The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

11 protocols using anti collagen 1

1

Immunofluorescence Analysis of Muscle Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For TA, DIAPH, and EDL immunofluorescence, cryosections of 10 µm were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (Winkler), permeabilized with PBS-0.05% Triton, and blocked for 1 h with blocking buffer (BSA 2%, 0.05% Triton X-100 in PBS). Samples were incubated overnight at 4 °C with: anti-Fibronectin (F3648, Sigma Aldrich), anti-Collagen I (PA1-26204, Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA), anti-Slow Myosin (M8421, Sigma Aldrich), anti- nNOSµ (617000, Invitrogen) and anti-IIA myosin heavy chain antibody (SC-71, DSHB, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA). The corresponding Alexa Fluor- 568 or 488-conjugated anti-IgGs (Invitrogen) were used as secondary antibodies. In addition, fluorescent wheat germ agglutinin (WGA) (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA) was used to label cell membranes and Hoescht for nuclear staining. Slices were washed and mounted in Fluoromount G. Samples were visualized on a Nikon Eclipse E600 using NIS Elements software v4.20 or Leica DM2000 epifluorescence using Mshot Image Analysis System software with 20× or 40× objectives.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Histological and Immunofluorescence Analysis of Liver

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Liver samples were fixed in 10% neutral formalin fixative and embedded in paraffin, and were sectioned at 4 µm thickness. Histological analysis was performed in hematoxylin-eosin staining and Sirius red staining. For immunohistochemistry, liver sections were incubated with anti-ARK5 (Santa, Santa Cruz, CA, USA, sc-271828), anti-α-SMA (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA, PA5-18292), anti-collagen I (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA, PA5-29569) primary antibodies overnight at 4 °C. Positive staining was visualized with the EnVision immunodetection system (K5007; Dako, Copenhagen, Denmark) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. For immunofluorescence, liver sections or cells were fixed in ice-cold methanol and were incubated with anti-ARK5 (Santa, Santa Cruz, CA, USA, sc-271828), anti-α-SMA (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA, PA5-18292), anti-p-Smad2/3 (Abcam, Cambridge, UK, ab254407), anti-Smurf2 (Santa, Santa Cruz, CA, USA, sc-518164), anti-TβRI (Santa, Santa Cruz, CA, USA, sc-518018), anti-Smad4 (Cell Signaling Technology, Beverly, MA, USA, 46535S) and anti-HNF-4α (Abcepta, Suzhou, China, AP60014) antibodies followed by incubation with Alexa Fluor 488 or 555-conjugated secondary antibodies (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA). Nucleis were counterstained with DAPI. Images were captured using an inverted fluorescence microscope or confocal laser scanning microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Western Blot Analysis of Keloid Fibroblasts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Keloid fibroblasts were lysed with Cell Extraction Buffer (Invitrogen). The relevant cellular lysates were separated on 12% SDS‐PAGE and transferred to NC membrane, which were blocked with 5% non‐fat milk in phosphate‐buffered saline (PBS) for 2 hours and incubated with primary antibody overnight at 4°C and secondary antibody at room temperature for 1 hours. GE Healthcare ECL system was utilised to develop the signal, and the intensity of the interest bands was calculated with NIH‐Image J1.51p 22 by correcting with GAPDH expression. Primary antibodies utilised were indicated: anti‐FBXL6 (1:1000 dilution, SAB1407299, Sigma, St. Louis, MO), anti‐c‐MYC (1:1000 dilution, MA1‐980, Invitrogen), anti‐Collagen I (1:2000 dilution, PA5‐95137, Invitrogen), and anti‐GAPDH (12 000 dilution, MA1‐16757, Invitrogen).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Immunohistochemical Analysis of ECM Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The sections were rehydrated in citrate buffer in the microwave for antigen retrieval. The endogenous peroxidase blockage was performed with 3% hydrogen peroxide in distilled water for 30 min in the dark. After that, 2% bovine serum albumin (BSA) in PBS was used for non-specific protein interaction blockage. The primary antibodies used were: anti-collagen I (#PA5-29569, 1:250, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), anti-collagen III (#PA1-28870, 1:250; Invitrogen), anti-fibronectin (#Ab2413, 1:100, Abcam, Cambridge, UK), anti-laminin subunit α2 (#PA1-16730, 1:200; Invitrogen), anti-elastin (#Ab9519, 1:100, Abcam), anti-hyaluronic acid (#c41975, 1:100, LS Bio, Seattle, WA, USA), and the secondary antibodies were IgG anti-mouse/anti-rabbit (#K800; Dako, CA, United States). The incubation occurred overnight in a wet chamber at 4 °C. The reaction was detected by Dako Advance HRP (#K6068; Dako) and developed with DAB (#k3468; Dako), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Slides were photographed and analyzed using a light microscope (Nikon ECLIPSE 80I, CADI FMVZ-USP).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Western Blot Analysis of Statin and E2 Effects

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were harvested after treatment with simvastatin (0.001, 0.01, 0.1, and 1 μM) and E2 (10 nM), alone or in combination, at the specified time points. Cells were lysed in a lysis buffer (radioimmunoprecipitation assay buffer, Sigma-Aldrich) containing a protease and phosphatase inhibitor cocktail (Sigma-Aldrich). An equal amount of protein lysates was resolved using 4 to 12% Bis-Tris protein gradient gels (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Membranes were blocked using 5% nonfat milk in Tris-buffered saline with 0.1% Tween-20 (TBST, Thermo Fisher Scientific) for 1 h at room temperature and incubated with PCNA (CST, #13110), anti- ER-α (Invitrogen, PA5–16440), pERK1/2 (CST, #4695S), ERK1/2 (CST, #4370), pAKT (Santa Cruz; sc-7985), AKT (Santa Cruz; sc-8312), anti-collagen 1 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, PA5–29569), anti-β-actin (Sigma, A3854), anti-Na,K-ATPase (CST, 23565), or anti-lamin B1 (Invitrogen, PA5–19468) at 4 °C overnight on a rocker. Membranes were washed with TBST, co-incubated with appropriate horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated secondary antibodies (GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL) for 1 h at room temperature and visualized using an Azure Imager c300 (Azure Biosystems, Dublin, CA). Band signals were quantified using the NIH ImageJ software (version 1.52r, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Immunoblotting with TGF-beta1 and Collagen 1

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The following primary antibodies were used for immunoblotting at the following concentrations: anti-actin (1:10,000) (Abcam, UK) and anti-Collagen 1 (1:1000, Thermo Fisher, USA). Secondary antibodies used for immunoblotting were goat anti-mouse and goat anti-rabbit horseradish peroxidase-conjugated IgG (1:10,000, Thermo Fisher, USA). Recombinant human TGF beta 1 (Abcam, USA) and lipofectamine 2000 Reagent (Thermo Fisher, USA) were used to treat cells and siRNA transfection, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Modulating MDM4 and p53 Acetylation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Anti-MDM4 antibodies were purchased from Bethyl Laboratories. Anti-MDM2 antibody was purchased from R&D Systems. Anti–acetylated p53, anti-p53, anti–phospho ELK1, anti-ELK1, and anti–lamin B antibodies were from Cell Signaling. Anti-αSMA antibody was from American Research Products. Anti-Fas (CH11), anti-DD1α, anti-CD68, and anti–collagen I antibodies were from Thermo Fisher Scientific. Anti-AGE antibody was from Abcam. Anti-fibronectin and anti-GAPDH antibodies were from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. CXCL10 neutralizing antibody was from Thermo Fisher Scientific. CX3CL1 neutralizing antibody was from R&D Systems. The activities of commercial CXCL10 and CX3CL1 neutralizing antibodies were verified by functional blocking of cell chemotaxis. C646 and tamoxifen were from Sigma. CA was from MedChem Express. Validated MDM4 siRNAs were from OriGene.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Histological Analysis of Atrial Appendage

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The inverted LAA was collected and fixed by 4% paraformaldehyde. The right atrial appendage was collected and fixed as a control. Paraffin sections were made at 4 µm. Hematoxylin-eosin (HE), Masson trichrome (MT), and immunofluorescence (IF) staining were performed following standard protocols. In IF staining, anti-fibronectin (Abcam), anti-collagen I (Thermo Fisher Scientific), anti-macrophage (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), and anti-caspase 3 (Abcam) were used as primary antibodies. A digital camera attached to a microscope (Nikon, ECLIPSE E600 or TS2R) was used to observe and photograph the sections.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Gastric Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Stomachs from 30- to 90-day-old Bmpr1aΔMES and control littermates were fixed, sectioned and stained as previously described6 (link)17 (link) or according to the manufacturer’s protocol (395B-1KT Sigma-Aldrich). Immunostainings were performed as previously described6 (link)59 (link). The following antibodies were used at the indicated dilutions: anti-PCNA (1:10,000, Abcam), anti-Bmpr1a (1:300, Abcam), anti-pSmad1-5-8 Ser463-465 (1:500, Santa Cruz), 488 Alexa Fluor Lectin GSII (1:200, Invitrogen) anti-H+/K+-ATPase (1:2, MBL), anti-GIF (1:75, Abnova), anti-somatostatin (1:100, Santa Cruz), anti-gastrin (1:100, Chemicon), anti-CD3 (1:200, Dako), anti-F4/80 (1:100, eBioscience), anti- α-Sma clone 1A4 (1:5000, Sigma), anti-VimentinXP D21H3 (1:100, Cell Signaling), anti-fibronectin (1:1000, Millipore), anti-collagen-I (1:200, Thermo Scientific), anti-collagen-IV (1:200, Chemicon International) and FITC-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG (1:300, Vector), FITC-conjugated anti-goat IgG (1:300, Vector) and Alexa 568-conjugated anti-mouse (1:400, Invitrogen). For immunofluorescence, images were captured on a Leica DMLB2 microscope using a Leica DC300 camera except for α-Sma/pSmad1-5-8 immunostaining and α-Sma/Bmpr1a where a Confocal Zeiss LSM700 along with Zen Blue software was used. For IHC, images were captured on a Nanozoomer Digital slides Scanner (Hamamatsu).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Wound Healing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The wounds, together with unwounded skin margins, were excised, fixed with 10% formaldehyde, and embedded with paraffin. The sections (4 μm thick) were then deparaffinized and rehydrated. Antigen retrieval was performed at 95°C by microwave in 0.01 mol/L sodium citrate buffer (pH 6.0). Endogenous peroxidase activity was quenched by exposing to 3% H2O2. After blocking with 5% BSA in PBS, the sections were incubated with anti-CD68 (1 : 100, Thermo Fisher Scientific), anti-MPO (1 : 100, Thermo Fisher Scientific), anti-CD31 (1 : 200, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti-desmin (1 : 100, Thermo Fisher Scientific), and anti-collagen I (1 : 100, Thermo Fisher Scientific), respectively, followed by incubating with the corresponding HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies. The antigen-antibody complex was visualized with a Diaminobenzidine (DAB) kit. For evaluation of staining, the overview of the positive-signal density was scored semiquantitatively as 1 (absent), 2 (low), 3 (medium), 4 (strong), and 5 (very strong). The median of scores from three observers, who were blinded to the treatment, was used for comparisons.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!