The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

8 protocols using cd4 bv786

1

Comprehensive PBMC Immunophenotyping Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PBMC were collected from the patients’ EDTA blood samples using a lymphocyte separation medium (Ficoll-Human density 1.077g/mL, PAN Biotech, Aidenbach, Germany). Harvested cells were cryopreserved in a 9:1 medium of fetal calf serum (Gibco) and dimethyl sulfoxide (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) until immunophenotyping analysis.
Lymphocyte subpopulations were determined with the following panel of 14 antibodies (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA): CD3-APC-H7, CD4-BV786, CD8α-BV711, CD19-BV510, CD25-BV421, CD45RA-PE-Cy7, CD56-BV605, CD127-AF647, CD183-BB700, CD194-BV650, CD196-PE-CF594, CD197-BB515, Foxp3-PE and a viability marker (FVS-APC R700). Frozen PBMC were thawed, and a total of 500,000 cells were labeled after saturation with human serum. Cells were successively stained with the viability dye, the surface antibodies and, finally, with FoxP3 after cell fixation and permeabilization with Transcription Factor Buffer (BD Biosciences). For all experiments, acquisition was performed using LSR-Fortessa flow cytometer (BD Biosciences) and data were analyzed using Flowjo software (version 10). The gating strategy is detailed in the Supplementary Data section (Supplementary Figure S1). In order to avoid uncertain results, the TCD4 and TCD8 subpopulations were not analyzed when there were fewer than 500 events for TCD4 or TCD8 cells.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Multiparametric Flow Cytometry Immunophenotyping

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For surface staining, antibodies were diluted in brilliant stain buffer (BD Biosciences, P/N 563794) and cells were stained with this mixture. Washing steps were performed with a standard flow cytometry buffer (1% FBS, 0.02% NaN3, PBS). For intracellular staining, the Foxp3/Transcription Factor Staining Buffer Set (Invitrogen, P/N 00-5523-00) was used according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Cells were pretreated with GolgiStop for cytokine staining (BD, P/N 554724). Viability was assessed using either 7-AAD (BioLegend, P/N 420403) or fixable viability dye eFluor780 (Invitrogen, P/N 65-0865-14). All antibodies used were from BD Biosciences: CD3-PE (P/N 566683), CD4-FITC (P/N 300538), CD4-BV786 (P/N 563877), IFN-γ-FITC (P/N 554551), Isotype control-FITC (P/N 554679), CD9-PE (P/N 555372), CD30-BV421 (P/N 562876), CD45RA-BV711 (P/N 612847), CD45RO-BV421 (P/N 562641), CD52-AF647 (P/N 563610), CD96-BV711 (P/N 563174).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Comprehensive T-cell Immunophenotyping Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Flow cytometry antibodies used for surface marker staining are listed as follows. Antibodies from BD Biosciences include: CD3‐BUV395 (Clone UCHT1; cat #563 546), CD4‐BV786 (Clone SK3; cat #563 877) and CD8‐PE‐Cy7 (Clone SK1; cat #335 787). Antibodies from Biolegend include: CD3‐FITC (Clone UCHT1; cat #300 406), CCR7‐PE (Clone G043H7; cat #353 204), CD45RA‐APC (Clone HI100; cat #304 112), CD45RO‐Pacific Blue (Clone UCHL1; cat #304 215),CD27‐Pacific Blue (Clone M‐T271; cat #356 413), CD28‐FITC (Clone CD28.2; cat #302 906), CD28‐PE (Clone CD28.2; cat #302 907), CD95‐FITC (Clone DX2; cat #305 605), CD127‐Brilliant Violet 785 (Clone A019D5; cat #351 329), TIM‐3‐Pacific Blue (Clone F38‐2E2; cat #345 041), CD57‐FITC (Clone HNK‐1; cat #359 603), LAG‐3‐Brilliant Violet 785 (Clone 11C3C65; cat #369 321) and human TruStain FcX reagent (Cat #422 302). Antibodies for intracellular staining include granzyme B‐PE (BD Biosciences, GB11; cat #561 142), IFN‐γ‐FITC (Miltenyi Biotec, cat #130‐090‐433), IL‐2‐PE (Miltenyi Biotec, cat #130‐090‐487) and TNF‐α‐APC (Miltenyi Biotec, cat #130‐091‐267).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Isolation and Characterization of Intestinal Epithelial Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Small intestine segments were washed and incubated in HBSS with 30 mM EDTA for 20 min. Epithelial cells were dissociated mechanically through vigorous shaking followed by incubation in Triple-X (Thermo Fisher Scientific) supplemented with Y-27632 (10 mM, Sigma-Aldrich) and 0.5 mM N-acetyl-L-cysteine at 37°C. Dissociated enterocytes were filtered and pelleted before re-suspended in complete advanced DMEM/F12 media containing 10 mM Y-27632 and 0.5 mM N-acetylcysteine. Cells were stained with fluorochrome-conjugated surface antibodies according to the manufacturer’s instructions. For intracellular staining, cells were fixed and permeabilized for 1 hr at 4°C with the Foxp3/ Transcription Factor Staining Buffer Set according to the manufacturer’s instructions (eBioscience). The following antibodies were used for surface or intracellular staining: CD45 BUV393 (BD Cat#565967), Epcam BV421 (BioLegend, Cat# 324219), p-S6 (S235/236) PerCP e710 (eBioscience, Cat# 46900742), p-mTOR eFluor 660 9S24480 (eBioscience, Cat# 50971842), CD4 BV786 (BD, Cat#563727), IFN-γ BV421 (BD, 563376), Lysozyme 1 (rabbit polyclonal; Dako), and goat anti-rabbit Alexa 488 (Molecular Probes). Cell fluorescence was measured using an LSRII flow cytometer, and data were analyzed using FlowJo software (Tree Star).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Isolation and Analysis of Lung Immune Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Whole-lung, single-cell suspensions were stained with CD11c-BV421 (Biolegend, N418) and Siglec-F-PE (BD Biosciences, E50-2440) and CD11c+Siglec-F+ cells were sorted directly into TRIzol LS Reagent (Ambion) with the BD FACSAria II (BD Biosciences). For whole-lung phenotyping, whole-lung, single-cell suspensions were stained with CD3-AF488 (Biolegend, 17A2), CD11c-BV421 (Biolegend, N418), CD8a-BV650 (Biolegend 53-6.7), CD4-BV786 (BD Biosciences GK1.5), SiglecF-PE (BD Biosciences, E50-2440), and Zombie NIR (Biolegend). Intracellular Ki-67-FITC (Biolegend, 11F6) staining was performed with the eBioscience Transcription Factor Staining Buffer Set (ThermoFisher) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Annexin V staining was performed with PerCP-Cy5-labeled Annexin V (Biolegend) in Annexin V Binding Buffer (Biolegend) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Data were collected with an Aurora (Cytek) or LSRFortessa (BD) and analyzed with FlowJo software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantifying CD4+ T-cell Proliferation Suppression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Either ex vivo- or 7-day-cultured CD4+ T-cells were placed in flow cytometric suppression assays, as described previously [11 , 13 (link), 14 (link)]. Briefly, responder CD4+ T-cells were stained with CFSE, followed by culture 1 μg/ml of fixed anti-CD3 (eBiosciences, 16-0037-85) and 1μg/ml of fixed anti-CD28 (eBiosciences, 16-0289-85) in the presence or absence of ex vivo sorted autologous bulk CD8+ T-cells at 1:0, 1:1 and 1:0.5 CD4:CD8 cell concentrations. On day 7 of culture, cells were stained for anti-CD4 PE-Cy7 (BD, 557852), anti-CD3 AlexaFluor700 (BD, 557943), anti-CD8 Pacific Blue (Biolegend, 344718) and flow cytometrically assessed for CD4 proliferating fraction (CFSE dilution). Percent proliferation and percent suppression were calculated as described previously [13 (link)]. Other antibodies utilized include: CD45RO Pacific Blue, Biolegend 304216; CD45RO PE, Biolegend 304244; CD45RA Fitc, BD 555488; CD8 PE, BD 340046; CD8 BV786, BD 563823; CD4 BV786, BD 563877; CD4 APC, BD 561841; CD4 PE, BD 555347; CD3 APC, Biolegend 300412; CD25 PE, BD 555432; CD25 APC, BD 555434; CD25 PacBlue, Biolegend 356130. Cells were analyzed on a BD LSRII or Cytek Aurora. Data were analyzed with FlowJo software v10.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Evaluation of CD4 T-cell Differentiation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To evaluate CD4 T-naïve differentiation, the lymphocyte component of the ascites was analyzed in all culture conditions from 3 patients. Specifically, after 72 h of co-culture with hA-MSCs, the maturation status (naïve, central memory, CM; effector memory, EM; terminal effector memory, TEM) of CD4+ cells was analyzed and compared to the control lymphocytes. We phenotyped T cells using a panel of markers that distinguish lymphocyte cell subsets in T helper CD4+ Th1/Th2/Th17. In detail, we analyzed the CD4+ T cells’ differentiation states using different marker combinations, CD4+ naïve (CD45+CCR7+), CD4+ CM (CD45RA-CCR7+), CD4+ EM (CD45RA-CCR7-), and CD4+ TEM (CD45RA+CCR7-), and the lymphocytes cells subsets in T-helper CD4+ using specific marker combinations, Th1 (CD4+CXCR3+CCR4-), Th2 (CD4+CCR4+CCR6-), and Th17 (CD4+CCR4+CCR6+). The cells were labeled with CD45 APC-Cy7, CD3 BV510, CD4 BV786, CD45RA PE Cy-7, CCR7 BV711, CXCR3 BV421, CCR4 APC, and CCR6 BB515—all from BD Biosciences (BB: Brilliant Blue, BV: Brilliant Violet). Analyses were conducted using a BD FACS Celesta SORP instrument, FACS Celesta SORP flow cytometer, and FACS Diva software version 9.0 (BD Biosciences, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Multiparameter Flow Cytometry Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell staining was performed using various combinations of the following Abs: CD3-BV650 (BD, clone UCHT1), CD4-BV786 (BD, clone SK3), CD8-APC-H7 (BD, clone SK1), CD103-BV605 (BD, clone Ber-ACT8), CD69-BV421 (BD, clone FN50), CD19-APC-H7 (BD, clone HIB19), CD24-PE (BD, clone ML5), CD27-PE-Cy7 (BD, clone M-T271), CD38-PerCP-Cy5.5 (BD, clone HIT2), IgD-FITC (BD, clone IA6-2), CXCL13-APC (Invitrogen, clone 53,610). Surface staining was performed for 30 min at 4 °C. Intracellular staining was performed by the use of Intrasure kit (BD) according with the manufacturer instructions. Cells were immediately acquired in the BD FACSCelesta flow cytometer and analyzed by the use of BD FACSDiva software (RRID:SCR_001456).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!