The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Sense xl torso coil

Manufactured by Philips
Sourced in Netherlands

The SENSE XL Torso coil is a specialized lab equipment component designed for use with Philips MRI systems. It serves as a radiofrequency coil that is optimized for imaging the torso region. The coil's core function is to transmit and receive radiofrequency signals during the MRI scanning process, enabling the acquisition of high-quality images of the torso area.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

15 protocols using sense xl torso coil

1

Muscle Quality Assessment in Nutrition Trial

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Of the 50 participants who completed the intervention, 45 participants [n = 22 (10 women) in the placebo and n = 23 (10 women) in the long-chain n–3 PUFA group] were able to participate in MRI data collection. The other 5 participants were unable to undergo scans because 3 suffered from claustrophobia and 2 had metal implants. All scans were carried out on a Philips Achieva 3.0T whole-body MRI scanner with the use of a 16-channel sensitivity-encoding (SENSE XL Torso) coil, and muscle anatomic cross-sectional area (ACSA) was calculated as described previously (8 (link)). Muscle quality was calculated as torque (knee-extensor isometric strength) per unit ACSA.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Hepatic Fat Quantification via MRS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Hepatic fat was measured at screening, baseline, and at the end of the study. MRS was performed by a 3.0 T MRI using SENSE XL Torso coil (Philips) and single-voxel MRS, with the torso coil as the transmitter and phased surface coils as the receiver. MRS measurements were acquired during breath-hold using single-voxel stimulated acquisition mode (TE/TR 20/3.000 ms, six acquisitions) at a voxel size of 27 mm3. Data analysis and interpretation were conducted using jMRUI software version 3. x (proprietary software package for advanced analysis of MRS data) at the Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Hip MRI Protocol for Femoral Neck

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Hip MRI was performed using a 1.5T scanner (Gyroscan Intera; Philips, Best, the Netherlands) with SENSE-body coil (Philips, Best, the Netherlands) and a 3T scanner (Achieva; Philips, Best, the Netherlands) with SENSE-XL-Torso coil (Philips, Best, the Netherlands), with the patients in supine position. Sequence, scan plane, repetition time, echo time, slice thickness, and field of view were shown in Table 1. Oblique axial images were obtained by positioning a box in the femoral neck on coronal image and oblique axial slices were obtained parallel to femoral neck.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Imaging Metallic Implants Using MRI

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MRI examinations were performed on a clinical 1.5 Tesla scanner (Achieva, Philips Healthcare, Best, The Netherlands) using a 16-channel torso receiver coil (Sense XL Torso Coil, Philips Healthcare, Best, The Netherlands) one day after surgery. The MR sequence protocol included a conventional gradient echo sequence (GRE) and a positive contrast susceptibility imaging (PCSI) sequence.
The GRE was based on sequences that were previously used, in which the iron loaded implant was exhibited as distinct signal voids a homogenously hyperintense surrounding anatomy [4 (link), 6 (link)]. The GRE sequence parameters are given in Table 1. Image data were acquired as modulus, real, imaginary, and phase images. Based on these, the susceptibility maps were subsequently calculated.
In previous animal studies [3 , 4 (link)] positive contrast was achieved using the idea of Stuber. suppressing the on-resonant protons [13 (link)]. The PCSI pulse sequence was based on a slice selective gradient echo sequence with a broad pre-pulse of 120° flip angle and a duration of 3 milliseconds and without frequency offset.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Multimodal Brain Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were acquired on a Philips 3-T full-body scanner (Achieva; Philips Medical Systems, Best, the Netherlands) equipped with a standard eight-channel-phased array head coil (SENSE XL-Torso coil, Achieva; Philips Medical Systems, Best, the Netherlands). Head movements were restrained with foam padding. Headphones and earplugs were used to reduce the interference of noise.
High-resolution structural T1-weighted images (T1: turbo field echo; TR = 8.2 ms; TE = 3.7 ms; matrix size 198 × 192; 160 sagittal slices; voxel size = 1 mm × 1 mm × 1 mm) were acquired coplanar with functional scans (8 (link), 9 (link)) (Figure 1A).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

MRI and MR Spectroscopy Protocol for 1.5T Scanner

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MR imaging and localized 1H-MR spectroscopy was performed using a 1.5 T MR-system (Intera/Achieva, software release 3.2) using the vendor´s 16 channel SENSE XL Torso coil (Philips Medical Systems, Best, The Netherlands). The software used included a research package enabling navigator triggered MRS and a field map based B0-shimming29 (link),30 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Spinal Nerve MRI Using Reduced Field-of-View

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The DTI protocol included DTI sequences in the axial plane with the rFOV [20 (link)]. The participants were scanned in a supine position using Sense XL Torso coil (Philips Healthcare, Best, The Netherlands). The rFOV scan was performed using a special sensitivity array encoding technique (factor: 2, spectral-spatial radio frequency pulse and water excitation method), a diffusion-weighted spinecho single-shot echo-planar imaging with free breathing technique, 11 different diffusion gradients, and a b-value of 800 sec/mm2. The rFOV was created using FOV optimized and constrained undistorted single-shot sequence sequence and two-dimensional spatially selective echoplanar radiofrequency excitation pulse (GE Healthcare). The 16 slices for rFOV (contiguous thickness, 3 mm) were acquired from L3 to S1 nerve roots. The parameters were as follows: TR, 6,000 ms; TE, 55.6 ms; 6 excitations, FOV, 100×60 mm; matrix, 68×34; voxel size, 1.47×1.76×3 mm; and total acquisition time, 7 minutes 18 seconds.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Multiparametric MRI Protocol for Evaluating Pediatric Patients

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Volunteers were examined on a 3T MR clinical scanner (Philips, Achieva, Philips Healthcare, Best, The Netherlands), using a 16‐element body coil (SENSE XL Torso coil). Volunteers underwent coronal T2‐weighted anatomical imaging and diffusion weighted imaging (DWI), which consisted of two scans: a DTI scan with b = 0, 100, and 300 s/mm2 in 15 gradient directions, and an IVIM scan with b = 10, 25, 40, 75, 100, 200, 300, 500, 700 s/mm2 in three gradient directions. All image acquisitions were navigation‐triggered7, 10, 33 (see Table 1 for the MRI acquisition details). After acquisition, all raw images were assessed for data quality. Images were evaluated by the principle investigator (S.v.B., 1 year of experience) in agreement with experienced MRI scientists (A.L. and M.F., 10 years of experience) and an experienced pediatric urologist (P.D., 25 years of experience) on a three‐point scale (1 = bad, 2 = sufficient, 3 = good) for the presence of visible blurring, signal dropouts, susceptibility artifacts, and distortions. Datasets with a score of 2 or 3 were considered of adequate quality for further processing.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Diffusion Tensor Imaging of Lumbosacral Nerve Roots

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The DTI protocol included DTI sequences in the axial plane with and without the rFOV. The participants were scanned in the supine position using a Sense XL Torso coil (Philips Healthcare, Best, The Netherlands). Conventional FOV and rFOV scans were performed using a special sensitivity array encoding technique (factor: 2, spectral–spatial radio frequency pulse, and water excitation method), a diffusion-weighted spin-echo single-shot echoplanar imaging with free-breathing technique, 11 different diffusion gradients, and a b-value of 800 sec/mm2. The rFOV was generated using the FOV Optimized and Constrained Undistorted Single-shot sequence (GE Healthcare) and a two-dimensional spatially selective echoplanar RF excitation pulse. In total, 52 slices for the conventional FOV and 16 slices for the rFOV (contiguous thickness: 3 mm) were acquired from the L5 to S1 nerve roots. For the conventional FOV, the parameters were as follows: TR, 6,000 ms; TE, 74.5 ms; 4 excitations; FOV, 320×256 mm; matrix, 96×192; voxel size, 3.33×1.33×3 mm; and total acquisition time, 4 minutes 54 seconds. For the rFOV, the parameters were as follows: TR, 6,000 ms; TE, 55.6 ms; 6 excitations; FOV, 100×60 mm; matrix, 68×34; voxel size, 1.47×1.76×3 mm; and total acquisition time, 7 minutes 18 seconds.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Fetal Brain MRI Acquisition Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All fetal brain MRI scans were performed using a Philips 1.5 T MRI scanner with a 16-channel Sense XL Torso Coil. The imaging sequences included steady-state free-precession (SSFP), single-shot turbo spin echo (SSTSE), T1-weighted fast imaging (T1WI), and DWI. DWI sequence was performed in the transverse plane using b values of 0 and 700 mm2s−1. The maximal b value of 700 was chosen to increase the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the immature brain for demonstrating optimal contrast in the fetal brain. The following parameters were used: repetition time (TR), 2,494 ms; echo time (TE), 96 ms; slice thickness, 4 mm; field of view (FOV), 280 mm2 × 320 mm2; matrix, 188 × 125; spacing, 0 mm; flip-angle, 90°. The scan time of the DWI sequence was 60 s. The overall duration of fetal MRI acquisition ranged from 15 to 25 min.
Pregnant women were lying in the supine position or the left side position. Neither the mother nor the fetus took sedatives during the examinations. Firstly, the middle and lower abdomens of pregnant women were scanned in the coronal plane, followed by a focused multiplanar scan of the fetal brain. Subsequently, the fetal chest, abdomen, and pelvis were scanned in the axial, sagittal, and coronal planes, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!