The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

366 protocols using brilliance 64

1

Multi-institution CE-CT Imaging in PASC and PDAC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In 16 PASC patients, CE-CT was performed in our institution. In the remaining 15 PASC patients, CE-CT was performed in the other two institutions. Among the 31 PASC patients, CT was performed (a) with SOMATOM Definition (Siemens Healthcare, Germany) in 12, (b) with Optima 670 (GE Healthcare, Tokyo, Japan) in eight, (c) with Philips Brilliance 64 (Philips Healthcare, DA Best, Netherlands) in seven, and (d) with GE Lightspeed 64 VCT (GE Healthcare, United States) in four. Among the 81 PDAC patients, 63 patients underwent CE-CT in our institution (a) with Optima 670 (GE Healthcare, Tokyo, Japan) and (b) with Philips Brilliance 64 (Philips Healthcare, DA Best, Netherlands). The remaining 18 patients underwent CE-CT in the other two institutions (a) with SOMATOM Definition (Siemens Healthcare, Germany) and (b) with GE Lightspeed 64 VCT (GE Healthcare, United States). Similar protocols were adopted during the CT examinations: 120 kVp, 200–400 mAs, gantry rotation time of 0.5 s, helical pitch of 1.375, matrix of 512, and slice thickness of 1.0 mm, with a reconstruction interval of 1.0 mm. For multiphase imaging, 100–120 ml of non-ionic intravenous contrast media (Omnipaque, 350 mg I/ml, GE Healthcare) was administrated at a fixed rate of 3.0 ml/s. The scanning time delay was 40 s for the late arterial phase and 70 s for the portal venous phase.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Optimized Protocols for Comprehensive Urinary Tract Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All CTU examinations were performed using various CT scanners from 16-channel to 128-channel MDCT scanners (Somatom Sensation 16, Siemens Healthcare, Brilliance 64, Philips Medical Systems, Best, Netherlands or Somatom Definition Flash 128, Siemens Healthcare Forchheim, Germany). Scanning parameters of the most frequently used CT scanner (Brilliance 64, Philips Medical Systems, Best, Netherlands) were as follows: tube voltage, 120 kVp; effective tube current, 300 mAs; section thickness, 5 mm; pitch and speed, 0.891:1; rotation time, 0.75 s and collimation, 64 × 0.625 mm for 64-channel MDCT. Before acquisition of contrast-enhanced scans, simple unenhanced scans were obtained, after which 2 ml kg–1 non-ionic contrast material containing 300–350 mg ml−1 of iodine [iomeprol (Iomeron 300, Bracco Altana Pharma, Konstanz, Germany), iopamidol (Pamiray 300, Dongkook Pharmaceutical, Seoul, Republic of Korea) or iobitridol (Xenetix 300, Guerbet, Villepinte, France)] was intravenously administered at a rate of 3.0 ml s−1 using a standard power injector. For CTU, in addition to the unenhanced scan, two-phase studies were performed with combinations of corticomedullary and excretory phases at our institution. The corticomedullary phase began 30–40 s after contrast administration, and excretory phases began 300 s after contrast administration, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Multidetector CT Scanner Calibration Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CT was performed using seven multidetector CT scanners (Siemens Somatom Definition Edge, Definition Flash, and Force, Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany; Philips Brilliance 64 and Brilliance 16, Philips Healthcare, Best, Netherlands; Canon Aquilion One, Canon Medical Systems, Otawara, Japan; GE Revolution EVO, Madison, WI, GE Healthcare). CT was performed using a peak tube voltage of 120 kVp, a slice thickness of 2.0–5.0 mm, and adaptive tube current in helical mode. CT scans were performed using a bone kernel or a soft tissue kernel depending on the imaging purpose. All CT machines were calibrated daily with external air. The HU value of air should remain relatively constant, but it can vary slightly depending on factors such as temperature and humidity. Therefore, a calibration process is performed by conducting a scan using only air, without any specific object or phantom inside the CT bore, to adjust the HU value. Two-dimensional reconstructions were acquired in the coronal and/or sagittal planes with a bone or soft tissue kernel and a thickness of 2.0–5.0 mm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Multi-Phase CT Imaging of PNETs and PDAC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CT images were obtained by different multi-detector CT (MDCT) scanners. The following CT machines were used: Philips Brilliance 64 (Philips Healthcare, DA Best, the Netherlands), Discovery HD750 (GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA), and optima 670 (GE healthcare, Tokyo, Japan). Dynamic CT images consisting of the unenhanced, arterial, portal venous and delayed phase images were obtained. All CE-CT were with the intravenous administration of Ultravist (Ultravist 300, Bayer Schering Pharma AG, 1.2 ml/kg body weight) at a rate of 3.0 ml/s followed by 40ml saline solution through the elbow vein via a power injector. The imaging parameters were as follows: tube voltage, 120 kVp; tube current, 200–400 mAs; a helical pitch of 1.375; slice thickness, 3.0 mm; slice interval, 3.0 mm, and a reconstruction interval of 1.25 mm. Fourteen cases of PNETs and 31 cases of PDAC patients underwent a 4-phase CT examination (unenhanced, arterial, portal venous, and delayed phase). The other 4 cases of PNETs and 8 cases of PDAC patients underwent a 3-phase CT examination (unenhanced, arterial and portal venous phase). The mean imaging time delay was 30 s for the arterial phase, 60s for the portal venous phase, and 120s for the delayed phase.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Chest CT Imaging Protocol for Pulmonary Disease

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Chest CT studies were interpreted by the means of a consensus assessment from two radiologists with at least 5 years of experience for each centre. If consensus was not reached, a senior radiologist was consulted to address the final decision.
CT scan acquisitions were performed using different scanners in different institutions: GE VCT Lightspeed 64, GE VCT Lightspeed 16 (GE Healthcare, Buckinghamshire, UK), Philips CT Ingenuity 64, Philips Brilliance 64 (Philips Medical Systems, Best, The Netherlands), Toshiba Aquilion S16 TSX-101A and Toshiba Aquilion S32 TSX-101A (Toshiba Medical Systems Europe, Zoetermeer, The Netherlands).
The scans included non-contrast acquisition and were obtained in the supine position from lung apices to bases at full-suspended inspiration, with ≤ 1.25-mm section thicknesses, using standard acquisition parameters adjusted to patients’ biometrics (100–120 effective mAs and 120–140 kVp). Images were reconstructed using both sharp kernels and visualized at window settings optimized for lung parenchyma (window width, 1500 HU; window level, -500 HU), and medium-soft kernels with soft-tissue window settings (window width, 300 HU; window level, 40 HU). Maximum intensity projection (MIP) images were used to facilitate the recognition of the TIB and VEP.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Lower Extremity CT Scans for Network Training

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the training and initial evaluation of the networks, fifty CT scans of the lower extremity were used. The anonymized data were acquired retrospectively and was judged not to be subject to the Medical Research Involving Human Subjects Act (WMO) by the Medical Ethical Committee, as described in IRB Protocol Number 16‐612/C. Lower extremity CT scans of patients who had undergone CT scanning due to unrelated medical reasons (i.e., vascular indications) were collected from the UMCU (Utrecht, The Netherlands) and anonymized. The mean age of the male patients was 61 years (SD: 10 years) and of the female patients 53 years (SD: 15 years).
All CT scans were acquired with either the Philips iCT scanner or Philips Brilliance 64 (Philips Medical Systems, Best, The Netherlands). The CT acquisition parameters were: tube voltage = 120 kVp, tube current = 31–347 mA, effective dose = 35–150 mAs, slice thickness = 1 mm. slice increment = 0.7 mm, pixel spacing = 0.63–0.98 mm, matrix size = 512 × 512 pixels. The iDOSE4 reconstruction algorithm was used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Coronary CTA Classification for Identifying Non-Obstructive CAD

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Coronary CTA was performed according to the Society of Cardiovascular Tomography (SCCT) guidelines7 (link) using the following multi-detector CT scanners: Philips Brilliance 64, Philips Medical Systems, Best, the Netherlands; Somatom Definition AS, Siemens Healthineers, Germany. Lesions on coronary CTA were then categorized based on the severity of stenosis: 0% (no CAD) and 1–49% (non-obstructive CAD). Four classifications were defined according to coronary CTA: Traditional NOCAD classification: no CAD (0% stenosis) and NOCAD (1–49% stenosis). NOCAD-RADS classification was defined according to the highest degree of coronary stenosis: NOCAD-RADS 0 (0% stenosis), NOCAD-RADS 1 (1–24% stenosis) and NOCAD-RADS 2 (25–49% stenosis). Duke prognostic NOCAD index: Duke NOCAD 0 (0% stenosis in all vessels), Duke NOCAD 1 (1–24% stenosis, or at most 1 with 25–49% stenosis) and Duke NOCAD 2 (≥ 2 vessels of 25–49% stenosis). Stenosis proximal involvement (SPI) classification: SPI 0 (no CAD, 0% stenosis), SPI 1 (1–49% stenosis with no proximal lesion) and SPI 2 (1–49% stenosis with proximal lesion) (Fig. 2). We defined proximal involvement as any plaque was present (by visual estimation) in the main or proximal segments of coronary artery (left main, left anterior descending artery, left circumflex artery, or right coronary artery).

SPI classification assessed by coronary CTA.

+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Biomechanical Analysis of Spinal ALL

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To analyze the behavior of the ALL, three fresh-frozen human thoracolumbar spine segments (consisting of 6 FSUs from T12 to sacrum) were obtained through an ethically approved international donation program (Science Care Inc., Phoenix, AZ, USA) (Figure 1). The donors were all Caucasian, two males and one female (Table 1). Clinical computed tomography (CT) scans (Philips Brilliance 64, Philips Healthcare, Cleveland, OH, USA, with a resolution of 0.4 mm) were used to verify the state of degeneration and to determine the bone mineral density (BMD) [20 (link)]. No fractures, tumors were observed; however, all specimens showed some osteophytes, as can be expected with aged donors [21 (link)].
The spines were carefully cleaned on the anterior side, removing fat tissue and muscles in order to expose the ALL, while all the posterior osteo-ligamentous structures were left intact. The two extremities of the specimens were potted in poly methyl-methacrylate cement (PMMA, Technovit 3040, Heraeus Kulzer, Werheim, Germany). Specimen hydration was granted by spraying saline solution on their surface during the tests.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Standardized Imaging Protocols for Knee Evaluation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All radiographs (RX) were performed in a standard fashion, as already described in a previous paper [1 (link)]. Plain anteroposterior (AP) and lateral (LAT) view were acquired with a detector-to-tube distance of 1.15 m and using calibrators for the correction of magnification (Ysio, Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany).
All CT scans were performed on a 64-slice CT scanner (Philips Brilliance 64, Philips Healthcare, or Somatom Definition AS, Siemens Healthcare) using our standard protocol for knee joints. Technical specifications: tube voltage 120 kV, tube current 250 mAs, collimation 64 × 0.625 mm, and rotation time 0.5 s. Axial images were reconstructed with 1 mm slice thickness.
All MRI scans consisted of sagittal, coronal and axial sequences and were performed on a 3.0 T magnet (Skyra-fit, Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany) with a dedicated knee coil in supine position with stretched knee, as a part of the standard MRI procotol [2 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Triple-Phase CT Liver Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All patients underwent triple-phase CT scan including unenhanced, late arterial, and portal venous phases. CT scanning was completed using one of the following scanners: (1) GE Optima 670 (GE Healthcare, Tokyo, Japan); (2) GE Lightspeed 64 VCT (GE Healthcare); (3) SIMENS SOMATOM Definition; and (4) Philips Brilliance 64 (Philips Healthcare, DA Best, the Netherlands). The following scan parameters were used: Tube voltage, 120Kvp; tube current, 200-400 mAs; helical pitch, 0.984-1.375; and 1.0 mm reconstruction slice thickness with an interval of 1.0 mm. An administration of 100-120 mL nonionic contrast media (Omnipaque 350, Bayer Pharmaceuticals) at a rate of 3.0-4.0 mL/s was performed after the unenhanced CT scan. The late arterial and portal venous phases were acquired at 35 s and 70 s, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!