The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

13 protocols using waters 996 pda detector

1

Multidimensional Peptide Fractionation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After tryptic digestion, peptides were separated in a first dimension based on hydrophobicity at high pH by using a reversed phase C18 column (X!Select, CSH, RP-C18, 2.1 x 150 mm, 3.5 μm, Waters) connected to a Waters Alliance e2695 HPLC bio-system and a Waters 996 PDA detector (Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, USA). Solvent A contains 200 mM ammonium formate at pH 10, while solvent C contains 100% water and solvent D 100% acetonitrile (ACN) (LC-MS grade, Biosolve, Valkenswaard, Netherlands). During the chromatographic run, an ACN gradient was performed, while continuously 10% of solvent A was added to become an overall pH of 10 during the entire run. The following gradient was used at a constant flow rate of 200 μL/min: 5% to 15% D over the first 5 min, 15% to 40% D over 80 min, 40% to 90% D over 8 min, 5 min 90% D, and 90% to 5% D over 2 min. In total, 30 fractions were collected starting from 10 to 100 min with an interval of 3 min/fraction. The peptide concentration of the different fractions was determined based on the area under the curve (AUC at 214 nm). Fractions were pooled in a concatenated way (e.g. fractions 1, 11 and 21) to obtain optimal orthogonality, yielding in total 10 fractions for further analysis. Collected fractions were lyophilized and re-suspended in RP mobile phase (97% water, 3% ACN, 0.1% FA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

HPLC Analysis of Polyphenol Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HPLC analysis have been carried out according to Pudziuvelyte et al. [34 (link)] method. For analysis a Waters 2695 chromatography system (Waters, Milford, CT, USA), equipped with a Waters 996 PDA detector was used. Data was collected and analyzed using the Empower-2 chromatographic manager system (Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, USA). For determination of polyphenols, an ACE 5C18 250 × 4.6 mm (Advanced Chromatography Technologies, Aberdeen, Scotland, UK) column was used. The mobile phase consisted of solvent A (phosphoric acid/acetonitrile/water) (1:19:80 v/v/v) and solvent B (phosphoric acid/methanol/acetonitrile) (1:40:59 v/v/v). The linear gradient elution profile was as follows: 100% A—at 0 min, 55% A/45% B—at 20 min, 100% B—from 25 to 26 min, 100% A—from 30 to 31 min. The flow rate was 1.2 mL/min and the injection volume was 10 μL. Absorption was measured at 330 nm. Quantification of phenolic compounds was performed using reference standards of apigenin, rosmarinic acid, and chlorogenic acid. The linear calibration curves were constructed (apigenin R2 = 0.999979, rosmarinic acid R2 = 0.999551, chlorogenic acid R2 = 0.999914), the peak areas were used for quantification. The contents were expressed as μg/g dry weight.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Preparative HPLC Purification of Natural Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Preparative HPLC was generally carried out using Quaternary Gradient Module 2545, Photodiode Array Detector 2998, Autosampler 2707, Waters Prep Degasser and Waters Fraction Collector III. Software: Waters ChromScope v1.40 Beta (Waters, Milford, MA, USA). Stationary phase: Nucleodur® C18 HTec, 5 µm, 250 × 21 mm, mobile phase: binary gradient of water (A) and acetonitrile (B) at a flow rate of approx. 15.5 mL/min.
Separation of fraction SE6 yielded 1 (118 mg) and 2 (1.2 mg). 3 (11 mg) was obtained from SE7, 4 (5.3 mg), 5 (13 mg) and 6 (0.65 mg) from fraction SE8. Subfractionation of MPLC fraction M2 and M3 led to 15 (39 mg). 16 (0.5 mg) was obtained from M4, and M5 yielded 17 (0.6 mg), 18 (0.9 mg) and 19 (0.3 mg).
Fractions N3 to N5 obtained from FCPC and SE3 were further purified using the following system: Two Waters 515 HPLC Pumps, Waters Pump Control Module II, Degasys DG-2410 (Uniflows, Tokyo, Japan), Waters 996 PDA Detector, software: Waters ChromScope v1.40 Beta Software (Waters, Milford, MA, USA), stationary phase: Eurospher 100 C18, 250 × 21 mm; 7 µm (VDS Optilab, Germany), mobile phase gradient: water (A), acetonitrile (B), flow: 10 mL/min, injection volume: 1 mL. 7 (0.12 mg), 8 (0.9 mg) and 9 (1.7 mg) were isolated from N3, N5 and N4 resp. Compound 14 (11 mg) was isolated from SE3 along with 10 (3.9 mg), 11 and 12 as a mixture (4.3 mg) and 13 (2.7 mg).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Isolation and Purification of Fungal Metabolites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The crude extract of ELF29 was fractionated by reversed-phase, open-column chromatography on C-18 resin with a step gradient of water and methanol to afford nine fractions. The fourth fraction was purified by HPLC (Waters 996 PDA Detector, Waters Corp, Milford, MA, USA) equipped with a reversed-phase column (Phenomenex Luna C-18 (2), 250 × 100 mm, 5 μm, 100 Å, 2.0 mL/min, UV = 254 nm; Torrance, CA, USA) using an isocratic solvent system from 40% CH3CN in water to yield alternariol (AT, 1, 4.2 mg, tR = 26.2 min, purity = 99.3%), 5′-hydroxy-alternariol (HAT, 2, 2.0 mg, tR = 18.6 min, purity = 99.3%), and mycoepoxydiene (MED, 3, 30.2 mg, tR = 22.9 min, purity = 99.2%). The purities of the compounds were calculated by HPLC chromatograms (Supplementary Figures S1–S3).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantification of Nicotine by Potentiometric Titration

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Analysis of nicotine by potentiometric titration was carried out using a TruLab pH 1310P (YSI Incorporated, Xylem Inc, USA) potentiometric pH meter with TruLine 15 glass electrode selective to H+ ions and containing silver chloride reference electrode. Liquid-Liquid Extraction was carried out using a Waters Alliance 2695 quaternary pump HPLC equipped with Waters 996 PDA Detector, Hypersil Gold Phenyl column (150 mm × 4.6 mm, 3 μm, Thermo Scientific™, USA), and a Security Guard Cartridge Phenyl (4 mm × 2.0 mm, Phenomenex, USA). Waters Empower 2 software was used for processing data. NMR analysis was carried out using Bruker NanoBay AVANCE III 400 MHz NMR spectrometer (Bruker Corporation, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantitative Cannabinoid Analysis via HPLC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Two methods previously described and validated were applied [13 (link)]. The overall fingerprint (detection at 214, 254, 275, and 324 nm) allowed us to address the ratio between cannabinoids (CANtot) and other phenolic compounds (TPC), while the cannabinoid profile method (λ = 214 nm) served for the quantification of cannabinoids and cannflavins. The HPLC Waters™ system 900, with a Waters™ 996 PDA detector and a Waters™ 717 plus autosampler device and Millenium or EmPower software were used equipped with an Ace® 5 Phenyl (25 cm × 4.6 mm) column (ACT, Aberdeen, UK) for the fingerprint and an Agilent Zorbax RX-C18 column (5 µm 4.6 × 250 mm Highchrom, Reading, UK) and a Nova-Pak® C8 Guard Column 3.9 × 20 mm, 2/pkg (Waters UK Elstree, UK) for the cannabinoid profile. Gradient solvent mixtures of water (TFA 0.1%) (solvent A), a water-acetonitrile mixture (65:35, TFA 0.1%) (solvent B), and acetonitrile (solvent C) were used for the fingerprint (80 min including pre- and washing phase). Solvent B and C were used for the cannabinoid profile (55 min including pre- and washing phase). Reference standards were used as described previously, while liquid extracts were injected directly or after 1:1 dilution, in case of highly concentrated tinctures.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Carotenoid and Chlorophyll Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Carotenoids were extracted from 0.5 mg ground tissue samples in a mixture of hexane:acetone:ethanol (2:1:1, v/v/v) as described previously (Tadmor et al., 2005 ), and separated using a Waters 2695 HPLC apparatus equipped with a Waters 996 PDA detector (Milford, MA, USA). Carotenoids were identified by their characteristic absorption spectra, distinctive retention time, and comparison with authentic standards. Quantification was performed by integrating the peak areas with standard curves of authentic standards with the Waters millennium chromatography software. Lutein and β-carotene were relatively quantified at 450 nm and 270 nm, respectively, by integrating their peak areas and calculating their percentage from total integrated peak areas. Tissues for chlorophyll determination were sampled as explained for carotenoid analysis. Chlorophyll extraction was performed in dimmed light to avoid possible photodegradation of chlorophyll. Chlorophyll was extracted by adding 5 ml of DMSO to 0.5 g, vortexing, and incubating in the dark at room temperature for 24 h. The extract was analyzed for absorbance in the wavelengths of 663 nm and 645 nm using a Cary50Bio spectrophotometer (Varian). Chlorophyll concentration was calculated as described by Tadmor et al., (2010) (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Tablet Weight Variation and Meloxicam Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Weight variation test was done by weighing 20 tablets individually, calculating the average weight and comparing the individual tablet weight to the average weight.
Drug content: For this test, 10 tablets were weighed and crushed into powder. Ten milliliters of powder were mixed with 10 mL of methanol and placed in ultrasound-assisted bath for 15 min. After this the solution was filtered through 0.22 μm membrane filter. Quantitative analysis of meloxicam was performed using Waters 2695 chromatography system (Waters, MI, USA) equipped with Waters 996 PDA detector of 350 nm absorbance [28 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Analytical and Preparative Peptide HPLC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All
crude and purified peptides were analyzed by analytical RP-HPLC on
a Waters e2695 Alliance system (Waters, Milford, MA, USA) employing
a Waters 2998 photo diode array (PDA) detector equipped with an ISAspher
Xela 100-1.7 C18 column (50 × 2.1 mm). HPLC eluent A was water
(0.1% trifluoroacetic acid (TFA)) and eluent B was acetonitrile (0.1%
TFA) (detection at 214 nm).
Preparative scale purification of
the peptides was achieved employing a Waters 1525 binary gradient
pump and a Waters 2998 PDA detector or a customized Waters 600 module
equipped with a Waters 996 PDA detector (Waters). HPLC eluent A was
water (0.1% TFA), and eluent B was acetonitrile (0.1% TFA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Analytical and Preparative HPLC for Peptides

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All crude and purified peptides were analyzed by analytical RP-HPLC on a Waters 2695
Alliance system (Waters, Milford, MA, USA) employing a Waters 2998 photo diode array (PDA)
detector equipped with a prontosil C8-SH (120 × 5 mm, 5.0 μm) column. HPLC
eluent A was water [0.1% trifluoroacetic acid (TFA)] and eluent B was acetonitrile (0.1%
TFA). If not stated otherwise, HPLC conditions for model peptides (1,
1′, and 2), 25–35% eluent B over 30 min at flow
rate of 1 mL/min was applied (detection at 214 nm). For peptides (5,
5′, and 6), 10% eluent B for 3 min followed by 10
– 99% eluent B over 30 min was used. Chromatograms were extracted at 220 nm and
analyzed at 214 nm. Peptide absorptivity for the 2998 PDA detector at 214 nm was
determined from the peak area of a standard reference solution of the respective peptide.
Concentration of the peptide solution was determined through a HPLC-based amino acid
analysis protocol.
Preparative scale purification of the peptides was achieved by employing a Waters 1525
binary pump and a Waters 2998 PDA detector or a customized Waters 600 module equipped with
a Waters 996 PDA detector (Waters, Milford, MA, USA). HPLC eluent A was water (0.1% TFA)
and eluent B was acetonitrile (0.1% TFA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!