The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

10 protocols using genemapper v6

1

Parentage Analysis of Fish Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Parentage analysis was performed to confirm that the sampled fish corresponded to the correct family, as described in [54] . Briefly, DNA was extracted from fin clips from parents and offspring, amplified at 12 microsatellite loci [55] (link), and visualized on an AB3500 automated DNA sequencer. GeneMapper V6 (Applied Biosystem) was used to determine allele lengths, which were imported into both Cervus v3.0.7 [56] (link) and COLONY v2.0.6 [57] (link). Parentage analysis was performed using COLONY's full likelihood approach and Cervus' 90% confidence likelihood approach. Parentage assignment was considered successful when both programs identified the same set of parents. If the identified parents were not crossed in the breeding design, the next most probable parentage assignment was used. If both programs did not suggest the same pair, the most probable pair between the possible crosses was assigned. Inability to assign both parents to an individual resulted in a failed assignation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Parentage Analysis of Fish Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Parentage analysis was performed to confirm that the sampled fish corresponded to the correct family, as described in [57 ]. Briefly, DNA was extracted from fin clips from parents and offspring, amplified at 12 microsatellite loci [58 (link)], and visualized on an AB3500 automated DNA sequencer. GeneMapper V6 (Applied Biosystem) was used to determine allele lengths, which were imported into both Cervus v. 3.0.7 [59 (link)] and COLONY v. 2.0.6 [60 (link)]. Parentage analysis was performed using COLONY's full likelihood approach and Cervus's 90% confidence likelihood approach. Parentage assignment was considered successful when both programs identified the same set of parents. If the identified parents were not crossed in the breeding design, the next most probable parentage assignment was used. If both programs did not suggest the same pair, the most probable pair between the possible crosses was assigned. Inability to assign both parents to an individual resulted in a failed assignation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantifying Alternative Splicing by RT-PCR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All PCR experiments involved four independent biological replicates. For conventional end-point PCR, primers in exons flanking the alternative splicing event were used to amplify 1 μL of cDNA with the Taq DNA polymerase (New England Biolabs) for 35 cycles in a 25 μL total volume. RT-PCR products were resolved by gel electrophoresis in 2% agarose gels and bands were quantified using the Image Lab 6.0.1 software (Bio-Rad). The identity of the amplified products was verified by Sanger sequencing. For semi-quantitative analysis of fluorescently marked PCR products, the same protocol was applied except that FAM-labeled forward primers were used and the cycling conditions were as follows: 94 °C for 3 min followed by 26 cycles at 94 °C for 30 s, 59 °C for 30 s and 72 °C for 45 s and a final extension step at 72 °C for 20 min. Fluorescently labeled PCR fragments were separated by size on an Applied Biosystems® 3500 Dx Genetic Analyzer and analyzed with the GeneMapper v6.0 software (Applied Biosystems). Ratios of splicing isoforms were determined as the peak area of one specific isoform divided by the total peak areas for the other detected isoforms. Primer sequences for RT-PCR are provided in the Supplementary Table 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Serum Glycoprotein N-Glycome Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Serum glycoprotein N-glycome profiling was performed on the GlyFace (Glycoprofiling by Fluorophore-Assisted Carbohydrate Electrophoresis) glycome detection technology platform provided by SysDiagno (Nanjing) Biotech Co. The results were analyzed using GeneMapper v6.0 software (Applied Biosystems). The height intensities of the nine most intense GPs were detected in all samples and normalized to the total intensity of the measured GPs.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Genetic Identification of Farmed Salmonids

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA from eggs was isolated as described by Mateos‐Rivera et al. (2020 ), while cod tissue was suspended in lysis buffer from the DNAdvance kit (Beckman Coulter, CA, USA) and processed using a Biomek i5 Automated Workstation (Beckman Coulter), following the manufacturer's instructions.
All samples (eggs and tissues) were genotyped with 21 microsatellite loci. Microsatellites were chosen as the marker of choice as extensive experience in genetic identification of farmed salmonids and gadoids (Glover et al., 2008 , 2010 (link), 2011 ) has illustrated that they are effective at detecting founder effects and drift that are rife in aquaculture and that they effectively resolve parent‐offspring and sibship relations (Duval et al., 2021 (link); Quintela et al., 2016 ). Detailed genotyping conditions are summarized in Table S1. PCR products were diluted 1:20 and analysed on an ABI3730 sequencer (Applied Biosystems, MA, USA). Microsatellite alleles were scored using GeneMapper v6.0 (Applied Biosystems).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Genotyping Sanguisorba pratensis using SSR Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Per leaf sample of S. pratensis, DNA was extracted from 50 mg of leaf material with the DNA Isolation Plus Kit (Norgen Biotek, Canada) following the manufacturer’s protocol. The genetic variation of S. pratensis was assessed using microsatellite analysis (Single Sequence Repeats, SSR), as they are widely applied for genotyping plants, highly informative and cost-effective [42 (link)]. Twelve loci developed by the Research Institute for Nature and Forest (Belgium) were amplified (Supr-10, Supr-12, Supr-13, Supr-14, Supr-23, Supr-30, Supr-31, Supr-32, Supr-34, Supr-35, Supr-36 and Supr-43; Additional file 1: Table S1) [41 ]. Three multiplex PCRs performed on a Bio-Rad T100 thermal cycler (Bio-Rad Laboratories, CA, USA) were constructed of three to six loci in 10 μl reactions. Each multiplex contained 1 μl template DNA, 50–200 nM primer concentration and 5 μl Qiagen Multiplex PCR Master Mix. The PCR cycling profile consisted of an initial denaturation at 94 °C for 2 min, 30 cycles consisting of 45 s at 94 °C, 45 s at 57 °C and 45 s at 72 °C, followed by a final elongation of 10 min at 72 °C. Fragments were sized on an ABI Prism 3500 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems) and scored with Genemapper v6 (Applied Biosystems).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

FLT3-ITD Allelic Ratio Determination

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fragment analysis electropherograms (Figure 1) were generated using the GeneMapper v6 software (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, California, United States), and displayed the size of the alleles obtained for the target PCR fragments (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, California, United States). FLT3-ITD allelic ratios were determined by calculating the ratio of the area under the curve of the FLT3-ITD mutant allele to the FLT3 wild-type allele as displayed by GeneMapper.
The sequence was analysed using the Sequencing Analysis Program version 5.3.1 (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, California, United States) and Chromas version 2.6.6 (Technelysium Pty Ltd, Brisbane, Australia). Tables were generated using Microsoft Word 2016 (Microsoft, Redmond, Washington, United States). Patients’ demographic data and AML classification were summarised in table format. Ethnicity, defined as either black, white or mixed race, was based on patients’ self-proclaimed identity and accordingly documented.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Microsatellite Analysis of Sanguisorba pratensis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Per leaf sample of S. pratensis, DNA was extracted from 50 mg of leaf material with the DNA Isolation Plus Kit (Norgen Biotek, Canada) following the manufacturer's protocol. The genetic variation of S. pratensis was assessed using microsatellite analysis (Single Sequence Repeats, SSR), as they are widely applied for genotyping plants, highly informative and cost-effective (42) . Twelve loci developed by the Research Institute for Nature and Forest (Belgium) were amplified (Supr-10, Supr-12, Supr-13, Supr-14, Supr-23, Supr-30, Supr-31, Supr-32, Supr-34, Supr-35, Supr-36 and Supr-43; Supplementary information Table S1) (41) . Three multiplex PCRs performed on a Bio-Rad T100 thermal cycler (Bio-Rad Laboratories, CA, USA) were constructed of three to six loci in 10 μl reactions. Each multiplex contained 1 μl template DNA, 50-200 nM primer concentration and 5 μl Qiagen Multiplex PCR Master Mix. The PCR cycling profile consisted of an initial denaturation at 94°C for 2 min, 30 cycles consisting of 45 s at 94°C, 45 s at 57°C and 45 s at 72°C, followed by a final elongation of 10 min at 72°C. Fragments were sized on an ABI Prism 3500 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems) and scored with Genemapper v6 (Applied Biosystems).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Y-STR Profiling of p.R337H Carrier Cohort

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A set of 23 Y-STRs (short tandem repeats) was analyzed for 13 unrelated male p.R337H carriers and four first-degree male relatives in the main cohort of 38 individuals using the PowerPlex Y23 System (Promega) as described by the manufacturer. Y-STR haplotypes were also determined for Brazilian male individuals harboring the p.R337H allele (validation cohort) that was paternally inherited (n = 41). Alleles were separated and detected on an ABI 3500 sequencer (ThermoFisher Scientific) and sizes were assigned to the different fragments using GeneMapper v 6.0 (ThermoFisher Scientific). The alleles were named according to the number of repeated units, based on the sequenced allelic ladder following International Society for Forensic Genetics recommendations.15 (link),16 The classification of Y chromosome haplogroup was done using the Haplogroup Predictor program FTDNA 2.0 (http://www.hprg.com/hapest5/index.html) and Y chromosome Haplotype Reference Database (https://yhrd.org/search).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

TP53 Sequencing and XAF1 Variant Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA was isolated and used to determine TP53 sequence and the XAF1 p.E134∗ variant status as previously reported.8 Additionally, fluorescent-labelled PCR products for 10 polymorphic microsatellite markers located within (VNTRp53) or telomeric to the TP53 locus (Table S1) were genotyped by using the ABI 3500 sequencer (ThermoFisher Scientific) and sizes assigned to the different fragments using GeneMapper v 6.0 (ThermoFisher Scientific).8 ,13 (link) Haplotypes were determined by segregation analysis of genomic DNA from parents and descendants, loss of heterozygosity in tumor samples, or inferred.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!