The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Nupage gel

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States, United Kingdom, Germany, France

NuPAGE gels are pre-cast polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) systems designed for the separation and analysis of proteins. They are used for protein separation and visualization in a variety of applications, including western blotting, protein analysis, and protein sample preparation.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

529 protocols using nupage gel

1

In Vitro Kinase Assay of SGN3 and SGN1

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

In vitro kinase assay was done as described previously (Alassimone et al, 2016) with small modifications. Purified 250 ng GST‐SGN3 kinase domain was incubated with 250 ng TF‐SGN1 or TF proteins in reaction buffer (50 mM HEPES‐KOH pH7.5, 1 mM MnCl2. 1 mM DTT, 1 mM ATP, 185,000 Bq [γ‐32P] ATP) at 30°C for 30 min. 250 ng TF‐SGN1 and 1 μg GST or 500 ng GST‐N‐terminal cytoplasmic domains of RBOHD or F were treated in the same way as above. The reaction was stopped by adding 4 × LDS sample buffer (Invitrogen) and heating at 75°C for 10 min. The samples were separated on 4–12% gradient Nu‐PAGE gels or 10% Nu‐PAGE gels (Invitrogen). After drying the gels, signal was detected using Typhoon FLA7000 (GE Healthcare).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Viral Protein Analysis by SDS-PAGE and Western Blot

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To analyze protein composition of the pelleted virions, the pellets were suspended in 50 μl of 1X non-reducing SDS sample buffer (BioRad, Richmond, CA), and then 10 μl of the RA27/3 preparation and 1 μl RV-Dz preparation were separated by 4–12% NuPage gels (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). Different running buffers were used to separate proteins in conformations optimal for detection with each antibody, non-reducing (E1 MAb) or reducing (E2, C MAbs). To analyze viral proteins in infected cells, the cell monolayers were washed 3 times with ice-cold PBS and then proteins were extracted with RIPA buffer (Thermo Scientific, Rockford, IL) supplemented with Halt protease cocktail (Thermo Scientific, Rockford, IL). Protein concentration in the extracts was determined by BCA assay (Thermo Scientific, Rockford, IL). Equal amounts of total protein (10 μg/lane) for each sample were separated by 4–12% NuPage gels (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) using MOPS running buffer and then transferred onto nitrocellulose membrane. SNAP i.d. Protein Detection System (Millipore) was used to process western blots as described earlier [18 (link)]. Blots were developed with the ECL-plus detection reagents (GE Healthcare, Piscataway, NJ) and exposed to X-ray film. The intensity of capsid band was quantified by densitometry with Carestream Molecular Imaging Software (Carestream Health Inc., New Haven, CT).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Phospho-site Identification in RGS1

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To identify the phospho-sites in RGS1, WT protoplasts expressing RGS1CT-FLAG was treated with 1 μM flg22 for 5 min, lysed in protein IP buffer (50 mM HEPES [pH 7.5], 150 mM KCl, 1 mM EDTA, 0.5% Trition-X 100, 1 mM DTT, proteinase inhibitor cocktail), and the RGS1CT-FLAG protein was purified using anti-FLAG M2 agarose (Sigma). The immunoprecipitates were separated in 10% NuPAGE gel (Invitrogen) and subject to LC-MS/MS analysis as previously described.23 (link)To identify BIK1- and PBL1-phosphorylated sites in RGS1, the GST-tagged BIK1, PBL1, or BIK1K105E was co-expressed with HIS-tagged RGS1CT in E. coli and purified using Ni-NTA agarose beads. RGS1CT-HIS protein was separated in 10% NuPAGE gel (Invitrogen) and subjected to LC-MS/MS analysis.
For in vitro phosphorylation of RGS1 isolated from protoplasts, Arabidopsis protoplasts were transfected with 100 μg RGS1CT-FLAG plasmid. RGS1CT-FLAG was affinity-purified, incubated with 200 ng HIS-BIK1 in the kinase reaction buffer (25 mM Tris-HCl, 10 mM MgCl 2, 1 mM DTT, 100 mM ATP, pH 7.5) for 30 min at 30 °C, and phosphorylation of RGS1 (band-shift) was detected by immunoblot analyses.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Bronchoalveolar Lavage and Lung Protein Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BAL) was obtained by cannulation of the trachea and lavaging the airways with 2 × 1 ml sterile saline. BAL cell counts were performed with a cell counting chamber (hemocytometer, improved Neubauer) under phase microscopy with results expressed as “number of cells per cubic millimeter. BAL differential counts were performed using Wright stained cytospin preparations of BAL. At least 200 cells were counted per slide to obtain statistically significant counts. In order to determine the presence and quantity of hepoxilin in the lung tissue of mice, we utilized Western blots analysis. The presence of 5-LO and 12-LO protein was determined by running lung homogenates on NuPAGE gels (Life Technologies Corporation, Grand Island, NY), transferring to PVDF membrane and probing the blots with anti-5-LO and anti-12-LO antibodies (Santa Cruz Biotech, Dallas, Texas).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantitative Western Blot Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total protein concentrations of tissue homogenates and cell lysates were determined by Pierce BCA kit (Thermo Fisher). Homogenates or lysates were separated on 4–12% NuPAGE gels (Life Technologies) and transferred onto PVDF membranes (iBlot; Life Technologies). Membranes were blocked with 5% non-fat milk in TBST (0.1% Tween-20 in Tris-Buffered Saline) before overnight incubation with indicated antibodies. After incubation with the appropriate horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies, the bands were visualized by enhanced chemiluminescence (Pierce West Femto ECL). The intensity of the bands was quantified with Bio-Rad Quantity One software. When the IRDye secondary antibodies were used, the infrared signal was detected using an Odyssey scanner (Li-COR Biosciences) and the densitometry was performed using the Odyssey 2.1 Analyser software. The IRDye secondary antibodies anti-mouse (926-32212) and anti-mouse (926-68072) were purchased from Li-COR Biosciences and used at a 1:5,000 dilution. Statistical analysis of tissue densitometry levels were performed with GraphPad Prism software using the indicated statistical test
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Purification and N-terminal Sequencing of L. donovani Protein

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Dialyzed cell-free release assay supernatants obtained from L. donovani (1SCL-2D) promastigotes were loaded on to a Mono-Q column fitted onto a FPLC system (GE Healthcare Life Sciences). The column was extensively washed with buffer (50 mM Tris pH 7.4) and, subsequently, bound proteins were eluted using a Tris–NaCl gradient. Four ml fractions were collected, dialyzed, and concentrated. Aliquots from each fraction were separated on 10–15 % NUPAGE gels (Life Technologies) and silver stained using SilverXpress® silver staining kit (Life Technologies) according to manufacturer’s recommendations. Results of silver staining demonstrated that one of these fractions contained a single protein band with an apparent molecular mass of approximately 70 kDa. An aliquot of this selected fraction was separated by SDS-PAGE, blotted onto a PVDF membrane (Life Technologies), and stained with Coomassie Blue as described previously [32 (link)]. Subsequently, a single Coomassie Blue-stained protein band was excised from such blots and subjected to N-terminal Edman Sequencing at the Research Technologies Branch facility of the NIAID, NIH, Rockville, MD.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Immunoblotting Procedure for Protein Detection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were grown in N-minimal medium containing 15 μM MgCl2. Crude extracts were prepared in B-PER reagent (Pierce) with 100 μg/mL lysozyme and EDTA-free protease inhibitor (Roche). Samples were loaded on 4–12% NuPAGE gels (Life Technologies) and transferred to nitrocellulose membrane using the iBot machine (Life Technologies). Membranes were blocked with 3% skim milk solution at room temperature for 1 h. Then, samples were analysed using anti-HA, anti-FLAG, anti-PhoP, anti-MgtC, anti-GFP, anti-CAT, anti-GroEL or anti-AtpB antibodies. Rabbit anti-HA, anti-FLAG, anti-MgtC and anti-PhoP antibodies were used at 1:2,000 dilution. Mouse anti-HA, anti-FLAG, anti-GFP and anti-CAT antibodies were used at 1:2,000 dilution. Mouse anti-GroEL and anti-AtpB were used as control at 1:5,000 dilution. Secondary horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-rabbit or anti-mouse antiserum (GE healthcare) was used at 1:5,000 dilution. The blots were developed with the Amersham ECL Western Blotting Detection Reagents (GE Healthcare) or SuperSignal West Femto Chemiluminescent system (Pierce).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Pulse-chase Labeling of B. subtilis for AmyQ

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Pulse-chase labeling of B. subtilis was performed with 25 μCi Easy tag [35S]methionine (PerkinElmer) as previously described (23 (link)). Subsequently, 35S-labeled AmyQ was immunoprecipitated with protein A affinity medium (Mabselect Sure; GE Healthcare Life Sciences) and specific polyclonal antibodies. Precursor and mature forms of the immunoprecipitated labeled AmyQ were separated by lithium dodecyl sulfate-PAGE using 10% NuPage gels (Life Technologies) and visualized using a Cyclone Plus PhosphorImager (PerkinElmer) as previously described (23 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Protein-Protein Interaction Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For protein-protein interaction experiments, 20 μg of total plasmids including Flag-tagged Rph3A, myc-tagged GluN2A or HA-tagged PSD95 were transfected to a 10-cm dish. 48 h after transfection, transfected dishes were washed twice with PBS. Cells were then collected in 700 μL of lysis buffer containing: 50 mM Tris-HCl, 1 mM EDTA, 150 mM NaCl, 1% lgepal CA-630. Anti-Flag or Anti-myc magnetic agarose beads (Life Technology) was washed six times with lysis buffer, and then added to 600 μL samples and rotated at 4°C overnight. Then, the agarose beads were washed six times with lysis buffer, the proteins were eluted with sample buffer (Life Technology) for further western blot analysis. SDS-PAGE was performed by using NuPAGE gels (Life Technology). The membrane was scanned with an infrared imaging system (Odyssey). Monoclonal antibodies against Flag tag (Abmart: M20008L, 1:1000 dilution), myc tag (Abmart: M20002H, 1:1000 dilution) and HA tag (Abmart: M20003L, 1:1000 dilution) were used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Protein Expression Analysis in Fungi

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Protein extracts were prepared from C. albicans and S. cerevisiae cells using previously described protocols [60 (link)], and then subjected to western blotting as described [61 (link)]. Total protein extracts (15 μg) were separated on 4–12% NuPage gels (Life Technologies, Bleiswijk, Netherlands) and transferred to PVDF membranes. Membranes were blocked with 5% milk in 1x PBS with 0.01% Tween-20, then incubated with primary anti-Myc (Cell Signalling Technology #2272; Danvers, MA, USA) or anti-actin antibodies (Sigma #A5060; Dorset, UK) overnight at 4°C with shaking. Membranes were repeatedly washed in PBS containing 0.01% Tween-20, incubated with secondary HRP-conjugated goat anti-rabbit antibody (Cell Signalling, Danvers, MA, USA), and signals detected using the ECL system (GE Amersham; Little Chalfont, UK).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!