The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

41 protocols using chef dr 2

1

Yeast Chromosome Preparation for PFGE

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Yeast S288c cells were grown for 1 day at 25°C, 220 rpm. The cells were harvested, and the OD600 was adjusted to 10.0. After mixing with 2% low gelling temperature agarose for a final concentration of 0.75%, the cells were lyticase-treated for 1 h at 37°C followed by washing the cell plugs in 1 × TE. Forty U of Proteinase K was added to a reaction tube and incubated at 42°C overnight. Then, gel plugs were washed several times in 1 × TE and subjected to pulse-field gel electrophoresis following the manufacturer's guide (Bio-Rad CHEF-DR® II): 1% low melting temperature agarose, 0.5 × TBE (Tris–borate–EDTA), 14°C, 60–120 s of switch time, with 24 h of running and a voltage gradient of 6 V/cm. After running, the gel was stained with SYBR Gold for 30 min, immediately extracted, and destained with 200 mM of NaCl and 300 mM of sodium acetate (pH 5.2) for 30 min. After repeating the destaining procedure and washing three times, the gel was used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Genomic DNA Extraction from Candida tropicalis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
C. tropicalis strain MYA-3404 was grown until exponential phase (~2×107 cells/ml). Cells were washed with 50 mM EDTA and counted with a hemocytometer. Approximately 6×108 cells were used for the preparation of 1 ml genomic DNA plugs. The plugs were made according to the instruction manual protocol (BioRad, Cat No. 170–3593) with cleancut agarose (0.6%) and the lyticase enzyme provided by the kit. A 0.6% pulsed field certified agarose gel was prepared using 0.5X TBE buffer (0.1 M Tris, 0.09 M boric acid, 0.01 M EDTA, pH 8) and the PFGE was performed on a CHEF-DR II (Bio-Rad) for 72 h (24 h at 4.5 V/cm/106° with an initial and final switch times 200 s; 48 h at 3 V/cm/106° with an initial and final switch time 700 s). The gel was stained with ethidium bromide (EtBr) and analyzed by using the Quantity One software (Bio-Rad).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Genotypic Analysis of Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The clonal relationship was performed by Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). Genomic DNA was digested using SpeI restriction enzyme (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and macrorestriction fragments were separated as previously described29 (link) on a CHEF-DR II (BioRad Laboratories Inc., Hercules, CA, USA). Banding patterns were visualized by ethidium bromide staining and photographed. Dendrogram and cluster analysis were performed with NTSYSpc2.2. software, using the Unweighted Pair Group Method with Arithmetic Averages (UPGMA) and based on the criteria of Tenover et al.30 (link) The sequence type (ST) was determined in the three strains with new variants of β-lactamases by the multilocus sequence typing (MLST) technique as previously described by Curran et al31 (link) Allelic profile and a sequence type (ST) were assigned using the Pseudomonas aeruginosa MLST website.32
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Yeast Chromosome Visualization Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA preparation, restriction enzyme digestion, gel electrophoresis, Southern blotting, hybridisation, and autoradiography were essentially as described [90 ]. To prepare S. pombe spheroplasts, logarithmically-growing cells were treated with zymolase (Zymo Research, Irvine, CA, USA) [84 (link),91 (link)]. High molecular weight (HMW) DNA from yeast, insect and chicken cells was prepared in agarose blocks using standard methods and resolved by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) using either a Chef DRII (BioRad, ‎Hercules, CA, USA) or Biometra Rotaphor Type V (Analytik, Jena, Germany) apparatus [26 (link)]. DNA size markers used were: lambda DNA ladder, S. cerevisiae chromosomes, H. wingei chromosomes (BioRad). DNA was transferred to nylon membrane (Hybond N+, GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Little Chalfont, UK). Probe DNA was radioactively labelled by random-priming [92 (link)]. Southern blot hybridisations were carried out in a Hybaid oven and membranes washed at high stringency (0.2 × SSC/0.1% SDS at 65 °C).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

PFGE analysis of bacterial isolates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA fragments were separated using a clamped homogenous electric field device (CHEF-DR II, BioRad) with pulse times of 5–15 sec over 10 h, and 15–60 sec over 13 h at 6 V, and run through a 1.2% gel of Agarose NA (GE Healthcare, Uppsala, Sweden) in 0.5 × Tris-borat EDTA-buffer (0.9 M Tris-borat, 20 mM EDTA; National Veterinary Institute, Uppsala, Sweden). Then, gels were stained with GelRed (Biotium, CA, USA).
For each bacterial species, one isolate with an easily interpreted pattern was selected among our collected isolates, as an internal reference and was run every 5th to 6th lane on all gels. In addition, a Lambda Ladder PFG Marker (New England Biolabs, MA, USA) was used in the first and last lane on each gel.
The protocol was repeated for untypeable isolates.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Chromosomal DNA Extraction Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cultures were grown to saturation and 8.5 × 105 cells were embedded in agarose using Bio-rad plug molds followed by incubations in zymolyase T100 (200 g/mL) overnight at 37°C, proteinase K (4 mg/mL) and 1% N-lauroyl sarko sine overnight at 50°C, and PMSF (1 mM) for one hour at 4°C. PMSF and remaining detergent were removed by washing plugs with 1 mL of CHEF TE (10 mM Tris.HCl pH 7.5, 50 mM EDTA) three times for thirty minutes. Plugs were subsequently run in a 1 × TAE, 0.8% agarose gel using a Bio-rad CHEF-DR II at settings: 3V/cm, 50 hrs, 250 seconds start switch time, and 900 seconds end switch time (Figs. 1B, S1A-D, S3B-C, S6E). H. wingei ladder (Biorad) was used as size marker.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Karyotyping by PFGE and Hybridization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA for PFGE was extracted in low-melting point agarose from cells grown to saturation as described previously86 (link). The chromosomes were separated in a BioRad CHEF-DR II. The gel was then stained using SYBR Gold (Invitrogen # S11494) for 1 h. The chromosomes from the gel were transferred to nylon membranes (Hybond N+) and hybridized to radioactively labeled PCM1 to identify Chr V fragments.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

DNA Plug Preparation and PFGE Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA plugs for PFGE were prepared as described [71 (link)]. Electrophoresis was performed using a Bio-Rad CHEF-DRII apparatus at 6 V/cm, with a 60 to 120 s switch time for 25 h. The gels were stained with ethidium bromide and imaged. The DNA in the gel was transferred to Hybond-XL membranes by neutral capillary blotting. The DNA was crosslinked to the membrane by UV irradiation in a Stratalinker (Stratagene) apparatus at maximum output for 60 seconds. The MCM3 probe was generated by amplifying MCM3 from genomic DNA using the primers 5’-CTGTGCAAGAAATGCCCGAAATG-3’ and 5’-GCCCCGGAGTTGGAATGCTC-3’ followed by random primer labeling of the PCR product with the Biotin DecaLabel DNA Labeling Kit (Thermo Scientific). Probe hybridization was performed at 50°C for 1 hr. Biotin signal was detected using Chemiluminescent Nucleic Acid Detection Module Kit (Thermo Scientific).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Molecular Typing of MRSE and MRSH

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Typing MRSE and MRSH was performed using the PFGE method as previously described by Talebi et al. [3 (link)]. Briefly, the enzyme digestion of the plugs was carried out with the restriction enzyme SmaI (New England Biolabs). A Salmonella serotype Braenderup strain (H9812) was used as a molecular size marker (kindly provided by the Research Center of Health Reference Laboratories, Tehran, Iran). In addition, DNA separation was carried out by programming two states under the following conditions in a pulsed-field electrophoresis system (CHEF DR-II; Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA) at the temperature of 14°C; voltage 6 V/cm; switch angle, 120°C; switch ramp 1-30 second for 20 hours. Ethidium bromide (SinaClon, Iran) 0.5 mg/mL was used for staining gels. For PFGE pattern analysis, BioNumerics software version 7.5 (Applied Maths, St-Martens-Latem, Belgium) was applied. The unweighted pair group method by using mathematical averaging (UPGMA), dice correlation coefficient with 1.5% optimization, and a 1.5% tolerance setting was used for the calculation of dendrograms. Isolates were considered genetically indistinguishable, closely related, possibly related, and different when there were 0, 1, 2, and >3 banding differences, respectively [25 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Genotyping of Bacterial Isolates by PFGE

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All S. aureus isolates were genotyped by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) using the SmaI digestion enzyme (Sigma, Poole, Dorset, UK) as described before [29 (link)]. PFGE of the H. influenzae isolates was performed similarly, with some supplementation taken from the protocol by Saito et al [30 (link)]. Briefly, after solidification, the plugs were incubated first in 100 mM EDTA containing lysozyme for three hours at 37°C, then in 100 mM EDTA containing proteinase K overnight at 54°C. The purified chromosomal DNA was digested by SmaI enzyme. DNA fragments were separated in 1% pulse-field certified agarose gel (Bio-Rad) in 0.5x TBE (Tris-boric acid-EDTA) buffer in a CHEF-DR® II apparatus, at 14°C, 6 V/cm, for 10 h with pulse times of 5 s to 15 s, and for 10.5 h with pulse times of 15 s to 60 s. S. pneumoniae isolates were also compared based on their SmaI restriction patterns as described before [31 (link)]. PFGE profiles were analysed with the BioNumerics software version 2.5 (Applied Maths, Sint-Martens-Latem, Belgium), applying unweighted pair group method using arithmetic averages (UPGMA) and the different bands similarity coefficient, with a band position tolerance of 2.0%. During interpretation, the Tenover’s criteria [32 (link)] and the suggested designation by van Belkum et al. [33 ] were applied.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!