To generate subcutaneous xenografts, ACHN YAP knockdown and ACHN mock-transfected cells in log growth phase were harvested by trypsinization, counted, and subsequently injected into the flanks of five male athymic CD1nu/nu mice (Charles River, Wilmington, MA) as previously described [16] (link). In brief, 2.5 × 106 cells suspended in a total volume of 250 μl [full growth medium/Matrigel (BD Biosciences), 1:1 (vol/vol), prechilled to 4°C] were subcutaneously injected into the flanks of 6- to 8-week-old mice. Starting 10 days after the injection of tumor cells, tumor dimensions were determined twice a week by use of digital calipers (Milomex, Pulloxhill, United Kingdom), and tumor volumes (V) were determined as V = 1/2(ab2), with a being the longest and b the shortest orthogonal tumor diameter. Mice were sacrificed after 6 weeks, and tumors were harvested and cryopreserved or formalin-fixed for later analysis.
Cd 1 nu nu mice
The CD-1 nu/nu mouse is an athymic, hairless mouse model. It is commonly used in research due to its lack of T cells, which makes it useful for the study of human tumor xenografts and the evaluation of therapeutic agents.
Lab products found in correlation
48 protocols using cd 1 nu nu mice
Subcutaneous Xenograft Tumor Model
To generate subcutaneous xenografts, ACHN YAP knockdown and ACHN mock-transfected cells in log growth phase were harvested by trypsinization, counted, and subsequently injected into the flanks of five male athymic CD1nu/nu mice (Charles River, Wilmington, MA) as previously described [16] (link). In brief, 2.5 × 106 cells suspended in a total volume of 250 μl [full growth medium/Matrigel (BD Biosciences), 1:1 (vol/vol), prechilled to 4°C] were subcutaneously injected into the flanks of 6- to 8-week-old mice. Starting 10 days after the injection of tumor cells, tumor dimensions were determined twice a week by use of digital calipers (Milomex, Pulloxhill, United Kingdom), and tumor volumes (V) were determined as V = 1/2(ab2), with a being the longest and b the shortest orthogonal tumor diameter. Mice were sacrificed after 6 weeks, and tumors were harvested and cryopreserved or formalin-fixed for later analysis.
Genetically Modified Mouse Models for Colorectal Cancer
In Vivo Evaluation of DRE Antitumor Efficacy
Glioma Xenograft Mouse Model
Conditional Smarca4 Knockout in Mice
Subcutaneous Injection of Green 1 in Mice
Mouse Xenograft Tumor Studies with 264RAD and Trastuzumab
Colon Cancer Xenograft Model: Evaluating LG and FOLFOX Therapy
Laboratories (Wilmington, MA). Mice were housed, and the protocols were followed
using relevant guidelines and regulations that were approved by the University
of Windsor Animal Care Committee (AUPP #17-15) in accordance with the Canadian
Animal Care committee in a laboratory setting with 12-hour light/dark cycles.
Following an acclimatization period, mice were injected subcutaneously with
colon cancer cells (HT-29, HCT-116) cell lines suspension in Matrigel at a
concentration of 1.0 × 106 cells per mouse in the hind flanks. On
tumor formation, mice were randomly separated into 4 groups (control [n = 3], LG
drinking water [n = 4], FOLFOX [n = 3] intraperitoneal injection, and FOLFOX
intraperitoneal injection [n = 4]). Control and chemotherapeutic mice were given
normal water, while LG treatment groups received water supplemented with 0.1
mg/mL LG (approximately 16 mg/kg/day) for 8 weeks. At 4 weeks, intraperitoneal
injections of FOLFOX (90 mg/kg folinic acid/50 mg/kg 5-fluorouracil/6 mg/kg
oxaliplatin) commenced once per week for 4 weeks. Mice were then sacrificed
using CO2 chamber followed by cervical dislocation, and tumors were
harvested. Tumor volumes (using the formula ½ × [L × W2] to calculate
approximate volume) and body weights of each mouse were measured throughout the
length of the study once per week.
Genetically Engineered Mouse Models for Medulloblastoma Research
Tumor Growth Inhibition by JNJ
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!