The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

9 protocols using phenochart software

1

Multiplex Immunofluorescence Profiling of Colorectal Cancer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Two panels of antibodies were used to perform mIF on CRC TMAs (n=787). On panel 1, a fully automated mIF assay was developed on the Ventana Discovery Ultra autostainer platform (Roche Tissue Diagnostics, software version RUO Discovery Universal V21.00.0019). Staining was performed on 4 µm thick sections of previously constructed TMAs with the optimised antibodies (Table S1). A negative control slide was used on each staining run to rule out non-specific staining. Whole slide images were captured at 10x magnification using the PhenoImager HT multispectral slide scanner (Akoya Biosciences V1.0.13), TMA maps were applied using Phenochart software (Akoya Biosciences V1.1.0), and core images were captured at 20x magnification. Core images were spectrally unmixed using Inform software (Akoya Biosciences, software version 2.5.1).
mIF panel 2 was stained using an autostainer (Thermofisher) with optimised antibodies (Table S1). The slides were scanned by NanoZoomer S60 digital slide scanner (Hamamatsu, USA) with 20x magnification. TMA maps were applied for further analysis. Visiopharm (version 2021.02.5.10297), a digital precision pathology software, was used to perform the analysis. The percent positive cells of total cells detected for each marker were calculated (Figure S1).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Automated Quantitative Pathology Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Whole slide scans were imaged on the Vectra 3.0 Automated Quantitative Pathology Imaging System (Akoya) using the 20× objective. We randomly selected 12 multispectral image regions each slide using Phenochart software (Akoya Biosciences) at 40× magnification, which were then analyzed with inForm software (v2.4.10, Akoya) to unmix adjacent fluorochromes, subtract autofluorescence, segment the tissue into tumor and stroma regions, segment the cells into nuclear, cytoplasmic, and membrane compartments, and to phenotype the cells according to morphology and cell marker expression based on either their PD-L1 status or their expression of CD68, CD11c, and CK (CD68CD11cCK cells were defined as “other”). Independent projects were created to phenotype each cellular marker, then merged, consolidated, and analyzed in R Studio using the phenoptrReports plug-in (Akoya Biosciences) to quantify the total number of PD-L1+ cells that overlapped CD68/CD11c/CK/other cells. We also used phenoptrReports to quantify entire-cell PD-L1 expression in each phenotype category in all 23 samples. Use of human samples was approved by IRB of University of Colorado AMC (COMIRB Protocol 16-2436).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Histological Analysis of Liver and Intestine

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Liver tissues were processed for hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining and immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining for CK-19 and Ki67 at the Mouse Model Core at the VCU Massey Cancer Center (Richmond, VA, USA). Picro Sirius Red Staining was performed using the commercial Kit (Abcam, USA) with the paraffin-embedded tissue sections according to the manufacturer's instructions. Small intestine tissues were processed for H&E staining. Alcian blue staining was performed using the Alcian blue Stain Kit (Abcam, USA). Immunofluorescence staining of ZO-1 was performed with the paraffin-embedded tissue sections according to the manufacturer's instructions. All the stained slides were scanned using a Vectra Polaris Automated Quantitative Pathology Imaging System (Akoya Biosciences, MA, USA), and the images were captured using Phenochart software (Akoya Biosciences, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Immunofluorescent Tissue Staining Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Five-micrometer sections of paraffin-embedded tissue were stained with Akoya Biosciences Opal multiplex automation kit reagents unless stated otherwise. Automated staining was performed on a Leica BondRX autostainer. The protocol was performed according to the manufacturers’ instructions with primary antibodies to CD19 (Cell Signaling Technology, 90176) and CD4 (Cell Signaling Technology, 25229). Briefly, all slides underwent sequential epitope retrieval with Leica Biosystems epitope retrieval 2 solution (EDTA based, pH 9, AR9640), primary and secondary antibody incubation, and tyramide signal amplification with Opal fluorophores Op690 and Op520. Primary and secondary antibodies were removed during epitope retrieval steps, while fluorophores remain covalently attached to the epitope. Semiautomated image acquisition was performed on a Vectra Polaris multispectral imaging system. After whole-slide scanning at 10×, the tissue was manually outlined to select fields for multispectral imaging at 20×. Phenochart software from Akoya Biosciences was used for spectral unmixing of the whole-slide scans. Scans were imported into QuPath, and representative images were exported into FIJI.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Multiplex Imaging of Tissue Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Upon whole slide scanning with the Vectra 3.0 Automated Imaging System (Akoya Biosciences) at 100x magnification, regions of interest were defined in Phenochart software (Akoya Bioscience) based on H&E-stained sections. Then, multispectral images (MSIs) were acquired at 200x magnification, spectrally unmixed using inForm software (Akoya Biosciences) and a previously built spectral library, and exported as multi-channel TIFF files.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantitative Spatial Analysis of PD-L1 Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The images (200× magnification) of whole tissue contents were generated by whole-slide scanning by Vectra Polaris (Akoya Biosciences). Multispectral images (MSI) to be analyzed were defined and selected on the whole tissue images using the Phenochart software, whole slide contextual viewer (Akoya Biosciences). The integral algorithm of inForm® (Akoya Biosciences) as a tissue analysis software was used to convert MSI to numeric data, which consisted of the spatial information, definition of cell components (nuclear, cytosol, and cell membrane), classifications of cell populations, and intensities of each marker. For evaluation of PD-L1 expression, TPS was determined as the number of PD-L1-expression tumor cells (TCs) divided by the total TC counts, multiplied by 100.24 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Multiplexed Immunophenotyping of Tumor Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After staining, tissue section slides were scanned with Vectra 2 (Akoya, Boston, MA, USA) at 4× magnification, and then 10 fields of view were randomly selected per slide with PhenoChart software (Akoya, Boston, MA, USA) to be scanned with Vectra 2 at 20× magnification and analyzed with the InForm v.2.4 software (Akoya, Boston, MA, USA). A spectral library algorithm was created to unmix each individual signal, and the following pseudocolors were applied for image analysis: CD4 (yellow), CD68 (red), CD8 (green), CD20 (pink), and PCK (magenta). The InForm software was used to segment tissue compartments (epithelium vs. stroma) and subcellular compartments (nucleus, membrane, and cytoplasm). Individual cell segmentation was performed, and cell phenotypes were quantitated as cell density (cells/mm2) (Figure 1A).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Multiplex Imaging of FFPE Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Imaging of the stained FFPE slides was performed on the Vectra 3.0 Automated Imaging System (Akoya Biosciences). Whole slide scans at 100x magnification were obtained to define Regions of Interest (ROIs) using the Phenochart™ software (Akoya Biosciences). Based on the ROIs, multispectral images (MSIs) at 200x magnification were taken and subsequently analyzed using inForm software (Akoya Biosciences). Spectral unmixing of OPAL fluorophore signals was based on a manually built OPAL fluorophore library. Cell quantification was done in a semi-automated manner using manually trained algorithms to discriminate between tissue/non-tissue area, segment cells based on DAPI signal and finally, phenotype cells based on the staining intensity and pattern of the respective marker.
MSIs were exported as multi-channel TIFFs and processed in imageJ software for representative images (22 (link)). Upon importing the images as TIFF-virtual stacks, single channels were processed using arithmetic point operations. For figures showing a larger field of view, multiple images were stitched using the grid/collection stitching plugin (23 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantitative Spatial Immunophenotyping of Tumor Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Digital mIHC images were acquired with the Vectra Polaris Automated Quantitative Pathology Imaging System (Akoya Biosciences). Whole tissue slides were scanned at 20Â magnification and visualized with Phenochart software (Akoya Biosciences) to identify the regions of interest (ROI). Between 13 and 20 ROIs were selected from each tissue sample for mIHC analysis with InForm 2.4 software (Akoya Biosciences). Cell phenotypes were enumerated in the stroma and tumor compartment for the images. Each tissue slide was analyzed in individual InForm projects.
Consecutive tissue slides for each case were stained by conventional hematoxylin and eosin method to ensure the presence of tumor and evaluate fixation quality. Tissue slides were digitally scanned with the Leica SCN400F platform at 20Â and magnified at 200Â to 400Â for immune infiltration evaluation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!