The composite material was applied to the specimens in Groups A2, B2, C2, D2, and E2. The groups were treated first with silane for 60 s. Clearfil Ceramic Primer and Clearfil SE BOND primer, mixed one to one according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Kuraray Medical Inc., Japan), were applied to the remaining specimens of Groups A, B, C, D, and E. After application of Clearfil Ceramic Primer and Clearfil SE BOND primer mixture, Clearfil SE BOND (Kuraray Medical Inc., Japan) was applied and polymerized for 40 s. A 2 mm thick composite (Kuraray Esthetic Majesty, Kuraray Medical Inc., Japan) was applied to each sample surface with reference to the 2 mm high silicone matrix that was formed. After the matrix was removed, each sample was polymerized for another 20 s on each surface.
Clearfil se bond
Manufactured by Kuraray
Sourced in Japan, United States
Clearfil SE Bond is a light-cured dental adhesive system. It is a two-step self-etching adhesive that bonds dental restorative materials to tooth structure.
Automatically generated - may contain errors
Lab products found in correlation
Clearfil protect bond, by Kuraray (3 mentions)
Adper single bond 2, by 3M (3 mentions)
Clearfil ap x, by Kuraray (3 mentions)
Clearfil tri s bond, by Kuraray (3 mentions)
Filtek z350 xt, by 3M (3 mentions)
Clearfil majesty posterior, by Kuraray (2 mentions)
Single bond universal, by 3M (2 mentions)
Futurabond u, by Voco dental (2 mentions)
Phosphoric acid, by Fujifilm (1 mentions)
Clearfil majesty es 2, by Kuraray (1 mentions)
Filtek z250, by 3M (1 mentions)
Adper easy one, by 3M (1 mentions)
Ez sx, by Shimadzu (1 mentions)
Clearfil ceramic primer plus, by Kuraray (1 mentions)
Model repair 2 blue, by Dentsply (1 mentions)
Cd 15c, by Mitutoyo (1 mentions)
Bluephase style, by Ivoclar Vivadent (1 mentions)
Feg sem, by JEOL (1 mentions)
Sm 09020 cp, by JEOL (1 mentions)
Em uc7, by Leica (1 mentions)
38 protocols using clearfil se bond
1
Adhesive Bonding of Composite to Dental Ceramics
2
Evaluation of Self-Etching Adhesive Systems
Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
+ Expand
Three self-etching adhesive systems were evaluated: Clearfil™ SE Bond containing 5% QAMP, Clearfil™ Protect Bond (Kuraray Medical, Kurashiki, Japan) as positive control and Clearfil™ SE Bond (Kuraray Medical, Kurashiki, Japan) as negative control. Detailed composition and application mode of these commercial adhesive systems are described in Table 6 .
The self-etching adhesive systems were applied onto the dentin in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. After light curing of each adhesive, three 1 mm-increments of composite resin Filtek™ Z350 XT (3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA) were bonded to each dentin surface. Each increment was light cured with LED (LED Radii-cal, SDI, São Paulo, Brazil) for 30 s at 600 mW/cm2. All bond procedures were carried out by a single operator at room temperature and constant relative humidity.
The self-etching adhesive systems were applied onto the dentin in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. After light curing of each adhesive, three 1 mm-increments of composite resin Filtek™ Z350 XT (3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA) were bonded to each dentin surface. Each increment was light cured with LED (LED Radii-cal, SDI, São Paulo, Brazil) for 30 s at 600 mW/cm2. All bond procedures were carried out by a single operator at room temperature and constant relative humidity.
3
Dental Adhesive Protocols for Amalgam Restoration
Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
+ Expand
The amalgam specimens were divided into 12 main groups according to adhesive applications as mentioned belove:
Group 1 – Single Bond Universal (3M ESPE)
Group 2 – Alloy Primer (Kuraray) + Single Bond Universal (3M ESPE)
Group 3 – Futurabond U (Voco)
Group 4 – Alloy Primer (Kuraray) + Futurabond U (Voco)
Group 5 – Clearfil Universal (Kuraray)
Group 6 – Alloy Primer (Kuraray) + Clearfil Universal (Kuraray)
Group 7 – Single Bond 2 (3M ESPE)
Group 8 – Alloy Primer (Kuraray) + Single Bond 2 (3M ESPE)
Group 9 – Clearfil Tri-S Bond (Kuraray)
Group 10 – Alloy Primer (Kuraray) + Clearfil Tri-S Bond (Kuraray)
Group 11 – Clearfil SE Bond (Kuraray)
Group 12 – Alloy Primer (Kuraray) + Clearfil SE Bond (Kuraray).
4
Borate Bioactive Glass Paste Application Protocol
Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
+ Expand
EXAMPLE 3
Borate Bioactive Glass Paste Application
50 wt % phosphoric acid was prepared by the dilution of 85 wt % phosphoric acid (Wako Chemicals, Osaka, Japan) in distilled water. One-tenth of a gram of the borate glass particles was mixed with 0.2 mL 50 wt % phosphoric acid to form a gel with a pH of 2. The acidic paste (i.e. borate bioactive glass paste) was immediately applied to the dentin surfaces of group III and IV specimens by microbrush (Microbrush International, Grafton, Wis., USA). A layer of bonding agent (Clearfil SE Bond, Kuraray-Medical, Tokyo, Japan) was immediately applied over the borate glass-phosphoric-acid gel and then light-cured.
After storage in artificial saliva for 24 h, the thin layer of the bonding agent was gently removed by means of an excavator, and then rinsed with water spray for 30 s.
5
Evaluating Resin Composite Usage
Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
+ Expand
On a practice level, the individual practitioner who placed the restoration was coded.
GDPs were completely free to use restorative materials at their discretion. From January 12, 2015, until January 2, 2017, the Clearfil Majesty ES-2 hybrid resin composite, Clearfil SE Bond, and Clearfil Protect Bond (all from Kuraray Noritake) were provided to the practitioners for free. Treatments were regularly carried out with the assistance of a dental nurse, and only a few practitioners used rubber dam isolation during restoration placement.
GDPs were completely free to use restorative materials at their discretion. From January 12, 2015, until January 2, 2017, the Clearfil Majesty ES-2 hybrid resin composite, Clearfil SE Bond, and Clearfil Protect Bond (all from Kuraray Noritake) were provided to the practitioners for free. Treatments were regularly carried out with the assistance of a dental nurse, and only a few practitioners used rubber dam isolation during restoration placement.
6
Adhesive Bond Strength on Dentin Substrates
Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
+ Expand
Teeth from each dentin substrate (sound or eroded) were randomly reassigned into three subgroups (n = 10), according to the adhesive system used: Adper Single Bond 2 (SB; 3M ESPE, Saint Paul, USA), Clearfil SE Bond (CSEB; Kuraray Medical Inc., Tokyo, Japan), and Adper Easy One (EASY; 3M ESPE, Saint Paul, USA). Table 1 displays the main components and application mode of these adhesive systems.
After adhesive systems' application, according to manufacturers' instructions, polyethylene tubes (Micro-bore ® Tygon S-54-HL Medical Tubing, Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics, Akron, USA) with an internal diameter of 0.76 mm and height of 1.0 mm were positioned over the dentin surfaces. Then, the adhesives were light cured using a halogen light-curing unit (Jetlite 4000 Plus, J. Morita USA; Irvine, USA) with 600 mW/cm 2 power density. The device's own radiometer quantified the output power. The tubes were filled with resin composite (Filtek Z250, 3M ESPE, Saint Paul, USA) and light cured. For each tooth, four specimens were built up. A trained operator conducted all bonding and restorative procedures at room temperature.
After adhesive systems' application, according to manufacturers' instructions, polyethylene tubes (Micro-bore ® Tygon S-54-HL Medical Tubing, Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics, Akron, USA) with an internal diameter of 0.76 mm and height of 1.0 mm were positioned over the dentin surfaces. Then, the adhesives were light cured using a halogen light-curing unit (Jetlite 4000 Plus, J. Morita USA; Irvine, USA) with 600 mW/cm 2 power density. The device's own radiometer quantified the output power. The tubes were filled with resin composite (Filtek Z250, 3M ESPE, Saint Paul, USA) and light cured. For each tooth, four specimens were built up. A trained operator conducted all bonding and restorative procedures at room temperature.
7
Microshear Bond Strength of Resin Composite
Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
+ Expand
The bonded specimens were kept in water at 37°C for 24 h. The top surface of the CAD/CAM resin slab was treated with 37% phosphoric acid (K-etchant) for 5 s, rinsed with water and air-dried. A silane coupling agent (Clearfil Ceramic Primer Plus, Kuraray Noritake Dental) was applied to the surface and gently air-dried. A bonding agent (Clearfil SE Bond, Kuraray Noritake Dental) was applied to the surface, gently air-dried, and light cured for 10 s. Then, a direct resin composite (Clearfil AP-X Shade A2, Kuraray Noritake Dental) was incrementally built up to a thickness approximately 2 mm high for the μTBS test. Each tooth was cross-sectioned longitudinally with a low-speed diamond saw (Isomet) to produce beam-shaped specimens with an approximate surface area of 1×1 mm 2 at the bonded interface. Before the μTBS test, the dimensions of each beam were determined with a digital caliper (Mitutoyo CD-15C). After this, each specimen was secured to a customized microtensile jig with a cyanoacrylate glue (Model Repair II Blue, Dentsply-Sankin, Tokyo, Japan) and placed in the testing apparatus (EZ-SX, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) for the μTBS test at a 1 mm/min crosshead speed.
8
Evaluating Tooth Enamel Adhesion under H2S
Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
+ Expand
Twenty bovine tooth root samples were sectioned, the pulp was removed, and the cervical portion was sealed with glass ionomer cement. Teeth were then placed in a mold and embedded in self-curing resin before exposing the enamel using #100 waterproof sandpaper and polishing from the cervical side to the crown side using #600 waterproof sandpaper. These teeth were used as samples.
Teeth were then divided evenly into 10 H2S experimental group samples and 10 control samples. Experimental group samples were immersed in distilled water and placed in individual Petri dishes with an aqueous solution of sodium hydrosulfide from inside the sealed container, and the control group samples were immersed in distilled water and placed in individual Petri dishes with sterilized distilled water. The aqueous solution of saturated hydrosulfide was replaced, and distilled water was added every 2 days, and samples were stored for 1 week. After 1 week, the polished surface of the tooth samples was treated with self-etching bonding system (CLEARFIL SE BOND, Kuraray Noritake Dental, Tokyo, Japan), packed with resin composite (Clearfil AP-X A3, Kuraray Noritake Dental), and immersed in water for 24 h before undergoing a shear test with a cross-head speed of 1.0 mm/min (Model 444, Instron, Darmstadt, Germany).
Teeth were then divided evenly into 10 H2S experimental group samples and 10 control samples. Experimental group samples were immersed in distilled water and placed in individual Petri dishes with an aqueous solution of sodium hydrosulfide from inside the sealed container, and the control group samples were immersed in distilled water and placed in individual Petri dishes with sterilized distilled water. The aqueous solution of saturated hydrosulfide was replaced, and distilled water was added every 2 days, and samples were stored for 1 week. After 1 week, the polished surface of the tooth samples was treated with self-etching bonding system (CLEARFIL SE BOND, Kuraray Noritake Dental, Tokyo, Japan), packed with resin composite (Clearfil AP-X A3, Kuraray Noritake Dental), and immersed in water for 24 h before undergoing a shear test with a cross-head speed of 1.0 mm/min (Model 444, Instron, Darmstadt, Germany).
9
Standardized Molar Cavity Preparation
Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
+ Expand
Forty standardised cavities were created in upper first molar (#26) typodont teeth (AG-3, Frasaco GmbH, Tettnang, Germany) using a rigid tool setup on a milling table (FB-H, Demanders Verktygsfabrik AB, Virserum, Sweden). A Kestag High-Speed steel end mill with a diameter of 5 mm was mounted (Ibarmia B-35, Azkoitia, Spain) and a cylindrical cavity was prepared to a depth of 3.5 mm with a rounded cavity floor. A pointed bud, fine grit, diamond bur (Viking, Foss & co, Norway) was used to roughen the internal walls prior to bonding with Clearfil SE Bond (Kuraray, Osaka, Japan) according to the instruction for use.
10
Comparative Evaluation of Bond Strength
Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
+ Expand
Four experimental and one gold-standard self-etch adhesives (Table 1 ) are used to compare bond strength results of the pushout and shear test. The synthesis and exact compositions of the four experimental adhesives, namely Exp. 1.1–2.2, are addressed elsewhere (submitted paper), as this paper focuses on the comparison of both tests, rather than the influence of the adhesives’ components.
Clearfil SE Bond (CSE; Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc., Kurashiki, Japan) worked as the gold-standard reference and its primer was used for all groups. Primer and adhesive were applied with a microbrush for 20 s each, followed by gentle air drying. Any excess bonding agent was removed with a disposable paper fabric. Light curing was performed for 10 s with a light-curing unit (Bluephase® Style, Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein) with a light-emitting window of 10 mm diameter and an irradiance of 1544 ± 207 mW/cm2. A low shrinkage resin-based composite (RBC; Admira Fusion x-tra, AF, VOCO GmbH, Cuxhaven, Germany; LOT 2111693) was applied with gentle pressure through a ball-end plunger to ensure good alignment to dentin. Any excess material was removed, followed by light curing for 20 s.
Clearfil SE Bond (CSE; Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc., Kurashiki, Japan) worked as the gold-standard reference and its primer was used for all groups. Primer and adhesive were applied with a microbrush for 20 s each, followed by gentle air drying. Any excess bonding agent was removed with a disposable paper fabric. Light curing was performed for 10 s with a light-curing unit (Bluephase® Style, Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein) with a light-emitting window of 10 mm diameter and an irradiance of 1544 ± 207 mW/cm2. A low shrinkage resin-based composite (RBC; Admira Fusion x-tra, AF, VOCO GmbH, Cuxhaven, Germany; LOT 2111693) was applied with gentle pressure through a ball-end plunger to ensure good alignment to dentin. Any excess material was removed, followed by light curing for 20 s.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!