The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

23 protocols using sputter coater

1

Morphology Analysis of Microparticles using SEM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to investigate morphology of MPs (Zeiss Merlin SEM, GEMINI II column). MPs were resuspended in DI water and a droplet was added to a piece of conductive tape attached to a SEM stub. The water was evaporated overnight, and the MPs were sputter coated with gold for 70 s (Cressington Sputter Coater) before imaging.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Cecal Tissue Preparation for SEM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cecal tissues were fixed in 3% glutaraldehyde buffered with 0.1 M phosphate buffer, pH 7.2, washed with 0.1 M phosphate buffer, and dehydrated in a graded ethanol solution in water (30% increased gradually to 100%; 20 min each). The samples were dried with a Leica CPD300 critical point dryer and coated with Pt(80)/Pd (20 (link)) of an 8- to 12-nm thickness by using a Cressington sputter coater (model 208HR). Samples were viewed with a FEI Nova NanoSEM230 scanning electron microscope (SEM).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Analyzing Extrudate Morphology and Protein Distribution

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A scanning electron microscope (SU 3500, Hitachi High Technologies, Krefeld, Germany), equipped with a backscattered electron detector (BSE) was used to investigate the morphology of the surfaces and cross sections of the prepared extrudates. BSE images were collected at an acceleration voltage of 5 kV at a variable pressure mode of 30 Pa. The cut extrudates were placed on an aluminum stub. Samples were sputtered with a thin platin layer (Sputter Coater, Cressington Scientific Instruments, Watford, England). Protein particle distribution was examined by elemental mapping of the cross sections of extrudates for the characteristic X-ray peak of nitrogen. The elemental distributions were investigated by SEM combined with an energy-dispersive X-ray detector (EDX) (EDAX Element-C2B, Ametek, Weiterstadt, Germany). The percentage of detected nitrogen was evaluated by the TEAM software (Version 4.4.1, Ametek, Weiterstadt, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Characterizing Nanofiber Morphology via SEM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The morphology and the size of
the nanofibers were assessed by using a scanning electron microscope
(SEM) (NovaNanoSEM 230, FEI). Samples of the nanofibrous mats were
harvested and coated with platinum–iridium (Pt–Ir) using
a sputter coater (Cressington). After Pt–Ir coating, the samples
were examined with an accelerated voltage of 5 kV–8 kV. The
diameter of the nanofibers was inferred by evaluating the SEM images
obtained using ImageJ.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Scanning Electron Microscopy of Starch Granules

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Starch samples were spread onto a circular metal stub covered with double-sided adhesive tape and were coated with platinum by a sputter coater (Cressington, UK). Images of starch granules were acquired using a scanning electron microscope (SEM, model EVO 18, Zeiss, Germany) under an accelerating voltage of 10 kV and at multiple magnifications [28 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Ultrastructural Analysis of Tetrahymena

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tetrahymena samples collected from different time points of regrowth after deciliation were fixed by 1% glutaraldehyde and placed in pre-processed aluminum carriers from the M. Wohlwend GmbH, Engineering office. Before adding Tetrahymena cells, the carriers were carbon coated and glow discharged (two minutes) followed by treatment of poly-L-lysine coating to increase cell attachment. The Tetrahymena cells in the carriers were subjected to a six-step gradient dehydration of ethyl alcohol (10%, 20%, 40%, 70%, 90%, and 100%) followed by critical-point drying using Samdri-795 with a 15 minutes purging process. Afterwards, the samples in the carrier were fixed on conductive stubs with silver glue and gold-coated for 45 seconds using a CRESSINGTON Sputter Coater. SEM images were captured at 2 kx, 5 kx, and 10 kx magnifications using Secondary Electrons Secondary Ions detector of a ZEISS NEON 40EsB High Resolution Dual Beam Scanning Electron Microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Neural Recording Microelectrode Array Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Ionic liquid 1-Ethyl-3-methylimidazolium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl) imide (EMIIM) was acquired from Covalent Associates, Inc. (OR). All other chemicals were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (MO). 22 mm plastic coverslips (Fisher, PA) were cut to uniform dimension of 7×22 mm, cleaned with 8N HNO3 for 30 min, washed in deionized H2O and stored in ethanol. Coverslips were then sputter coated with 35nm of gold, using a Cressington Sputter Coater (Cressington, UK). 32 channel gold site microelectrode arrays for in vivo neural recording were generously provided by Science and Biomedical Microsystems (MD). The GSA of electrode sites on the probe was 155 μm2. Each of the 3 shanks that were 150 μm apart had 10 sites arranged in an arrowhead formation; with one site at the tip of the shank and the rest in two parallel columns. The middle shank also has 2 sites at least 200 μm away from the rest. They were not included in the neurophysiology experiments. The adjacent sites center to center distance is 25 um and the center to center distance of the furthest sites was 135 μm. The densely packed sites ensured all recording were performed within the same layer of cortex.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Scanning Electron Microscopy of Quinoa Starch

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Quinoa starch samples isolated by different extraction methods were pasted on an adhesive carbon tape followed by platinum coating with a sputter coater (Cressington Scientific Instruments, Cressington, UK). Sample scanning was performed at an accelerated voltage of 10 kV using the SEM (Carl ZEISS, EVO 18, Oberkochen, Germany) and images were snapped at 500×, 1000×, and 10,000× magnifications.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Characterizing PLGA Nanoparticle Morphology

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The morphology of the PLGA NPs were determined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Briefly, dried PLGA/OVA NPs and PLGA/OVA/MPLA NPs were applied onto a pin stub covered with double-sided carbon tape and then coated with 3.5 nm of platinum/palladium using a Cressington Sputter Coater. Images were taken using an FEI Quanta 200F SEM (Franceschi Microscopy and Imaging center, WSU, WA) at 5 to 10 kV accelerating voltage. The PLGA NP preparations sizes were measured using ImageJ software (NIH, 1.48v).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Biofilm Characterization in Stainless Steel

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To examine biofilms inside the small stainless-steel tubes using SEM, some preparations were required; these preparations were executed as described previously (Speers et al., 1984 (link); Latorre et al., 2010 (link)) with some modifications. The tubes, which were taken from the fouling system, were rinsed with 10 mL of 0.1% peptone water and then placed in glass vials. The tubes were fixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer at pH 7.4 in glucose solution. The tubes were rinsed three times in 0.1 M phosphate buffer for 15 min each, and each tube was then cut carefully into halves longitudinally. The half-tube pieces were rinsed three times in 0.1 M phosphate buffer, 15 min each rinse. The washed biofilm-containing half tubes were dehydrated in increasing concentrations of ethanol (25, 50, 70, 85 and 95%) for 10 min each, and then three times in 100% ethanol for 30 min each. Dried samples were mounted onto aluminum stubs and coated with gold for 2 min in a sputter coater (Cressington, Redding, CA). The samples were imaged by SEM (Nova 400 NanoSEM, FEI, Hillsboro, OR).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!