The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Novaseq 6000 platform

Manufactured by Novogene
Sourced in China, United States, United Kingdom

The NovaSeq 6000 platform is a high-throughput sequencing system designed for large-scale genomic studies. It utilizes the latest sequencing-by-synthesis (SBS) technology to generate high-quality sequencing data. The platform can be used to perform a variety of applications, including whole-genome sequencing, exome sequencing, and transcriptome analysis.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

27 protocols using novaseq 6000 platform

1

RNA Sequencing Library Preparation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The total RNA was extracted from cultured cells with RNAiso Plus (#9109, Takara, Japan) and applied to Oligo(dT) magnetic beads to enrich the mRNA with poly-A tail. Then, the mRNA was randomly cut into fragments with divalent cations in NEB Fragmentation Buffer. The mRNA fragments were transcribed into cDNA and amplified to construct the library. After quality inspection and pooling, the library sequencing was conducted at the Illumina Novaseq 6000 platform (Novogene Co., Ltd., Beijing, China). The following analyses were performed by R (4.1.3) and GSEA (4.2.3).44 (link),45 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Single-cell RNA-seq of Megakaryocytes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The single‐cell RNA‐seq library preparation and sequencing were performed based on the modified Smart‐Seq2 protocol.[58] For human MKs isolated in vivo, the single CD41a+CD42b+ cells were transferred into lysis buffer by manual picking and sequenced on Illumina Hiseq X ten platform. For mouse MKs isolated in vivo, the single CD41+CD42d+ cells were treated with the same Smart‐Seq2 protocol and sequenced on NovaSeq 6000 platform (Novogene). For human MKs differentiated in vitro, total cells on day 0, day 4, day 8, and day 12 of MK differentiation from BM‐CD34+ HSPCs were collected and used to perform the single‐cell RNA‐Seq using 10x Genomics Chromium platform (Novogene). All the raw data of single‐cell RNA‐seq are deposited at National Omics Data Encyclopedia (NODE) with accession codes OEP000756, OEP001150, and OEP001128. The detailed information about the quality control and data processing is described in the Experimental Section in the Supporting Information.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Bacterial Species Identification via WGS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In order to identify the species of bacterial isolates, we utilized whole genome sequencing on the twelve Pseudomonas strains. First, single colonies from each strain were transferred from NA plates to 4 mL nutrient broth and cultured overnight in a shaking incubator (200 rpm, 28°C). Then, a Monarch Genomic DNA Purification Kit (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA) was used to extract genomic DNA from 1 mL of overnight culture. A NEBNext Ultra II DNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina was used to prepare genomic libraries and the Illumina Novaseq 6,000 platform was used to sequence the libraries by Novogene Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China). Raw sequences were filtered using fastp v 0.20.0 (Chen et al., 2018 (link)), and quality checks were conducted using fastqc v 0.11.91. The processed reads were assembled using SPAdes v 3.14 (−-isolate --cov-cutoff auto mode) (Bankevich et al., 2012 (link)) and filtered for a minimum contig size of 500 bp. The final assemblies were deposited in the NCBI database under the BioProject PRJNA890938, and uploaded to the Life Identification Number (LIN) platform developed by Tian et al. (2020) (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Transcriptome Analysis of Insect Salivary Glands

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
First of all, C.lividipennis and A.lucorum were anesthetized using carbon dioxide. Subsequently, the SGs, guts, and other carcasses without SGs and guts from both insects were carefully dissected under a microscope (Olympus, Japan). Thereafter, the total RNA was extracted from each sample using the Trizol RNA Isolater Total RNA Extraction Reagent (Vazyme Biotech, Nanjing, China), in line with the manufacturer’s protocol. Afterwards, the RNA concentration, quantity, and integrity were assessed by the Agilent 2100 bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, California, USA). Then, to synthesize cDNA, the mRNA was purified from the total RNA using magnetic beads carrying Oligo(dT). The purified cDNA then experienced end repairing, adenylation of 3’ ends, and ligation of adaptors. AMPure XP beads (Beckman Coulter, Beverly, USA) were used to screen out 370–420 bp cDNA. Next, the sequencing library was generated through PCR, and AMPure XP beads were further used in a second purification step. Finally, RNA-seq was conducted on the Illumina Novaseq 6000 platform (Novogene, Tianjin, China). The quality summary regarding library sequencing is listed in (Supplementary Table 8), with over 40 million clean reads being obtained in each library.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

ChIP-seq Analysis of Histone H3K27 Acetylation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Furthermore, 3-5 × 107 cells were cross-linked with 1% formaldehyde for 10 minutes and neutralized with 1.25 M glycine at room temperature for 5 minutes. Bioruptor (Diagenode, Liège, Belgium) was used to collect, lyse, and sonicate fixed cells. Sonicated chromatin was incubated with an anti-histone H3 (acetyl K27) antibody (cat. No. ab4729; Abcam, Cambridge, UK) overnight at 4°C. DNA was eluted and purified using a QIAquick PCR purification kit (cat. No. 208106; Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). The samples were sequenced on the NovaSeq 6000 platform (Novogene Bioinformatics Technology Co., Ltd. Beijing, China) and a BGISEQ 2000 platform (Beijing Genomics Institute, Shenzhen, China). Raw data of ChIP-seq H3K27ac analysis were aligned to the reference genome (UCSC hg38) using Bowtie2 (v 2.3.5) [17 (link)], with alignment parameters -p 4 -q -x. Peaks were identified using MACS2 (v2.0.9) [18 (link)], with parameters -g hs -n test -B -q 0.01. The bedGraph files generated by MACS2 were converted to bigwig files using the UCSC bedGraphToBigWig tool, and bigwig files were then visualized by Integrative Genomics Viewer (IGV) [19 (link)]. Superenhancers were then identified using the ROSE (Rank Order of Superenhancers) method [20 (link), 21 (link)], with parameters -s 12500 -t 2000.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Rumen Microbiome Analysis by 16S Sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The total DNA from the rumen content samples was extracted using the QIAamp DNA Stool Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer's protocols. 16S rRNA genes were amplified by PCR from the genomic DNA samples using specific primers for the V4 region of the bacterial 16S rRNA. Amplicon libraries for all samples were quantified by a Qubit 2.0 Fluorometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, USA) and sequenced on an NovaSeq 6000 platform by Novogene Bioinformatics Technology Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China) to generate 2 × 250 bp paired-end reads.
The singletons and chimeras were removed, and then tags were clustered into the operational taxonomic unit (OTU) using UPARSE (V 7.0.1001, http://www.drive5.com/uparse/) at 97% similarity (17 (link)). Afterward, the representative sequences of the OTUs were annotated using the SSUrRNA database (SILVA138, http://www.arb-silva.de/) (18 (link)). The alpha and beta diversity were analyzed by QIIME (19 (link)).
Linear discriminant analysis coupled with effect size (LEfSe) was conducted to identify bacterial taxa differentially represented among the groups at various taxonomy levels. An LDA effect size of more than 2.5 was used as threshold for the LEfSe analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Whole-Genome Sequencing of Onion Bacterial Strains

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For bacterial species determination, the whole-genomes of the seven onion strains were sequenced. For sequencing, cultures for each bacterial strain were prepared by transferring single colonies from two-day-old NA plates into 4 mL of nutrient broth followed by incubation at 28°C overnight in a rotary shaker at 200 rpm. Total microbial genomic DNA was extracted from 1 mL of an overnight culture using a Monarch Genomic DNA Purification Kit (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, United States) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The genomic libraries were prepared using a NEBNext Ultra II DNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina and were sequenced using an Illumina Novaseq 6,000 platform by Novogene Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China). The raw sequences were filtered using fastp v 0.20.0 http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/, and quality-checked using fastqc v 0.11.9. Processed reads were assembled using SPAdes v 3.14 (--isolate --cov-cutoff auto mode) (Bankevich et al., 2012 (link)) and filtered to a minimum contig size of 500 bp. The assembly files were deposited in the NCBI database under the BioProject PRJNA776088. The final assemblies were also uploaded to the Life Identification Number (LIN) platform (Tian et al., 2020 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Gut Microbiome DNA Extraction and Sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In total, 0.18–0.22 g stool samples were used to extract total bacteria DNA following the protocol of the DNA extraction kit (#DP328, Tiangen Company, Beijing, China). The 16S rRNA V4 regions were performed using specific primers 515 F GTGCCAGCMGCCGCGGTAA and 806 R GGACTACHVGGGTWTCTAAT. Sequencing libraries were generated using the Illumina TruSeq DNA PCR-Free Library Preparation Kit (Illumina, USA) with following manufacturer recommendations, and index codes were added. Sequencing was performed in the Illumina Novaseq 6000 platform (Novogene, China).
Microbiome bioinformatics were performed with QIIME2 2021.4.47 (link) Shannon index for alpha diversity and Bray-Curtis for beta diversity measures. Principle Coordinate Analysis (PCoA) were analyzed using the vegan v2.5–7 R package. Taxonomy was assigned to ASVs using the qiime feature-classifier classify-sklearn. Naive Bayes classifiers trained on Silva 138 99% OTUs from 515 F/806 R region of sequences. Gene functions analysis were predicted as previous method.48 (link) Predicted functions were calibrated for all of samples (n = 73) using Meta-Apo49 (link) based on the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) database. Thirty paired metagenomic samples were used for training.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Metagenomic Sequencing and Functional Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sequence libraries were generated using NEBNext® Ultra™ DNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina (NEB, USA). The libraries were sequenced on the Illumina Novaseq 6000 platform (insert size 350 bp, read length 150 bp) at the Novogene Bioinformatics Technology Co., Ltd. (Tianjin, China).
Raw sequence reads were trimmed using Trimmomatic v0.39 to remove adapters and low-quality regions and then removed of contaminating human reads using Bowtie2 v2.4.2 (Reference database: GRCh38).50 (link) The taxonomic composition was profiled using the default parameters of MetaPhlAn3 v3.0.9.51 (link) The functional gene pathway was profiled using the default settings of HUMAnN3 v3.0.0.alpha.3.52 (link) Functional potential profiling of microbial communities was performed by HUMAnN3 using pangenomes annotated with UniRef90 on all species detectable per sample with MetaPhlAn3. Functional annotations rely on the MetaCyc database and gut-brain modules (GBMs) database.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

ChIP-Seq Analysis of H3K27ac in NB4 Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
3–5 × 107 cells were crosslinked with 1% formaldehyde for 10 min and neutralized with 1.25 M glycine for 5 min at room temperature. Fixed cells were harvested, lysed, and sonicated using a Bioruptor (Diagenode, Liège, Belgium). Sonicated chromatin was incubated with anti-histone H3 (acetyl K27) antibody (cat. No. ab4729; Abcam, Cambridge, UK) overnight at 4 °C. DNA was eluted and purified using a QIAquick PCR purification kit (cat. No. 208106; Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Samples were sequenced on a novaseq 6000 platform (Novogene Bioinformatics Technology Co., Ltd. Beijing, China). Raw data of ChIP-Seq H3K27ac analysis for NB4 cell line was aligned to the reference genome (UCSC hg38) using Bowtie2 (v 2.3.5) [34 (link)], with alignment parameters -p 4 -q -x. Peaks were identified using MACS2 (v2.0.9) [35 (link)], with parameters -g hs -n test -B -q 0.01. The bedgraph files generated by MACS2 were converted to bigwig files using the UCSC bedGraphToBigWig tool, and then bigwig files were visualized by Integrative Genomics Viewer (IGV) [36 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!