The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Spss statistics v 21.0 for windows

Manufactured by IBM
Sourced in United States

SPSS Statistics v.21.0 for Windows is a comprehensive software package for statistical analysis. It provides a wide range of data management, analysis, and presentation tools. The software is designed to handle large and complex data sets, and offers a user-friendly interface for easy access to its features.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Lab products found in correlation

7 protocols using spss statistics v 21.0 for windows

1

Mediation Analysis of Weight Status, Physical Fitness, and Motivation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Firstly, we calculated the percentages for categorical variables and means with standard deviation for continuous variables. Then, we analysed the correlations between global PF index, perceived PF and situational motivation by bivariate correlation analysis. Likewise, we examined the possible differences in these variables between overweight (including obese) and non-overweight students using an independent sample T-test. Finally, we analysed the total, direct and indirect effects of weight status (X) on situational motivation (Y) mediated by global PF index (M1) and perceived PF (M2) using multiple mediation analysis. In all mediation analyses, we used bootstrapping with 10,000 samples via the PROCESS procedure for SPSS [34 ], adjusted by age, gender and school. All analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics v.21.0 for Windows (IBM Software Group, Armonk, NY, USA) and the level of statistical significance was set at p = 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantitative Analysis of Smoking Effects

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All comparison data among the smoke (S) and control (C) at the different times studied were performed using IBM SPSS® Statistics V21.0 for Windows software. The level of significance used was 5% (α = 0.05).
The descriptive analyses for the quantitative data that showed normal distribution are expressed as the mean and standard deviation. For quantitative data without a normal distribution, the results are expressed as the median and interquartile range IQ (25–75%). The assumptions of the normal distribution in each group and the homogeneity of the variances among groups were evaluated using the Shapiro-Wilk test and the Levene test, respectively.
For the quantitative data that showed a normal distribution in which two factors were analyzed, the double factor analysis of variance test (ANOVA) was used. We considered as a factor 1 the time exposure and as factor 2 the smoking. When it was necessary to perform multiple comparisons of means, the Bonferroni test was used. When the data did not present a normal distribution, we used the Mann-Whitney test for the group factor. For the time factor, the Kruskal-Wallis test was used, and when it was necessary to perform multiple comparisons, the Dunn test was used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Comparing Infection Rates and Symptoms

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Chi-square test was used to compare differences in infection rates of assemblages among children and adult and clinical symptoms. Differences were considered significant at the level of P < 0.05. The probability for the occurrence of asymptomatic infection or abdominal pain between assemblages A and B was measured by the odds ratio (OR) together with its 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS Statistics v.21.0 for Windows (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Infection Rates Across Demographic Factors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Chi-square test was used to compare differences in infection rates among samplings, age groups, genders and diarrhea status. Differences were considered significant at the level of P < 0.05. The statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS Statistics V21.0 for Windows (IBM Corp., New York, NY, United States). As children were sampled anonymously, no attempts were made to differentiate infection episodes among samplings.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Cryptosporidium Prevalence in Regions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

Cryptosporidium spp. prevalence in different regions and ages was determined using IBM SPSS Statistics V21.0 for Windows (International Business Machines Corp, New York, USA). The differences were considered significant when p<0.05 by Pearson’s Chi-Square test (χ2 test) analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analyses were performed in SPSS Statistics v.21.0 for Windows (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Statistically significant differences between samples were determined with one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post-hoc Tukey’s test with a threshold of p ≤ 0.05. All measurements were conducted in triplicate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Enzyme Activity Assay Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antibody levels and enolase activities were performed using GraphPad Prism 6.0 software for Windows (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA), and the data in this study were the mean values ± standard deviations. The significance analysis of differences between 0 mM metal ions and other concentrations at the same time point were analysed by IBM SPSS Statistics V21.0 for Windows (International Business Machines Corp, New York, USA). The differences were considered significant when P < 0.05 by one-way ANOVA test.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!