The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Dye reagent

Manufactured by Bio-Rad
Sourced in United States

Dye reagent is a laboratory product used for the detection and quantification of proteins in analytical procedures. It functions as a colorimetric agent, changing color in the presence of proteins, allowing for their identification and measurement. The core purpose of this product is to facilitate protein analysis in various research and diagnostic applications.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

53 protocols using dye reagent

1

Protein Quantification in HCE Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Bio-Rad protein assay (Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc., Hercules, CA, USA) was used to measure the protein concentration of the HCE cell samples. The bovine serum albumin standards (0.1–2 µg/mL) were prepared in blank cell lysate, and the lysed samples were centrifuged at 2800 rpm for 5 min. The supernatant (5 µL) in duplicates were then transferred into 96-well plates. Dye reagent (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA, USA) solution (Dye reagent concentrate diluted in distilled water at 1:4 ratio) was added to each well (200 µL/well) and incubated for 15 min at room temperature. The absorbance was measured at 595 nm in Victor2 multilabel plate reader (PerkinElmer, Wallac, St. Paul, MN, USA)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Protein Concentration and Western Blotting Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Protein concentration was determined according to Bradford (Bradford, 1976 (link)) by utilizing a dye reagent purchased from Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. (Hercules, CA), and SDS-PAGE was performed according to Laemmli (1970) (link). Western blotting was performed as described previously (Mukhopadhyay et al., 1995 (link)) with the following modifications. Monoclonal ANTI-FLAG® M2 antibody produced in mouse (catalog number, F1804; Sigma-Aldrich, Inc., St. Louis, MO) served as the primary antibody, and anti-mouse IgG (whole molecule) rabbit antibody conjugated with alkaline phosphatase (catalog number, A2418; Sigma-Aldrich) was the secondary antibody. The antibody reacting band was detected with BCIP and NBT.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Caspase-3 and PARP Protein Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total proteins were extracted from U87-MG cells using RIPA buffer (25 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.6; 150 mM NaCl; 1% NP-40; 1% sodium deoxycholate; and 0.1% SDS) containing a protease inhibitor cocktail (complete, Mini, EDTA-free, Roche Applied Science, Penzberg, Germany) and homogenized using an ultrasonic homogenizer. After quantitative analysis using the Bradford protein assay with a Bio-Rad Dye Reagent (500-0006, Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA), the protein samples were denatured with 5× sample buffer (10% SDS, 25% beta-mercaptoethanol, 50% glycerol, 0.25 M Tris-HCl [pH 6.8], and 0.01% bromophenol blue) and incubated in a water bath at 95°C for 10 min. Cell protein lysates were loaded into 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gels. The gels were transferred onto PVDF filters and incubated with a specific primary antibody to caspase-3 (1:1000) (Novusbio Inc., USA), cleaved caspase-3 (1:1000) (Novusbio Inc., Centennial, CO, USA), PARP (1: 1000) (Cell Signaling Inc., Danvers, MA USA), cleaved PARP (1:1000) (Cell Signaling Inc.), and β-actin (1:1000) (Cell Signaling Inc.). All blots were normalized to the internal standard of β-actin. Bands of interest were visualized using ECL reagents (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA) and quantified using the UVP BioImaging system (Biospectrum AC Imaging System, Upland, CA, USA) and the ImageJ software program (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Membrane Protein Isolation Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were transfected and harvested as described above, resuspended in TEGM buffer (50 mM Tris pH 7.5, 1 mM EGTA, 1 mM PMSF, 1 μg/ml leupetin, 1 μg/ml pepstatin A, 1 μg/ml aprotinin), and disrupted by sonication at 3.0 power using 3 × 15s bursts. Cell debris was pelleted at 5000 × g and the resulting supernatant was pelleted at 100000 × g for 35 minutes. The cell pellet was washed with TEGM buffer and repelleted at 100000 × g. The final membrane pellet was resuspended in TEGM Buffer containing 33% glycerol and stored at −80° C. Protein concentration was determined using Bio-Rad dye reagent with IgG as standard.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Protein Quantification and Structural Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Protein was determined (Bradford, 1976 (link)) with a commercial dye reagent (from Bio-Rad) using bovine serum albumin as standard. However, with S. elongatus extracts, to avoid chlorophyll interference, protein was determined according to Lowry (Lowry et al., 1951 (link)), again with a commercial Lowry reagent (Modified Lowry protein Assay Kit, from Thermo Scientific) and bovine serum albumin as standard, measuring the absorbance at 750 nm.
Protein structures were represented using PyMOL 0.99rc6 (DeLano Scientific LLC), utilizing the Protein DataBank (PDB; http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/) files 2XG8, 2XKO, and 2V5H for PII-PipX, NtcA-PipX, and PII-NAGK, respectively (Llácer et al., 2007 (link), 2010 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Recombinant Trl1 Protein Purification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Recombinant Candida Trl1(1–400), Trl1(1–410), Trl1(401–832) and Trl1(401–636) proteins were purified from soluble extracts of 4-liter cultures of IPTG-induced Escherichia coli BL21-CodonPlus(DE3) pET28b-His10Smt3-Trl1 strains by sequential nickel-affinity, tag-cleavage, tag removal by second nickel-affinity and gel filtration steps as described previously for Aspergillus and Coccidioides Trl1 proteins (9 (link)). Protein concentrations were determined by using the Biorad dye reagent with bovine serum albumin as the standard.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Protein Concentration Determination via Bradford Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Protein concentration was determined using the Bradford (1976) (link) microassay procedure with Bio-Rad Dye Reagent. BSA was used as the reference protein and the concentration was expressed in mg/mL or µg/µL. Enzyme amount in a microplate was expressed in µg/well.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Purification of Candida Trl1 Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Recombinant Candida Trl1(401-832) [KIN-CPD] and Trl1(401-636)-D445N [KIN-D445N] proteins were purified from soluble extracts of IPTG-induced Escherichia coli BL21(DE3) pET28b-His10Smt3-Trl1 strains by sequential nickel-affinity, tag cleavage, tag removal by second nickel-affinity, and gel filtration steps (10 (link),28 (link)). The peak Superdex 200 fractions were concentrated by centrifugal ultrafiltration to 9.5 mg/ml (for KIN-CPD) or 8.5 mg/ml (for KIN) in buffer containing 20 mM HEPES-NaOH, pH 7.5, 200 mM NaCl, 1 mM DTT, 5% glycerol. Protein concentrations were determined by using the BioRad dye reagent with bovine serum albumin as the standard.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Purification of Tpt1 Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
His6-tagged CthTpt1 and CthTpt1-C46S mutant and His6-tagged RslTpt1 and RslTpt1-Ala mutants were produced in E. coli and purified from soluble bacterial extracts by sequential Ni-NTA agarose and gel-filtration chromatography steps27 (link). Protein concentrations were determined by using the BioRad dye reagent with bovine serum albumin as the standard.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Purification of Recombinant AtRNL Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Recombinant wild-type AtRNL and mutants K152A, K700A-S701A, D726A, and T1001A were produced in Escherichia coli as His10Smt3 fusions and purified as described (Remus and Shuman 2013 (link)). The tagged proteins were isolated from soluble bacterial extracts by Ni-agarose chromatography, followed by treatment with Smt3-specific protease Ulp1 to cleave the tag. After depletion of the tag by adsorption to Ni-agarose, the AtRNL proteins were subjected to gel-filtration through a Superdex-200 column equilibrated in 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 100 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM DTT, 0.05% Triton X-100, and 10% glycerol. Peak AtRNL fractions were pooled and stored at −80°C. Protein concentrations were determined by using the Biorad dye reagent with BSA as the standard.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!