on the neuro-navigation system to ensure precision. Determining corticospinal excitability also required electromyographic (Medelec Synergy; VIASYS HealthCare Inc., Surrey, UK) recording from silver/silver chloride electrodes positioned in a belly-tendon montage on the skin overlying the ED muscle. First, we measured the rMT of the non-lesioned hemisphere. The rMT refers to the lowest intensity that induces MEPs of 50-μV peakto-peak amplitude in the target muscle in 50% of the trials applying TMS to the ‘optimal site’ [25 (link)]. The peak-topeak MEP amplitude was then determined for ten trials at 120% of rMT.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Standardized Nerve Conduction Study Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The nerve conduction study (NCS) was carried out using MedelecSynergy (VIASYS Healthcare, Philadelphia, PA, USA) based on standardized methodology for NCS [18 (link),19 ]. The sensory nerve tested were median and sural nerves, whereas the motor nerve tested was tibial nerve. These three nerves were tested bilaterally on all the participants. When conducting the NCS, it was ensured that the skin temperature was maintained above 32 °C, over the upper limbs as well as the lower limbs. The parameters recorded in sensory NCS include onset latency, peak latency, sensory nerve action potential (SNAP), conduction velocity (CV) and peak velocity (PV). On the other hand, distal and proximal onset latencies, compound muscle action potential (CMAP), distance between distal and proximal stimulation point, as well as CV were parameters recorded for motor NCS. Details of the NCS methodology used is available in the “Supplementary Materials”.
To ensure validity of the results, NCS was performed using the same methodology on age-matched volunteers recruited without diabetes mellitus to obtain a group of normal control for comparison of the nerve conduction parameters.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Electrophysiological Assessment of Nerve Regeneration

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
At 8 and 12 weeks after surgery, electrophysiological recordings were performed using Medelec Synergy (Viasys Healthcare Inc., Conshohocken, PA, USA) in a quiet room at 22–23°C. All recordings were performed with a subcutaneous needle electrode. Nerve conduction tests of nerve fibers were performed, including motor nerve conduction velocity (MNCV) and compound muscle action potential (CMAP). For CMAP, the active electrode was inserted to the middle of gastrocnemius, the reference electrode on the muscle tendon in the silent region of the distal extremity, and a ground electrode externally on the animal's thorax. The tibial nerve was stimulated at the tibial notch 1.5 cm proximal to the injured region by adjusting the distance between the cathode and anode to 1 cm. Supramaximal pulses (usually 0.05 ms in duration) were delivered. To reduce artifacts, stimulus intensity was held at the lowest level (1 mA) according to the muscle reaction. The filter was set at 1 Hz–5 kHz, sweep speed was 1 ms/div, and sensitivity was 0.5 mV/div. Latency was calculated from the onset of CMAP, with conduction velocity of the fastest fiber given. Baseline to peak amplitude was also measured; this shows the numbers of fibers activated by nerve stimulation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Evaluating Lower Limb Nerve Function

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Nerve function of the lower limbs was assessed with a Medelec Synergy electromyography apparatus (version 15.0, Viasys Healthcare, UK) using surface electrodes. Before testing, feet and lower legs were warmed in warm water (38°C) for a minimum duration of 10 min, to ensure that skin temperature (measured on the dorsal surface of the foot) was >32°C. Motor peroneal and tibial nerves and sensory sural nerve were examined at supra-maximal stimulation.
Peroneal nerve function was recorded on the right leg, at the digitorum brevis muscle with stimulations at the ankle (8 cm proximal from the recording site), below the fibular head and above the fibular head. Tibial nerve function was recorded on the left leg, at the abductor hallucis muscle with stimulations at the ankle and in the popliteal fossa. Sural nerve function was recorded on the left leg between the lateral malleolus and the Achilles tendon while stimulating 12 cm proximal to the recording site.
Variables analysed were compound muscle action potential (CMAP) amplitudes (stimulated at the ankle), nerve conduction velocities (NCV) of the peroneal and tibial nerves, and the sural sensory nerve action potential (SNAP) amplitude and NCV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Standardized Nerve Conduction Study Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The NCS was conducted using MedelecSynergy (VIASYS Health care, Philadelphia, PA, USA) based on standardized methodology for NCS (26 (link)). Four sensory nerves, including the median, ulnar, sural and superficial peroneal nerves, were tested bilaterally on all the participants. When conducting NCS, it was ensured that the skin temperature was maintained above 32°C over the upper limbs as well as the lower limbs. The parameters recorded in sensory NCS include sensory nerve conduction velocity potential (SNCV) and sensory nerve amplitude.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Median Nerve Somatosensory Evoked Potentials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP) were recorded after electrical stimulation of the right and left median nerve at the wrist (MedelecSynergy, Viasys Healthcare, UK). Stimuli of 0.2 ms duration were given at a frequency of 5 Hz.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Electrophysiological Evaluation of Affected Puppies

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Two affected puppies (2009 litter) were anesthetized to perform a complete electrodiagnostic examination including electromyography (EMG) and measurement of mean motor and sensory nerve conduction velocities (Medelec Synergy, Viasys Healthcare, Old Woking, UK). Insulated stainless steel needle electrodes were used for nerve stimulation, muscle recording, and ground. Motor nerve conduction velocities of the peroneal and ulnar nerves were calculated, and sensory nerve conduction studies were performed on the peroneal and ulnar nerves as previously described.19 (link), 20 (link), 21 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Assessing Muscle Reinnervation Post-Injury

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Reinnervation of target muscles was assessed at 30, 60, 90, and 120 days post-injury (dpi) by motor nerve conduction tests. Animals were anesthetized as indicated above, and the sciatic nerve was stimulated with transcutaneous needle electrodes placed at the sciatic notch delivering single pulses of increasing intensity (Synergy Medelec, Viasys HealthCare), and the compound muscle action potential (CMAP) was recorded by placing electrodes on the tibialis anterior (TA), gastrocnemius (GA), and plantar interosseus (PL) muscles. The reference electrode was placed at the fourth toe, and a ground electrode was placed at the knee. The amplitude and latency of the CMAP were measured. The contralateral intact limbs were used as control. The rat body temperature was maintained throughout the test with a thermostatic warming flat coil.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!