The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

3 protocols using eaat2

1

Western Blot Analysis of NAc Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
NAc tissues were homogenized in a solution containing 50 mM Tris buffer (pH 7.4), 2 mM EDTA, 5 mM EGTA, 0.1% SDS, protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche, Indianapolis, IN), and phosphatase inhibitor cocktail type I and II (Sigma). Homogenates were centrifuged at 500 g for 15 min and supernatants were collected. Proteins were analyzed using Bradford protein assay (BioRad, Hercules, CA). Proteins were separated by 4–12% NuPAGE Bis Tris gels at 130 V for 2 h, transferred onto PVDF membranes at 30 V for 1 h (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA), and incubated with antibodies against EAAT2 (Santa Cruz, Dallas, TX; SC-365634; 1:500), CAP1 (Santa Cruz, Dallas, TX; SC-376286; 1:500), RTN4 (Santa Cruz, Dallas, TX; SC-271878; 1:500), pERK; phospho-p44/42MAPK (Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA; 9106; 1:500), ERK; p44/42MAPK (Cell Signaling, Danvers; 9102; 1:500), and GAPDH (Millipore, Burlington, MA; MAB374; 1:2000). Chemiluminescent bands were detected on an Image Station and quantified using NIH Image J software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Comprehensive Immunolabeling of Neural Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For immunohistochemical analysis, cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) in 120mM phosphate buffer (PBS), pH 7.4, permeabilized with 0.05% Triton X-100 in PBS, blocked with 10% goat serum in PBS and subjected to immunohistochemistry staining with primary and secondary antibodies diluted in the blocking solution.
For immunolabelling the following antibodies at indicated dilutions were used: anti-Nestin (1:400; BD Bioscience), anti-Sox1 (1:100; R&D Systems), anti-Sox2 (1:200; Abcam), anti-Pax6 (1:200; DSHB), anti-Ki67 (1:200; Vector Labs), anti-TuJ1 (1:400; Covance), anti-Map2 (1:200; Millipore), anti-DCX (1:200; Millipore), anti-GFAP (1:200; Millipore), anti-O4 (1:50, Sigma-Aldrich), anti-GABA (1:200, Abcam), anti-vGlut1 (1:200; Millipore), anti-TH (1:100, Millipore), anti-Synaptophysin (1:100; Millipore), anti-PSD95 (1:200; Invitrogen), anti-vimentin (1:5000; Abcam), anti-S100β (1:1000; Sigma-Aldrich), anti-aquaporin 4 (AQP4, 1:100; Santa Cruz Biotechnology) and anti-excitatory amino acid transporter 2 (EAAT2, 1:100; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), secondary Alexafluorophore-conjugated antibodies (1:1000, Invitrogen). DNA was stained using Hoechst 33258 (1:10000, Invitrogen). All cells expressing a particular marker were counted manually and normalized to the total number of cells.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Protein Expression Analysis in Brain Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Brain tissues were lysed with RIPA buffer (150 mmol/L NaCl, 1% Nonidet P‐40, 0.5% deoxycholic acid, 0.1% SDS and 50 mmol/L Tris‐HCl, pH 7.4) containing a protease inhibitor (Roche), and then sonicated for 1 minutes and incubated on ice for 20 minutes. The supernatant was collected and centrifugated at 13,200 g for 15 minutes at 4°C, and protein concentrations were determined using a BCA assay (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Equal amounts of proteins were then loaded on 8%‐12% SDS polyacrylamide gels. The separated samples were transferred to a PVDF membrane and incubated with the primary antibodies against the target proteins and then with the HRP‐conjugated secondary antibodies. The protein bands were visualized by enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL; Millipore) using a bioimaging analyser (Bio‐Rad). The relative intensity of each band was measured using Image J software (rsb.info.nih.gov, by W. Rasband). Primary antibodies used: human GFAP (R&D Systems, 1:1000), EAAT2 (Santa Cruz, 1:1000), Kir4.1 (Millipore, 1:1000), Arginase‐1 (Santa Cruz, 1:1000) and IL‐1β (Santa Cruz, 1:1000).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!